Cited by 108Innovative Human-Technology InteractionMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTechnology Use by Older Adults

Beyond self-monitoring: understanding non-functional aspects of home-based healthcare technology

Open access
Grönvall, Erik, Verdezoto, Nervo·2013·Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing

Abstract

Monitoring of health parameters in non-clinical settings is one strategy to address the increasingly aging population and age-related disabilities and diseases. However, challenges exist when introducing self-monitoring activities in people's everyday life. An active lifestyle can challenge the appropriation of healthcare technologies and people with comorbidity may have diverse but co-existing monitoring needs. In this paper, we seek to understand home-based health monitoring practices to better design and integrate them into people's everyday life. We perform an analysis of socio-technical complexities in home-based healthcare technologies through three case studies of self-monitoring: 1) pre-eclampsia (i.e. pregnancy poisoning), 2) heart conditions, and 3) preventive care. Through the analysis seven themes emerged (people, resources, places, routines, knowledge, control and motivation) that can facilitate the understanding of home-based healthcare activities. We present three modes of self-monitoring use and provide a set of design recommendations for future Ubicomp designs of home-based healthcare technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2493432.2493495

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been a wide range of research on risk prediction in healthcare.

    “There has been a wide range of research on risk prediction in healthcare (e.g., [42,63,86]).”

    From Talk2Care: An LLM-based Voice Assistant for Communication between Healthcare Providers and Older Adults (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Introduction and Related Work discuss preventive care and home-based self-monitoring, but do not address research on healthcare risk prediction. Searches for “risk prediction in healthcare” and predictive models or risk assessment found no passage establishing the claimed range of research. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Andreassen, H.K. What does an e-mail address add? - Doing health and technology at home. Social Science & Medicine, 72(2011), 521-528.
  2. Arnrich, B., Mayora, O., Bardram, J., Tröster, G. Pervasive healthcare: paving the way for a pervasive, user-centered and preventive healthcare model. Methods of information in medicine, 49(2010), 67.
  3. Ashiful, A., Zarifi Eslami, M., and Sikkel, K. Elderly and homecare tasks: A literature review on problems. In Proc. eHealth 2012, IADIS Press (2012).
  4. Axelrod, L., Fitzpatrick, G., Burridge, J., et al. The reality of homes fit for heroes: design challenges for rehabilitation technology at home. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 3(2009).
  5. Ballegaard, S.A., Hansen, T.R., and Kyng, M. Healthcare in everyday life: designing healthcare services for daily life. In Proc.CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1807-1816.
  6. Bossen, C. The parameters of common information spaces:: the heterogeneity of cooperative work at a hospital ward. In Proc. CSCW 2002, ACM Press (2002).
  7. Chen, Y. Health information use in chronic care cycles. In Proc.CSCW 2011, ACM Press (2011), 485-488
  8. Clemensen, J., Craggs, M.A., Marcussen, C. et al. Chronically Ill Citizens and Home Monitoring:"Nothing to talk about!". In Proc. eTELEMED 2013, IARIA (2013).
  9. Consolvo, S., Roessler, P., and Shelton, B. The CareNet Display: Lessons Learned from an In Home Evaluation of an Ambient Display. In Proc. UbiComp 2004, Springer (2004). p. 1-17.
  10. Dalgaard, L.G., Grönvall, E., and Verdezoto, N. Accounting for Medication Particularities: Designing for Everyday Medication Management. In Proc. Pervasive Health 2013, IEEE (2013).
  11. Grönvall, E. and Verdezoto, N. Understanding Challenges and Opportunities of Preventive Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring at Home. In Proc. ECCE 2013, ACM Press (2013).
  12. Heart, T. and Kalderon, E. Older adults: Are they ready to adopt health-related ICT? International Journal of Medical Informatics (in press).
  13. Li, I., Dey, A.K., and Forlizzi, J. Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. In Proc. UbiComp, ACM Press (2011).
  14. Lupton, D. M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society. Soc Theory Health, 10(2012), 229-244.
  15. Milligan, C., Roberts, C., and Mort, M. Telecare and older people: Who cares where? Social Science & Medicine, 72(2011), 347-354.
  16. Palen, L. and Ballegaard, S. Of pill boxes and piano benches: "home-made" methods for managing medication. In Proc. CSCW 2006, ACM Press (2006).
  17. Patton, M.Q. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 2001: Sage Publications, Incorporated.
  18. Rogers, Y. Moving on from Weiser's Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging UbiComp Experiences. In Proc. UbiComp 2006, Springer (2006). p. 404-421.
  19. Slovák, P., Janssen, J., and Fitzpatrick, G. Understanding heart rate sharing: towards unpacking physiosocial space. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 859-868.
  20. Steele, R. and Lo, A. Future Personal Health Records as a Foundation for Computational Health. ICCSA 2009, Springer (2009), 719-733.
  21. Tentori, M., Hayes, G.R., and Reddy, M. Pervasive Computing for Hospital, Chronic, and Preventive Care. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact., 5(2012), 1-95.
  22. Aarhus, R. and Ballegaard, S. Negotiating boundaries: managing disease at home. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1223-1232
  23. Aarhus, R., Ballegaard, S., and Hansen, T. The eDiary: Bridging home and hospital through healthcare technology. In Proc. ECSCW 2009, Springer (2009).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grönvall, E., & Verdezoto, N.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing
Publisher
ACM
Published
2013-09-08
Pages
587-596
OpenAlex
W2123508139
Cited by
108
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10
FWCI
8.69
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
self-monitoring, home health monitoring, ubiquitous computing, socio-technical analysis, preeclampsia, cardiac conditions, preventive medicine, population aging, comorbidities, design guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review