Cited by 29Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

I am a "Smart" watch, Smart Enough to Know the Accuracy of My Own Heart Rate Sensor

Ra, Ho-Kyeong, Ahn, Jungmo, Yoon, Hee Jung, Yoon, Dukyong, Son, Sang Hyuk, Ko, JeongGil·2017·Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications

Abstract

With the wide-distribution of smart wearables, it seems as though ubiquitous healthcare can finally permeate into our everyday lives, opening the possibility to realize clinical-grade applications. However, given that clinical applications require reliable sensing, there is a need to understand how accurate healthcare sensors on wearable devices (e.g., heart rate sensors) are. To answer this question, this work starts with a thorough investigation on the accuracy of widely used wearable devices' heart rate sensors. Specifically, we show that when actively moving, heart rate readings can diverge far from the ground truth, and also show that such inaccuracies cannot be easily correlated, nor predicted, using accelerometer and gyroscope measurements. Rather, we point out that the light intensity readings at the photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor can be an effective indicator of heart rate accuracy. Using a Viterbi algorithm-based Hidden Markov Model, we show that it is possible to design a filter that allows smartwatches to self-classify measurement quality with ~ 98% accuracy. Given that such capabilities allow the smartwatch to internally filter misleading values from being application input, we foresee this as an essential step in catalyzing novel clinical-grade wearable applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3032970.3032977

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ra, H.-K., Ahn, J., Yoon, H. J., Yoon, D., Son, S. H., & Ko, J.
Affiliations
  • Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Ajou University (KR)
Venue
Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-02-21
Pages
49-54
ISSN
1550-6193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2592377534
Cited by
29
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (WMCSA) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (International Cooperative R&D Program (#N0002099))
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea (Korea Health Technology R&D Project (HI16C0982))
  • Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (DGIST R&D program (CPS Global Center), Resilient CPS Research (14-824-09-013))
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
smartwatches, heart rate sensor, sensor accuracy, photoplethysmography, hidden Markov models, Viterbi algorithm, accelerometer and gyroscope, ubiquitous healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review