The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 14 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Open accessAbstract
We trained a large, deep convolutional neural network to classify the 1.2 million high-resolution images in the ImageNet LSVRC-2010 contest into the 1000 different classes. On the test data, we achieved top-1 and top-5 error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively, which is considerably better than the previous state-of-the-art. The neural network, which has 60 million parameters and 650,000 neurons, consists of five convolutional layers, some of which are followed by max-pooling layers, and three fully connected layers with a final 1000-way softmax. To make training faster, we used non-saturating neurons and a very efficient GPU implementation of the convolution operation. To reduce overfitting in the fully connected layers we employed a recently developed regularization method called "dropout" that proved to be very effective. We also entered a variant of this model in the ILSVRC-2012 competition and achieved a winning top-5 test error rate of 15.3%, compared to 26.2% achieved by the second-best entry.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
29 No basis given · 22 Own result · 19 Own interpretation · 4 No full text of the sources · 3 Sources not found · 2 Supported · 2 Not checked yet · 1 Own method
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This technique reduces complex co adaptations of neurons, since a neuron cannot rely on the presence of particular other neurons.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012). source
The paper states on p. 1 that dropout prevents complex co-adaptations by randomly omitting hidden units, so a hidden unit cannot rely on other hidden units being present. This directly supports the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“There is, however, a very efficient version of model combination that only costs about a factor of two during training.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012). source
The paper describes dropout as an efficient way to combine many neural-network models (p. 1). In F.6 Training (p. 17), it reports that ImageNet training took roughly four days with dropout versus two days without it, supporting the approximate factor-of-two training cost. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scheme reduces our top-1 and top-5 error rates by 1.7% and 1.2%, respectively, as compared with a net with half as many kernels in each convolutional layer trained on one GPU.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.2. Training on multiple GPUs
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The size of our network made overfitting a significant problem, even with 1.2 million labeled training examples”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So these data augmentation schemes are, in effect, computationally free.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we found that removing any convolutional layer (each of which contains no more than 1% of the model's parameters) resulted in inferior performance.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scheme reduces the top-1 and top-5 error rates by 0.4% and 0.3%, respectively, as compared with the non overlapping scheme s = 2, z = 2, which produces output of equivalent dimensions.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This increases the size of our training set by a factor of 2048”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Deep CNNs with ReLUs train several times faster than their equivalents with tanh units.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.1. Rectified Linear Unit nonlinearity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, we still find that the following local normalization scheme aids generalization.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 18
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the 1000 classes of ILSVRC make each training example impose 10 bits of constraint on the mapping from image to label, this turns out to be insufficient to learn so many parameters without considerable overfitting.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5. REDUCING OVERFITTING
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“though the resulting training examples are, of course, highly inter dependent.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the test data, we achieved top-1 and top-5 error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We generally observe during training that models with overlapping pooling find it slightly more difficult to overfit.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a four-layer CNN achieved a 13% test e r r o r r a t e w i t h o u t n o r m a l i z a t i o n a n d 1 1 % w i t h normalization.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“so we used several effective techniques for preventing overfitting”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Response normalization reduces our top-1 and top-5 error rates by 1.4% and 1.2%, respectively.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two-GPU net takes slightly less time to train than the one-GPU net.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.2. Training on multiple GPUs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our network contains a number of new and unusual features which improve its performance and reduce its training time”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without this scheme, our network suffers from substantial overfitting, which would have forced us to use much smaller networks.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, only other types of cat are considered plausible labels for the leopard.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This initialization accelerates the early stages of learning by providing the ReLUs with positive inputs.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 6. DETAILS OF LEARNING
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notice that at the pixel level, the retrieved training images are generally not close in L2 to the query images in the first column.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Training one CNN, with an extra sixth convolutional layer over the last pooling layer, to classify the entire ImageNet Fall 2011 release (15M images, 22K categories), and then”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our top-1 and top-5 error rates on this dataset are 67.4% and 40.9%, attained by the net described above but with an additional, sixth convolutional layer over the last pooling layer.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The Fall 2009 ImageNet split used by the authors, which differs from previous authors' splits, does not affect the results appreciably.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This kind of specialization occurs during every run and is independent of any particular random weight initialization (modulo a renumbering of the GPUs).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The magnitude of the effect demonstrated here varies with network architecture, but networks with ReLUs consistently learn several times faster than equivalents with saturating neurons.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 9. EPILOGUE
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our network achieves top-1 and top-5 test set error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 7. RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Averaging the predictions of five similar CNNs gives an error rate of 16.4%.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the remainder of this paragraph, we use validation and test error rates interchangeably because in our experience they do not differ by more than 0.1% (see Table 2).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notice that even off-center objects, such as the mite in the top-left, can be recognized by the net.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of our experiments suggest that our results can be improved simply by waiting for faster GPUs and bigger datasets to become available.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ReLUs have the desirable property that they do not require input normalization to prevent them from saturating.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) constitute one such class of models.9,15,17,19,21,26,32”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] 9. Fukushima, K. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biol. Cybern. 36, 4 (1980), 193-202. source
- Not checked yetcites [15] 15. Krizhevsky, A. Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10. Unpublished manuscript, 2010.
- Not checked yetcites [17] 17. LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J., Henderson, D., Howard, R., Hubbard, W., Jackel, L., et al. Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagation network. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (1990).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the immense complexity of the object recognition task means that this problem cannot be specified even by a dataset as large as ImageNet, so our model should also have lots of prior knowledge to compensate for all the data we do not have.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, compared to standard feedforward neural networks with similarly sized layers, CNNs have much fewer connections and parameters and so they are easier to train, while their theoretically best performance is likely to be only slightly worse.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“methods that require careful hand-engineering by a programmer who understands the domain do not scale as well as methods that replace the programmer with a powerful general-purpose learning procedure.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Luckily, current GPUs, paired with a highly optimized implementation of 2D convolution, are powerful enough to facilitate the training of interestinglylarge CNNs”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“they also make strong and mostly correct assumptions about the nature of images (namely, stationarity of statistics and locality of pixel dependencies).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the attractive qualities of CNNs, and despite the relative efficiency of their local architecture, they have still been prohibitively expensive to apply in large scale to highresolution images.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“ImageNet, 7 which consists of over 15 million labeled high-resolution images in over 22,000 categories.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [7] 7. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., Fei-Fei, L. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In CVPR09 (2009). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which is considerably better than the previous state-of-the-art”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With enough computation and enough data, learning beats programming for complicated tasks that require the integration of many different, noisy cues.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and recent datasets such as ImageNet contain enough labeled examples to train such models without severe overfitting.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for deep neural networks to shine, they needed far more labeled data and hugely more computation.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If at least some training examples produce a positive input to a ReLU, learning will happen in that neuron.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To learn about thousands of objects from millions of images, we need a model with a large learning capacity.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The constants k, n, α, and β are hyperparameters whose values are determined using a validation set”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, on this dataset the primary concern is preventing overfitting, so the effect they are observing is different from the accelerated ability to fit the training set which we report when using ReLUs.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.1. Rectified Linear Unit nonlinearity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“since then the best published results are 45.7% and 25.7% with an approach that averages the predictions of two classifiers trained on Fisher Vectors (FVs) computed from two types of densely sampled features.29”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 7. RESULTS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] 29. Sánchez, J., Perronnin, F. High- dimensional signature compression for large-scale image classification. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 (2011). IEEE, 1665-1672. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Combining the predictions of many different models is a very successful way to reduce test errors, 1, 3”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but it appears to be too expensive for big neural networks that already take several days to train.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The best published results on this dataset are 78.1% and 60.9%.23”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] 23. Mensink, T., Verbeek, J., Perronnin, F., Csurka, G. Metric learning for large scale image classification: Generalizing to new classes at near-zero cost. In ECCV -European Conference on Computer Vision (Florence, Italy, Oct. 2012). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Objects in realistic settings exhibit considerable variability.
“But objects in realistic settings exhibit considerable variability”
The paper relies on this without support.
Object identity is invariant to changes in the intensity and color of illumination.
“object identity is invariant to changes in the intensity and color of the illumination.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Fall 2009 ImageNet split used by the authors, which differs from previous authors' splits, does not affect the results appreciably.
“Since there is no established test set, our split necessarily differs from the splits used by previous authors, but this does not affect the results appreciably.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the field of DL, the CNN is the most famous and commonly employed algorithm [30, 71–75].”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Fully convolutional neural networks (fCNNs) have provided state-of-the-art performance for object classification and image segmentation (1).”
From Fully automated, real-time 3D ultrasound segmentation to estimate first trimester placental volume using deep learning (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The first wave saw the emergence of deep learning as the dominant paradigm for analyzing high-dimensional biological data.”
From The next paradigm in bioinformatics: a review of multi-agent systems and foundational models for end-to-end scientific discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Krizhevesky et al. [30] first proposed AlexNet and consequently improved the CNN learning ability by increasing its depth and implementing several parameter optimization strategies.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In deep CNN architecture, AlexNet is highly respected [30], as it achieved innovative results in the fields of image recognition and classification.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many CNN models, e.g. AlexNet [30], GoogleNet [103], and ResNet [37], have been trained on large datasets such as ImageNet for image recognition purposes.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To avoid model-specific biases, two different AI models, AlexNet [22] and VGG16 [38], were selected for classification.”
From Study on the Helpfulness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In particular, the choice of this specific size is based on the fact that the AlexNet 34 (and also similar CNN architectures) has been shown to offer satisfactory performances with an input matrix of that size or very similar, albeit for different types of problems with respect to the one presented in this work (e.g., image classification).”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Jung et al. [21] found that a reduction in accuracy does not occur when using only four bits for both weight and activation parameters, even for the ImageNet dataset [32].”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Feature-based approaches [17,18,19] commonly employ networks pre-trained on ImageNet [20] to map original images into a more distinguishable feature space. These methods are typically characterized by low training costs and outstanding performance.”
From An Unsupervised Method for Industrial Image Anomaly Detection with Vision Transformer-Based Autoencoder (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Over the past several years, the successes of deep learning on visual tasks has critically relied on convolutional neural networks [20, 16].”
From Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks? (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A common perception metric is the Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) which uses pre-trained deep neural network backbones such as VGG [9] and AlexNet [22].”
From MTReD: 3D Reconstruction Dataset for Fly-over Videos of Maritime Domain (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Starting with the the success of AlexNet [5] in the ILSVRC challenge [6] in 2012, deep learning models have been outperforming traditional approaches on a number of computer vision problems.”
From Satellite Pose Estimation Challenge: Dataset, Competition Design, and Results (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Unfortunately, it has been acknowledged that the performance of those hashing schemes may degrade significantly if the projected dimensions are imbalanced [4], [6], [13], i.e., their variances vary a lot.”
From Unsupervised Deep Video Hashing via Balanced Code for Large-Scale Video Retrieval (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“When convolutional RBMs are stacked together, they form convolutional deep belief networks [22].”
From Multimodal emotion recognition using deep learning architectures (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), built for spatial data, have demonstrated performance comparable to that of specialists in cancer detection and tumor segmentation [15,16,17,18,19,20].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“When a low-capacity model, such as AlexNet, is used for pre-training, little improvement can be obtained when compared to the Resnet50 family [26].”
From Self-supervised learning: A succinct review (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Since its introduction by Krizhevsky et al. [7] in 2012, the CNN model has been successfully applied to a wide range of multimodal applications, such as image dehazing [239, 240] and human activity recognition [241].”
From A survey on deep multimodal learning for computer vision: advances, trends, applications, and datasets (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“The AlexNet architecture was published in [4], achieved significantly improved performance over the other non-deep learning methods for ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2012.”
From Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: cnn architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Deep CNN architectures with 8, even 22 layers [4], [33], can be useful even for CADe problems where the available training datasets are limited.”
From Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: cnn architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“focusing on AI and deep learning architectures that have already become the de facto approach.”
From AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions (2020) · cites this paper as [101]
In the citing paper
“Since then, fueled by the revolutionary results of AlexNet [101] and incarnations of patch-based adaptations of Deep Boltzmann Machines and stacked autoencoders, deep learning based segmentation of anatomy and pathology has witnessed a revolution (see also Table II), where for some tasks now we observe human level performance [102].”
From AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions (2020) · cites this paper as [101]
In the citing paper
“ReLU significantly increases the rate of con-vergence of stochastic gradient descent in comparison with the sigmoid [26].”
From Real-time system for automatic cold strip surface defect detection (2019) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Real-time volume estimation has been achieved using fully convolutional neural networks (FCNNs) [11] to produce state-of-the-art performance in a range of medical imaging modalities [12].”
From Fully Automated 3-D Ultrasound Segmentation of the Placenta, Amniotic Fluid, and Fetus for Early Pregnancy Assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
“we found that removing any convolutional layer (each of which contains no more than 1% of the model's parameters) resulted in inferior performance.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.5. Overall architecture
“The third convolutional layer has 384 kernels of size 3 × 3 × 256”
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
Krizhevsky, A. (2024) · doi:10.57702/zp44cu3g · Cited by 23,889
Self-citationLearning Internal Representations by Error Propagation
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1985) · doi:10.21236/ada164453 · Cited by 16,501
Self-citation(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Self-citationImproving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382
Self-citationFukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759
LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation
Russell, B. C., Torralba, A., Murphy, K. P., & Freeman, W. T. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0090-8 · Cited by 4,210
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 · Cited by 4,196
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Berg A., 2010, Large scale visual recognition challenge
- Deng J., 2009, CVPR09
- Krizhevsky A., 2009, Department of Computer Science
- Krizhevsky A., 2010, Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10. Unpublished manuscript
- Krizhevsky A., 2011, ESANN
- LeCun Y., 1990, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- LeCun Y., 1985, Une procedure d'apprentissage pour reseau a seuil asymmetrique (a learning scheme for asymmetric threshold networks)
- 10.5555/1896300.1896315 · DOI
- Mensink T., 2012, Italy
- 10.5555/3104322.3104425 · DOI
- Rumelhart D.E., 1985, DTIC Document
- 10.5555/938980.939477 · DOI
- Werbos P., 1974, Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 107,201–107,300 of 108,435
Zero-Shot Coreset Selection via Iterative Subspace Sampling
Griffin, B., Marks, J., & Corso, J. J. (2026) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv61042.2026.00210 · Cited by 5
Zhou, T., Yu, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2026) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2026.141233
Kumar, V. S. P., Koushik, K. I., Pradeep, K., et al. (2026) · doi:10.1109/icmlas67792.2026.11483801
“Lastly, [12] an in-depth 2024 survey highlighted that hybrid, transformer-based, and multi-task learning strategies yield optimal results but have problems with cross-dataset generalization, optimization, and scalability [13].”
Szwarcberg, L., Anwer, A., Gozlan, A., et al. (2026) · Ophthalmic Research · doi:10.1159/000551126
Kumar, D. S., & Bansal, K. L. (2026) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0329106
Research on multi-label clothing image recognition based on deep learning
Liu, C.-X., Zhang, Y., & Yao, L. (2026) · International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology · doi:10.1108/ijcst-05-2025-0085
Siregar, G. U. P., Subekti, A., Rozaq, H. A. A., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems · doi:10.59395/ijadis.v7i1.1400
Hu, H., Ma, R., & Yuan, W. (2026) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2026.3690099
A Study on Fine-Tuned Techniques for Detecting Real and Synthetic Art Images
Oo, S. T., Htwe, A. N., & Aye, N. (2026) · IEEE Conference on Computer Applications (ICCA) · doi:10.1109/icca69280.2026.11485792
“There are around 60 million parameters in the CNN architecture of [26] .”
MART+AWP: A Hybrid Adversarial Training Framework to Reduce Robust Overfitting
Gaur, S., Singh, A. K., Kansal, V., et al. (2025) · International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA) · doi:10.1109/dasa68193.2025.11499127
“As we all can see, deep neural networks have brought significant progress in areas like image recognition, language processing, finance, medical analysis, etc., and with all of this, they drive almost all the technological development of today [1], [2].”
A Hybrid YOLOv5 and Graph-Based Segmentation Framework for Bangladeshi License Plate Recognition
Biswas, O., Islam, M. K., Jahan, F., & Uddin, M. (2025) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit68739.2025.11491746
“A personalised CNN architecture [25] that is capable of performing effectively for usage in the real world was built in order to address these issues.”
Artificial Intelligence-driven Millet Pest Identification through Damage Assessment
Khouma, O., Bakhoum, A. S., & Ndiaye, M. M. (2025) · International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA) · doi:10.1109/dasa68193.2025.11498824
Ghojogh, B., & Ghodsi, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10738-1_4
Abdulghani, A. M., Abdulghani, M. M., Walters, W. L., et al. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22202-2_26
StructFusionNet: Structural Feature Fusion in CNNs for Handwritten
Alzubaidi, L., Alnahdi, A., Ahmed, A., Waheed, N., & Elhassan, A. (2026) · Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing · doi:10.1155/acis/4724541
Ghojogh, B., & Ghodsi, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10738-1_1
Yadav, L., Chandra, G., & Yadav, D. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4831-6_4
Ayoade, O. B., Giweli, N., & Ginige, J. A. (2026) · doi:10.1109/aaiml67890.2026.11498127
Abdulghani, A. M., Abdulghani, M. M., Walters, W. L., et al. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22202-2_39
Abdulghani, A. M., Abdulghani, M. M., Walters, W. L., et al. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22202-2_27
Aslam, M. N., Hussain, J., Mateen, M. H., et al. (2026) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2026.115337
Convolutional Neural Network-Based Wenzhou Lanjiefu Cultural and Creative Design Experimentation
Wang, L., Ghani, D. B. A., & Liu, Z. (2026) · Learning and analytics in intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08195-7_15
Barron Space for Graph Convolutional Neural Networks
Chung, S.-Y., & Sun, Q. (2026) · Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00041-026-10260-4 · Cited by 4
Generative Adversarial Networks for Handwritten Digit Image Synthesis
Jayanthi, J., Kumar, A., Singh, P., et al. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19672-9_32
Federated Split Learning: Distributed Local Training for Low Computational Unit Clients
Rahaman, K. H., Ferdouse, L., & Liu, Y. (2026) · International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AAIML) · doi:10.1109/aaiml67890.2026.11498179
A Medical Vending Machine with an Intelligent Inventory Management
Arthey, A. G., Roy, A. J., Hasan, M. H., et al. (2025) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit68739.2025.11490384
“The analysis of recent CNN-based methods, which include MobileNet transfer learning, demonstrates that these approaches achieve currency recognition accuracy rates between 95 and 98 percent according to the source [12].”
Radar Compound Jamming Recognition Based on Multilabel Classification Network
Guo, S., Zeng, Q., Yan, J., Pin, Z., Sun, Y., & Sheng, W. (2026) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2026.3689641
“This performance can be attributed to its feature extraction [47], Cutout [48], geometric transformations (random cropping and flipping) [55], RandAugment [49], and multiscale resizing [56].”
Real-Time Waste Classification via Image Recognition in a ROS2-Gazebo Simulated Environment
Subrina, R., Mouli, S. J., & Moyeen, S. I. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics, Automation, Artificial-Intelligence and Internet-of-Things (RAAICON) · doi:10.1109/raaicon69033.2025.11502267
“Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have demonstrated excellent results in real-time classification tasks [3], while lightweight models, such as MobileNetV2, enable deployment on mobile and embedded platforms with improved speed and accuracy.”
Cosmo, L. D., Colella, F. E., Łajczak, P., Schifino, E., Cuervo, S. N., Choueiri, J. E., Centini, F. R., Pellicanò, F., Łajczak, A., Mazzapicchi, E., et al. (2026) · Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2026.101562 · Cited by 1
Al-Shalabi, L., & Al-Shalabi, R. (2026) · Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.1155/jece/9298734
Explainable hybrid AlexNet-EfficientViT architecture for accurate gallbladder disease diagnosis
Elbedwehy, S., Alnowaiser, K., Saber, A., et al. (2026) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2026.e03399
Autonomously estimating leaf parameters of sugarbeet plants in real agricultural environments
Marks, E., Bömer, J., Magistri, F., Sodano, M., Mahlein, A., Behley, J., & Stachniss, C. (2026) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2026.111794
Meng, F., Li, X. F., Zhu, X., et al. (2026) · AI Thermal Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.aitf.2026.100039
Angle-adaptive SAR images recognition based on combinatorial knowledge distillation optimization
Zhang, T. (2026) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2026.2663565
“…approach full-dataset generalization performance, while bypassing the need for elaborate manual feature engineering (Szegedy et al. 2016, 2017) that large-scale deep learning otherwise demands (T. Chen et al. 2020; He et al. 2016, 2020; Krizhevsky, Sutskever, and Hinton 2017; Vaswani et al. 2017).”
Deep Learning Patent Validation in Automatic Detection of Faulty PV Modules
Yoga Archana, P., Dhanush Raj, R., & Vadivel, S. (2026) · International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) · doi:10.1109/iciccs67901.2026.11502979
Decoding Molecular Language Model with Beam Search
Obonyo, S., Jouandeau, N., & Owuor, D. O. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-25305-7_18
Fine-Tuning Swin Transformer for Helmet Detection: A Comparative Study with CNNs
Kumar, V., Agrawal, T. L., & Jangid, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-7241-0_11
Evolution of Decision-making Systems in Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Comprehensive Review
Rizehvandi, A. (2025) · Journal of Superintelligence and Computing · doi:10.66967/jsc.2025.v1i102
TVL-Filter: Total Variation Loss–Based Sample Filter for Efficient Adversarial Detection
Zhang, F., Li, Q., Li, Z., Hu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-7084-3_1
A High-Fidelity Facial Expression Representation Framework Using Curated Multi- Dataset LearningPreprint
Verma, H., Kumar, N., & Vyas, P. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9295088/v1
An Efficient Approach to Predict Storm Path in Indian Sub-Continent Using Machine Learning Model
Mallick, S. S., Roy, M., & Datta, S. (2026) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Networks (CINE) · doi:10.1109/cine68769.2026.11502822
“A CNN is a deep learning based architecture widely accepted as a very efficient model for analysing data images for pattern recognition [4][5] .”
Encyclopedia of Transformative Trends
Singh, R., Manoharan, G., & Singh, S. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7345-4.ch002
How artificial intelligence reshapes materials design and its evolutionary path
Qiao, Z., Jiang, R., & Cao, D. (2026) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/csb-2025-5797
Student Behavior Recognition System: A Review
Rawat, K., Rawat, M., Pandey, K., et al. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT) · doi:10.1109/csnt69054.2026.11502255
“Deep CNNs and attention mechanisms require intensive computation and may not be transparent [32-33].”
InfluentialContrastive Self-Supervised Learning for Network-Based Intrusion Detection in IoT Environments
Kumar, C. S. S., Sathyanarayanan, D., Potha, U., Shahid, S., Charitha, M. B., & Reddy, A. J. M. (2026) · International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) · doi:10.1109/iciccs67901.2026.11503004
“The study [9] developed MoCo, a momentum encoder approach for stable contrastive learning in large-scale settings.”
He, G., Feng, L., Liu, F., Sui, C., Liu, S., & Han, X. (2026) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ae6b0f
“The design follows the AlexNet architecture (Krizhevsky et al 2017), adapted for meteorological data.”
Kidney Disease Classification Using Deep and Transfer Learning Models
Kanimozhi, N., B, P., R, R., et al. (2026) · 2026 7th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Networks (CINE) · doi:10.1109/cine68769.2026.11502683
“Transfer learning-based architectures, for instance, EfficientNet, ResNet, and VGG, employ pre-trained feature extractors that lead to very high accuracy even with a relatively small-sized dataset [3].”
Ensemble Transfer Learning Approach for Multi-Class Skin Cancer Classification
Rajib, M. S., & Tonu, M. T. H. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Computer and Information Technology for Health (BECITHCON) · doi:10.1109/becithcon69222.2025.11504273
Zhu, T., Wang, C., Luo, J., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-026-06356-8
Adversarial Detection via Multi‐Channel Feature Redistribution for Subcategory Classification
Zheng, H., Wang, X., Chen, J., Zheng, S., Jin, J., & Ming, Z. (2026) · IET Information Security · doi:10.1049/ise2/7067260
Data-driven classification and shape parameterization of ice crystal habits for aviation meteorology
Zhong, F., Liu, X., Liu, S., Chen, J., Fang, Z., Han, B., & Hou, Y. (2026) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2026.112548
Liu, B., Tang, Q., Xiao, Y., et al. (2026) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2026.110389
Rice Pest Classification Model Based on Improved VovNet
Zhang, Y. B., & Liang, Z. X. (2026) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-6860-4_23
EpigraphAI: A Deep Learning Framework for Ancient Tamil Stone Character Recognition
Ramola, A. E., Nithiyasri, R., Bhavana, K., et al. (2026) · doi:10.1109/icdsaai69492.2026.11505170
Deep Learning and Generative Models for Stress–Strain Prediction of Bio-Inspired Composite MaterialsPreprint
Chavan, A. A. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9467337/v1
CNN-Driven Model for Aerial and Satellite Image Classification and Feature Extraction
Srinidhi, S. R., Lancia, M., & Vinnarasi, F. S. F. (2026) · doi:10.1109/icdsaai69492.2026.11505090
Coarse mask-guided multitask learning for waterline extraction from optical coastal imagery
Kim, J., Chang, S., Kim, T., et al. (2026) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2026.114720
VLMM Model-Based Comprehensive Understanding of Post-Earthquake Images in Civil Infrastructure
Li, S. Y., Gao, J., Li, Y., Jiang, J., Wang, Q.-A., Ma, F., & Zhao, X. (2026) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/jccee5.cpeng-7387
Neuro Symbolic Ai For Context-Aware Decision Making In Real Time Systems
Thakkallapelly, R., Bandla, S. L., Chava, S. C., Rathod, K., Gudelli, V. R., & Sadat, Q. T. (2026) · IEEE International Conference for Convergence in Computing Technology (I3CTCON) · doi:10.1109/i3ctcon68242.2026.11507136
“They are also suitable to process rich representations of real-time sensory data due to their capability of learning such representations out of large-scale data sets [3], [4].”
Herbal RX: Herbal Remedy Extraction and Recommendation Using Deep Learning and Image Processing
Subhakar, S., Harishit, K., Prasad, S. D., et al. (2026) · doi:10.1109/i3ctcon68242.2026.11507221
E3S-Net: an efficient end-to-end 6D pose estimation method for non-cooperative space target
Shen, N., & Wang, J. (2026) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ae6ba8
“They proposed a pose estimation method based on AlexNet [46], classifying images into discrete pose label categories to achieve six degrees of freedom pose output without geometric target information.”
Li, X., Bao, K., Ding, Y., et al. (2026) · Academic Journal of Emerging Technologies · doi:10.63313/ajet.9050
Mamba-HTEPA: A multi-branch structure framework for multimodal grading of meningiomas using Mamba
Zhang, Z., Wen, Y., Liang, W., Zhang, F., Niu, G., & Ma, Q. (2026) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2026.132689
Artificial Intelligence: A Smart Way to Detect and Control Weeds
Seal, D., Pramanik, K., Layek, A., & PATRA, B. C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-0862-2_50-2
Survey on Disaster Management Datasets for Remote Sensing-Based Emergency Applications
Ndigande, A. P., Wiggins, J., & Özer, S. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2026.3692760
“Next, we provide a brief introduction to ML and DL terms.”
Targeted Detection of Unsafe Behavior of Factory Personnel Based on YOLOv5
Liu, L., Liu, L., & Shan, B. (2026) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3316-9_3
Fang, L., Song, X., Yin, W., Huang, Y., Huang, J., Fang, Y., & Su, H. (2026) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-026-01108-7
An improved sparse R-CNN approach for strawberry disease detection
Xu, S. S.-D., Wedajew, G. N., Ku, C.-M., Chiu, C.-C., & Yusuf, S. H. (2026) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2026.106212
A Geospatial Vision-Based Deep Learning (GeoVDL) approach for curbside parking detection
Pardameh, A., & Effati, M. (2026) · Spatial Information Research · doi:10.1007/s41324-026-00685-w
Self-Attention Gated Linear Recurrent Units for Sequential Recommendation
Yang, J., Bi, T., Huang, J., & Li, M. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2026.3679563
MF-VPD: A Vision Perception Diffusion Model Based on Multimodal Feature Fusion
Jia, D., Zhang, H., Zhao, C., & Song, H. (2026) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2026.3692723
Huang, Z., Ren, C., Li, H. L., et al. (2026) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s44443-026-00837-w
Kulhari, A., & Patwa, S. (2026) · International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-026-03337-2
Intelligent white balance based on combined dilated convolution and deployment on smartphones
Huang, C., & Yang, Y. (2026) · Engineering Research Express · doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ae6c95
“First, the input color image is resized to (224, 224, 3).”
Frequency-Aware Domain Generalization
Xiang, X., Ma, J. X., Li, H., & Tran, T. D. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2026.3689419
Whole-to-parts causation mechanism
Ohmura, Y., & Kuniyoshi, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1654139
Omotani, S., Yonemoto, N., Muramoto, A., & Kobayashi, M. (2026) · Pathology International · doi:10.1111/pin.70125
Adaptive transformer-augmented network for multi-type defect detection in ball grid array assemblies
Zhiqiang, 焦. J., Zhang, Y., Wang, M., Qiao, S., & Huang, Z. (2026) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-026-02856-w · Cited by 1
Detection and Mitigation of Replay Attacks in CCTV Systems
Singh, M. P., Suresh, S., Mishra, S. R., et al. (2026) · International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT) · doi:10.1109/icict68280.2026.11511006
“Reinforcement learning was analyzed for defending against a replay attack when a Q-learning method retrofitted to cope with dynamic attack behavior in a Markov Decision Process was used for attack detection [5].”
Xu, Y., Cheng, J., Xu, H., et al. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/ton.2026.3692159
Kapse, D., Mehta, M., Sabale, A., et al. (2026) · 2026 International Conference on Smart Futuristic Technology · doi:10.1109/icsft66733.2026.11507816
Real World Performance Evaluation of AI Hardware: Beyond Standardized Benchmarks
Sinnaiya, C. R. M., Al-Mahri, M. M., Wasim Haidar, S. K., Radhakrishnan, V., Veerasamy, D., & Mohiuddin, A. (2026) · International Conference on Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs68853.2026.11511065
“…the field of deep learning, has currently become a foundational cornerstone of modern computing technology which powers important applications ranging from complicated medical diagnosis to autonomous vehicles and powerful recommendation systems and helpful natural language assistants[1].”
Memari, M., Farzadi, A., Davarzani, H., et al. (2026) · Welding in the World · doi:10.1007/s40194-026-02476-1
Jia, B., Liang, Z., Lin, Y., & Yu, X. (2026) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122964
Dual-Domain Balanced Channel-Spatial Mixed Attention in Convolutional Neural Networks
Zhu, M., Min, W., Han, Q., et al. (2026) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-026-11855-0
Enhanced EEG Classification for Alzheimer’s Disease Using Flattened Power Spectral Density and CNN
Li, Z., Chen, X., Chen, L., Lan, Y., Luo, J., Chen, C., Chen, S., Wei, X., & Yang, D. (2026) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-026-11850-5
Research on Efficient E-Commerce Commodity Classification Using Multi-Scale Feature Fusion CNN
张, 泰. (2026) · E-Commerce Letters · doi:10.12677/ecl.2026.155491
Edge Feature Fusion-Based Salient Object Detection Network
Sun, Y., Ren, X., Jiang, H., et al. (2026) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-6557-3_30
Haruyama, K., Kimura, T., Unno, N., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2026.105768
Xu, J., Liu, W., Tian, R., Wang, C., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs18101577 · Cited by 1
Zhang, N., & Shi, W.-Z. (2026) · 2026 5th Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning (CACML) · doi:10.1109/cacml68972.2026.11506913
Introduction to Secured AIoT and Authentication Challenges
Sharma, B. B., Sharma, R., & Shaheen, M. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6299-1.ch001
From embodied AI to cobodied AI: Foundations and frontiers
Feng, L., Ruijia, P. A. N. G., Qi, B., & Zhao, Q. (2026) · Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware · doi:10.1016/j.vrih.2026.03.001
Seismic impedance inversion based on multi-scale dual-branch semi-supervised learning
Long, S., & Wang, X. (2026) · Journal of Applied Geophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2026.106326 · Cited by 1
UAV-LDFNET: A Lightweight and High-Precision Model for Small Object Detection in Aerial Images
Hu, S., & Jia, Z. (2026) · Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning (CACML) · doi:10.1109/cacml68972.2026.11507114
“Traditional architectures rely on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) [1] for local feature extraction or Transformer [2] for global dependencies.”
Deep-Learning Inversion Maps Arbitrary Design Images to Low-Cost, Efficient Nanofabrication
Zhang, J., Chen, X., Ngo, A. T., Cheng, M., Zhao, Y., Yang, S., Wong, Z., & Ai, B. (2026) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6c06350
Explainability-guided spatiotemporal adaptive differential privacy for graph neural networks
He, C., Xiao, S., 陈恒波, Ding, Y., & 陈恒波 (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.116195
Hybrid deep learning approach for hand gesture recognition in classical dance
Remya, P. K., & Rajkumar, K. K. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01425-7
“Devi et al. [10] analyzed Asamyukta Hastas in Sattriya dance using Bayesian Network, k-NN, Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, and SVM, with Legendre, Zernike [11], and Hu moments, where Legendre moments yield the highest accuracy of 96.03%.”
InfluentialDEGD: Learning a Dual-Encoder Gated Decoder for graph data augmentation
Chowdhury, S. A., Uddin, M. A., & Lee, Y.-K. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.116175
Metadata
- Authors
- Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2017-05-24
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 84-90
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2163605009
- Cited by
- 112,155
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2710 · 2025: 7710 · 2024: 10211 · 2023: 12267 · 2022: 12280 · 2021: 15497 · 2020: 14538 · 2019: 13976 · 2018: 9999 · 2017: 6661
- FWCI
- 5127.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- ImageNet, image classification, deep convolutional neural networks, dropout regularization, overfitting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
