Cited by 61Teaching and Learning ProgrammingIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Factors Influencing Students' Help-Seeking Behavior while Programming with Human and Computer Tutors

Price, Thomas W., Liu, Zhongxiu, Cateté, Veronica, Barnes, Tiffany·2017·Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research

Abstract

When novice students encounter difficulty when learning to program, some can seek help from instructors or teaching assistants. This one-on-one tutoring is highly effective at fostering learning, but busy instructors and large class sizes can make expert help a scarce resource. Increasingly, programming environments attempt to imitate this human support by providing students with hints and feedback. In order to design effective, computer-based help, it is important to understand how and why students seek and avoid help when programming, and how this process differs when the help is provided by a human or a computer. We explore these questions through a qualitative analysis of 15 students' interviews, in which they reflect on solving two programming problems with human and computer help. We discuss implications for help design and present hypotheses on students' help-seeking behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3105726.3106179

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students' desire for independence is a common reason that they avoid help when programming, and overcoming this barrier can be very challenging.

    “Students' desire for independence is a common reason that they avoid help when programming, and overcoming this barrier can be very challenging [15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, T. W., Liu, Z., Cateté, V., & Barnes, T.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-08-14
Pages
127-135
OpenAlex
W2746960282
Cited by
61
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1623470)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
help-seeking, programming education, human tutors, computer tutors, novice programmers, feedback, student interviews

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review