Cited by 43Diabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Take it personally: accounting for individual difference in designing diabetes management systems

Chen, Yunan·2010·Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate how diabetes patients use health information to support their daily disease management. A qualitative interview study was conducted with type-2 diabetes patients and healthcare providers. The analysis suggests that individual diabetes patients have a unique way of managing their care through the interpretation of personal health experiences. The ways in which patients learn to interact with their diabetes are detailed in this paper in four themes: understanding typical life routine, accommodating atypical activities, disproving & discovering healthy tips and reevaluating personal expectations. The findings of this study call for a diabetes management system that addresses a patient's physiological, social and psychological activities within the process of individual disease management. The finding opens up new opportunities for designing interactive systems to account for individual differences, encouraging positive patient involvement and sustaining long-term health outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1858171.1858218

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies claim that a supporting tool for people with diabetes should facilitate the learning process based on personal experiences on top of necessary knowledge provided by diabetes education.

    “It is also claimed in previous studies that a supporting tool for people with diabetes should facilitate this learning process [48,58].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Yunan
Venue
Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-08-16
Pages
252-261
OpenAlex
W2038284941
Cited by
43
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
20.97
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Designing Interactive Systems Conference (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of California, Irvine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management, health information use, patient experience, patient expectations, patient involvement, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review