Cited by 110Emotion and Mood RecognitionSpeech and Audio ProcessingSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Multi-Modal Audio, Video and Physiological Sensor Learning for Continuous Emotion Prediction

Brady, Kevin, Gwon, Youngjune, Khorrami, Pooya, Godoy, Elizabeth, Campbell, William, Dagli, Charlie, Huang, Thomas S.·2016·Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge

Abstract

The automatic determination of emotional state from multimedia content is an inherently challenging problem with a broad range of applications including biomedical diagnostics, multimedia retrieval, and human computer interfaces. The Audio Video Emotion Challenge (AVEC) 2016 provides a well-defined framework for developing and rigorously evaluating innovative approaches for estimating the arousal and valence states of emotion as a function of time. It presents the opportunity for investigating multimodal solutions that include audio, video, and physiological sensor signals. This paper provides an overview of our AVEC Emotion Challenge system, which uses multi-feature learning and fusion across all available modalities. It includes a number of technical contributions, including the development of novel high- and low-level features for modeling emotion in the audio, video, and physiological channels. Low-level features include modeling arousal in audio with minimal prosodic-based descriptors. High-level features are derived from supervised and unsupervised machine learning approaches based on sparse coding and deep learning. Finally, a state space estimation approach is applied for score fusion that demonstrates the importance of exploiting the time-series nature of the arousal and valence states. The resulting system outperforms the baseline systems [10] on the test evaluation set with an achieved Concordant Correlation Coefficient (CCC) for arousal of 0.770 vs 0.702 (baseline) and for valence of 0.687 vs 0.638. Future work will focus on exploiting the time-varying nature of individual channels in the multi-modal framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2988257.2988264

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brady et al. [18] found that learning temporal context with LSTM and handcrafted features leads to improvements over shallow baseline models.

    “Brady et al. [18] found that learning temporal context with LSTM and handcrafted features leads to improvements over shallow baseline models.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brady, K., Gwon, Y., Khorrami, P., Godoy, E., Campbell, W., Dagli, C., & Huang, T. S.
Affiliations
  • MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge
Publisher
ACM
Published
2016-10-16
Pages
97-104
OpenAlex
W2531648894
Cited by
110
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14
FWCI
20.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge (AVEC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
emotion recognition, multimodal fusion, audio features, video features, prosodic features, sparse coding, deep learning, state-space estimation, score-level fusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review