Cited by 260Mobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Robust Mobile Crowd Sensing: When Deep Learning Meets Edge Computing

Zhou, Zhenyu, Liao, Haijun, Gu, Bo, Huq, Kazi Mohammed Saidul, Mumtaz, Shahid, Rodriguez, Jonathan·2018·IEEE Network

Abstract

The emergence of MCS technologies provides a cost-efficient solution to accommodate large-scale sensing tasks. However, despite the potential benefits of MCS, there are several critical issues that remain to be solved, such as lack of incentive-compatible mechanisms for recruiting participants, lack of data validation, and high traffic load and latency. This motivates us to develop robust mobile crowd sensing (RMCS), a framework that integrates deep learning based data validation and edge computing based local processing. First, we present a comprehensive state-of-the-art literature review. Then, the conceptual design architecture of RMCS and practical implementations are described in detail. Next, a case study of smart transportation is provided to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed RMCS framework. Finally, we identify several open issues and conclude the article.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mnet.2018.1700442

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, Z., Liao, H., Gu, B., Huq, K. M. S., Mumtaz, S., & Rodriguez, J.
Affiliations
  • North China Electric Power University (CN)
  • Kogakuin University (JP)
  • Instituto de Telecomunicações (PT)
Venue
IEEE Network
Published
2018-07
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
54-60
ISSN
  • 0890-8044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-156X
OpenAlex
W2887817291
Cited by
260
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 2
FWCI
55.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Network (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
mobile crowdsensing, deep learning, edge computing, data validation, incentive mechanisms, participant recruitment, traffic load, latency, smart transportation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review