The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do electronic marketplaces lower the price of goods?
Open accessAbstract
markets.AUCNET is an electronic marketplace introduced to reduce search costs of buyers for usedcar transactions in Japan.The average contract price of secondhand cars sold through AUCNET is much higher than that of traditional, non-electronic markets.The industry case study suggests that the analysis of electronic market impacts on product prices should take into account economic factors beyond the buyers' search costs.This article investigates why the product prices in AUCNET are higher than those of traditional markets by examining other economic variables than the buyer's search costs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Public Regulation of the Securities Markets
Stigler, G. J. (1964) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/294677 · Cited by 679 · cited 1×
“The reserve price plays a role as sequentially rational rules for suppliers under incomplete market information [11].”
Background
Cited by
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715
Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers
Brynjolfsson, E., & Smith, M. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.4.563.12061 · Cited by 2,498
Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust
Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0015 · Cited by 2,516
Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet
Lu, J., Yu, C., Liu, C., & Yao, J. E. (2003) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662240310478222 · Cited by 991
What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites
Liu, Z., & Park, S. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.020 · Cited by 963
Lin, H.-F. (2011) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.07.006 · Cited by 912
On Product Uncertainty in Online Markets: Theory and Evidence1
Dimoka, A., Hong, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703461 · Cited by 682
Price dispersion and differentiation in online travel: An empirical investigation
Clemons, E. K., Hann, I.-H., & Hitt, L. M. (2002) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.4.534 · Cited by 481
The relationship between website quality, trust and price premiums at online auctions
Gregg, D. G., & Walczak, S. (2010) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-010-9044-2 · Cited by 208
Online and Offline Demand and Price Elasticities: Evidence from the Air Travel Industry
Granados, N., Gupta, A., & Kauffman, R. J. (2012) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0312 · Cited by 189
Guo, Y., Bao, Y., Stuart, B. J., & Le‐Nguyen, K. (2018) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12144 · Cited by 127
Consumer cost differences for traditional and Internet markets
Strader, T. J., & Shaw, M. J. (1999) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662249910264819 · Cited by 93
Chai, L., & Pavlou, P. A. (2004) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/17410390410566706 · Cited by 81
(2009) · Cited by 61
Electronic Travel Markets: Elusive Effects on Consumer Behavior
Öörni, A., & Klein, S. (2003) · Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2003 · doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-6027-5_4 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, H.-G.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-80
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W1994137932
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
