The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms During Medical Decision-Making
Open accessAbstract
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used in image retrieval systems for medical decision making. One application of ML is to retrieve visually similar medical images from past patients (e.g. tissue from biopsies) to reference when making a medical decision with a new patient. However, no algorithm can perfectly capture an expert's ideal notion of similarity for every case: an image that is algorithmically determined to be similar may not be medically relevant to a doctor's specific diagnostic needs. In this paper, we identified the needs of pathologists when searching for similar images retrieved using a deep learning algorithm, and developed tools that empower users to cope with the search algorithm on-the-fly, communicating what types of similarity are most important at different moments in time. In two evaluations with pathologists, we found that these tools increased the diagnostic utility of images found and increased user trust in the algorithm. The tools were preferred over a traditional interface, without a loss in diagnostic accuracy. We also observed that users adopted new strategies when using refinement tools, re-purposing them to test and understand the underlying algorithm and to disambiguate ML errors from their own errors. Taken together, these findings inform future human-ML collaborative systems for expert decision-making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In particular, humans can review AI explanations to understand how the AI models generate outputs [61] and identify whether an AI output is right or not [14, 42].”
From Understanding the Effect of Counterfactual Explanations on Trust and Reliance on AI for Human-AI Collaborative Clinical Decision Making (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In order to better understand factors impacting the adoption of CDS, previous studies of deployed systems have used post-hoc surveys or interviews to gauge provider impressions 28,44,53 ; however, provider impressions can differ from their actual use 4,18,27 .”
From Factors driving provider adoption of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system and its effects on sepsis treatment timing (2022) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, ease of use and integration into the workflow have been noted as important factors influencing adoption 26,28,47,48 .”
From Factors driving provider adoption of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system and its effects on sepsis treatment timing (2022) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many researchers have discussed that the explainability [61] of a system is critical for humanAI collaborative decision-making [14, 42].”
From Understanding the Effect of Counterfactual Explanations on Trust and Reliance on AI for Human-AI Collaborative Clinical Decision Making (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These mechanisms include providing interpretable explanations for AI advice [21, 72, 123], using cognitive forcing functions[17, 47, 99], and incorporating feedback loops to enhance the interaction between humans and AI systems [10, 11, 139].”
From Dealing with Uncertainty: Understanding the Impact of Prognostic Versus Diagnostic Tasks on Trust and Reliance in Human-AI Decision Making (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks
Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.244 · Cited by 23,602
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267
Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years
Smeulders, A. W. M., Worring, M., Santini, S., Gupta, A., & Jain, R. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.895972 · Cited by 6,050
CNN Features Off-the-Shelf: An Astounding Baseline for Recognition
Razavian, A. S., Azizpour, H., Sullivan, J., & Carlsson, S. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2014.131 · Cited by 4,451
Query by image and video content: the QBIC system
Flickner, M., Sawhney, H., Niblack, W., Ashley, J., Huang, Q., Dom, B., Gorkani, M., Hafner, J., Lee, D., Petković, D., et al. (1995) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.410146 · Cited by 3,097
Datta, R., Joshi, D., Li, J., & Wang, J. Z. (2008) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1348246.1348248 · Cited by 3,080
Garg, A. X., Adhikari, N. K. J., McDonald, H., Rosas-Arellano, M. P., Devereaux, P. J., Beyene, J., Sam, J., & Haynes, R. B. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 · Cited by 2,936
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Matthew Chalmers and Ian MacColl. 2003. Seamful and seamless design in ubiquitous computing. In Workshop at the crossroads: The interaction of HCI and systems issues in UbiComp, Vol. 8.
- 10.5555/647251.720114 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 406
Evaluating the Interpretability of Generative Models by Interactive Reconstruction
Ross, A., Chen, N., Hang, E. Z., Glassman, E. L., & Doshi-Velez, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445296 · Cited by 40
Salimzadeh, S., He, G., & Gadiraju, U. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3641905 · Cited by 41
“These mechanisms include providing interpretable explanations for AI advice [21, 72, 123], using cognitive forcing functions[17, 47, 99], and incorporating feedback loops to enhance the interaction between humans and AI systems [10, 11, 139].”
Misfitting With AI: How Blind People Verify and Contest AI Errors
Alharbi, R., Lor, P., Herskovitz, J., Schoenebeck, S., & Brewer, R. N. (2024) · The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3663548.3675659 · Cited by 40
“To bridge these gaps, HCI research has begun unpacking how users interpret and understand AI in various domains such as social media algorithms [37, 116], healthcare [29] and creativity [31].”
Andersen, T. O., Nunes, F., Wilcox, L. G., Coiera, E. W., & Rogers, Y. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3589961 · Cited by 48
Toward Practices for Human-Centered Machine Learning
Chancellor, S. (2023) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3530987 · Cited by 52
Hwang, J., Lee, T., Lee, H., & Byun, S. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/28659 · Cited by 46
Software Developers Learning Machine Learning: Motivations, Hurdles, and Desires
Cai, C. J., & Guo, P. J. (2019) · IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) · doi:10.1109/vlhcc.2019.8818751 · Cited by 39
Self-citationvan Berkel, N., Bellio, M., Skov, M. B., & BLANDFORD, A. E. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3571815 · Cited by 42
Never tell me the odds: Investigating pro-hoc explanations in medical decision making
Cabitza, F., Natali, C., Famiglini, L., Campagner, A., Caccavella, V. M., & Gallazzi, E. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102819 · Cited by 45
PathologyGAN: Learning deep representations of cancer tissue
Quiros, A. C., Murray‐Smith, R., & Yuan, K. (2021) · The Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging · doi:10.59275/j.melba.2021-gfgg · Cited by 64
Towards Visual Explainable Active Learning for Zero-Shot Classification
Jia, S., Li, Z., Chen, N., & Zhang, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2021.3114793 · Cited by 39
Brewer, J., Patel, D., Kim, D., & Murray, A. M. (2024) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2024.04.011 · Cited by 42
Gu, H., Yang, C., Haeri, M., Wang, J., Tang, S., Yan, W., He, S., Williams, C. K., Magaki, S., & Chen, X. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580694 · Cited by 45
Vereschak, O., Alizadeh, F., Bailly, G., & Caramiaux, B. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642018 · Cited by 50
Are Visual Explanations Useful? A Case Study in Model-in-the-Loop Prediction
Chu, E., Roy, D., & Andreas, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.12248 · Cited by 34
Understanding Human-AI Collaboration in Music Therapy Through Co-Design with Therapists
Sun, J., Yang, J., Zhou, G., Jin, Y., & Gong, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642764 · Cited by 33
Artinter: AI-powered Boundary Objects for Commissioning Visual Arts
Chung, J. J. Y., & Adar, E. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3563657.3595961 · Cited by 33
Reliable and Safe Use of Machine Translation in Medical Settings
Mehandru, N., Robertson, S., & Salehi, N. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533244 · Cited by 48
AutoML in The Wild: Obstacles, Workarounds, and Expectations
Sun, Y., Song, Q., Gui, X., Ma, F., & Wang, T. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581082 · Cited by 31
Fraile Navarro, D., Kocaballi, A. B., Dras, M., & Berkovsky, S. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3569893 · Cited by 28
Randomized Controlled Trials in Medical AI
Genin, K., & Grote, T. (2021) · Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.5195/philmed.2021.27 · Cited by 40
Toward Practical Usage of the Attention Mechanism as a Tool for Interpretability
Tutek, M., & Šnajder, J. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3169772 · Cited by 35
Multi-disciplinary fairness considerations in machine learning for clinical trials
Chien, I., Deliu, N., Turner, R. E., Weller, A., Villar, S. S., & Kilbertus, N. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533154 · Cited by 35
Explainable AI decision support improves accuracy during telehealth strep throat screening
Gomez, C., Smith, B.-L., Zayas, A., Unberath, M., & Canares, T. (2024) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-024-00568-x · Cited by 30
Human, Do You Think This Painting is the Work of a Real Artist?
Park, J., Kang, H., & Kim, H. Y. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2232978 · Cited by 32
Human-Machine Cooperative Video Anomaly Detection
Yang, F., Yu, Z., Chen, L., Gu, J., Li, Q., & Guo, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3434183 · Cited by 28
Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanations
Arora, S., Pruthi, D., Sadeh, N., Cohen, W. W., Lipton, Z. C., & Neubig, G. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20464 · Cited by 41
How Much Automation Does a Data Scientist Want?Preprint
Wang, D., Liao, Q. V., Zhang, Y., Khurana, U., Samulowitz, H., Park, S., Muller, M. J., & Amini, L. D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.03970 · Cited by 57
Trusting AI: does uncertainty visualization affect decision-making?
Reyes, J., Batmaz, A. U., & Kersten-Oertel, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2025.1464348 · Cited by 27
Zhang, Z., Sun, B., & An, P. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713853 · Cited by 41
A Survey of Domain Knowledge Elicitation in Applied Machine Learning
Kerrigan, D., Hullman, J. R., & Bertini, E. (2021) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti5120073 · Cited by 28
Validating Automatic Concept-Based Explanations for AI-Based Digital Histopathology
Sauter, D., Lodde, G., Nensa, F., Schadendorf, D., Livingstone, E., & Kukuk, M. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22145346 · Cited by 26
“We apply two XAI methods to histopathology: ACE and Guided Grad-CAM as examples for explanations on model level and image level, respectively.”
MethodCollaborative Robotics: A Survey From Literature and Practitioners Perspectives
Montini, E., Daniele, F., Agbomemewa, L., Confalonieri, M., Cutrona, V., Bettoni, A., Rocco, P., & Ferrario, A. (2024) · Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems · doi:10.1007/s10846-024-02141-z · Cited by 26
New XAI tools for selecting suitable 3D printing facilities in ubiquitous manufacturing
Wang, Y.-C., & Chen, T. (2023) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-023-01104-5 · Cited by 27
Ramaekers, M., Viviers, C. G. A., Janssen, B. V., Hellström, T. A. E., Ewals, L. J. S., van der Wulp, K., Nederend, J., Jacobs, I., Pluyter, J. R., Mavroeidis, D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12134209 · Cited by 26
Understanding Choice Independence and Error Types in Human-AI Collaboration
Erlei, A., Sharma, A., & Gadiraju, U. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3641946 · Cited by 34
Lindvall, M., Lundström, C. F., & Löwgren, J. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3397481.3450681 · Cited by 33
Mapping the Landscape of Care Providers’ Quality Assurance Approaches for AI in Diagnostic Imaging
Lundström, C. F., & Lindvall, M. (2022) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-022-00731-7 · Cited by 28
"What is Your Envisioned Future?": Toward Human-AI Enrichment in Data Work of Asthma Care
Su, Z., He, L., Jariwala, S. P., Zheng, K., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555157 · Cited by 32
Wang, Q., L’Yi, S., & Gehlenborg, N. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581127 · Cited by 26
Han, J., & Ko, D. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15040534 · Cited by 39
Corti, L., Oltmans, R., Jung, J., Balayn, A., Wijsenbeek, M. S., & Yang, J. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642551 · Cited by 27
Designing Visual Markers for Continuous Artificial Intelligence Support
van Berkel, N., Ahmad, O. F., Stoyanov, D. V., Lovat, L. B., & BLANDFORD, A. E. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3422156 · Cited by 22
From Bias to Repair: Error as a Site of Collaboration and Negotiation in Applied Data Science Work
Lin, C. K., & Jackson, S. J. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579607 · Cited by 22
PDFChatAnnotator: A Human-LLM Collaborative Multi-Modal Data Annotation Tool for PDF-Format Catalogs
Tang, Y., Chang, C.-M., & Yang, X. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3640543.3645174 · Cited by 29
A Human–AI interaction paradigm and its application to rhinocytology
Desolda, G., Dimauro, G., Esposito, A., Lanzilotti, R., Matera, M., & Zancanaro, M. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102933 · Cited by 25
Show or suppress? Managing input uncertainty in machine learning model explanations
Wang, D., Zhang, W., & Lim, B. Y. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103456 · Cited by 24
van Berkel, N., Opie, J., Ahmad, O. F., Lovat, L. B., Stoyanov, D. V., & BLANDFORD, A. E. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3480247 · Cited by 22
Blanes-Selva, V., Cuesta, S. A., Doñate-Martínez, A., Mesquita, F. P., & Garcia-Gomez, J. M. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076221150735 · Cited by 27
DiscipLink: Unfolding Interdisciplinary Information Seeking Process via Human-AI Co-Exploration
Zheng, C., Zhang, Y., Huang, Z., Shi, C., Xu, M., & Ma, X. (2024) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/3654777.3676366 · Cited by 41
Suresh, H., Lewis, K. M., Guttag, J. V., & Satyanarayan, A. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3490099.3511160 · Cited by 26
Interpretable Directed Diversity: Leveraging Model Explanations for Iterative Crowd Ideation
Wang, Y., Venkatesh, P., & Lim, B. Y. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517551 · Cited by 21
Hassan, S., Amin, A. A., Gordon, A., Lee, S., & Huenerfauth, M. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501986 · Cited by 21
Schrills, T., & Franke, T. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3588594 · Cited by 26
Marvista: Exploring the Design of a Human-AI Collaborative News Reading Tool
Chen, X., Wu, C.-S., Murakhovs’ka, L., Laban, P., Niu, T., Liu, W., & Xiong, C. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3609331 · Cited by 35
To Search or To Gen? Exploring the Synergy between Generative AI and Web Search in Programming
Yen, R., Sultanum, N., & Zhao, J. (2024) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3613905.3650867 · Cited by 26
Designing for Control in Nurse-AI Collaboration During Emergency Medical Calls
Berge, A., Guribye, F., Fotland, S.-L. S., Fonnes, G., Johansen, I. H., & Trattner, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3563657.3596110 · Cited by 20
Invisible clinical labor driving the successful integration of AI in healthcare
Ulloa, M., Rothrock, B., Ahmad, F. S., & Jacobs, M. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2022.1045704 · Cited by 24
Human-centered AI Technologies in Human-robot Interaction for Social Settings
Zhang, Y., Kassem, K., Gong, Z., Mo, F., Ma, Y., Kirjavainen, E., & Häkkilä, J. (2024) · International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM) · doi:10.1145/3701571.3701610 · Cited by 20
Rideshare Transparency: Translating Gig Worker Insights on AI Platform Design to Policy
Rao, V. N., Dalal, S., Agarwal, E., Calacci, D., & Monroy‐Hernández, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3711059 · Cited by 32
Angler: Helping Machine Translation Practitioners Prioritize Model Improvements
Robertson, S., Wang, Z. J., Moritz, D., Kery, M. B., & Hohman, F. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580790 · Cited by 22
Lee, M. H., Siewiorek, D. P., Smailagic, A., Bernardino, A., & Bermúdez i Badia, S. (2022) · 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3490099.3511112 · Cited by 19
“tively explored by researchers to create a better ML model with improved performance and user acceptance [1, 12, 37, 42] and improve the annotations [28, 32, 35].”
BackgroundInfluentialAmplifying Domain Expertise in Clinical Data Pipelines
Rahman, P., Nandi, A., & Hebert, C. L. (2020) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/19612 · Cited by 19
Artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis
Tschandl, P. (2021) · Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.23736/s2784-8671.20.06753-x · Cited by 19
Benjamin, J. J., Kinkeldey, C., Müller-Birn, C., Korjakow, T., & Herbst, E.-M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3492858 · Cited by 19
Willem, T., Krammer, S., Böhm, A. ‐., French, L. E., Hartmann, D., Lasser, T., & Buyx, A. (2022) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.18192 · Cited by 20
Do Expressions Change Decisions? Exploring the Impact of AI's Explanation Tone on Decision-Making
Okoso, A., Yang, M., & Baba, Y. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713744 · Cited by 26
Vatsal, S., Dubey, H., & Singh, A. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3651218 · Cited by 27
Machine Learning Model for Hepatitis C Diagnosis Customized to Each Patient
Chen, L., Ji, P., & Ma, Y. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3210347 · Cited by 24
Socially intelligent machines that learn from humans and help humans learn
Gweon, H., Fan, J. E., & Kim, B. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2022.0048 · Cited by 24
Self-citationClinical needs and preferences for AI-based explanations in clinical simulation training
Kollerup, N. K., Johansen, S. S., Tolsgaard, M. G., Friis, M. L., Skov, M. B., & van Berkel, N. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2334852 · Cited by 22
Kambhamettu, H., Metaxa, D., Johnson, K. B., & Head, A. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642573 · Cited by 24
Human in the AI Loop via xAI and Active Learning for Visual Inspection
Rožanec, J. M., Montini, E., Cutrona, V., Papamartzivanos, D., Klemenčič, T., Fortuna, B., Mladenić, D., Veliou, E., Giannetsos, T., & Emmanouilidis, C. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence in Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-46452-2_22 · Cited by 17
Robertson, S., Nguyen, T., & Salehi, N. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555207 · Cited by 20
Zhou, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., & Sun, L. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2093773 · Cited by 18
SemanticOn: Specifying Content-Based Semantic Conditions for Web Automation Programs
Pu, K., Fu, R., Dong, R., Wang, X., Chen, Y., & Grossman, T. (2022) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/3526113.3545691 · Cited by 18
TutoAI: a cross-domain framework for AI-assisted mixed-media tutorial creation on physical tasks
Chen, Y., Morariu, V. I., Truong, A., & Liu, Z. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642443 · Cited by 21
Socio-Technical Design of Hybrid Intelligence Systems – The Case of Predictive Maintenance
Herrmann, T. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50334-5_20 · Cited by 16
Jo, E., Ryu, M., Kenderova, G., So, S., Shapiro, B. B., Papoutsaki, A., & Epstein, D. A. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3502206 · Cited by 15
Taking Off with AI: Lessons from Aviation for Healthcare
Bondi, E., Hartvigsen, T., Sanneman, L., Sankaranarayanan, S., Harned, Z., Wickerson, G., Gichoya, J. W., Oakden‐Rayner, L., Celi, L. A., Lungren, M. P., et al. (2023) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623224 · Cited by 17
SOYSAL, F. (2023) · Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Uluslararası Filoloji ve Çeviribilim Dergisi · doi:10.55036/ufced.1402649 · Cited by 21
Muijlwijk, H., Willemsen, M. C., Smyth, B., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3640543.3645205 · Cited by 17
Yoo, D. W., Woo, H., Nguyen, V. C., Birnbaum, M. L., Kruzan, K. P., Kim, J. G., Abowd, G. D., & Choudhury, M. D. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642369 · Cited by 23
Beyond Recommendations: From Backward to Forward AI Support of Pilots' Decision-Making Process
Zhang, Z. T., Feger, S. S., Dullenkopf, L., Liao, R., Süsslin, L. E., Liu, Y., & Butz, A. M. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3687024 · Cited by 22
Hussain, M. H., Iacovides, I., Lawton, T., Sharma, V., Porter, Z., Cunningham, A., Habli, I., Hickey, S., Jia, Y., Morgan, P., et al. (2024) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3643834.3660697 · Cited by 18
Sadeghi, M., Chilana, P. K., Yap, J., Tschandl, P., & Atkins, M. S. (2019) · Skin Research and Technology · doi:10.1111/srt.12822 · Cited by 15
Promoting Human Competences by Appropriate Modes of Interaction for Human-Centered-AI
Herrmann, T. A. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05643-7_3 · Cited by 16
Debiasing Concept-based Explanations with Causal AnalysisPreprint
Bahadori, M. T., & Heckerman, D. E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.11500 · Cited by 15
Ferreira, J. J., & Monteiro, M. D. S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.05460 · Cited by 15
Exemplary Natural Images Explain CNN Activations Better than State-of-the-Art Feature VisualizationPreprint
Borowski, J., Zimmermann, R. S., Schepers, J., Geirhos, R., Wallis, T. S. A., Bethge, M., & Brendel, W. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.12606 · Cited by 31
Navarro, D. F., Kocaballi, A. B., & Berkovsky, S. (2025) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-025-02234-8 · Cited by 16
Kamboj, P., Banerjee, A., & Gupta, S. K. S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2024.3396421 · Cited by 14
Schneider, T., Hois, J., Rosenstein, A., Metzl, S., Gerlicher, A. R. S., Ghellal, S., & Love, S. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3581641.3584085 · Cited by 14
Opportunities and Barriers for Adoption of a Decision-Support Tool for Alzheimer’s Disease
Bellio, M., Furniss, D. J., Oxtoby, N. P., Garbarino, S., Firth, N. C., Ribbens, A., Alexander, D. C., & BLANDFORD, A. E. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3462764 · Cited by 14
Toward automated infrared spectral analysis in community drug checking
Gozdzialski, L., Hutchison, A., Wallace, B. B., Gill, C. G., & Hore, D. K. (2023) · Drug Testing and Analysis · doi:10.1002/dta.3520 · Cited by 15
Guo, G., Deng, L., Tandon, A. A., Endert, A., & Kwon, B. C. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3659011 · Cited by 15
A Brief Summary of Prompting in Using GPT ModelsPreprint
Wang, S., & Jin, P. (2023) · doi:10.32388/imzi2q · Cited by 17
Searching for the Non-Consequential: Dialectical Activities in HCI and the Limits of Computers
Zhang, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3641945 · Cited by 12
A surgical approach to building impactful artificial intelligence
Williams, S. C., Khan, D. Z., Bano, S., BLANDFORD, A. E., Clarkson, M. J., Costanza, E., Mazomenos, E. B., Stoyanov, D. V., McCulloch, P. G., & Marcus, H. J. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02073-4 · Cited by 11
Transitioning Cognitive Aids into Decision Support Platforms: Requirements and Design Guidelines
Mastrianni, A., Sarcevic, A., Hu, A., Almengor, L., Tempel, P. E., Gao, S., & Burd, R. S. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3582431 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Cai, C. J., Reif, E., Hegde, N., Hipp, J., Kim, B., Smilkov, D., Wattenberg, M., Viegas, F., Corrado, G. S., Stumpe, M. C., & Terry, M.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Google Brain, Mountain View, CA, USA
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-05-02
- Pages
- 1-14
- OpenAlex
- W2918341242
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 37.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Keywords
- medical image retrieval, pathologists, human-machine collaboration, trust in machine learning, diagnostic accuracy, human-centered design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
