Documents and professional practice: “bad” organisational reasons for “good” clinical records
Abstract
Article Documents and professional practice: "bad" organisational reasons for "good" clinical records Share on Authors: Christian Heath Centre for Work, Interaction and Technology, School of Social Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom Centre for Work, Interaction and Technology, School of Social Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United KingdomView Profile , Paul Luff Centre for Work, Interaction and Technology, School of Social Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom Centre for Work, Interaction and Technology, School of Social Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United KingdomView Profile Authors Info & Claims CSCW '96: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative workNovember 1996 Pages 354–363https://doi.org/10.1145/240080.240342Online:16 November 1996Publication History 140citation1,845DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations140Total Downloads1,845Last 12 Months76Last 6 weeks5 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If computer technology does not take into account support for the dynamic development, change, and breakdown in cooperation, the system fails.
“If computer technology does not take into account support for the dynamic development, change, and breakdown in cooperation the system fails.”
From Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities (1998) · cites this paper as [12]
Cites
Wallace, A. F. C., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092245 · Cited by 12,413 · see citing works
(1961) · Cited by 3,562 · see citing works
Star, S. L. (1989) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-55860-092-8.50006-x · Cited by 1,492 · see citing works
Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk
Wellner, P. D. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/159544.159630 · Cited by 1,074 · see citing works
Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction
Heath, C., & Nicholls, K. (1986) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628221 · Cited by 1,053 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability, and Productivity
Landauer, T. K. (1996) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6918.001.0001 · Cited by 788 · see citing works
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/143457.143549 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Suchman, L. A. (1993) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/bf00749015 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Gurwitsch, A. (1964) · Duquesne University Press eBooks · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Workflow From Within and Without: Technology and Cooperative Work on the Print Industry Shopfloor
Bowers, J., Button, G., & Sharrock, W. (1995) · Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW ’95 · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0349-7_4 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Do Categories Have Politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered
Suchman, L. A. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2094-4_1 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Luff, P., Heath, C., & Greatbatch, D. (1992) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/143457.143475 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Self-citationMurtagh, J. (1994) · Cited by 164 · see citing works
A desk supporting computer-based interaction with paper documents
Newman, W. M., & Wellner, P. D. (1992) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/142750.143007 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Medium versus mechanism: Supporting collaboration through customisation
Bentley, R., & Dourish, P. (1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0349-7_9 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Greatbatch, D., Luff, P., Heath, C., & Campion, P. D. (1993) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/0953-5438(93)90018-o · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationRequirements engineering as the reconciliation of social and technical issues
Goguen, J. A. (1994) · Requirements Engineering · Cited by 97 · see citing works
The Automation of Air Traffic Control
de Villiers, J. A. J. (1975) · Journal of Navigation · doi:10.1017/s0373463300025613 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Whitney, J. D. W. (1979) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.6161.492-d · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility
Ackerman, M. S. (2000) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1523_5 · Cited by 892 · see citing works
How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design
Klemmer, S. R., Hartmann, B., & Takayama, L. (2006) · Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems · doi:10.1145/1142405.1142429 · Cited by 645 · see citing works
GREENHALGH, T., POTTS, H. W. W., WONG, G., BARK, P., & SWINGLEHURST, D. (2009) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00578.x · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Lee, C. P. (2007) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-007-9044-5 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories?
Halverson, C. A. (2002) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1023/a:1015298005381 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Sharing Knowledge and Expertise: The CSCW View of Knowledge Management
Ackerman, M. S., Dachtera, J., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2013) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-013-9192-8 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities
Bardram, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work · doi:10.1145/289444.289483 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
“[6, 12]).”
BackgroundCollaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND Case Study
JIROTKA, M., PROCTER, R., HARTSWOOD, M., SLACK, R., SIMPSON, A., COOPMANS, C., HINDS, C., & VOSS, A. (2005) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-005-9001-0 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
- Authors
- Heath, C., & Luff, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1996-11-16
- Pages
- 354-363
- OpenAlex
- W2133036399
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 47.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- medical records, clinical documentation, organisational pressures, professional practice, clinical information systems, medical records management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
