Cited by 275Speech and dialogue systemsAI in Service InteractionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Chatbots, Humbots, and the Quest for Artificial General Intelligence

Grudin, Jonathan, Jacques, Richard·2019·Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

What began as a quest for artificial general intelligence branched into several pursuits, including intelligent assistants developed by tech companies and task-oriented chatbots that deliver more information or services in specific domains. Progress quickened with the spread of low-latency networking, then accelerated dramatically a few years ago. In 2016, task-focused chatbots became a centerpiece of machine intelligence, promising interfaces that are more engaging than robotic answering systems and that can accommodate our increasingly phone-based information needs. Hundreds of thousands were built. Creating successful non-trivial chatbots proved more difficult than anticipated. Some developers now design for human-chatbot (humbot) teams, with people handling difficult queries. This paper describes the conversational agent space, difficulties in meeting user expectations, potential new design approaches, uses of human-bot hybrids, and implications for the ultimate goal of creating software with general intelligence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3290605.3300439

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human-chatbot teams (humbots) handle challenging service queries better than chatbots alone and more efficiently than humans alone.

    “human-chatbot teams which handle challenging service queries better than chatbots alone and more efficiently than humans alone.”
  • Google's Duplex faced criticism for not always disclosing its AI identity during interactions.

    “Google's Duplex, an AI system capable of making phone calls and scheduling appointments on behalf of users, faced criticism for not always disclosing its AI identity during interactions [135], [136], highlighting the importance of transparency and ethical considerations in AI development.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grudin, J., & Jacques, R.
Affiliations
Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-05-02
Pages
1-11
OpenAlex
W2940884072
Cited by
275
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 6
FWCI
11.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
chatbots, artificial general intelligence, task-oriented chatbots, intelligent assistants, chatbot design, user expectations, low-latency communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review