Cited by 164Data-Driven Disease SurveillanceCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis

Tracking COVID-19 using online search

Open access
Lampos, Vasileios, Majumder, Maimuna S., Yom-Tov, Elad, Edelstein, Michael, Moura, Simon, Hamada, Yohhei, Rangaka, Molebogeng X., McKendry, Rachel A. +1 more·2021·npj Digital Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that various properties of infectious diseases can be inferred from online search behaviour. In this work we use time series of online search query frequencies to gain insights about the prevalence of COVID-19 in multiple countries. We first develop unsupervised modelling techniques based on associated symptom categories identified by the United Kingdom's National Health Service and Public Health England. We then attempt to minimise an expected bias in these signals caused by public interest-as opposed to infections-using the proportion of news media coverage devoted to COVID-19 as a proxy indicator. Our analysis indicates that models based on online searches precede the reported confirmed cases and deaths by 16.7 (10.2-23.2) and 22.1 (17.4-26.9) days, respectively. We also investigate transfer learning techniques for mapping supervised models from countries where the spread of the disease has progressed extensively to countries that are in earlier phases of their respective epidemic curves. Furthermore, we compare time series of online search activity against confirmed COVID-19 cases or deaths jointly across multiple countries, uncovering interesting querying patterns, including the finding that rarer symptoms are better predictors than common ones. Finally, we show that web searches improve the short-term forecasting accuracy of autoregressive models for COVID-19 deaths. Our work provides evidence that online search data can be used to develop complementary public health surveillance methods to help inform the COVID-19 response in conjunction with more established approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-021-00384-w

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models for COVID-19, building on previously established internet search algorithms for influenza, are included in Public Health England's weekly reports.

    “Models for COVID-19 (ref. 33 ), building on previously established internet search algorithms for influenza 34 , are included in Public Health England's weekly reports 35 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. [1]Polgreen PM Chen Y Pennock DM Nelson FD Weinstein RA Using internet searches for influenza surveillance Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008 47 1443 1448 10.1086/593098 18954267 · DOI
  2. [2]Ginsberg J Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data Nature 2009 457 1012 1014 10.1038/nature07634 19020500 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Eysenbach, G. Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the internet. J. Med. Internet Res. 11, 10.2196/jmir.1157 (2009). PMC2762766 19329408 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Lampos, V. & Cristianini, N. Tracking the flu pandemic by monitoring the Social Web. In Proc. of the 2nd International Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing, 411–416, 10.1109/CIP.2010.5604088 (2010). · DOI
  5. [5]Culotta, A. Towards detecting influenza epidemics by analyzing Twitter messages. In Proc. of the 1st Workshop on Social Media Analytics, 115–122, 10.1145/1964858.1964874 (2010). · DOI
  6. [6]Choudhury, M. D., Gamon, M., Counts, S. & Horvitz, E. Predicting depression via social media. In Proc. of the 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 128–137 (2013).
  7. [7]Yom-Tov, E. Crowdsourced health: How what you do on the Internet will improve medicine (MIT Press, 2016).
  8. [8]Wagner, M., Lampos, V., Cox, I. J. & Pebody, R. The added value of online user-generated content in traditional methods for influenza surveillance. Sci. Rep.8, 10.1038/s41598-018-32029-6 (2018). PMC6143510 30228285 · DOI
  9. [9]Chew, C. & Eysenbach, G. Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak. PLoS ONE5, 10.1371/journal.pone.0014118 (2010). PMC2993925 21124761 · DOI
  10. [10]Lampos V Cristianini N Nowcasting events from the social web with statistical learning ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2012 3 1 22 10.1145/2337542.2337557 · DOI
  11. [13]Yang S Santillana M Kou SC Accurate estimation of influenza epidemics using google search data via ARGO PNAS 2015 112 14473 14478 10.1073/pnas.1515373112 26553980 PMC4664296 · DOI
  12. [14]Lampos, V., Miller, A. C., Crossan, S. & Stefansen, C. Advances in nowcasting influenza-like illness rates using search query logs. Sci. Rep. 5, 10.1038/srep12760 (2015). PMC4522652 26234783 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [15]Lampos, V., Zou, B. & Cox, I. J. Enhancing feature selection using word embeddings: the case of flu surveillance. In: Proc. of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, 695–704, 10.1145/3038912.3052622 (2017). · DOI
  14. [16]Reich NG A collaborative multiyear, multimodel assessment of seasonal influenza forecasting in the United States PNAS 2019 116 3146 3154 10.1073/pnas.1812594116 30647115 PMC6386665 · DOI
  15. [17]Lampos V Yom-Tov E Pebody R Cox IJ Assessing the impact of a health intervention via user-generated internet content Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2015 29 1434 1457 10.1007/s10618-015-0427-9 · DOI
  16. [19]Lipsitch M Swerdlow DL Finelli L Defining the epidemiology of covid-19-studies needed NEJM 2020 382 1194 1196 10.1056/NEJMp2002125 32074416 · DOI
  17. [21]Qiu, J. et al. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen. Psychiatr.33, 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213 (2020). PMC7061893 32215365 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [22]Santillana, M. et al. Combining Search, Social Media, and Traditional Data Sources to Improve Influenza Surveillance. PLoS Comp. Biol. 11, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004513 (2015). PMC4626021 26513245 · DOI
  19. [23]Boddington, N. L. et al. COVID-19 in Great Britain: epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the first few hundred (FF100) cases: a descriptive case series and case control analysis. [Preprint]. Bull. World Health Organ. 10.2471/BLT.20.265603 (2020). · DOI
  20. [24]Granger CWJ Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods Econometrica 1969 37 424 438 10.2307/1912791 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [25]Zou, B., Lampos, V. & Cox, I. J. Transfer Learning for Unsupervised Influenza-like Illness Models from Online Search Data. In Proc. of the 28th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2505–2516, 10.1145/3308558.3313477 (2019). · DOI
  22. [27]Lau, H. et al. The positive impact of lockdown in Wuhan on containing the COVID-19 outbreak in China. J. Travel Med. 27, 10.1093/jtm/taaa037 (2020). PMC7184469 32181488 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [28]Hopman J Allegranzi B Mehtar S Managing COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries JAMA 2020 323 1549 1550 10.1001/jama.2020.4169 32176764 · DOI
  24. [29]Gilbert M Preparedness and vulnerability of African countries against importations of COVID-19: a modelling study The Lancet 2020 395 871 877 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30411-6 PMC7159277 32087820 · DOI
  25. [31]Remuzzi A Remuzzi G COVID-19 and Italy: what next? The Lancet 2020 395 1225 1228 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30627-9 PMC7102589 32178769 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [32]Grasselli G Pesenti A Cecconi M Critical care utilization for the COVID-19 outbreak in Lombardy, Italy: early experience and forecast during an emergency response JAMA 2020 323 1545 1546 10.1001/jama.2020.4031 32167538 · DOI
  27. [33]Zhou F Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study The Lancet 2020 395 1054 1062 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3 PMC7270627 32171076 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [34]Sohrabi C World Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) Int. J. Surg. 2020 76 71 76 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034 32112977 PMC7105032 · DOI
  29. [36]de Lusignan, S. et al. Emergence of a Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19): Protocol for Extending Surveillance Used by the Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre and Public Health England. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 6, 10.2196/18606 (2020). PMC7124955 32240095 · DOI
  30. [37]Jarvis, C. I. et al. Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK. BMC Med. 18, 10.1186/s12916-020-01597-8 (2020). PMC7202922 32375776 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [38]Li, C. et al. Retrospective analysis of the possibility of predicting the COVID-19 outbreak from Internet searches and social media data, China, 2020. Eurosurveillance25 (2020). PMC7078825 32183935
  32. [39]Effenberger M Association of the COVID-19 pandemic with Internet Search Volumes: A Google TrendsTM Analysis Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020 95 192 197 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.033 32305520 PMC7162745 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [40]Sousa-Pinto, B. et al. Assessment of the impact of media coverage on COVID-19–related google trends data: Infodemiology Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, 10.2196/19611 (2020). PMC7423386 32530816 · DOI
  34. [41]Zou H Hastie T Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net J. Royal Stat. Soc.: Series B 2005 67 301 320 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. [42]Lampos, V., Preoţiuc-Pietro, D. & Cohn, T. A user-centric model of voting intention from social media. In Proc. of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 993–1003 (2013).
  36. [43]Lampos, V., Aletras, N., Preoţiuc-Pietro, D. & Cohn, T. Predicting and Characterising User Impact on Twitter. In: Proc. of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 405–413, 10.3115/v1/E14-1043 (2014). · DOI
  37. [44]Paul, M. J., Dredze, M. & Broniatowski, D. Twitter Improves Influenza Forecasting. PLoS Curr. 6, 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.90b9ed0f59bae4ccaa683a39865d9117 (2014). PMC4234396 25642377 · DOI
  38. [45]Zou, B., Lampos, V. & Cox, I. Multi-Task Learning Improves Disease Models from Web Search. In Proc. of the 27th International Conference on World Wide Web, 87–96, 10.1145/3178876.3186050 (2018). · DOI
  39. [46]Rasmussen, C. E. & Williams, C. K. I. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (MIT Press, 2006).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lampos, V., Majumder, M. S., Yom-Tov, E., Edelstein, M., Moura, S., Hamada, Y., Rangaka, M. X., McKendry, R. A., & Cox, I. J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • London Centre for Nanotechnology (GB)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Lampos, Vasileios
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2021-02-08
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
17-17
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011613821
Cited by
164
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 20
FWCI
21.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K031953/1, EP/R00529X/1)
  • RCUK | Medical Research Council (MC_PC_19070)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, internet search data, nowcasting, disease surveillance, transfer learning, COVID-19 mortality, confirmed cases, autoregressive models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review