Cited by 86Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringECG Monitoring and AnalysisHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Smart-watches: a potential challenger to the implantable loop recorder?

Open access
Carpenter, Alexander, Frontera, Antonio·2016·Europace

Abstract

The newest generation of smart-watches offer heart rate monitoring technology via photoplethysmography, a technology shown to demonstrate impressive ability in diagnosing arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation. Combining such technology with the portability, connectivity and other location and activity tracking features smart-watches could represent a powerful new tool in extended non-invasive arrhythmia detection. The technology itself, including potential uses and limitations, is discussed. There is a need for further software development but crucially, further work into clarifying the diagnostic accuracy of such technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/euv427

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Noninvasive, consumer-grade wearables are less expensive than gold standard research devices.

    “they are generally unobtrusive, less expensive than gold standard research devices [4], comfortable to wear [5], and affordable for consumers [6].”
  • Reviews on the application and potential of wearables have focused on specific wearable devices or measurements, or on applications in specific medical fields and interventions.

    “Similarly, reviews on the application and potential of wearables have focused on (1) specific wearable devices or specific wearable measurements, for example, only smartwatches [4] or only sleep measurements [28] or (2) applications of specific medical fields and interventions, for example, only for diagnosis and treatment in cardiological conditions [29] or wearables as an intervention to promote”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carpenter, A., & Frontera, A.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR)
Corresponding author
Carpenter, Alexander
Venue
Europace
Published
2016-02-03
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
791-793
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W2266977369
Cited by
86
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
smartwatches, implantable loop recorder, photoplethysmography, heart rate monitoring, atrial fibrillation detection, arrhythmia detection, non-invasive cardiac monitoring, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Equipment Design, Heart Rate, Humans, Software, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review