Cited by 69Information and Cyber SecurityNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

Detecting Insider Threat from Enterprise Social and Online Activity Data

Gavai, Gaurang, Sricharan, Kumar, Gunning, Dave, Rolleston, Rob, Hanley, John, Singhal, Mudita·2015·Proceedings of the 7th ACM CCS International Workshop on Managing Insider Security Threats

Abstract

Insider threat is a significant security risk for organizations. In this paper, we attempt to discover insider threat by identifying abnormal behavior in enterprise social and online activity data of employees. To this end, we process and extract relevant features that are possibly indicative of insider threat behavior. This includes features extracted from social data including email communication patterns and content, and online activity data such as web browsing patterns, email frequency, and file and machine access patterns. Subsequently, we detect statistically abnormal behavior with respect to these features using state-of-the-art anomaly detection methods, and declare this abnormal behavior as a proxy for insider threat activity. We test our approach on a real world data set with artificially injected insider threat events. We obtain a ROC score of 0.77, which shows that our proposed approach is fairly successful in identifying insider threat events. Finally, we build a visualization dashboard that enables managers and HR personnel to quickly identify employees with high threat risk scores which will enable them to take suitable preventive measures and limit security risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2808783.2808784

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gavai, G., Sricharan, K., Gunning, D., Rolleston, R., Hanley, J., & Singhal, M.
Affiliations
Palo Alto Research Center (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 7th ACM CCS International Workshop on Managing Insider Security Threats
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-10-16
Pages
13-20
OpenAlex
W2005221715
Cited by
69
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.48
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM CCS International Workshop on Managing Insider Security Threats (MIST) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W911NF-11-C- 0216)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Keywords
insider threat detection, file access patterns, anomaly detection, feature extraction, dashboard visualization, enterprise security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review