Cited by 54Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Learning Tasks for Multitask Learning: Heterogenous Patient Populations in the ICU

Suresh, Harini, Gong, Jen J., Guttag, John V.·2018·Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining

Abstract

Machine learning approaches have been effective in predicting adverse outcomes in different clinical settings. These models are often developed and evaluated on datasets with heterogeneous patient populations. However, good predictive performance on the aggregate population does not imply good performance for specific groups. In this work, we present a two-step framework to 1) learn relevant patient subgroups, and 2) predict an outcome for separate patient populations in a multi-task framework, where each population is a separate task. We demonstrate how to discover relevant groups in an unsupervised way with a sequence-to-sequence autoencoder. We show that using these groups in a multi-task framework leads to better predictive performance of in-hospital mortality both across groups and overall. We also highlight the need for more granular evaluation of performance when dealing with heterogeneous populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3219819.3219930

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For outcomes that happen in hospital, such as inpatient mortality, length-of-stay, and intervention prediction, observation windows at hour level are developed.

    “On the contrary, for those outcomes that happen in hospital, such as inpatient mortality [14,57,61,65], length-of-stay [14,83], and intervention prediction [32,55,65], observation windows at hour level are developed.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suresh, H., Gong, J. J., & Guttag, J. V.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-07-19
Pages
802-810
OpenAlex
W4289257494
Cited by
54
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wistron Corporation
  • National Institutes of Health (P50DC015446)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
multi-task learning, patient subgroups, subgroup discovery, sequence-to-sequence autoencoder, unsupervised learning, in-hospital mortality prediction, heterogeneous patient populations, clinical outcome prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review