The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating the Impact of Gender on Rank in Resume Search Engines
Open accessAbstract
In this work we investigate gender-based inequalities in the context of resume search engines, which are tools that allow recruiters to proactively search for candidates based on keywords and filters. If these ranking algorithms take demographic features into account (directly or indirectly), they may produce rankings that disadvantage some candidates. We collect search results from Indeed, Monster, and CareerBuilder based on 35 job titles in 20 U. S. cities, resulting in data on 855K job candidates. Using statistical tests, we examine whether these search engines produce rankings that exhibit two types of indirect discrimination: individual and group unfairness. Furthermore, we use controlled experiments to show that these websites do not use inferred gender of candidates as explicit features in their ranking algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Usually, a biased system generates the biased output, and the uncontrolled biases can lead to the uneven distribution of opportunities and resources [58, 78], exacerbating the “ 𝐸𝑐ℎ𝑜 𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 ” or “ 𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑢𝑏𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠 ” effects [86, 87].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Google, Twitter, and Pinterest all provide similar features; these are called Customer Match[7], Tailored Audiences, and Customer Lists[61], respectively.”
From Discrimination through Optimization (2019) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Automated interviews, including the use of speech and facial recognition software, has been shown to perform poorly, particularly with regards to women of colour [15,16].”
From What does it mean to 'solve' the problem of discrimination in hiring?: social, technical and legal perspectives from the UK on automated hiring systems (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques
Järvelin, K., & Kekäläinen, J. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/582415.582418 · Cited by 4,841
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828042002561 · Cited by 4,504
MatchIt : Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v042.i08 · Cited by 4,385
Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2007) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpl013 · Cited by 4,285
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2477899 · Cited by 3,048
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal4230 · Cited by 2,887
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents
Järvelin, K., & Kekäläinen, J. (2017) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/3130348.3130374 · Cited by 1,460
(2013) · Cited by 1,126
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Quoctrung Bui. 2014. The Most Common Jobs For The Rich, Middle Class And Poor. NPR. (October 2014). http://n.pr/2iSViU0.
- CEB 2011. Most Common Job Titles Posted Online. CEB. (August 2011). http://bit.ly/2iSYb9h.
- Steven Greenhouse. 2013. Supreme Court Raises Bar to Prove Job Discrimination. New York Times. (June 2013). http://nyti.ms/2ppuG3w.
- Faisal Kamiran and Toon Calders. 2010. Classification with No Discrimination by Preferential Sampling. In Proc. of Machine Learning Conference of Belgium and The Netherlands.
- Pauline T. Kim. 2017. Data-Driven Discrimination at Work. William & Mary Law Review 58 (2017).
- Thomas Lee. 2017. LinkedIn, HiQ spat presents big questions for freedom, innovation. San Francisco Chronicle. (July 2017). http://www.sfchronicle.com/ business/article/LinkedIn-HiQ-spat-presentsbig-questions-for-11274133.php.
- Gabriel Magno, Camila Souza Araujo, Wagner Meira Jr., and Virgílio A. F. Almeida. 2016. Stereotypes in Search Engine Answers: Local or Global? CoRR abs/1609.05413 (2016). · arXiv
- Devah Pager and Hana Shepherd. 2008. The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual review of sociology 34 (2008), 181.
- Christian Sandvig, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie Karahalios, and Cedric Langbort. 2014. Auditing algorithms: Research methods for detecting discrimination on internet platforms. In Proceedings of "Data and Discrimination: Converting Critical Concerns into Productive Inquiry", a preconference at the 64th Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association.
- Latanya Sweeney. 2013. Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery. (2013). http://ssrn.com/abstract=2208240. · DOI
- 10.5555/1996686.1996731 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-020-00134-w · Cited by 511
Roles for computing in social change
Abebe, R., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J. M., Levy, K. E. C., Raghavan, M., & Robinson, D. G. (2020) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372871 · Cited by 341
Discrimination through Optimization
Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A., & Rieke, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359301 · Cited by 268
“s “black boxes” and observe their reactions to di˛erent inputs. Among most notable results, researchers have shown price discrimination in online retail sites [40], gender discrimination in job sites [15, 41], stereotypical gender roles re-enforced by online translation services [12] and image search [43], disparate p…”
BackgroundMeasuring Misinformation in Video Search Platforms: An Audit Study on YouTube
Hussein, E., Juneja, P., & Mitra, T. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3392854 · Cited by 268
Sánchez-Monedero, J., Dencik, L., & Edwards, L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372849 · Cited by 196
Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Audits
Bandy, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449148 · Cited by 193
Shen, H., DeVos, A., Eslami, M., & Holstein, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479577 · Cited by 171
Building and Auditing Fair Algorithms: A Case Study in Candidate Screening
Wilson, C., Ghosh, A., Jiang, S., Mislove, A., Baker, L., Szary, J., Trindel, K., & Polli, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445928 · Cited by 133
Self-citationKroll, J. A. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0084 · Cited by 132
Laine, J., Minkkinen, M., & Mäntymäki, M. (2024) · Information Manager (The) · doi:10.1016/j.im.2024.103969 · Cited by 122
Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?
Miceli, M., Posada, J., & Yang, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3492853 · Cited by 125
Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: A Multidisciplinary Survey
Fabris, A., Baranowska, N., Dennis, M. J., Graus, D., Hacker, P., Saldivar, J., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., & Biega, A. J. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3696457 · Cited by 117
Bujold, A., Roberge‐Maltais, I., Parent‐Rocheleau, X., Boasen, J., Sénécal, S., & Léger, P. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00325-1 · Cited by 229
Discrimination through Optimization: How Facebook's Ad Delivery Can Lead to Biased OutcomesPreprint
Ali, M., Sapieżyński, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A. E., & Rieke, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 116
Toward creating a fairer ranking in search engine results
Gao, R., & Shah, C. S. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102138 · Cited by 114
DeVos, A., Dhabalia, A., Shen, H., Holstein, K., & Eslami, M. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517441 · Cited by 98
Quantifying the Impact of User Attentionon Fair Group Representation in Ranked Lists
Sapiezynski, P., Zeng, W., E Robertson, R., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2019) · Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3308560.3317595 · Cited by 92
Self-citationArtificial Intelligence (AI) in Islamic Ethics: Towards Pluralist Ethical Benchmarking for AI
Elmahjub, E. (2023) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-023-00668-x · Cited by 200
Women (Still) Ask For Less: Gender Differences in Hourly Rate in an Online Labor Marketplace
Foong, E., Vincent, N., Hecht, B., & Gerber, E. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274322 · Cited by 80
Toward Pareto Efficient Fairness-Utility Trade-off in Recommendation through Reinforcement Learning
Ge, Y., Zhao, X., Yu, L., Paul, S., Hu, D. J., Hsieh, C.-C., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3488560.3498487 · Cited by 77
Lam, M. S., Gordon, M., Metaxa, D., Hancock, J. T., Landay, J. A., & Bernstein, M. S. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555625 · Cited by 95
Auto-essentialization: Gender in automated facial analysis as extended colonial project
Scheuerman, M. K., Pape, M., & Hanna, A. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211053712 · Cited by 75
Keyes, O., Hutson, J. A., & Durbin, M. (2019) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3290607.3310433 · Cited by 85
Discrimination through optimization: How Facebook's ad delivery can lead to skewed outcomes
Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A., & Rieke, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.02095 · Cited by 72
Scientism as illusio in HR algorithms: Towards a framework for algorithmic hygiene for bias proofing
Vassilopoulou, J., Kyriakidou, O., Özbilgin, M. F., & Groutsis, D. G. (2022) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12430 · Cited by 81
Rekabsaz, N., Kopeinik, S., & Schedl, M. (2021) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3404835.3462949 · Cited by 79
Auditing Race and Gender Discrimination in Online Housing Markets
Asplund, J., Eslami, M., Sundaram, H., Sandvig, C., & Karahalios, K. G. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7276 · Cited by 66
Do neural ranking models intensify gender bias?
Rekabsaz, N., & Schedl, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3397271.3401280 · Cited by 64
Interplay between upsampling and regularization for provider fairness in recommender systems
Boratto, L., Fenu, G., & Marras, M. (2021) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-021-09294-8 · Cited by 69
Predicting employee attrition using tree-based models
El-Rayes, N., Fang, M., Smith, M. R., & Taylor, S. M. (2020) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-10-2019-1903 · Cited by 59
Explainable Fairness in Recommendation
Ge, Y., Tan, J., Zhu, Y., Xia, Y., Luo, J., Liu, S., Fu, Z., Geng, S., Li, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3477495.3531973 · Cited by 55
Metaxa, D., Gan, M. A., Goh, S., Hancock, J. T., & Landay, J. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449100 · Cited by 65
Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Systems—A Fish-eye View
Orphanou, K., Otterbacher, J., Kleanthous, S., Batsuren, K., Giunchiglia, F., Bogina, V., Tal, A. S., Hartman, A., & Kuflik, T. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3527152 · Cited by 58
Gender stereotype reinforcement: Measuring the gender bias conveyed by ranking algorithms
Fabris, A., Purpura, A., Silvello, G., & Susto, G. A. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102377 · Cited by 63
Chaloner, K., & Maldonado, A. (2019) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3804 · Cited by 52
Andrus, M., & Villeneuve, S. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533226 · Cited by 59
Rank aggregation algorithms for fair consensus
Kuhlman, C., & Rundensteiner, E. A. (2020) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3407790.3407855 · Cited by 56
Auditing E-Commerce Platforms for Algorithmically Curated Vaccine Misinformation
Juneja, P., & Mitra, T. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445250 · Cited by 48
Examining the Use of Online Platforms for Employment: A Survey of U.S. Job Seekers
Dillahunt, T. R., Israni, A., Lu, A. J., Cai, M., & Hsiao, J. C.-Y. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445350 · Cited by 64
People versus machines: introducing the HIRE framework
Will, P., Krpan, D., & Lordan, G. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-022-10193-6 · Cited by 64
The Silicon Ceiling: Auditing GPT’s Race and Gender Biases in Hiring
Armstrong, L., Liu, A., MacNeil, S., & Metaxa, D. (2024) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3689904.3694699 · Cited by 78
What You See Is What You Get? The Impact of Representation Criteria on Human Bias in Hiring
Peng, A., Nushi, B., Kıcıman, E., Inkpen, K. M., Suri, S., & Kamar, E. S. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v7i1.5281 · Cited by 44
Evaluation metrics for measuring bias in search engine results
Gezi̇ci, G., Lipani, A., Saygın, Y., & Yılmaz, E. (2021) · Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/s10791-020-09386-w · Cited by 45
Who's Learning? Using Demographics in EDM Research
Paquette, L., Ocumpaugh, J. L., Li, Z., Andres, A., & Baker, R. S. (2020) · Journal of Educational Data Mining · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4143611 · Cited by 48
Fairness-aware Federated Matrix Factorization
Liu, S., Ge, Y., Xu, S., Zhang, Y., & Marian, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3523227.3546771 · Cited by 43
Bias Misperceived:The Role of Partisanship and Misinformation in YouTube Comment Moderation
Jiang, S., Robertson, R. E., & Wilson, C. (2019) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3229 · Cited by 45
Self-citationEvaluating the Promise of Human-Algorithm Collaborations in Everyday Work Practices
Wolf, C., & Blomberg, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359245 · Cited by 48
Sociotechnical Audits: Broadening the Algorithm Auditing Lens to Investigate Targeted Advertising
Lam, M. S., Pandit, A., Kalicki, C. H., Gupta, R., Sahoo, P., & Metaxa, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610209 · Cited by 44
Hou, T.-Y., Tseng, Y.-C., & Yuan, C. W. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102775 · Cited by 43
Lazovich, T., Belli, L., Gonzales, A., Bower, A., Tantipongpipat, U. T., Lum, K., Huszár, F., & Chowdhury, R. (2022) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2022.100568 · Cited by 46
AI Hiring with LLMs: A Context-Aware and Explainable Multi-Agent Framework for Resume Screening
Lo, F. P.-W., Qiu, J., Wang, Z., Yu, H., Chen, Y., Zhang, G., & Lo, B. P. L. (2025) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw67362.2025.00402 · Cited by 37
Sánchez‐Monedero, J., Dencik, L., & Edwards, L. (2019) · Goldsmiths (University of London) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.06144 · Cited by 37
The Gendered Geography of Contributions to OpenStreetMap
Das, M., Hecht, B. J., & Gergle, D. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300793 · Cited by 34
An external stability audit framework to test the validity of personality prediction in AI hiring
Rhea, A. K., Markey, K., D’Arinzo, L., Schellmann, H., Sloane, M., Squires, P., Khan, F. A., & Stoyanovich, J. (2022) · Data mining and knowledge discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-022-00861-0 · Cited by 41
Understanding Decision-Making in Recruitment
Koivunen, S., Olsson, T., Olshannikova, E., & Lindberg, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3361123 · Cited by 49
When Fair Ranking Meets Uncertain Inference
Ghosh, A., Dutt, R., & Wilson, C. (2021) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3404835.3462850 · Cited by 33
Self-citationCounterfactual Explanation for Fairness in Recommendation
Wang, X., Li, Q., Yu, D., Li, Q., & Xu, G. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3643670 · Cited by 32
Gao, R., & Shah, C. S. (2019) · ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR) · doi:10.1145/3341981.3344215 · Cited by 29
Algorithms that "Don't See Color"
Sapieżyński, P., Ghosh, A., Kaplan, L., Rieke, A., & Mislove, A. E. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534135 · Cited by 34
Trautwein, Y., Zechiel, F., Coussement, K., Meire, M., & Büttgen, M. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115298 · Cited by 31
Hanley, H. W. A., Kumar, D., & Durumeric, Z. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610043 · Cited by 36
Kumar, D., Grosz, T., Rekabsaz, N., Greif, E., & Schedl, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2023.1245198 · Cited by 29
Lu, A. J., Marcu, G. M., Ackerman, M. S., & Dillahunt, T. R. (2021) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3461778.3462084 · Cited by 30
Grep-BiasIR: A dataset for investigating gender representation bias in information retrieval results
Krieg, K., Parada-Cabaleiro, E., Medicus, G., Lesota, O., Schedl, M., & Rekabsaz, N. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3576840.3578295 · Cited by 31
Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?Preprint
Miceli, M., Posada, J., & Yang, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.08131 · Cited by 25
Chua, P. K., & Mazmanian, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3415214 · Cited by 24
Lu, A. J., & Dillahunt, T. R. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445774 · Cited by 24
Investigating Societal Biases in a Poetry Composition SystemPreprint
Sheng, E., & Uthus, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.02686 · Cited by 26
Gender equity in hiring: examining the effectiveness of a personality-based algorithm
Kubiak, E., Efremova, M. I., Baron, S., & Frasca, K. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219865 · Cited by 27
Rajadesingan, A., Mahalingam, R., & Jurgens, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3239 · Cited by 28
Zerveas, G., Rekabsaz, N., Cohen, D., & Eickhoff, C. (2022) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3477495.3531891 · Cited by 22
Urman, A., & Makhortykh, M. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221099536 · Cited by 21
Farkas, A., & Németh, R. (2021) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100239 · Cited by 20
Products of Positionality: How Tech Workers Shape Identity Concepts in Computer Vision
Scheuerman, M. K., & Brubaker, J. R. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3641890 · Cited by 23
Algorithmic gender bias: investigating perceptions of discrimination in automated decision-making
Kim, S., Oh, P., & Lee, J. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2306484 · Cited by 23
Amin, A. A., Hassan, S., Lee, S., & Huenerfauth, M. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517681 · Cited by 17
Wang, H., Wu, H., Zhu, H., Miao, Y., Wang, Q., Qiao, S., Zhao, H., Chen, C., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture12060813 · Cited by 17
Do Perceived Gender Biases in Retrieval Results Affect Relevance Judgements?
Krieg, K., Parada‐Cabaleiro, E., Schedl, M., & Rekabsaz, N. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09316-6_10 · Cited by 19
Rhea, A. K., Markey, K., D’Arinzo, L., Schellmann, H., Sloane, M., Squires, P., & Stoyanovich, J. (2022) · AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534189 · Cited by 19
Augmenting diversity in hiring decisions with artificial intelligence tools
Wilkens, U., Lutzeyer, I., Zheng, C. S.-M., Beşer, A., & Prilla, M. (2025) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2025.2492867 · Cited by 21
Escher, N., & Banović, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3392874 · Cited by 16
Lu, A. J., Gilhool, A., Hsiao, J. C.-Y., & Dillahunt, T. R. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555113 · Cited by 18
Job Recommender Systems: A ReviewPreprint
de Ruijt, C., & Bhulai, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.13576 · Cited by 59
Das, D., Guha, S., Brubaker, J. R., & Semaan, B. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642669 · Cited by 27
Kim, S. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103387 · Cited by 22
Unmasking Nationality Bias: A Study of Human Perception of Nationalities in AI-Generated Articles
Venkit, P. N., Gautam, S., Panchanadikar, R., Huang, T.-H., & Wilson, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3600211.3604667 · Cited by 21
Hilbert, M., Thakur, A., Flores, P. M., Zhang, X., Bhan, J. Y., Bernhard, P., & Ji, F. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102743 · Cited by 20
Epstein, R., & Ji, L. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0300727 · Cited by 13
A Normative Framework for Assessing the Information Curation Algorithms of the Internet
Lazer, D. M. J., Swire‐Thompson, B., & Wilson, C. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231186779 · Cited by 16
Self-citationDetection of Groups with Biased Representation in Ranking
Li, J., Moskovitch, Y., & Jagadish, H. V. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde55515.2023.00168 · Cited by 13
A Comparative Analysis of Web Search Query: Informational Vs. Navigational Queries
Yusuf, N., Yunus, M. A. M., & Wahid, N. (2019) · International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.18517/ijaseit.9.1.7578 · Cited by 10
Wijnhoven, F., & van Haren, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2021.622106 · Cited by 10
Quantifying the Impact of User Attention on Fair Group Representation in Ranked ListsPreprint
Sapieżyński, P., Zeng, W., Robertson, R. E., Mislove, A. E., & Wilson, C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.10437 · Cited by 10
Self-citationChua, P. K., & Mazmanian, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555565 · Cited by 9
Interacting with Masculinities: A Scoping Review
Seaborn, K. (2023) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3544549.3585770 · Cited by 9
Cherubini, M., Lu, A. J., Hsiao, J. C.-Y., Zhao, M., Aggarwal, A., & Dillahunt, T. R. (2021) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3461778.3462049 · Cited by 9
Decisional guidance for detecting discriminatory data analytics recommendations
Ebrahimi, S., & Hassanein, K. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103520 · Cited by 12
Facing the Forecaster’s Dilemma: Reflexivity in Ocean System Forecasting
Record, N. R., & Pershing, A. J. (2021) · Oceans · doi:10.3390/oceans2040042 · Cited by 9
Predictive Uncertainty-based Bias Mitigation in Ranking
Heuss, M., Cohen, D., Mansoury, M., de Rijke, M., & Eickhoff, C. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3583780.3615011 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, L., Ma, R., Hannák, A., & Wilson, C.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern University (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Central European University - Budapest Campus (HU)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-04-21
- Pages
- 1-14
- OpenAlex
- W2796402109
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 30.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NSF (IIS-1408345, IIS-1553088)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Keywords
- gender discrimination, job search engines, algorithmic fairness, indirect discrimination, candidate ranking, gender inference, Indeed, monsters, recruitment bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
