Cited by 355Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management

Mamykina, Lena, Mynatt, Elizabeth, Davidson, Patricia, Greenblatt, Daniel·2008·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

In the recent years, the number of individuals engaged in self-care of chronic diseases has grown exponentially. Advances in computing technologies help individuals with chronic diseases collect unprecedented volumes of health-related data. However, engaging in reflective analysis of the collected data may be challenging for the untrained individuals. We present MAHI, a health monitoring application that assists newly diagnosed individuals with diabetes in acquiring and developing reflective thinking skills through social interaction with diabetes educators. The deployment study with twenty five newly diagnosed individuals with diabetes demonstrated that MAHI significantly contributed to individuals' achievement of their diabetes management goals (changing diet). More importantly, MAHI inspired individuals to adopt Internal Locus of Control, which often leads to persistent engagement in self-care and positive health outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1357054.1357131

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first MAHI deployment study for newly diagnosed patients revealed that many participants considered intensive and focused exchange with the educator by using MAHI would be "most beneficial at the beginning of their engagement with diabetes management".

    “The first deployment study [27] for newly diagnosed patients revealed that many participants considered that intensive and focused exchange with the educator by using MAHI would be “most beneficial at the beginning of their engagement with diabetes management”.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mamykina, L., Mynatt, E., Davidson, P., & Greenblatt, D.
Affiliations
  • Siemens (United States) (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • St. Clair Hospital, Dover, NJ, USA
  • Motorola (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2008-04-06
Pages
477-486
OpenAlex
W2142477234
Cited by
355
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
FWCI
107.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
diabetes self-management, newly diagnosed diabetes, health monitoring applications, reflective thinking, internal locus of control, dietary change, chronic disease self-management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review