The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Issues and techniques in touch-sensitive tablet input
Abstract
Touch-sensitive tablets and their use in human-computer interaction are discussed. It is shown that such devices have some important properties that differentiate them from other input devices (such as mice and joysticks). The analysis serves two purposes: (1) it sheds light on touch tablets, and (2) it demonstrates how other devices might be approached. Three specific distinctions between touch tablets and one button mice are drawn. These concern the signaling of events, multiple point sensing and the use of templates. These distinctions are reinforced, and possible uses of touch tablets are illustrated, in an example application. Potential enhancements to touch tablets and other input devices are discussed, as are some inherent problems. The paper concludes with recommendations for future work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages
Shneiderman (1983) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.1983.1654471 · Cited by 1,939
The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1980) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358886.358895 · Cited by 1,174
The human factors of computer graphics interaction techniques
Foley, J. D., Wallace, V. L., & Chan, P. (1984) · IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications · doi:10.1109/mcg.1984.6429355 · Cited by 478
Soft machines: A philosophy of user-computer interface design
Nakatani, L. H., & Rohrlich, J. A. (1983) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '83 · doi:10.1145/800045.801573 · Cited by 59
Cited by
TeslaTouch: electrovibration for touch surfaces
Bau, O., Poupyrev, I., Israr, A., & Harrison, C. (2010) · Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/1866029.1866074 · Cited by 664
Shift: a technique for operating pen- based interfaces using touch
Vogel, D., & Baudisch, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240727 · Cited by 486
Kane, S. K., Bigham, J. P., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2008) · Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/1414471.1414487 · Cited by 374
EdgeWrite: a stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion
Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., & Kembel, J. A. (2003) · Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/964696.964703 · Cited by 355
Usable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance
Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., & Ladner, R. E. (2011) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979001 · Cited by 314
The performance of touch screen soft buttons
Lee, S., & Zhai, S. (2009) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1518701.1518750 · Cited by 226
Khan, A., & Khusro, S. (2021) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-020-00733-8 · Cited by 177
(2005) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 170
Enhancing physicality in touch interaction with programmable friction
Levesque, V., Oram, L., MacLean, K., Cockburn, A., Marchuk, N. D., Johnson, D., Colgate, J. E., & Peshkin, M. A. (2011) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979306 · Cited by 158
Access overlays: improving non-visual access to large touch screens for blind users
Kane, S. K., Morris, M. R., Perkins, A. Z., Wigdor, D., Ladner, R. E., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2011) · Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/2047196.2047232 · Cited by 127
Touchplates: low-cost tactile overlays for visually impaired touch screen users
Kane, S. K., Morris, M. R., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2013) · Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/2513383.2513442 · Cited by 107
MudPad: tactile feedback and haptic texture overlay for touch surfaces
Jansen, Y., Karrer, T., & Borchers, J. (2010) · ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces · doi:10.1145/1936652.1936655 · Cited by 102
Review Study of Computer Input Devices and Older Users
Taveira, A. D., & Choi, S. D. (2009) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447310902865040 · Cited by 94
Kwon, S., Lee, D., & Chung, M. K. (2009) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2009.02.013 · Cited by 65
Wobbrock, J. O. (2014) · Advances in Medical Technologies and Clinical Practice · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4438-0.ch008 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Buxton, W., Hill, R., & Rowley, P.
- Venue
- ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics
- Published
- 1985-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 215-224
- ISSN
- 0097-8930 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111644757
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
