Cited by 912Technology Adoption and User BehaviourHealth, Technology, Consumer BehaviorCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

An empirical investigation of mobile banking adoption: The effect of innovation attributes and knowledge-based trust

Lin, Hsiu-Fen·2011·International Journal of Information Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.07.006

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, H.-F.
Affiliations
National Taiwan Ocean University (TW)
Corresponding author
Lin, Hsiu-Fen
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
252-260
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045655911
Cited by
912
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 20
FWCI
42.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
mobile banking adoption, innovation characteristics, knowledge-based trust, perceived relative advantage, perceived ease of use, compatibility, perceived competence, benevolence, integrity, attitudes toward technology, behavioral intention, potential customers, repeat customers, diffusion of innovation theory, mobile commerce

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review