Cited by 107Emotion and Mood RecognitionSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningFace and Expression Recognition

How deep neural networks can improve emotion recognition on video data

Khorrami, Pooya, Le Paine, Tom, Brady, Kevin, Dagli, Charlie, Huang, Thomas S.·2016·2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)

Abstract

We consider the task of dimensional emotion recognition on video data using deep learning. While several previous methods have shown the benefits of training temporal neural network models such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs) on hand-crafted features, few works have considered combining convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with RNNs. In this work, we present a system that performs emotion recognition on video data using both CNNs and RNNs, and we also analyze how much each neural network component contributes to the system's overall performance. We present our findings on videos from the Audio/Visual+Emotion Challenge (AV+EC2015). In our experiments, we analyze the effects of several hyperparameters on overall performance while also achieving superior performance to the baseline and other competing methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icip.2016.7532431

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global temporal modeling is found to lead to improved accuracies when compared with simpler methods such as pooling of spatial features.

    “Global temporal modeling is found to lead to improved accuracies when compared with simpler methods such as pooling of spatial features (e.g., [152], [90], [108]).”
  • CNN-LSTM is the more frequent choice among the reviewed studies compared to CNN-RNN.

    “We see both CNN-RNN (e.g., [18], [90]) and CNN-LSTM (e.g., [108], [105], [64]) architectures, with CNN-LSTM being the more frequent choice among the reviewed studies.”
  • Most of these approaches train individual components separately, which may lead to suboptimal performance considering the whole system.

    “However, most of these approaches train individual components separately (e.g., [106], [90]), which may lead to suboptimal performance considering the whole system.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khorrami, P., Le Paine, T., Brady, K., Dagli, C., & Huang, T. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US)
Venue
2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-09
Pages
619-623
ISSN
1522-4880 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2281407413
Cited by
107
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
15.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
video-based emotion recognition, convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, hybrid CNN-RNN model, hyperparameter analysis, temporal modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review