Cited by 509Ethics and Social Impacts of AIMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingScience Education and Perceptions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations

Kay, Matthew, Matuszek, Cynthia, Munson, Sean A.·2015·Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

DOI 10.1145/2702123.2702520

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Information environments have the power to affect people's perceptions and behaviors. In this paper, we present the results of studies in which we characterize the gender bias present in image search results for a variety of occupations. We experimentally evaluate the effects of bias in image search results on the images people choose to represent those careers and on people's perceptions of the prevalence of men and women in each occupation. We find evidence for both stereotype exaggeration and systematic underrepresentation of women in search results. We also find that people rate search results higher when they are consistent with stereotypes for a career, and shifting the representation of gender in image search results can shift people's perceptions about real-world distributions. We also discuss tensions between desires for high-quality results and broader societal goals for equality of representation in this space.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2702123.2702520

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Untitled work
(2011) · Cited by 4,430
Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373 · Cited by 3,435
Description and Prescription: How Gender Stereotypes Prevent Women's Ascent Up the Organizational Ladder
Heilman, M. E. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00234 · Cited by 2,482
Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.656 · Cited by 1,374
Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self‐Assessments
Correll, S. J. (2001) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/321299 · Cited by 1,320
Bias in computer systems
Friedman, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (1996) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/230538.230561 · Cited by 1,203 · cited 2×
“Both algorithms and interfaces, however, can be biased in how they represent the world [9,34].”
Background
STEREOTYPES
Hilton, J. L., & von Hippel, W. (1996) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.237 · Cited by 1,118
Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations
Correll, S. J. (2004) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240406900106 · Cited by 934
The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction
Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(74)90059-6 · Cited by 902
Categorically unequal: the American stratification system
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-4699 · Cited by 900

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Executive Office of the President. Big Data: Seizing Opportunities , Preserving Values. May 2014 . Executive Office of the President. Big Data: Seizing Opportunities, Preserving Values. May 2014.
Hooper B. Porn star appears on cover of Thai math textbook . United Press International . http://upi.com/5031410787947 Hooper B. Porn star appears on cover of Thai math textbook. United Press International. http://upi.com/5031410787947

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 507

Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for Recommendation
Wu, H., Mitra, B., Ma, C., Díaz, F., & Liu, X. (2022) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3477495.3532007 · Cited by 56
Are Gender-Neutral Queries Really Gender-Neutral? Mitigating Gender Bias in Image Search
Wang, J., Liu, Y., & Wang, X. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.151 · Cited by 98
Four Years of FAccT: A Reflexive, Mixed-Methods Analysis of Research Contributions, Shortcomings, and Future Prospects
Laufer, B., Jain, S., Cooper, A. F., Kleinberg, J. M., & Heidari, H. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533107 · Cited by 67
Shall androids dream of genocides? How generative AI can change the future of memorialization of mass atrocities
Makhortykh, M., Zucker, E. M., Simon, D. J., Bultmann, D., & Ulloa, R. (2023) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-023-00072-6 · Cited by 48
The algorithmic persuasion framework in online communication: conceptualization and a future research agenda
Zarouali, B., Boerman, S. C., Voorveld, H. A. M., & van Noort, G. (2022) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-01-2021-0049 · Cited by 67
Auditing E-Commerce Platforms for Algorithmically Curated Vaccine Misinformation
Juneja, P., & Mitra, T. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445250 · Cited by 48
Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution: An Analysis of Gender and Bias Throughout the Machine Learning Lifecycle
Cao, Y. T., & Daumé, H. (2021) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00413 · Cited by 47
“5 In all cases, we focus largely on harms due to over-and under-representation (Kay, Matuszek, and Munson 2015), replicating stereotypes (Sweeney 2013; Caliskan, Bryson, and Narayanan 2017) (particular those Signiﬁcant limitations..”
Background
The Matter of Chance: Auditing Web Search Results Related to the 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Elections Across Six Search Engines
Urman, A., Makhortykh, M., & Ulloa, R. (2021) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393211006863 · Cited by 46
Investigating User Perception of Gender Bias in Image Search
Otterbacher, J., Checco, A., Demartini, G., & Clough, P. D. (2018) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3209978.3210094 · Cited by 45
Where the earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job: A comparative algorithm audit of conspiratorial information in web search results
Urman, A., Makhortykh, M., Ulloa, R., & Kulshrestha, J. (2022) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101860 · Cited by 53
Towards Unbiased and Accurate Deferral to Multiple Experts
Keswani, V., Lease, M., & Kenthapadi, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462516 · Cited by 45
“Prior work has shown that misrepresentative training data [8, 41] or inappropriate choice of model [57], along with the biases of the human experts [28, 68] can lead to disparate performance across protected attribute types.”
Background
Shirtless and Dangerous: Quantifying Linguistic Signals of Gender Bias in an Online Fiction Writing Community
Fast, E., Vachovsky, T., & Bernstein, M. S. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v10i1.14744 · Cited by 43
Good Secretaries, Bad Truck Drivers? Occupational Gender Stereotypes in Sentiment Analysis
Bhaskaran, J., & Bhallamudi, I. (2019) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3809 · Cited by 51
Digital Discrimination
Criado, N., & Such, J. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198838494.003.0004 · Cited by 46
Fairness in Supervised Learning: An Information Theoretic Approach
Ghassami, A., Khodadadian, S., & Kiyavash, N. (2018) · IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) · doi:10.1109/isit.2018.8437807 · Cited by 42
Psychologically Inclusive Design
Kizilcec, R. F., & Saltarelli, A. J. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300704 · Cited by 44
Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing
(2019) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-38 · Cited by 43
Revisiting Gendered Web Forms: An Evaluation of Gender Inputs with (Non-)Binary People
Scheuerman, M. K., Jiang, A., Spiel, K., & Brubaker, J. R. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445742 · Cited by 44
Fairness in Proprietary Image Tagging Algorithms: A Cross-Platform Audit on People Images
Kyriakou, K., Barlas, P., Kleanthous, S., & Otterbacher, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3232 · Cited by 40
To "See" is to Stereotype
Barlas, P., Kyriakou, K., Guest, O., Kleanthous, S., & Otterbacher, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3432931 · Cited by 41
Automated feature engineering for algorithmic fairness
Salazar, R., Neutatz, F., & Abedjan, Z. (2021) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3461535.3463474 · Cited by 47
Sociotechnical Audits: Broadening the Algorithm Auditing Lens to Investigate Targeted Advertising
Lam, M. S., Pandit, A., Kalicki, C. H., Gupta, R., Sahoo, P., & Metaxa, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610209 · Cited by 44
Data Representativeness in Accessibility Datasets: A Meta-Analysis
Kamikubo, R., Wang, L., Marte, C., Mahmood, A., & Kacorri, H. (2022) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3517428.3544826 · Cited by 46
Detecting race and gender bias in visual representation of AI on web search engines
Makhortykh, M., Urman, A., & Ulloa, R. (2021) · BORIS (University Library Bern) · Cited by 38
Gender stereotypes in original digital video advertising
Aramendia-Muneta, M. E., Pascual, C. O., & Hatzithomas, L. (2019) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2019.1650255 · Cited by 40
Mitigating Bias in Set Selection with Noisy Protected Attributes
Mehrotra, A., & Celis, L. E. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445887 · Cited by 40
GANSlider: How Users Control Generative Models for Images using Multiple Sliders with and without Feedforward Information
Dang, H., Mecke, L., & Buschek, D. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3502141 · Cited by 37
A Systematic Review of Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics in Information Retrieval
Bernard, N., & Balog, K. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3637211 · Cited by 44
Gender De-Biasing in Speech Emotion Recognition
Gorrostieta, C., Lotfian, R., Taylor, K. M., Brutti, R. A., & Kane, J. (2019) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2019-1708 · Cited by 35
"It's easier than causing confrontation": Sanctioning Strategies to Maintain Social Norms and Privacy on Social Media
Rashidi, Y., Kapadia, A. C., Nippert-Eng, C. E., & Su, N. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3392827 · Cited by 35
Detecting race and gender bias in visual representation of AI on web search engines
Makhortykh, M., Urman, A., & Ulloa, R. (2021) · International Workshop on Algorithmic Bias in Search and Recommendation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78818-6_5 · Cited by 37
The Worst of Both Worlds: A Comparative Analysis of Errors in Learning from Data in Psychology and Machine Learning
Hullman, J. R., Kapoor, S., Nanayakkara, P., Gelman, A., & Narayanan, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534196 · Cited by 48
From Plane Crashes to Algorithmic Harm: Applicability of Safety Engineering Frameworks for Responsible ML
Rismani, S., Shelby, R. M., Smart, A., Jatho, E. W., Kroll, J. A., Moon, A., & Rostamzadeh, N. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581407 · Cited by 38
A consumer perspective of AI certification – the current certification landscape, consumer approval and directions for future research
Blösser, M., & Weihrauch, A. (2023) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-01-2023-0009 · Cited by 35
Reinscribing gender: social media, algorithms, bias
Schroeder, J. E. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2020.1832378 · Cited by 38
Evaluating Fairness Using Permutation Tests
DiCiccio, C. J., Vasudevan, S., Basu, K., Kenthapadi, K., & Agarwal, D. (2020) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3394486.3403199 · Cited by 34
Gender Bias in Contextualized Word EmbeddingsPreprint
Zhao, J., Wang, T., Yatskar, M., Cotterell, R., Ordóñez, V., & Chang, K.-W. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.03310 · Cited by 109
#TulsaFlop: A Case Study of Algorithmically-Influenced Collective Action on TikTokPreprint
Bandy, J., & Diakopoulos, N. A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07716 · Cited by 70
The Ethics of Privacy and Surveillance
Véliz, C. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198870173.001.0001 · Cited by 33
Addressing Age-Related Bias in Sentiment Analysis
Díaz, M., Johnson, I. L., Lazar, A., Piper, A. M., & Gergle, D. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/852 · Cited by 32
Taxonomizing and Measuring Representational Harms: A Look at Image Tagging
Katzman, J., Wang, A., Scheuerman, M., Blodgett, S. L., Laird, K., Wallach, H., & Barocas, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26670 · Cited by 32
The ‘bad women drivers’ myth: the overrepresentation of female drivers and gender bias in China’s media
Li, M., & Luo, Z. (2020) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1713843 · Cited by 35
Has CEO Gender Bias Really Been Fixed? Adversarial Attacking and Improving Gender Fairness in Image Search
Feng, Y., & Shah, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21445 · Cited by 33
Perception of Fairness in Algorithmic Decisions: Future Developers' Perspective
Kleanthous, S., Kasinidou, M., Barlas, P., & Otterbacher, J. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100380 · Cited by 37
Informational Privacy, A Right to Explanation, and Interpretable AI
Kim, T. W., & Routledge, B. (2018) · IEEE Symposium on Privacy-Aware Computing (PAC) · doi:10.1109/pac.2018.00013 · Cited by 30
How Fair Can We Go
Gao, R., & Shah, C. S. (2019) · ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR) · doi:10.1145/3341981.3344215 · Cited by 29
Do Humans Prefer Debiased AI Algorithms? A Case Study in Career Recommendation
Wang, C., Wang, K., Bian, A., Islam, R., Keya, K. N., Foulds, J. R., & Pan, S. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3490099.3511108 · Cited by 29
Diversity computing
Fletcher‐Watson, S., Jaegher, H. D., van Dijk, J., Frauenberger, C., Magnée, M. J. C. M., & Ye, J. (2018) · interactions · doi:10.1145/3243461 · Cited by 28
Improved Adversarial Learning for Fair ClassificationPreprint
Celis, L. E., & Keswani, V. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.10443 · Cited by 28
Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence Adoption for European Union Elderly in the Context of Digital Skills Development
Bogoslov, I. A., Corman, S., & Lungu, A. E. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16114579 · Cited by 26
Implicit Diversity in Image Summarization
Celis, L. E., & Keswani, V. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3415210 · Cited by 32
Fairness in the Eyes of the Data: Certifying Machine-Learning Models
Segal, S., Adi, Y., Benny Pinkas, B., Baum, C., Ganesh, C., & Keshet, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462554 · Cited by 31
Beyond the shallows of physical attractiveness: Perfection and objectifying gaze on Instagram
Sokolova, K., Kéfi, H., & Dutot, V. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102546 · Cited by 34
Trust in news on social media
Heuer, H., & Breiter, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3240167.3240172 · Cited by 27
Automating Automaticity: How the Context of Human Choice Affects the Extent of Algorithmic Bias
Agan, A., Davenport, D., Ludwig, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2023) · doi:10.3386/w30981 · Cited by 25
Explainable AI: Foundations, Applications, Opportunities for Data Management Research
Pradhan, R., Lahiri, A., Galhotra, S., & Salimi, B. (2022) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3514221.3522564 · Cited by 25
Ethics in Linguistics
D’Arcy, A., & Bender, E. M. (2022) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-015324 · Cited by 32
Grep-BiasIR: A dataset for investigating gender representation bias in information retrieval results
Krieg, K., Parada-Cabaleiro, E., Medicus, G., Lesota, O., Schedl, M., & Rekabsaz, N. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3576840.3578295 · Cited by 31
Towards fairness-aware multi-objective optimization
Yu, G., Ma, L., Wang, X., Du, W., Du, W., & Jin, Y. (2024) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-024-01668-w · Cited by 32
Monitoring the Gender Gap with Wikidata Human Gender Indicators
Klein, M., Gupta, H., Rai, V., Konieczny, P., & Zhu, H. (2016) · International Symposium on Open Collaboration · doi:10.1145/2957792.2957798 · Cited by 25
Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?Preprint
Miceli, M., Posada, J., & Yang, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.08131 · Cited by 25
Do I Look Like a Criminal? Examining how Race Presentation Impacts Human Judgement of Recidivism
Mallari, K., Inkpen, K., Johns, P., Tan, S., Ramesh, D., & Kamar, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376257 · Cited by 24
New Digital Inequalities. Algorithms Divide
Ragnedda, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49079-9_4 · Cited by 28
Age and gender distortion in online media and large language models
Guilbeault, D., Delecourt, S., & Desikan, B. S. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09581-z · Cited by 32
Gender bias in machine learning for sentiment analysis
Thelwall, M. A. (2018) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-05-2017-0153 · Cited by 27
Gender Artifacts in Visual Datasets
Meister, N., Zhao, D., Wang, A., Ramaswamy, V., Fong, R., & Russakovsky, O. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00446 · Cited by 38
“No Prejudice Here”: Examining Social Identity Work in Starter Pack Memes
Eschler, J., & Menking, A. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118768811 · Cited by 29
Investigating Societal Biases in a Poetry Composition SystemPreprint
Sheng, E., & Uthus, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.02686 · Cited by 26
Can we avoid digital structural violence in future learning systems?
Winters, N., Eynon, R., Geniets, A., Robson, J., & Kahn, K. (2019) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1708099 · Cited by 26
Crowdsourcing with Fairness, Diversity and Budget Constraints
Goel, N., & Faltings, B. V. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314282 · Cited by 26
Biased Representation of Politicians in Google and Wikipedia Search? The Joint Effect of Party Identity, Gender Identity and Elections
Pradel, F. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1793846 · Cited by 22
AID: An Automated Detector for Gender-Inclusivity Bugs in OSS Project Pages
Chatterjee, A., Guizani, M., Stevens, C., Emard, J., May, M. E., Burnett, M., & Ahmed, I. (2021) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse43902.2021.00128 · Cited by 22
Mitigating Bias in Search Results Through Contextual Document Reranking and Neutrality Regularization
Zerveas, G., Rekabsaz, N., Cohen, D., & Eickhoff, C. (2022) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3477495.3531891 · Cited by 22
Auditing the representation of migrants in image web search results
Urman, A., Makhortykh, M., & Ulloa, R. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01144-1 · Cited by 25
“Foreign beauties want to meet you”: The sexualization of women in Google’s organic and sponsored text search results
Urman, A., & Makhortykh, M. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221099536 · Cited by 21
GIRE: Gender-Inclusive Requirements Engineering
Nunes, I. S., Moreira, A., & Araújo, J. (2022) · Data & Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.datak.2022.102108 · Cited by 21
Two-sided fairness in rankings via Lorenz dominancePreprint
Do, V., Corbett‐Davies, S., Jamal Atif, C., & Usunier, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.15781 · Cited by 22
Constrained Learning With Non-Convex Losses
Chamon, L. F. O., Paternain, S., Calvo-Fullana, M., & Ribeiro, A. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2022.3187948 · Cited by 35
Representations of women and men in popular chemistry textbooks in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland
Murray, C. A., Anderson, Y., Simms, C. H., & Seery, M. K. (2021) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d1rp00187f · Cited by 20
Examining Gender Bias in Languages with Grammatical GenderPreprint
Zhou, P., Shi, W., Zhao, J., Huang, K.-H., Chen, M., Cotterell, R., & Chang, K.-W. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.02224 · Cited by 20
Algorithmic gender bias: investigating perceptions of discrimination in automated decision-making
Kim, S., Oh, P., & Lee, J. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2306484 · Cited by 23
Reduced Products of Abstract Domains for Fairness Certification of Neural Networks
Mazzucato, D., & Urban, C. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88806-0_15 · Cited by 19
Why Organization Matters in “Algorithmic Discrimination”
Schwarting, R., & Ulbricht, L. (2022) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-022-00838-3 · Cited by 22
Intersectional Experiences of Unfair Treatment Caused by Automated Computational Systems
van Nuenen, T., Such, J. M., & Coté, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555546 · Cited by 22
Partiality and Misconception: Investigating Cultural Representativeness in Text-to-Image Models
Zhang, L., Liao, X., Yang, Z., Gao, B., Wang, C., Yang, Q., & Li, D. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642877 · Cited by 34
Fair k-Centers via Maximum Matching
Jones, M. R., Nguyen, T., & Nguyen, H. T. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 22
Brushing Society Against the Grain: Digital Footprints, Scraps, Non-Human Acts, Crumbs, and Other Traces
Comunello, F., Martıre, F., & Sabetta, L. (2022) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642221144844 · Cited by 19
Fairness in Rankings and Recommenders: Models, Methods and Research Directions
Pitoura, E., Stefanidis, K., & Koutrika, G. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde51399.2021.00265 · Cited by 18
Representativeness and face-ism: Gender bias in image search
Ulloa, R., Richter, A. C., Makhortykh, M., Urman, A., & Kacperski, C. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221100699 · Cited by 18
Auditing GPT's Content Moderation Guardrails: Can ChatGPT Write Your Favorite TV Show?
Mahomed, Y., Crawford, C. M., Gautam, S., Friedler, S. A., & Metaxa, D. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658932 · Cited by 25
Fairness-aware Methods in Rankings and Recommenders
Pitoura, E., Stefanidis, K., & Koutrika, G. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM) · doi:10.1109/mdm52706.2021.00013 · Cited by 17
Identifying Stereotypes in the Online Perception of Physical Attractiveness
Araújo, C. S., Meira, W., & Almeida, V. A. F. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_26 · Cited by 18
Towards Socially Responsible AI: Cognitive Bias-Aware Multi-Objective Learning
Sen, P., & Ganguly, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i03.5654 · Cited by 18
Auditing ImageNet: Towards a Model-driven Framework for Annotating Demographic Attributes of Large-Scale Image DatasetsPreprint
Dulhanty, C., & Wong, A. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.01347 · Cited by 40
How to Solve Fair $k$-Center in Massive Data ModelsPreprint
Chiplunkar, A., Kale, S., & Ramamoorthy, S. N. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.07682 · Cited by 18
Fast online ranking with fairness of exposure
Usunier, N., Do, V., & Dohmatob, E. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3534633 · Cited by 17
Memory, counter-memory and denialism: How search engines circulate information about the Holodomor-related memory wars
Makhortykh, M., Urman, A., & Ulloa, R. (2022) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/17506980221133732 · Cited by 17
Representation in AI Evaluations
Bergman, A. S., Hendricks, L. A., Rauh, M., Wú, B., Agnew, W. S., Kunesch, M., Duan, I., Gabriel, I., & Isaac, W. S. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594019 · Cited by 20
Improving Diversity of Demographic Representation in Large Language Models via Collective-Critiques and Self-Voting
Lahoti, P., Blumm, N., Ma, X., Kotikalapudi, R., Potluri, S., Tan, Q., Srinivasan, H., Packer, B., Beirami, A., Beutel, A., et al. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.643 · Cited by 45
Benchmark suites instead of leaderboards for evaluating AI fairness
Wang, A., Hertzmann, A., & Russakovsky, O. (2024) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.101080 · Cited by 19

Authors: Kay, M., Matuszek, C., & Munson, S. A.
Affiliations: University of Washington (US)
University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
ORCID: Kay, Matthew
Matuszek, Cynthia
Munson, Sean A.
Venue: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher: ACM
Published: 2015-04-18
Pages: 3819-3828
DOI: 10.1145/2702123.2702520
OpenAlex: W2149252982
Cited by: 509
References: 36
Citations by year: 2026: 27 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 10
FWCI: 110.27
Type: conference paper
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)
Locations: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
Keywords: gender stereotypes, gender bias, image search, occupation, gender representation, underrepresentation of women, search result quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks