The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The seven tools of causal inference, with reflections on machine learning
Open accessAbstract
The kind of causal inference seen in natural human thought can be "algorithmitized" to help produce human-level machine intelligence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Causal reasoning is foundational to human intelligence, and has been conjectured to be necessary for achieving human level AI (Pearl, 2019).”
From Robust agents learn causal world models (2024) · cites this paper as Pearl, 2019
In the citing paper
“ML can play a role in causal inference [41,340,619], including in the context of policy problems [40,453] and in climate-relevant scenarios such as estimating the effects of temperature on human mortality [356] and the effects of World Bank projects on vegetative cover [883].”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [619]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
(1988) · Cited by 16,582
Self-citationAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25
Zhang, Y., Sutton, C. A., Storkey, A., & Zoubin Ghahramani, A. (2012) · Cited by 12,653
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
Self-citationCAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,826
Self-citationCausation, Prediction, and Search
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2001) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1754.001.0001 · Cited by 4,521
Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1494a · Cited by 2,968
Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction
Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3050 · Cited by 2,817
Causal diagrams for empirical research
PEARL, J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.669 · Cited by 2,355 · cited 2×
“…engine is available, called do - calculus , which predicts the effect of policy interventions whenever feasible, and exits with failure whenever predictions cannot be ascertained with the specified assumptions [Bareinboim and Pearl 2012; Pearl 1995; Shpitser and Pearl 2008; Tian and Pearl 2002].”
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Balke A., 1994, Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Seattle, WA, July 31-Aug. 4)
- 10.5555/3086758 · DOI
- Jaber A., 2018, Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
- Morgan S.L., 2015, Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research (Analytical Methods for Social Research)
- Pearl J., 1988, Morgan Kaufmann
- 10.5555/3202377 · DOI
- Porta M., 2014, Oct. 17
- 10.5555/1248547.1248619 · DOI
- Tian J., 2002, Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Edmonton, AB, Canada, July 28-Aug. 1). AAAI Press/MIT Press
- 10.5555/3171642.3171832 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 659
Intelligence without Representation: A Historical Perspective
Jordanous, A. (2020) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems8030031 · Cited by 13
Ding, X., Hao, D., Zhang, Y., Liao, K., Li, Z., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.43 · Cited by 10
“However, deep learning systems’ lack of understanding of causal relations is perhaps the biggest roadblock to giving them human-level intelligence (Pearl, 2019).”
BackgroundInterventional Sum-Product Networks: Causal Inference with Tractable Probabilistic ModelsPreprint
Zečević, M., Dhami, D. S., Karanam, A., Natarajan, S., & Kristian Kersting, B. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.10440 · Cited by 11
“Pearl [2019] defined a three-level causal hierarchy that separates association (purely statistical level 1) from intervention (level 2) and counterfactuals (level 3), and argued that the latter two levels involve causal inference. iSPNs are a modelling scheme for arbitrary interventional…”
BackgroundRaita, Y., Camargo, C. A., Liang, L., & Hasegawa, K. (2021) · Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1080/17476348.2021.1913061 · Cited by 11
“This can be estimated experimentally using a randomized controlled trials (RCT) and analytically using a causal Bayesian network [1].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe use, misuse and opportunities for structural equation modelling ( SEM ) in wildlife ecology
Mendes, C. P., & Luskin, M. S. (2025) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.70189 · Cited by 10
6G-BRICKS: Building Reusable Testbed Infrastructures for Cloud-to-Device Breakthrough Technologies
Ramantas, K., Bikos, A. N., Nitzold, W. P., Pollin, S., Ksentini, A., Mayrargue, S., Theodorou, V., Christofi, L., Gardikis, G., Rahman, M. A., et al. (2023) · IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) · doi:10.1109/gcwkshps58843.2023.10465223 · Cited by 10
Thekdi, S., Tatar, U., Santos, J. R., & Chatterjee, S. (2024) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.17640 · Cited by 10
“The most notable work is that of Pearl (2019), who identifies a three-layer hierarchy of causality: (1) Association, (2) Intervention, and (3) Counterfactual.”
Liu, K., & Altman, R. B. (2025) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-103123-094844 · Cited by 13
“However, generating counterfactuals is challenging, as it relies on several strong assumptions and requires a causal model of the data (145).”
Simulating water lateral inflow and its contribution to spatial variations of rainfed wheat yields
Tenreiro, T. R., Jeřábek, J., Gómez, J. A., Zumr, D., Martínez, G., García‐Vila, M., & Fereres, E. (2022) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2022.126515 · Cited by 9
Do-calculus enables estimation of causal effects in partially observed biomolecular pathways
Mohammad-Taheri, S., Zucker, J., Hoyt, C. T., Sachs, K., Tewari, V., Ness, R. O., & Vitek, O. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac251 · Cited by 11
“Unfortunately, these approaches derive a separate statistical estimand for each causal query anew (Pearl, 2019).”
Kautz, E. J., Schreiber, D. K., Devaraj, A., & Gwalani, B. (2021) · Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101148 · Cited by 10
A Critical Look at the Consistency of Causal Estimation With Deep Latent Variable ModelsPreprint
Rissanen, S., & Marttinen, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.06648 · Cited by 10
“On the one hand, causal inference promises to provide traditional machine learning and AI with methods for explainability, domain adaptation, and causal reasoning capabilities in general [Pearl, 2019].”
BackgroundCausal Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Review and Open ProblemsPreprint
Grimbly, S. J., Shock, J. P., & Pretorius, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.06721 · Cited by 29
“Pearl’s ladder of causation encapsulates the limitations of different systems of reasoning by separating them into three distinct classes (Pearl and Mackenzie, 2018; Pearl, 2019).”
BackgroundLiu, Q., Chen, Z.-R., & Wong, W. H. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.2322376121 · Cited by 16
Causality from bottom to top: a survey
Weinberg, A. I., Premebida, C., & Faria, D. R. (2025) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-025-06855-5 · Cited by 17
“The ability to answer what-if questions about interventions is critical for decision support [2].”
Zhou, X., Liang, W., Yada, K., Yang, L. T., Yan, Z., Li, K., & Jin, Q. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2026.3673867 · Cited by 9
“…interpretation with more reliable predictions, while reducing the impact of confounding factors, which is one of the major issues a ff ecting the e ff ect of existing machine learning algorithms in real-life application development in terms of interpretability with heterogeneous big data [9], [10].”
A Comprehensive Framework for Learning Declarative Action Models
Aineto, D., Jiménez, S., & Onaindía, E. (2022) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.13073 · Cited by 9
“Last but not least, an important motivation for learning declarative action models is their application in deliberative tasks that compute explanations and counterfactuals (Pearl, 2019).”
BackgroundCausal Reasoning of Entities and Events in Procedural Texts
Zhang, L., Xu, H., Yang, Y., Zhou, S., You, W., Arora, M., & Callison-Burch, C. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.31 · Cited by 14
Jia, J., Ma, S., Liu, Y., Wang, L., & Deng, R. H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3318936 · Cited by 9
“It is known from the causality theory [51] that for each variable X in the SCM, when the causal mechanism X = F X ( P A ( X ), ψ X ) holds, there exists a single directed link from the parent variable P A ( X ) to X , where ψ X denotes the exogenous noise of X .”
BackgroundA Unified Knowledge Model for Managing Smart City/IoT Platform Entities for Multitenant Scenarios
Bellini, P., Bologna, D., Nesi, P., & Pantaleo, G. (2024) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities7050092 · Cited by 9
Fuel Prediction and Reduction in Public Transportation by Sensor Monitoring and Bayesian Networks
Delussu, F., Imran, F., Mattia, C., & Meo, R. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21144733 · Cited by 9
“We employed Bayesian networks (BN) as an essential tool that is able to provide descriptive and explainable models of the relationships between the monitored variables, and dependence relations that might also represent the cause–effect relationships [16].”
MethodDeep learning in multiagent systems
Esterle, L. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-32-385787-1.00022-1 · Cited by 9
Cyclic Boosting - An Explainable Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm
Wick, F., Kerzel, U., & Feindt, M. (2019) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla.2019.00067 · Cited by 9
Ergonomics for indoor air environments: Problems, reflections and investigations
Mo, J., Cao, B., Liu, N., Sun, Z., Xu, Y., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/tb-2022-0019 · Cited by 10
Kalinin, S. V., Dyck, O., Ghosh, A., Liu, Y., Proksch, R. B., Sumpter, B. G., & Ziatdinov, M. A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.09196 · Cited by 14
Learning from learning machines: a new generation of AI technology to meet the needs of sciencePreprint
Pion-Tonachini, L., Bouchard, K. E., Martín, H. G., Peisert, S., Holtz, W. B., Aswani, A. J., Dwivedi, D., Wainwright, H. M., Pilania, G., Nachman, B. P., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.13786 · Cited by 14
“While there are important differences between recently popular AI methods and traditional statistical methods, popular AI learning machines share far more in common with traditional statistical models than with first-principles models from domain science [88, 123].”
MethodSchunck, F., Kodritsch, B., Krauss, M. K. V., Busch, W., & Focks, A. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.4c06267 · Cited by 8
Wang, J., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Wang, H., Lin, J., Xu, C., & Hua, S. (2025) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.137666 · Cited by 8
Cognitive Identity Management: Risks, Trust and Decisions using Heterogeneous Sources
Yanushkevich, S. N., Howells, W. G. J., Crockett, K. A., O’Shea, J. D., Oliveira, H. C. R., Guest, R., & Shmerko, V. P. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI) · doi:10.1109/cogmi48466.2019.00014 · Cited by 8
“How to model security screening in conditions when the role of intelligent supporting tools becomes critical [56], [58]; We accept Haykin’s concept of cognitive dynamical systems [25], and developed a multi-state cognitive identity management process; How to measure risks and trust in the cognitive identity management…”
BackgroundInfluence network model uncovers relations between biological processes and mutational signatures
Amgalan, B., Wójtowicz, D., Kim, Y.-A., & Przytycka, T. M. (2023) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-023-01162-x · Cited by 7
Kalinin, S. V., Dyck, O., Ghosh, A., Liu, Y., Sumpter, B. G., & Ziatdinov, M. A. (2023) · APL Machine Learning · doi:10.1063/5.0147316 · Cited by 8
Decision support: using machine learning through MATLAB to analyze environmental data
Nadler, D. W. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-019-00558-9 · Cited by 9
“Machine learning can assist any environmental researcher with a number of practical tools, including adaptability, recovery from missing data, confounding control, and causal discovery through regression learning (Pearl 2019).”
BackgroundThe evolution of demographic methods
Li, T., & Xie, Y. (2022) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102768 · Cited by 9
Machine Reasoning ExplainabilityPreprint
Čyras, K., Badrinath, R., Mohalik, S. K., Mujumdar, A. P., Nikou, A., Previti, A., Sundararajan, V., & Feljan, A. V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.cp.2026.62 · Cited by 19
Explainability and causality for robust, fair, and trustworthy artificial reasoning
Rawal, A., Raglin, A. J., Sadler, B. M., & Rawat, D. B. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications · doi:10.1117/12.2666085 · Cited by 6
“9 Association is the first level of the hierarchy which represents the statistical correlations within the data.”
BackgroundSelf-Explanation as a Basis for Self-Integration - The Autonomous Passenger Ferry Scenario
Al-Falouji, G., Haschke, L., Nowotka, D., & Tomforde, S. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing and Self-Organizing Systems Companion (ACSOS-C) · doi:10.1109/acsos-c58168.2023.00038 · Cited by 9
“One approach is from the perspective of causal inference (CI), which is based on the work of Lewis[21] and Pearl[22].”
BackgroundUnderstanding with Toy Surrogate Models in Machine Learning
Páez, A. (2024) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-024-09700-1 · Cited by 12
A self-supervised deep learning model for enhanced generalization in soil moisture prediction
Wang, L., Shi, L., Reimers, C., Wang, Y., He, L., Wang, Y., Reichstein, M., & Jiang, S. (2025) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133974 · Cited by 13
Kafyra, M., Kalafati, I. P., Bruins, S., Episkopou, C., Gryspeerdt, D., Heggie, L., Kaltenbrunner, S., Kampshoff, S., Karaglani, E., Prändl, H. Ö., et al. (2026) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.70083 · Cited by 7
“This methodological sophistication allows for counterfactual predictions—estimating outcomes of hypothetical interventions—which is critical for tailoring lifestyle recommendations effectively [36].”
Pedagogy for Doctoral Seminars in Design Science Research
Hevner, A. R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84655-8_12 · Cited by 7
Deep Structural Causal Shape Models
Rasal, R., Castro, D. C., Pawlowski, N., & Glocker, B. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25075-0_28 · Cited by 11
Igoche, B. I., Matthew, O., Bednár, P., & GEGOV, A. E. (2024) · Journal of Computing Theories and Applications · doi:10.62411/jcta.10501 · Cited by 7
“It provides a mathematical and graphical framework for expressing causal hypotheses and identifies important variables used mostly in making causal inferences based on observational or experimental data [77] – [80].”
BackgroundJaradat, S., Nayak, R., & Elhenawy, M. M. Z. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Computing and Machine Intelligence (ICMI) · doi:10.1109/icmi60790.2024.10586184 · Cited by 6
“In contrast, the latter does not require any previous assumptions [11].”
BackgroundZhang, Y. T., Pan, R., Zhu, X., Fang, K., & Wang, H. (2024) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2024.2407465 · Cited by 7
“The third topic is machine learning, with a growing body of literature at the intersection of causal inference and machine learning (Pearl 2019; Cui and Athey 2022; Huber 2023).”
Improving Reinforcement Learning-Based Autonomous Agents with Causal Models
Briglia, G., Lippi, M., Mariani, S., & Zambonelli, F. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-77367-9_20 · Cited by 7
Toward Self-Aware Machines: Insights of Causal Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence
Pelivani, E., & Çiço, B. (2021) · International Conference on Information Technologies (InfoTech) · doi:10.1109/infotech52438.2021.9548511 · Cited by 8
Finding Causally Different Tests for an Industrial Control System
POSKITT, C. M., Chen, Y., Sun, J., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00215 · Cited by 7
Causal program dependence analysis
Lee, S., Binkley, D., FELDT, R. H., Gold, N., & Yoo, S. (2024) · Science of Computer Programming · doi:10.1016/j.scico.2024.103208 · Cited by 9
Cognitive Identity Management: Synthetic Data, Risk and Trust
Yanushkevich, S. N., Stoica, A., Shmerko, P., Howells, W. G. J., Crockett, K. A., & Guest, R. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn48605.2020.9207385 · Cited by 7
“enabling these operations is known as probabilistic inference called machine reasoning [36], [37].”
BackgroundStrategic Instrumental Variable Regression: Recovering Causal Relationships From Strategic ResponsesPreprint
Harris, K., Ngo, D., Stapleton, L., Heidari, H., & Wu, Z. S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.05762 · Cited by 9
“The above challenges have led to renewed calls on the ML community to strengthen their understanding of the connections between ML and causality (Pearl, 2019; Schölkopf, 2019).”
BackgroundWhat would have happened? Counterfactuals, hypotheticals, and causal judgmentsPreprint
Gerstenberg, T. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rsb46 · Cited by 7
Combating Alert Fatigue in the Security Operations CentrePreprint
Kearney, P., Abdelsamea, M. M., Schmoor, X., Shah, F., & Vickers, I. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4633965 · Cited by 7
VITA, R. D., Carlsson, L. S., & Samuelsson, P. (2024) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr12071414 · Cited by 6
Kolkman, D., Lee, G. K., & van Witteloostuijn, A. C. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309318 · Cited by 6
“The cycle builds on the methodologies that are advocated by Judea Pearl [19] and Herbert Simon [20], both being pioneers of artificial intelligence.”
Machine learning meets governance: AI innovation decodes corporate violations
Song, F., Huang, Y., & Liu, C. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104539 · Cited by 6
Rule guided transformers for dynamic knowledge adaptation in rotating machinery fault diagnosis
Hogea, E., Onchiş, D. M., Yan, R., & Zhou, Z. (2026) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2026.104444 · Cited by 6
Introduction to the Special Section on Advances in Causal Discovery and Inference
Li, J., Zhang, K., Kıcıman, E., & Cui, P. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3359995 · Cited by 6
“More importantly, the principles and insights of causal inference help to solve several challenging machine-learning problems, such as model explainability, transfer learning, domain adaptation, and lifelong learning [1].”
BackgroundFGGA-lnc: automatic gene ontology annotation of lncRNA sequences based on secondary structures
Spetale, F. E., Murillo, J. D., Villanova, G. V., Bulacio, P., & Tapia, E. (2021) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2020.0064 · Cited by 6
“Computationally, correlation is not causation, and this main principle of artificial intelligence [36] holds especially when predicting the functionality of lncRNAs: the local regulation of genes mediated by lncRNAs need not be direct but could be hidden in the act of their transcription or due to the presence of near…”
BackgroundCavique, L. (2023) · Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-9591-9.ch001 · Cited by 6
CAR-DESPOT: Causally-Informed Online POMDP Planning for Robots in Confounded Environments
Cannizzaro, R., & Kunze, L. (2023) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros55552.2023.10342223 · Cited by 6
“While research into causality in robotics is still nascent, it has been proposed to hold great potential benefits such as addressing machine learning domain transfer issues by providing artificial agents an understanding of cause and effect [14].”
BackgroundZhang, X., Long, X., Liu, Y., Zhou, K., & Li, J. (2024) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14347 · Cited by 6
“As pointed out by Pearl (2019), causal inference, as a hallmark of human intelligence, offers a nuanced and formal means to describe human perception in comprehending the world.”
Genome-Wide Causation Studies of Complex Diseases
Jiao, R., Chen, X., Boerwinkle, E., & Xiong, M. (2022) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2021.0676 · Cited by 6
“Although we infer causation from observation data, our concept of causation is derived from intervention (Pearl 2019).”
Evaluating Neural Model Robustness for Machine Comprehension
Wu, W. M. C., Arendt, D., & Volkova, S. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.210 · Cited by 6
“…more entrenched in our lives, AI models need to be held to higher standards including but not limited to accountability (e.g. Wang et al., 2018, 2019, GENIE 10 ), fairness (e.g. Saleiro et al., 2018; Bellamy et al., 2018; Bird et al., 2020; Ahn and Lin, 2020, 11 ; 12 ; 13 ), and transparency…”
BackgroundMethodVolkova, S., Arendt, D., Saldanha, E., Glenski, M., Ayton, E., Cottam, J. A., Aksoy, S. G., Jefferson, B. A., & Shrivaram, K. (2021) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/s10588-021-09351-y · Cited by 10
“The ability to learn causal relationships from observational data is considered a significant component of human-level intelligence and can serve as one of the foundations of artificial intelligence (AI) (Bengio 2019; Chollet 2020; Pearl 2019; Lake et al. 2017).”
BackgroundMultistakeholder Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Different Theories
Chen, V. Z., Zhong, M., Durán, P., & Sauerwald, S. (2022) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503221110181 · Cited by 6
“We suggest management researchers not only import ML methods but also strengthen the use of causal inference in ML (Pearl, 2019; Schölkopf, 2019).”
MethodHu, M., Li, X., Li, M., Zhu, R., & Si, B. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e25060892 · Cited by 6
Multi-agent Learning of Causal Networks in the Internet of Things
Mariani, S., Roseti, P., & Zambonelli, F. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37616-0_14 · Cited by 6
Causal Intervention for Mitigating Name Bias in Machine Reading Comprehension
Zhu, J., Wu, S., Zhang, X., Hou, Y., & Feng, Z. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.812 · Cited by 6
“It not only is a framework for interpreting data, but also provides causal modeling tools and solutions to achieve intended goals by estimating causal effect (Pearl, 2019).”
BackgroundModeling confidence in causal judgments.
O’Neill, K. J., Henne, P., Pearson, J., & Brigard, F. D. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001615 · Cited by 6
Hake, P., Rehse, J.-R., & Fettke, P. (2021) · Journal on Data Semantics · doi:10.1007/s13740-021-00124-z · Cited by 7
Complex Causal Extraction of Fusion of Entity Location Sensing and Graph Attention Networks
Chen, Y., Wan, W., Hu, J., Wang, Y., & Huang, B. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13080364 · Cited by 6
Nishioka, M., Inoue, H., Ota, T., & Mizoue, N. (2023) · Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1080/13416979.2023.2227820 · Cited by 6
“…the outcome (i.e. shallow landslide susceptibility) and the variable (i.e. land cover), they cannot adequately evaluate the impact on the outcome when the variable is changed (Hernán et al. 2019; Pearl 2019; Liu et al. 2021), because the influence of confounding factors cannot be eliminated.”
BackgroundSystematic Human Learning and Generalization From a Brief Tutorial With Explanatory Feedback
Nam, A., & McClelland, J. L. (2024) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00123 · Cited by 12
“Based in part on the findings from our experiments as well as work by others (Ahn et al., 1992; Chi et al., 1989; Lombrozo, 2006; Pearl, 2019; Rumelhart, 1980), we believe that one important part of helping models make better use of their context will be to find more human-like ways to encourage…”
ResultSchwartz, M. H., Kainz, H., & Georgiadis, A. G. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.03.04.21252476 · Cited by 6
“An RCT is the gold standard for measuring causal effects, but it is not the only means for obtaining an causal estimate (12).”
BackgroundHoogeveen, S., Haaf, J. M., Bulbulia, J. A., Ross, R. M., McKay, R., Altay, S., Bendixen, T., Berniûnas, R., Cheshin, A., Gentili, C., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/sf8ez · Cited by 6
Quantifying Causal Pathways of Teleconnections
Kretschmer, M. (2022) · EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-8246 · Cited by 9
Robust agents learn causal world models
Richens, J., & Everitt, T. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.10877 · Cited by 5
“Causal reasoning is foundational to human intelligence, and has been conjectured to be necessary for achieving human level AI (Pearl, 2019).”
BackgroundFrom Econometrics to Machine Learning: Transforming Empirical Asset Pricing
Shi, C. (2025) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.70002 · Cited by 10
Xu, T. N., Bai, J., Gong, X., Lei, R., & Yan, Y. J. (2025) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2025.114164 · Cited by 5
A comparison of causal discovery and explainable AI (XAI) for image datasets
Rawal, A., Raglin, A. J., Wang, Q., & Tang, Z. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications · doi:10.1117/12.3013193 · Cited by 7
What-If XAI Framework (WiXAI): From Counterfactuals towards Causal Understanding
Kshetry, N., & Kantardzic, M. M. (2024) · Journal of Computer and Communications · doi:10.4236/jcc.2024.126011 · Cited by 5
Understanding Requirements for Technology-Supported Healthy Aging
Wei, Z., Liu, Y., Liu, L., Yu, E. S. K., Mylopoulos, J., & Chang, C. K. (2020) · doi:10.1109/rewbah51211.2020.00017 · Cited by 5
Reproducibility, Transparency and Evaluation of Machine Learning in Health Applications
Wojtusiak, J. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC) · doi:10.5220/0010348306850692 · Cited by 5
“This approach is often done in the context of graphical models such as Bayesian or Gaussian Networks, and builds upon long research of Judea Pearl (i.e., Pearl, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodEvent Mining for Explanatory Modeling
Jalali, L., & Jain, R. (2021) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3462257 · Cited by 5
Lee, G. K., & Bettis, R. (2022) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2022.0169 · Cited by 5
Causality fields in nonlinear causal effect analysis
Wang, A., Liu, L., Yang, J., & Li, L. (2022) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.2200165 · Cited by 5
“…the observational distribution, SCE is more intuitive for machine learning researchers who are more accus‐ tomed to thinking while considering estimating func‐ tions rather than probability distributions (Pearl, 2019). where f i denotes a function and U i represents an exog‐ enous variable.”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Mich, L. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48652-5_25 · Cited by 5
Gagl, B., & Gregorová, K. (2024) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-024-00237-7 · Cited by 5
“Fromamoregeneral neuro-cognitiveperspective,thisdeducingtechniqueoftransparentpre-dictionsisawaytoinvestigatethecausalrelevanceofproposedbrain functionsforbehavior 45 .”
Machine learning and forensic risk assessment: new frontiers
Spivak, B., & Shepherd, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology · doi:10.1080/14789949.2020.1779783 · Cited by 5
“Human theorising is a sensible and arguably necessary element to identify causal structure (Pearl, 2018; Spirtes, 2010), but machine learning procedures such as constraint based, score based and hybrid algorithms (Koller & Friedman, 2009) can be a useful supplementary method to assist in…”
MethodAccurate Attribution and Seasonal Prediction of Climatic Anomalies Using Causal Inference Theory
He, S., Yang, S., & Chen, D. (2022) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-22-0033.1 · Cited by 5
Predictive World Models from Real-World Partial Observations
Karlsson, R., Carballo, A., Fujii, K., Ohtani, K., & Takeda, K. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Mobility, Operations, Services and Technologies (MOST) · doi:10.1109/most57249.2023.00024 · Cited by 6
“and perform counterfactual reasoning [3]–[5] through causal”
Perspektiven einer evidenzbasierten und personalisierten Psychotherapie
Lutz, W., Clausen, S. A., & Deisenhofer, A. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie · doi:10.1026/1616-3443/a000518 · Cited by 6
Wu, J., & Fang, D. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41560-0_14 · Cited by 5
de Freitas, E., & Truman, S. E. (2020) · Rhizomes Cultural Studies in Emerging Knowledge · doi:10.20415/rhiz/036.e02 · Cited by 5
An empirical study of Linespots: A novel past‐fault algorithm
Scholz, M., & Torkar, R. (2021) · Software Testing Verification and Reliability · doi:10.1002/stvr.1787 · Cited by 5
“Based on the work of Pearl [37,38], we started by building a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to represent the causal relationships of our measured variables, as shown in Figure 2.”
MethodNeto, E. C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
Neto, E. C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.09466 · Cited by 5
Towards a theory of out-of-distribution learningPreprint
Geisa, A., Mehta, R., Helm, H. S., Dey, J. K., Eaton, E., Priebe, C. E., & Vogelstein, J. T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
That was close! A counterfactual simulation model of causal judgments about decisionsPreprint
Wu, S. A., Sridhar, S., & Gerstenberg, T. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7uwhf · Cited by 6
Counterfactuals in explainable artificial intelligence: Theory, algorithms, and applications
Chou, Y.-L. (. (2024) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.248281 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearl, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pearl, Judea
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2019-02-21
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 54-60
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2917286209
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 78 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 24
- FWCI
- 35.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1704932, 1302448, 1527490)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (#W911NF-16-057)
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Office of Naval Research (N00014-17-S-B001, N00014)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Keywords
- causal inference, causal discovery, causal discovery algorithms, machine learning, philosophy of causation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review