Cited by 67Data Visualization and AnalyticsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Clinical Data in Context: Towards Sensemaking Tools for Interpreting Personal Health Data

Raj, Shriti, Lee, Joyce M., Garrity, Ashley, Newman, Mark W.·2019·Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Abstract

Clinical data augmented with contextual data can help patients with chronic conditions make sense of their disease. However, existing tools do not support interpretation of multiple data streams. To better understand how individuals make sense of clinical and contextual data, we interviewed patients with Type 1 diabetes and their caregivers using context-enhanced visualizations of patients' data as probes to facilitate interpretation activities. We observed that our participants performed four analytical activities when interpreting their data -- finding context-based trends and explaining them, triangulating multiple factors, suggesting context-specific actions, and hypothesizing about alternate contextual factors affecting outcomes. We also observed two challenges encountered during analysis -- the inability to identify clear trends challenged action planning and counterintuitive insights compromised trust in data. Situating our findings within the existing sensemaking frameworks, we demonstrate that sensemaking can not only inform action but can guide the discovery of information needs for exploration. We further argue that sensemaking is a valuable approach for exploring contextual data. Informed by our findings and our reflection on existing sensemaking frameworks, we provide design guidelines for sensemaking tools to improve awareness of contextual factors affecting patients and to support patients' agency in making sense of health data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3314409

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raj, S., Lee, J. M., Garrity, A., & Newman, M. W.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Published
2019-03-29
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1-20
ISSN
2474-9567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2931981991
Cited by
67
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
sensemaking, contextual information, type 1 diabetes, chronic disease, data triangulation, patient agency, trust in data, action planning, information needs, caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review