The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The seven tools of causal inference, with reflections on machine learning
Open accessAbstract
The kind of causal inference seen in natural human thought can be "algorithmitized" to help produce human-level machine intelligence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Causal reasoning is foundational to human intelligence, and has been conjectured to be necessary for achieving human level AI (Pearl, 2019).”
From Robust agents learn causal world models (2024) · cites this paper as Pearl, 2019
In the citing paper
“ML can play a role in causal inference [41,340,619], including in the context of policy problems [40,453] and in climate-relevant scenarios such as estimating the effects of temperature on human mortality [356] and the effects of World Bank projects on vegetative cover [883].”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [619]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
(1988) · Cited by 16,582
Self-citationAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25
Zhang, Y., Sutton, C. A., Storkey, A., & Zoubin Ghahramani, A. (2012) · Cited by 12,653
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
Self-citationCAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,826
Self-citationCausation, Prediction, and Search
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2001) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1754.001.0001 · Cited by 4,521
Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1494a · Cited by 2,968
Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction
Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3050 · Cited by 2,817
Causal diagrams for empirical research
PEARL, J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.669 · Cited by 2,355 · cited 2×
“…engine is available, called do - calculus , which predicts the effect of policy interventions whenever feasible, and exits with failure whenever predictions cannot be ascertained with the specified assumptions [Bareinboim and Pearl 2012; Pearl 1995; Shpitser and Pearl 2008; Tian and Pearl 2002].”
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Balke A., 1994, Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Seattle, WA, July 31-Aug. 4)
- 10.5555/3086758 · DOI
- Jaber A., 2018, Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
- Morgan S.L., 2015, Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research (Analytical Methods for Social Research)
- Pearl J., 1988, Morgan Kaufmann
- 10.5555/3202377 · DOI
- Porta M., 2014, Oct. 17
- 10.5555/1248547.1248619 · DOI
- Tian J., 2002, Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Edmonton, AB, Canada, July 28-Aug. 1). AAAI Press/MIT Press
- 10.5555/3171642.3171832 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 659
Gupta, G., & Chaudhuri, N. (2025) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-025-10646-7 · Cited by 4
A Knowledge-Augmented Multistage Reasoning Approach for Wind Turbine Fault Cause Analysis
Hu, Y., Wen, P., & Dai, Y. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2026.3658534 · Cited by 4
“Our abstraction is grounded in the three classic causal graphical structures of chain, fork, and collider [30].”
Causal Inference: A Tale of Three Frameworks
Wang, L., Richardson, T. S., & Robins, J. M. (2026) · Journal of Data Science · doi:10.6339/25-jds1211 · Cited by 6
Machine learning and theory-ladenness: a phenomenological account
Termine, A., Ratti, E., & Facchini, A. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05454-8 · Cited by 4
“…to make models more robust and increase their generalisability in so-called out-33 of-distribution samples, i.e., samples whose data have a distribution that differs significatively from the distribution of the training sample (see, e.g., Pearl 2019, Schölkopf et al. 2021, Kaddour et al. 2022).”
A causal representation learning based model for time series prediction under external interference
Feng, X., Fan, D., Jiang, S., Zhang, J., Guo, B., Ding, X., Hu, D., & Jiang, Y. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.120270 · Cited by 4
Predictive Analytics and AI-Driven Strategies for Enhanced Cash Flow Forecasting
Mehra, S., Aggarwal, S., & Mitra, P. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66329-1_21 · Cited by 5
Causal representation learning through higher-level information extraction
Silva, F., Oliveira, H. P., & Pereira, T. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3696412 · Cited by 5
“…representations would allow reaching the top of Pearl’s causality ladder, the counterfactual thinking: answering to questions as what if I had acted differently? requires intervening on the acquired knowledge symbolically, which may be something similar to modeling imagination [ 170 , 205 , 207 ].”
Petrophysical prediction of oil reservoirs using explainable artificial intelligence
Li, S., Wei, Z., Yang, Y., Zhang, J., & Cheng, Y. (2025) · Geophysics · doi:10.1190/geo2024-0271.1 · Cited by 4
Biomimicry as a decision-making methodology in condition monitoring
Dhungana, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1485489 · Cited by 4
“It draws upon scientific thinking, legal and moral reasoning (Pearl, 2019).”
Zeng, D., Legaspi, R., Sun, Y., Dong, X., Ikeda, K., Spirtes, P., & Zhang, K. (2025) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3699682.3728318 · Cited by 4
Gačnik, M. B., Škraba, A., Pažek, K., & Rozman, Č. (2025) · Beverages · doi:10.3390/beverages11040116 · Cited by 4
Shen, Z., Hong, A., & Chen, A. (2021) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2021.101283 · Cited by 4
Das Internet of Production als Fundament der Datenverwertung in der Produktion
Becker, M., Brockmann, M., Niemietz, P., Trauth, D., Bergs, T., & Brecher, C. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-62915-4_15 · Cited by 4
Artificial cognitive systems: the next generation of the digital twin. An opinion.
Jones, D. (2021) · Digital Twin · doi:10.12688/digitaltwin.17440.2 · Cited by 4
Lifelong Learning and Personalization in Long-Term Human-Robot Interaction (LEAP-HRI)
Irfan, B., Ramachandran, A., Staffa, M., & Güneş, H. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3568294.3579956 · Cited by 4
Shuryak, I. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Radioactivity · doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107205 · Cited by 4
Singh, S. S. K., Sinha, A. K., Pandey, T. N., & Acharya, B. M. (2023) · International Conference on Ambient Intelligence in Health Care (ICAIHC) · doi:10.1109/icaihc59020.2023.10431473 · Cited by 4
“While a supervised machine learning algorithm might be able to minimize the margin of error for a prediction, it also leads to a fallacy – that is, the act of making a decision to improve a certain aspect may change the environment on which the predictions were based upon [2].”
BackgroundCOIN: Counterfactual Inpainting for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation for Medical Images
Shvetsov, D., Ariva, J., Domnich, M., Vicente, R., & Fishman, D. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63800-8_3 · Cited by 4
“Originating from the fields of cognitive science [6], psychology [20], and causality research [28], counterfactual explanations have been explored as a way to understand AI’s decision-making processes.”
BackgroundCommonsense for AI: an interventional approach to explainability and personalization
Farahmand, F. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02107-7 · Cited by 4
“( Pearl 2019) I argue that such three-level hierarchy is beneficial to AI research and education, as it corresponds to Turing proposal to classify a cognitive system in terms of queries it can answer.”
Huang, P.-H., Li, J.-L., Chen, C.-P., Chang, M., & Chen, W.-C. (2025) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00597 · Cited by 7
“We regard the unrevealed relation between hallucinatory and non-hallucinatory words using conditional probability P ( O h | O n ) [28].”
Coincidence judgment in causal reasoning: How coincidental is this?
Johansen, M. K., & Osman, M. (2020) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101290 · Cited by 4
“The specification of how people normatively oughtto engage in causal reasoning is going to be strongly informed by how they actually do causal reasoning given the prior success of science (Pearl, 2019).”
BackgroundApplying PC Algorithm and GES to Three Clinical Data Sets: Heart Disease, Diabetes, and Hepatitis
Afrianto, N., Azzani, Y., Sa'adati, Y., Tou, N., Endraswari, P. M., Nur, Y. S. R., Annisa, N., Widyanara, R. N., & Rahmadi, R. (2021) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1077/1/012067 · Cited by 4
“Despite the accuracy of such classification models, the conducted learning process results in trained model parameters which are numerous and difficult to explain [4].”
BackgroundMethodContinuing to Advance Epidemiology
Kurth, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Epidemiology · doi:10.3389/fepid.2021.782374 · Cited by 4
“The increasing availability of data alone will not help improve population health if we only observe them without interpreting the underlying reality (10).”
BackgroundXin, Y., Tagasovska, N., Pérez‐Cruz, F., & Raubal, M. (2022) · ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (SIGSPATIAL GIS) · doi:10.1145/3557915.3561473 · Cited by 8
“, association, intervention, and counterfactual, machine learning methods are limited to the association level of the causal hierarchy [27], since they rely purely on asso-”
BackgroundCentrality of AI Quality in MLOPs Lifecycle and Its Impact on the Adoption of AI/ML Solutions
Akkineni, A., Koohborfardhaghighi, S., & Singh, S. K. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35510-3_42 · Cited by 4
Analisis Pengendalian Kualitas Pada Tempe Menggunakan Metode Seven Tools Dan FMEA
Falah, A., Arief, K., & Riginianto, R. S. (2023) · Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Industri Terapan · doi:10.55826/tmit.v2i3.264 · Cited by 4
Evaluating Explanation Methods of Multivariate Time Series Classification through Causal Lenses
Vareille, E., Abbas, A., Linardi, M., & Christophides, V. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa60987.2023.10302482 · Cited by 4
“In our work, we also consider causal explanations [22] in terms of cause-effect relationships among MTS variables.”
BackgroundImplications of Minimum Description Length for Adversarial Attack in Natural Language Processing
Tiwari, K., & Zhang, L. (2024) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e26050354 · Cited by 4
“The integration of causal graphs in activities such as causal representation, inference, and reasoning is pervasive [37].”
BackgroundA Causal Look at Statistical Definitions of Discrimination
Neto, E. C. (2020) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3394486.3403130 · Cited by 4
“These approaches, nonetheless, operate at the intervention or counterfactual levels (layers 2 and 3) of Pearl’s ladder of causality “taxonomy" [16, 17].”
BackgroundMerging Naive Bayes and Causal Rules for Text Sentiment Analysis
Luo, Y., Yang, X., Ouyang, C., Wan, Y., & He, S. (2021) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1757/1/012034 · Cited by 5
Lai, K., Yanushkevich, S. N., & Shmerko, V. P. (2021) · The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology · doi:10.1177/15485129211028659 · Cited by 4
Learning Temporal Causal Sequence Relationships from Real-Time Time-Series
da Costa, A. A. B., & Dasgupta, P. (2021) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.12395 · Cited by 5
“Methods for learning causal relationships from data have been studied extensively and its importance is well established (Pearl, 1995, 2000; Pearl et al., 2009; Evans & Grefenstette, 2018; Guo et al., 2018; Pearl, 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialDecision Support for Infection Outbreak Analysis: the case of the Diamond Princess cruise ship
Oliveira, H. C. R., Shmerko, V. P., & Yanushkevich, S. N. (2021) · IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · doi:10.1109/ssci50451.2021.9660140 · Cited by 4
Papantonis, I., & Belle, V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.10905 · Cited by 4
“Broadly speaking [24], the motivation stems from extending the query and reasoning capabilities over probabilistic domains.”
BackgroundSchockaert, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.02171 · Cited by 4
“In [21], J. Pearl is presenting a three-level causal hierarchy aiming at answering questions such as ‘What is?’”
BackgroundExplainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for healthcare decision-making
Zeng, Z. (2022) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/155849 · Cited by 4
Neuro-Symbolic AI for Autonomous Urban Decision-Making: A Framework for Resilient Smart Cities
Gupta, S., & Vanteru, K. (2025) · International Conference on Computing Technologies (ICOCT) · doi:10.1109/icoct64433.2025.11118762 · Cited by 4
Causality-Aware Predictions in Static Anticausal Machine Learning Tasks
Neto, E. C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3202151 · Cited by 3
“C AUSAL modeling has been recognized as a potential solution to many challenging problems in machine learning (ML) [30], [37].”
BackgroundCausal Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Ma, H., Pu, Z., Pan, Y., Liu, B., Gao, J., & Guo, Z. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191654 · Cited by 3
“The causal inference has already been exploited for communication pruning [21], solving credit assignment problem [7], [22], demonstrating the potential of causal inference in reinforcement learning [23]–[25].”
BackgroundWhy and how to construct an epistemic justification of machine learning?
Špelda, P., & Střítecký, V. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04702-z · Cited by 4
“For perspectives on this kind of generalization learning from the causal inference point of view, one may refer to Kilbertus et al. (2018), Pearl (2019) or Schölkopf et al. (2021).”
Nguyen, M.-Q., Tsuta, M., & Kokawa, M. (2024) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2024.105313 · Cited by 3
A causal framework for stochastic local search optimization algorithms
Franzin, A., & Stützle, T. (2025) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2025.107050 · Cited by 3
König, A. L., Boßow-Thies, S., & Krol, B. (2025) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.019 · Cited by 3
Is the Energy Quota Trading Policy a Solution to the Decarbonization of Energy Consumption in China?
Li, M., Zhong, B., & Guo, B. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17146644 · Cited by 3
CausalChat: Interactive Causal Model Development and Refinement Using Large Language Models
Zhang, Y., Kota, A., Papenhausen, E., & Mueller, K. D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2025.3602448 · Cited by 3
“Both have limitations: data-driven methods struggle with unobserved confounders, biases, and overfitting [3], while text-based methods face challenges like language ambiguity, lack of domain expertise, and difficulty distinguishing causation from correlation [4].”
Artificial Intelligence for Medical Decisions
Buchard, A., & Richens, J. G. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64573-1_28 · Cited by 3
Algorithmically-guided postharvest protocols by experimental combinatorial optimization
Shir, O. M., Yazmir, B., Israeli, A., & Gamrasni, D. (2022) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion (GECCO Companion) · doi:10.1145/3520304.3533976 · Cited by 3
“In particular, we foresee the formulation of scientific hypotheses as the possible next leap-frog of AI, capitalizing on established knowledge representation frameworks [15], and machine-driven causal inference [29].”
Sensitivity Analysis of Stroke Predictors Using Structural Equation Modeling and Bayesian Networks
Oliveira, H. C. R., Yanushkevich, S. N., & Almekhlafi, M. (2022) · IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) · doi:10.1109/cibcb55180.2022.9863028 · Cited by 3
“A BN is a probabilistic graphical model in the form of a direct acyclic graph [8], [19], where the variables (nodes) involved are connected by a single direction arrow which might indicate a causal (cause → effect) relationship among them [18], [19].”
BackgroundThe Internet of Production as the Foundation of Data Utilization in Production
Becker, M., Brockmann, M., Niemietz, P., Trauth, D., Bergs, T., & Brecher, C. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-66509-1_15 · Cited by 3
Prior and Posterior Checking of Implicit Causal Assumptions
Linero, A. R. (2023) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.13886 · Cited by 3
“…learning side, this has been motivated by the realization that strong predictive accuracy is not always sufficient to make informed decisions (Pearl, 2019); on the causal inference side, this interest has been motivated by the understanding that estimating causal effects requires the…”
BackgroundRawal, A., McCoy, J., Raglin, A. J., & Rawat, D. B. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35891-3_17 · Cited by 3
Structural Causal Model Design and Causal Impact Analysis: A Case of SENSE-EGRA Dataset
Ayem, G. T., Thandekkattu, S. G., Nsang, A. S., & Fonkam, M. M. (2023) · Algorithms for intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3485-0_4 · Cited by 3
Inference and Denoise: Causal Inference-Based Neural Speech Enhancement
Hsieh, T.-A., Yang, C.-H. H., Chen, P., Siniscalchi, S. M., & Tsao, Y. (2023) · Machine learning for signal processing ... · doi:10.1109/mlsp55844.2023.10285967 · Cited by 3
Assessing systematic weaknesses of DNNs using counterfactuals
Gannamaneni, S. S., Möck, M., & Akila, M. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00407-0 · Cited by 3
“Our method instead uses a statistical formulation of counterfactuals [33] as for unstructured data creating new “what if” scenarios is (computationally) too expensive, even when using simulators, to afford a meaningful analysis over many data points.”
The timeless relevance of libraries in the age of artificial intelligence: A review
Halburgi, S., & Mukarambi, P. (2024) · IP Indian Journal of Library Science and Information Technology · doi:10.18231/j.ijlsit.2023.014 · Cited by 3
Counterfactual and Causal Analysis for AI-Based Modulation and Coding Scheme Selection
Hao, K., Moysen, J., & Özger, M. (2023) · IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) · doi:10.1109/gcwkshps58843.2023.10464475 · Cited by 3
“Judea Pearl proposed a 3-level hierarchy of causality [1], consisting of 1) Association, 2) Intervention, and 3) Counter-factual.”
BackgroundMulti-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) with Causal Reasoning for AI/ML Applications – A Survey
Rawal, A., Rawal, J. C., & Raglin, A. J. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60611-3_30 · Cited by 3
van Lissa, C. V., Clapper, E.-B., & Kuiper, R. (2024) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1765 · Cited by 4
A New Perspective on AI Safety Through Control Theory Methodologies
Ullrich, L., Zimmer, W. M. X., Greer, R., Graichen, K., Knoll, A., & Trivedi, M. M. (2025) · IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/ojits.2025.3585274 · Cited by 5
“Moreover, technological initiatives such as explainable [170], [171], [172] or causal AI [173], [174] are emerging and offer advantages in terms of verifiability.”
Merging Intelligent API Responses Using a Proportional Representation Approach
Ohtake, T., Cummaudo, A., Abdelrazek, M., Vasa, R., & Grundy, J. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19274-7_28 · Cited by 3
Moulay, M., Leiva, R. A. G., Maroni, P. J. R., Diez, F., Mancuso, V., & Anta, A. F. (2022) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2022.05.013 · Cited by 5
Audit of Computational Intelligence Techniques for EDI-aware Systems
Abid, N., Shmerko, V. P., & Yanushkevich, S. N. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892638 · Cited by 3
“We found that criteria that were developed by Pearl [41] primarily for causal (Bayesian) networks, are useful for other purposes such as EDI modeling scenario differentiation, taxonomical view on EDI computational techniques, and computational roadmapping (Fig.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOptimizing WSNs for CPS Using Machine Learning Techniques
Çifçi, M. A. (2020) · Advances in systems analysis, software engineering, and high performance computing book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-5101-1.ch010 · Cited by 3
Artificial cognitive systems: the next generation of the digital twin. An opinion.
Jones, D. (2021) · Digital Twin · doi:10.12688/digitaltwin.17440.1 · Cited by 3
“Pearl’s causal inference 10 states that traditional statistics approaches, and by extension their implementations within machine learning algorithms, can only ever detect correlation.”
BackgroundEvaluating Neural Machine Comprehension Model Robustness to Noisy Inputs and Adversarial AttacksPreprint
Wu, W. M. C., Arendt, D., & Volkova, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.00190 · Cited by 3
“We plan to experiment with more aggressive and more natural perturbations, and deeper counterfactual evaluation (Pearl, 2019).”
MethodAn Interpretable Probabilistic Approach for Demystifying Black-box Predictive ModelsPreprint
Moreira, C., Chou, Y.-L., Velmurugan, M., Ouyang, C., Sindhgatta, R., & Bruza, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.10668 · Cited by 3
“And Level 3, Counterfactuals, involve constructing a theory of the world that explains why certain actions have specific effects and what happens is the absence of such actions [22].”
BackgroundExploiting non-i.i.d. data towards more robust machine learning algorithmsPreprint
Casteels, W., & Hellinckx, P. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.03429 · Cited by 1
“[6, 7, 12, 14–16]).”
Omnidirectional Transfer for Quasilinear Lifelong LearningPreprint
Dey, J. K., Vogelstein, J. T., Helm, H. S., LeVine, W., Mehta, R., Geisa, A., van de Ven, G. M., Chang, E., Gao, C., Yang, W., et al. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-831408/v1 · Cited by 3
“Pearl [19] introduced the transfer benefit ratio, which builds directly off relative efficiency from classical statistics [22].”
BackgroundTheory and Practice of Algorithm EngineeringPreprint
Mendling, J., Depaire, B., & Leopold, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.10675 · Cited by 12
“The key challenge is, however, that data do not uniquely identify the mechanisms by which they were generated [Pearl 2019].”
BackgroundA workflow for causal inference in cross-cultural psychologyPreprint
Bulbulia, J. A. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/tcrfu · Cited by 3
Empirical Assessment of Normalized Information Flow for Quantifying Causal ContributionsPreprint
Cheng, C.-H., & Redfern, S. A. T. (2022) · doi:10.5194/gmd-2022-106 · Cited by 3
Knowledge Trap in Augmented Intelligence: Human Experts' Overfocus on Details Hurts Task PerformancePreprint
Wang, W., Liu, X., Zhang, X., & Hong, Y. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4395858 · Cited by 3
Towards AI Research Agents in the Chemical SciencesPreprint
Shir, O. M. (2024) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-lf2xx · Cited by 3
Rosenstock, T. S., & Yet, B. (2024) · BMJ Paediatrics Open · doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2023-001983 · Cited by 3
“22 Bayesian networks (BNs) by comparison offer an opportunity to build holistic causal models, based on the current understanding of the complex factors determining child stunting and their inter-relationship.”
BackgroundShuryak, I., Liu, Z., Wang, E., Ullrich, R. L., & Brenner, D. J. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.04.30.24306639 · Cited by 3
Nomological Deductive Reasoning for Trustworthy, Human-Readable, and Actionable AI Outputs
Hakizimana, G., & Ledezma Espino, A. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18060306 · Cited by 2
“Several scholars have advocated integrating causal explanation theories, particularly Judea Pearl’s framework of causal inference [127], which models relationships using Bayesian networks [128] and supports counterfactual reasoning through directed acyclic graphs (DAGs).”
Causal Economic Machine Learning (CEML): “Human AI”
Horton, A. (2024) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai5040094 · Cited by 3
Human-Centered AI (Also) for Humanistic Management
Facchini, A., & Mangili, F. (2024) · Humanism in business series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67155-5_11 · Cited by 5
Igoche, B. I., Matthew, O., & Olabanji, D. (2025) · Knowledge · doi:10.3390/knowledge5030015 · Cited by 2
“The SCM framework provides a mathematical foundation for representing causal relationships between variables in complex systems [17,18].”
Causal Machine Learning Approaches for Modelling Data Center Heat Recovery: A Physical Testbed Study
Gonzalez, D. Z., Meyer, M., & Müller, O. (2025) · ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics Review · doi:10.1145/3757892.3757893 · Cited by 2
Cannizzaro, R., Groom, M., Routley, J., Ness, R., & Kunze, L. (2025) · European Conference on Mobile Robots · doi:10.1109/ecmr65884.2025.11163313 · Cited by 2
“Causality has gained increased attention as a foundation for trustworthy robot autonomy [5], [6], addressing key limitations of machine learning such as domain transfer and lack of interpretability or accountability [7], [8].”
Dattijo, A., & Jo, S. (2025) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-025-00439-x · Cited by 3
“This includes developing systems capable of causal inference, which advances beyond pattern matching to understand cause-and-effect relationships in complex environments [36].”
Liu, Y., Shen, Z., Yang, H., Liu, W., & Yang, X. (2026) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs18020358 · Cited by 2
Empirical evidence of direct and indirect relations between environmental pressure and conflict
Kopacheva, E., Bravo, G., & Natalini, D. (2026) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.1080/14678802.2026.2625718 · Cited by 2
Mapping the landscape of AI-empowered psychology: a topic modeling-based bibliometric analysis
Jia, S., Zhang, Y., & Wang, F. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-026-11543-4 · Cited by 2
“This shift toward purely predictive approaches risks transforming psychological science into what Pearl ( 2019 ) calls a “data-centric” enterprise, where researchers become primarily occupied with fitting complex functions to observed patterns rather than understanding the generative mechanisms…”
From black-box to clinical reasoning: CARE-MD a novel framework for Self-eXplainable skin lesions
Kandpal, K. C., & Verma, P. (2026) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2026.109478 · Cited by 2
Bridging Perception, Memory, and Inference through Semantic Relations
Björklund, J., Lindström, A. D., & Drewes, F. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.719 · Cited by 3
Digital Finance—The Future of Financial Planning in Companies
Kögel, H., Spindler, M., & Wasserbacher, H. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40232-7_18 · Cited by 2
The Role of Big Data in Sustainable Solutions
Igoche, B. I., & Ayem, G. T. (2024) · Advances in business information systems and analytics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-5498-8.ch007 · Cited by 3
Algorithmic models through a representational lens
Kolkman, D., & van Maanen, G. (2024) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2024.2398046 · Cited by 2
“For an introduction to causal inference see Pearl (2019).”
Igoche, B. I., Matthew, O., Bednár, P., & GEGOV, A. E. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/is61756.2024.10705239 · Cited by 2
“Pearl [11] introduced the concept of Structural Causal Models (SCMs), a formal framework for representing and reasoning about causal relationships.”
BackgroundA Two-Layer Causal Knowledge Network Construction Method Based on Quality Problem-Solving Data
Wang, Y., Qiang, S., Yue, X., Li, T., & Zhang, K. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13030142 · Cited by 3
Causal attribution from retrospective data in Canada's woodland caribou system
Wilson, S. F. (2025) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.70022 · Cited by 2
“This provides a third level of reasoning and completes Pearl ’ s (2019) “ ladder of causation ” (Table 1).”
The state of hybrid artificial intelligence for interstellar missions
Ellery, A. A. (2025) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2025.101100 · Cited by 2
Processing Use Case Scenarios and Text in a Formal Style as Inputs for TFM-based Transformations
Nazaruka, Ē. (2020) · Baltic Journal of Modern Computing · doi:10.22364/bjmc.2020.8.1.03 · Cited by 2
“In the formal text (instructions, descriptions of processing, etc.) they usually have a form “if/when <a cause occurs> then <an effect occurs>” as well as temporal priorities can be helpful in distinguishing them (Solstad and Bott, 2017; Pearl, 2019).”
BackgroundWhat Can the Millions of Random Treatments in Nonexperimental Data Reveal About Causes?
Ribeiro, A. F., Neffke, F. M. H., & Hausmann, R. (2022) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-022-01319-2 · Cited by 2
Registry data for use in health technology assessments in Norway – Opportunities and challenges
Hagen, G., & Wisløff, T. F. (2021) · Norsk Epidemiologi · doi:10.5324/nje.v29i1-2.4042 · Cited by 2
“Although this in the beginning may be more as a form of identifying potential hypotheses that later can be further examined using standard methods, there are also developments in the direction of thinking causally in machine learning (57).”
BackgroundGlenski, M., & Volkova, S. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.cinlp-1.7 · Cited by 2
Artificial Intelligence for Medical Decisions
Buchard, A., & Richens, J. G. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58080-3_28-1 · Cited by 2
Anomaly Ranking of Failure Causes in Manufacturing Process Using Causal Model
Hattori, R., Ota, Y., Fujii, T., & Nakajima, H. (2021) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc52423.2021.9659060 · Cited by 2
“To overcome the lack of explainability and the need to understand cause-effect connections, Pearl argued that causal reasoning is an indispensable component and causal modeling is an effective method for these problems [12].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearl, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pearl, Judea
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2019-02-21
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 54-60
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2917286209
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 78 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 24
- FWCI
- 35.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1704932, 1302448, 1527490)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (#W911NF-16-057)
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Office of Naval Research (N00014-17-S-B001, N00014)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Keywords
- causal inference, causal discovery, causal discovery algorithms, machine learning, philosophy of causation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review