Cited by 929Advanced Graph Neural NetworksGraph Theory and AlgorithmsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Adversarially Regularized Graph Autoencoder for Graph Embedding

Open access
Pan, Shirui, Hu, Ruiqi, Long, Guodong, Jiang, Jing, Yao, Lina, Zhang, Chengqi·2018·Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Graph embedding is an effective method to represent graph data in a low dimensional space for graph analytics. Most existing embedding algorithms typically focus on preserving the topological structure or minimizing the reconstruction errors of graph data, but they have mostly ignored the data distribution of the latent codes from the graphs, which often results in inferior embedding in real-world graph data. In this paper, we propose a novel adversarial graph embedding framework for graph data. The framework encodes the topological structure and node content in a graph to a compact representation, on which a decoder is trained to reconstruct the graph structure. Furthermore, the latent representation is enforced to match a prior distribution via an adversarial training scheme. To learn a robust embedding, two variants of adversarial approaches, adversarially regularized graph autoencoder (ARGA) and adversarially regularized variational graph autoencoder (ARVGA), are developed. Experimental studies on real-world graphs validate our design and demonstrate that our algorithms outperform baselines by a wide margin in link prediction, graph clustering, and graph visualization tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24963/ijcai.2018/362

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One simple way to learn graph embeddings unsupervisedly is to adopt an autoencoder framework where the encoder employs graph convolutional layers to embed the graph into a latent representation and a decoder reconstructs the graph structure.

    “One simple way is to adopt an autoencoder framework where the encoder employs graph convolutional layers to embed the graph into the latent representation upon which a decoder is used to reconstruct the graph structure [61], [62].”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

  • ARVGA employs the training scheme of a GAN to enforce the empirical distribution q(Z|X,A) to approximate the prior distribution p(Z).

    “To further enforce the empirical distribution q ( Z | X , A ) approximate the prior distribution p ( Z ) , Adversarially Regularized Variational Graph Autoencoder (ARVGA) [62], [109] employs the training scheme of a generative adversarial networks (GAN) [110].”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

  • ARVGA employs the training scheme of a GAN to enforce the empirical distribution q(Z|X,A) to approximate the prior distribution p(Z).

    “To further enforce the empirical distribution q ( Z | X , A ) approximate the prior distribution p ( Z ) , Adversarially Regularized Variational Graph Autoencoder (ARVGA) [62], [109] employs the training scheme of a generative adversarial networks (GAN) [110].”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [109]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget- Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Gen- erative adversarial nets. In NIPS, pages 2672-2680, 2014.
  2. Grover and Leskovec, 2016] Aditya Grover and Jure Leskovec. node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In SIGKDD, pages 855-864. ACM, 2016.
  3. Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. Variational graph auto-encoders. NIPS, 2016.
  4. Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In ICLR, pages 1-14, 2017.
  5. Qiu et al., 2017] Jiezhong Qiu, Yuxiao Dong, Hao Ma, Jian Li, Kuansan Wang, and Jie Tang. Network embedding as matrix factorization: Unifying deepwalk, line, pte, and node2vec. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.02971, 2017. · arXiv
  6. Wang et al., 2017a] Chun Wang, Shirui Pan, Guodong Long, Xingquan Zhu, and Jing Jiang. Mgae: Marginalized graph autoencoder for graph clustering. In CIKM, pages 889-898. ACM, 2017.
  7. Wang et al., 2017b] Xiao Wang, Peng Cui, Jing Wang, Jian Pei, Wenwu Zhu, and Shiqiang Yang. Community preserv- ing network embedding. In AAAI, pages 203-209, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pan, S., Hu, R., Long, G., Jiang, J., Yao, L., & Zhang, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2018-07
Pages
2609-2615
OpenAlex
W2808409763
Cited by
929
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 157 · 2022: 148 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 6
FWCI
30.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nvidia
  • Australian Research Council (LP160100630, LP150100671)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Graph Theory and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
graph embedding, graph autoencoder, adversarial training, variational graph autoencoder, adversarial regularization, link prediction, graph clustering, network visualization, latent representation learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review