Cited by 219Authorship Attribution and ProfilingSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningMental Health via Writing

Studying user income through language, behaviour and affect in social media

Open access
Preoţiuc-Pietro, Daniel, Volkova, Svitlana, Lampos, Vasileios, Bachrach, Yoram, Aletras, Nikolaos·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Automatically inferring user demographics from social media posts is useful for both social science research and a range of downstream applications in marketing and politics. We present the first extensive study where user behaviour on Twitter is used to build a predictive model of income. We apply non-linear methods for regression, i.e. Gaussian Processes, achieving strong correlation between predicted and actual user income. This allows us to shed light on the factors that characterise income on Twitter and analyse their interplay with user emotions and sentiment, perceived psycho-demographics and language use expressed through the topics of their posts. Our analysis uncovers correlations between different feature categories and income, some of which reflect common belief e.g. higher perceived education and intelligence indicates higher earnings, known differences e.g. gender and age differences, however, others show novel findings e.g. higher income users express more fear and anger, whereas lower income users express more of the time emotion and opinions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0138717

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The demographic makeup of a platform's users has an effect on the languages, topics, and viewpoints that are observed.

    “The demographic makeup of a platform's users has an effect on the languages, topics, and viewpoints that are observed”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Preoţiuc-Pietro et al., 2015

    The Results and Discussion > Topics section reports that income is associated with differences in topics discussed and word use among Twitter users; the Emotions section also reports differences in expressed sentiment. The paper does not establish that a platform’s overall demographic makeup causes these differences, nor does it examine which languages or viewpoints are observed. The passages provided have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [55]Bernstein B. Class, Codes and Control: Applied Studies Towards a Sociology of Language. vol. 2 Psychology Press; 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Preoţiuc-Pietro, D., Volkova, S., Lampos, V., Bachrach, Y., & Aletras, N.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-09-22
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
e0138717
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1948823840
Cited by
219
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 2
FWCI
28.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Templeton Religion Trust (TRT0048)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K031953/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
income prediction, social media, Twitter, user demographics, Gaussian processes, sentiment analysis, emotions, language use, topic, gender differences, age differences, fear and anger
MeSH terms
Affect, Data Collection, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Income, Intelligence, Language, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Linear Models, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review