The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling the impact of short- and long-term behavior on search personalization
Abstract
User behavior provides many cues to improve the relevance of search results through personalization. One aspect of user behavior that provides especially strong signals for delivering better relevance is an individual's history of queries and clicked documents. Previous studies have explored how short-term behavior or long-term behavior can be predictive of relevance. Ours is the first study to assess how short-term (session) behavior and long-term (historic) behavior interact, and how each may be used in isolation or in combination to optimally contribute to gains in relevance through search personalization. Our key findings include: historic behavior provides substantial benefits at the start of a search session; short-term session behavior contributes the majority of gains in an extended search session; and the combination of session and historic behavior out-performs using either alone. We also characterize how the relative contribution of each model changes throughout the duration of a session. Our findings have implications for the design of search systems that leverage user behavior to personalize the search experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Survey
Zhu, Y., Yuan, H., Wang, S., Liu, J., Liu, W., Deng, C., Chen, H., Liu, Z., Dou, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3748304 · Cited by 225
Interactive Intent Modeling for Exploratory Search
Ruotsalo, T., Peltonen, J., Eugster, M. J. A., Głowacka, D., Floréen, P., Myllymäki, P., Jacucci, G., & Kaski, S. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3231593 · Cited by 57
Advancing the search frontier with AI agents
White, R. W. (2024) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3655615 · Cited by 55
Self-citationOptimization Methods for Personalizing Large Language Models through Retrieval Augmentation
Salemi, A., Kallumadi, S., & Zamani, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3626772.3657783 · Cited by 52
Exploring Time-Dependent Concerns about Pregnancy and Childbirth from Search Logs
Fourney, A., White, R. W., & Horvitz, E. (2015) · Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702427 · Cited by 41
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, P. N., White, R. W., Chu, W., Dumais, S. T., Bailey, P., Borisyuk, F., & Cui, X.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-08-12
- Pages
- 185-194
- OpenAlex
- W2135500808
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.49
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling the impact of short- and long-term behavior on search personalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2348283.2348312
- The paper
- Bennett, P. N., White, R. W., Chu, W., Dumais, S. T., Bailey, P., Borisyuk, F., & Cui, X. (2012). Modeling the impact of short- and long-term behavior on search personalization. Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/2348283.2348312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.