Multi-Modal Audio, Video and Physiological Sensor Learning for Continuous Emotion Prediction
Abstract
The automatic determination of emotional state from multimedia content is an inherently challenging problem with a broad range of applications including biomedical diagnostics, multimedia retrieval, and human computer interfaces. The Audio Video Emotion Challenge (AVEC) 2016 provides a well-defined framework for developing and rigorously evaluating innovative approaches for estimating the arousal and valence states of emotion as a function of time. It presents the opportunity for investigating multimodal solutions that include audio, video, and physiological sensor signals. This paper provides an overview of our AVEC Emotion Challenge system, which uses multi-feature learning and fusion across all available modalities. It includes a number of technical contributions, including the development of novel high- and low-level features for modeling emotion in the audio, video, and physiological channels. Low-level features include modeling arousal in audio with minimal prosodic-based descriptors. High-level features are derived from supervised and unsupervised machine learning approaches based on sparse coding and deep learning. Finally, a state space estimation approach is applied for score fusion that demonstrates the importance of exploiting the time-series nature of the arousal and valence states. The resulting system outperforms the baseline systems [10] on the test evaluation set with an achieved Concordant Correlation Coefficient (CCC) for arousal of 0.770 vs 0.702 (baseline) and for valence of 0.687 vs 0.638. Future work will focus on exploiting the time-varying nature of individual channels in the multi-modal framework.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Brady et al. [18] found that learning temporal context with LSTM and handcrafted features leads to improvements over shallow baseline models.
“Brady et al. [18] found that learning temporal context with LSTM and handcrafted features leads to improvements over shallow baseline models.”
From Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data
Ringeval, F., Eyben, F., Kroupi, E., Yuce, A., Thiran, J.-P., Ebrahimi, T., Lalanne, D., & Schuller, B. (2015) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2014.11.007 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
How deep neural networks can improve emotion recognition on video data
Khorrami, P., Le Paine, T., Brady, K., Dagli, C., & Huang, T. S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) · doi:10.1109/icip.2016.7532431 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotion recognition using multi-modal data and machine learning techniques: A tutorial and review
Zhang, J., Yin, Z., Chen, P., & Nichele, S. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.011 · Cited by 806 · see citing works
End-to-End Multimodal Emotion Recognition using Deep Neural Networks
Tzirakis, P., Trigeorgis, G., Nicolaou, M. A., Schuller, B., & Zafeiriou, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.08619 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
AFEW-VA database for valence and arousal estimation in-the-wild
Kossaifi, J., Tzimiropoulos, G., Todorovic, S., & Pantic, M. (2017) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2017.02.001 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments
Rouast, P. V., Adam, M. T. P., & Chiong, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2018.2890471 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Recognizing Emotions in Video Using Multimodal DNN Feature Fusion
Williams, J., Kleinegesse, S., Comanescu, R., & Radu, O. (2018) · Proceedings of Grand Challenge and Workshop on Human Multimodal Language (Challenge-HML) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-3302 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Semi-supervised Multi-modal Emotion Recognition with Cross-Modal Distribution Matching
Liang, J., Li, R., & Jin, Q. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3394171.3413579 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Continuous Multimodal Emotion Prediction Based on Long Short Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network
Huang, J., Li, Y., Tao, J., Lian, Z., Wen, Z., Yang, M., & Yi, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the 7th Annual Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge · doi:10.1145/3133944.3133946 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brady, K., Gwon, Y., Khorrami, P., Godoy, E., Campbell, W., Dagli, C., & Huang, T. S.
- Affiliations
- MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-10-16
- Pages
- 97-104
- OpenAlex
- W2531648894
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14
- FWCI
- 20.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge (AVEC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- emotion recognition, multimodal fusion, audio features, video features, prosodic features, sparse coding, deep learning, state-space estimation, score-level fusion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review