The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The long quest for computational thinking
Abstract
Computational thinking (CT) is a popular phrase that refers to a collection of computational ideas and habits of mind that people in computing disciplines acquire through their work in designing programs, software, simulations, and computations performed by machinery. Recently a computational thinking for K-12 movement has spawned initiatives across the education sector, and educational reforms are under way in many countries. However, modern CT initiatives should be well aware of the broad and deep history of computational thinking, or risk repeating already refuted claims, past mistakes, and already solved problems, or losing some of the richest and most ambitious ideas in CT. This paper presents an overview of three important historical currents from which CT has developed: evolution of computing's disciplinary ways of thinking and practicing, educational research and efforts in computing, and emergence of computational science and digitalization of society. The paper examines a number of threats to CT initiatives: lack of ambition, dogmatism, knowing versus doing, exaggerated claims, narrow views of computing, overemphasis on formulation, and lost sight of computational models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
POLANYI, M. (1997) · Knowledge in Organisations · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-x · Cited by 12,408
Wing, J. M. (2006) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1118178.1118215 · Cited by 8,102
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,534
Computational Thinking in K–12: A Review of the State of the Field
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x12463051 · Cited by 2,513
Iterative Methods for the Solution of Equations.
Young, D. M., & Traub, J. F. (1967) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2316079 · Cited by 2,165
Computational thinking and thinking about computing
Wing, J. M. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0118 · Cited by 1,784
A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition
Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980) · doi:10.21236/ada084551 · Cited by 1,572 · cited 1×
“One of the most famous and useful models is the framework created by Stuart and Hubert Dreyfus in the 1970s [77].”
MethodStructure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
Abelson, H., Sussman, G. J., & Sussman, J. (1985) · Cited by 1,435
Changing minds: computers, learning, and literacy
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2855 · Cited by 816
Science in the Age of Computer Simulation
Winsberg, E. (2010) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226902050.001.0001 · Cited by 707
Cited by
Wu, T., Sarwono, E., & Huang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70017 · Cited by 9
Lin, P.-H., Huang, P.-S., Geng, Y., & Huang, Y.-M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12661-8 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Tedre, M., & Denning, P. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-11-24
- Pages
- 120-129
- OpenAlex
- W2554181311
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 16.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The long quest for computational thinking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2999541.2999542
- The paper
- Tedre, M., & Denning, P. J. (2016). The long quest for computational thinking. Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1145/2999541.2999542
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.