Cited by 323Network Security and Intrusion DetectionInformation and Cyber SecuritySoftware System Performance and Reliability

Log2vec: A Heterogeneous Graph Embedding Based Approach for Detecting Cyber Threats within Enterprise

Liu, Fucheng, Wen, Yu, Zhang, Dongxue, Jiang, Xihe, Xing, Xinyu, Meng, Dan·2019·Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

Abstract

Conventional attacks of insider employees and emerging APT are both major threats for the organizational information system. Existing detections mainly concentrate on users' behavior and usually analyze logs recording their operations in an information system. In general, most of these methods consider sequential relationship among log entries and model users' sequential behavior. However, they ignore other relationships, inevitably leading to an unsatisfactory performance on various attack scenarios. We propose log2vec, a heterogeneous graph embedding based modularized method. First, it involves a heuristic approach that converts log entries into a heterogeneous graph in the light of diverse relationships among them. Next, it utilizes an improved graph embedding appropriate to the above heterogeneous graph, which can automatically represent each log entry into a low-dimension vector. The third component of log2vec is a practical detection algorithm capable of separating malicious and benign log entries into different clusters and identifying malicious ones. We implement a prototype of log2vec. Our evaluation demonstrates that log2vec remarkably outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, such as deep learning and hidden markov model (HMM). Besides, log2vec shows its capability to detect malicious events in various attack scenarios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3319535.3363224

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sequence models such as LSTM, Transformer, etc., or heterogeneous graphs mainly focus on relative time information of user activity and do not establish a direct connection with the specific timing of user activities.

    “However, these methods mainly focus on relative time information of user activity and do not establish a direct connection with the specific timing of user activities.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, F., Wen, Y., Zhang, D., Jiang, X., Xing, X., & Meng, D.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Information Engineering (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-11-06
Pages
1777-1794
ISSN
1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2986944522
Cited by
319
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 9
FWCI
21.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.XDC02010300)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
Keywords
heterogeneous graph embedding, insider attacks, advanced persistent threats, information systems security, user behavior analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review