Cited by 40Digital Economy and Work TransformationJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLegal and Labor Studies

Impacts of Perceived Behavior Control and Emotional Labor on Gig Workers

Marquis, Elizabeth B., Kim, Sangmi, Alahmad, Rasha, Pierce, Casey S., Robert Jr., Lionel P.·2018·Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

Abstract

Gig economy workers enjoy flexibility in choosing certain aspects of their work. Nonetheless, platform companies still need to control workers’ behaviors to scale their business and ensure customers quality service. Mechanisms of control have been widely studied in traditional organizations; however, work in the gig economy differs from traditional organizations in that the role of a human supervisor is replaced with digital systems. Thus, there is reason to suspect that our traditional theories of control may not hold for new forms of work in the gig economy. To address these concerns, this study examines how gig economy workers, specifically Uber drivers, perceive behavior control and its effect on their job satisfaction. Our results suggest that emotional labor mediates the relationship between perceived behavior control and job satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3272973.3274065

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uber and Lyft workers often find their work emotionally taxing because they have to engage in emotional labor to gain favorable customer ratings.

    “Research has shown that Uber and Lyft workers often find their work emotionally taxing (Malin & Chandler, 2017) because they have to engage in emotional labor to gain favorable customer ratings (Grandey & Gabriel, 2015;Marquis et al., 2018).”

    From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Marquis et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marquis, E. B., Kim, S., Alahmad, R., Pierce, C. S., & Robert Jr., L. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-10-30
Pages
241-244
OpenAlex
W2889819295
Cited by
40
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
gig economy, perceived behavioral control, emotional labor, job satisfaction, Uber drivers, platform work, gig workers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review