The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What can I say?: addressing user experience challenges of a mobile voice user interface for accessibility
Open accessAbstract
Voice interactions on mobile phones are most often used to augment or supplement touch based interactions for users' convenience. However, for people with limited hand dexterity caused by various forms of motor-impairments voice interactions can have a significant impact and in some cases even enable independent interaction with a mobile device for the first time. For these users, a Mobile Voice User Interface (M-VUI), which allows for completely hands-free, voice only interaction would provide a high level of accessibility and independence. Implementing such a system requires research to address long standing usability challenges introduced by voice interactions that negatively affect user experience due to difficulty learning and discovering voice commands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Indeed, the studies investigating user experience and usability of voice assistants mainly involved able-bodied users [3,8-11], thereby neglecting a broad community of users with disabilities.”
From Investigating the Accessibility of Voice Assistants With Impaired Users: Mixed Methods Study (2020) · cites this paper as [8]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Research on voice assistants is focused mainly on the general population.”
From Investigating the Accessibility of Voice Assistants With Impaired Users: Mixed Methods Study (2020) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2014) · Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004 · Cited by 23,880
Norman, D. A. (2016) · Vahlen eBooks · doi:10.15358/9783800648108 · Cited by 6,415
The vocabulary problem in human-system communication
Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, L. M., & Dumais, S. T. (1987) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/32206.32212 · Cited by 1,504
Bruner, J. S. (2006) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203088609-13 · Cited by 1,478
Maximizing the guessability of symbolic input
Wobbrock, J. O., Aung, H. H., Rothrock, B., & Myers, B. A. (2005) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/1056808.1057043 · Cited by 418
Kane, S. K., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J. O., & Ladner, R. E. (2009) · Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility · doi:10.1145/1639642.1639663 · Cited by 383
A survey of software learnability: metrics, methodologies and guidelines
Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G., & Attar, R. (2009) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1518701.1518803 · Cited by 322
The limits of speech recognition
Shneiderman, B. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/348941.348990 · Cited by 279
Designing SpeechActs: issues in speech user interfaces
Yankelovich, N., Levow, G.-A., & Marx, M. (1995) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95 · doi:10.1145/223904.223952 · Cited by 250
Carroll, J. M., Smith-Kerker, P. L., Ford, J. K., & Mazur-Rimetz, S. (1987) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0302_2 · Cited by 230
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ruimin Hu Shaojian Zhu Jinjuan Feng and Andrew Sears. 2011. Use of speech technology in real life environment. Universal Access in Human-Computer : 62--71. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21657-2_7 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pradhan, A., Mehta, K., & Findlater, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174033 · Cited by 448
Patterns for How Users Overcome Obstacles in Voice User Interfaces
Myers, C., Furqan, A., Nebolsky, J., Caro, K., & Zhu, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173580 · Cited by 213
The State of Speech in HCI: Trends, Themes and Challenges
Clark, L., Doyle, P., Garaialde, D., Gilmartin, E., Schlögl, S., Edlund, J., Aylett, M., Cabral, J., Munteanu, C., Edwards, J., et al. (2019) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwz016 · Cited by 193
“One of the papers assessed a speech interface with a smartphone (Corbett & Weber, 2016), finding that existing approaches in voice interaction design do not necessarily translate into mobile interaction spaces.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOlder Adults and Voice Interaction: A Pilot Study with Google Home
Kowalski, J., Jaskulska, A., Skorupska, K., Abramczuk, K., Biele, C., Kopeć, W., & Marasek, K. (2019) · Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290607.3312973 · Cited by 125
“ty [9], also with older adults in the context of SH [12] it is worth to further investigate this problem in multiple cultural contexts in order to suggest how to make Voice Interfaces more accessible [3] in general to facilitate different groups of older adults’ interaction with ICT-enhanced solutions. METHODS Voice i…”
BackgroundPark, H., Ahn, D., Hosanagar, K., & Lee, J. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445304 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Corbett, E., & Weber, A.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Corbett, Eric
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-09-06
- Pages
- 72-82
- OpenAlex
- W2514025902
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- voice interaction, motor impairment, accessibility, touchless interaction, usability problems, user experience, mobile devices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
