Cited by 97AI in Service InteractionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond Dyadic Interactions: Considering Chatbots as Community Members

Open access
Seering, Joseph, Luria, Michal, Kaufman, Geoff, Hammer, Jessica·2019·Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Chatbots have grown as a space for research and development in recent years due both to the realization of their commercial potential and to advancements in language processing that have facilitated more natural conversations. However, nearly all chatbots to date have been designed for dyadic, one-on-one communication with users. In this paper we present a comprehensive review of research on chatbots supplemented by a review of commercial and independent chatbots. We argue that chatbots' social roles and conversational capabilities beyond dyadic interactions have been underexplored, and that expansion into this design space could support richer social interactions in online communities and help address the longstanding challenges of maintaining, moderating, and growing these communities. In order to identify opportunities beyond dyadic interactions, we used research-through-design methods to generate more than 400 concepts for new social chatbots, and we present seven categories that emerged from analysis of these ideas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3290605.3300680

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior CHI studies have investigated potential scenarios of interacting with multi-party based chatbots as well as diverse roles of chatbots and their positive impact on familiarization among teammates, generating more ideas and diverse views, and nudging silent people to speak up.

    “prior CHI studies [43, 50, 77, 79, 93] have investigated potential scenarios of interacting with multi-party based chatbots [77] as well as diverse roles of chatbots and their positive impact on familiarization among teammates [79], generating more ideas and diverse views [43, 50, 79], and nudging silent people to speak up [43].”

    From The Promise and Peril of ChatGPT in Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Design Implications (2024) · cites this paper as [77]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. 10.1145/2675133.2675208 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/3176349.3176380 · DOI
  3. Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt. 2016. Contextual Design: Design for Life 2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA, USA.
  4. 10.1145/3025453.3025919 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/3170427.3186519 · DOI
  6. 10.1145/1718918.1718940 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/1753326.1753625 · DOI
  8. 10.1145/3078072.3084330 · DOI · Paper page
  9. D Christopher Dryer. 1997. Ghosts in the machine: Personalities for socially adroit software agents. In AAAI Fall Symposium 1997 .
  10. 10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_50 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Milica Gavs ić, Catherine Breslin, Matthew Henderson, Dongho Kim, Martin Szummer, Blaise Thomson, Pirros Tsiakoulis, and Steve Young. 2013. On-line policy optimisation of bayesian spoken dialogue systems via human interaction. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2013 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 8367--8371.
  12. 10.1145/3134684 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/1718918.1718941 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1109/TNET.2011.2126591 · DOI
  15. 10.1145/3110025.3110091 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/1858171.1858189 · DOI
  17. 10.1145/2836041.2841208 · DOI
  18. 10.1145/1357054.1357130 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/01972240290108186 · DOI
  20. Michael A Hogg. 2001. A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and social psychology review, Vol. 5, 3 (2001), 184--200.
  21. 10.1145/3027063.3049270 · DOI
  22. 10.1057/bm.2009.18 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/3173574.3174080 · DOI
  24. Sara Kiesler, Robert Kraut, Paul Resnick, and Aniket Kittur. 2012. Regulating behavior in online communities. Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design (2012).
  25. 10.1145/3064663.3064672 · DOI
  26. 10.5555/2207798 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/ASRU.1997.658989 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/89.817450 · DOI
  29. 10.18653/v1/D16-1127 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/3210240.3210339 · DOI
  31. 10.1145/2974804.2980500 · DOI
  32. Dan Lockton. 2018. New Metaphors. http://imaginari.es/new-metaphors/ · DOI
  33. 10.1145/3025453.3025830 · DOI
  34. 10.1145/3149572.3149611 · DOI
  35. 10.1145/2559206.2581231 · DOI
  36. Lasguido Nio, Sakriani Sakti, Graham Neubig, Tomoki Toda, Mirna Adriani, and Satoshi Nakamura. 2014. Developing non-goal dialog system based on examples of drama television. In Natural Interaction with Robots, Knowbots and Smartphones. Springer, 355--361.
  37. 10.5555/874069.875999 · DOI
  38. 10.1145/3167132.3167362 · DOI
  39. 10.5555/1870559.1870561 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S0885-2308(02)00025-6 · DOI
  41. 10.5555/2481655.2481665 · DOI
  42. Dan Saffer. 2005. The role of metaphor in interaction design. Information Architecture Summit, Vol. 6 (2005).
  43. 10.1145/2818048.2819985 · DOI
  44. 10.1145/3173574.3173889 · DOI
  45. Joseph Seering, Juan Pablo Flores, Saiph Savage, and Jessica Hammer. 2018a. The Social Roles of Bots: Situating Bots in Discussions in Online Communities. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA.
  46. 10.1145/2998181.2998277 · DOI
  47. Joseph Seering, Felicia Ng, Zheng Yao, and Geoff Kaufman. 2018b. Applications of Social Identity Theory to Research and Design in Social Computing. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA.
  48. 10.1177/1461444818821316 · DOI
  49. 10.1145/3194104.3194111 · DOI
  50. 10.1145/1187358.1187365 · DOI
  51. 10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1145/3160504.3160544 · DOI
  53. Teun A Van Dijk. 1997. Discourse as structure and process. Vol. 1. SAGE Publications.
  54. 10.1145/3160504.3160584 · DOI
  55. 10.1145/3133850.3133864 · DOI
  56. Richard Wallace. 2003. The elements of AIML style. Alice AI Foundation (2003).
  57. Richard S Wallace. 2009. The anatomy of ALICE. In Parsing the Turing Test. Springer, 181--210.
  58. 10.1145/3184558.3191610 · DOI
  59. 10.1145/3025453.3025496 · DOI
  60. 10.1145/3007203.3007217 · DOI
  61. 10.1145/3030024.3040201 · DOI
  62. 10.1145/1240624.1240704 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Seering, J., Luria, M., Kaufman, G., & Hammer, J.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-05-02
Pages
1-13
OpenAlex
W2942454454
Cited by
97
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.30
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
chatbots, dyadic interaction, social chatbots, online communities, community moderation, community growth, research through design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review