Clinical Data in Context: Towards Sensemaking Tools for Interpreting Personal Health Data
Abstract
Clinical data augmented with contextual data can help patients with chronic conditions make sense of their disease. However, existing tools do not support interpretation of multiple data streams. To better understand how individuals make sense of clinical and contextual data, we interviewed patients with Type 1 diabetes and their caregivers using context-enhanced visualizations of patients' data as probes to facilitate interpretation activities. We observed that our participants performed four analytical activities when interpreting their data -- finding context-based trends and explaining them, triangulating multiple factors, suggesting context-specific actions, and hypothesizing about alternate contextual factors affecting outcomes. We also observed two challenges encountered during analysis -- the inability to identify clear trends challenged action planning and counterintuitive insights compromised trust in data. Situating our findings within the existing sensemaking frameworks, we demonstrate that sensemaking can not only inform action but can guide the discovery of information needs for exploration. We further argue that sensemaking is a valuable approach for exploring contextual data. Informed by our findings and our reflection on existing sensemaking frameworks, we provide design guidelines for sensemaking tools to improve awareness of contextual factors affecting patients and to support patients' agency in making sense of health data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous literature emphasizes incorporating concise and easily understandable textual details in visualizations while visualizing health data to support communication.
“Previous literature has also emphasized the importance of incorporating concise and easily understandable textual details in visualizations while visualizing health data to support communication [49, 64].”
From A Data Visualization Tool for Patients and Healthcare Providers to Communicate during Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
Cites
Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data
Choe, E. K., Lee, N. B., Lee, B., Pratt, W., & Kientz, J. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2556288.2557372 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Mobile Therapy: Case Study Evaluations of a Cell Phone Application for Emotional Self-Awareness
Morris, M. E., Kathawala, Q., Leen, T. K., Gorenstein, E. E., Guilak, F., Labhard, M., & Deleeuw, W. (2010) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1371 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management
Mamykina, L., Mynatt, E., Davidson, P., & Greenblatt, D. (2008) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357131 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Reviewing reflection: on the use of reflection in interactive system design
Baumer, E. P. S., Khovanskaya, V., Matthews, M., Reynolds, L., Schwanda Sosik, V., & Gay, G. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems · doi:10.1145/2598510.2598598 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Problem solving in diabetes self-management: A model of chronic illness self-management behavior
Hill-Briggs, F. (2003) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2503_04 · Cited by 241 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, one study found that the problem-solving process (identifying a problem, devising alternate solutions, implementing a solution, and evaluating the results [14]) was a natural way of reasoning when diabetes patients reflected on their data [23].”
BackgroundUnderstanding self-reflection: how people reflect on personal data through visual data exploration
Choe, E. K., Lee, B., Zhu, H., Riche, N. H., & Baur, D. (2017) · Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3154862.3154881 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Investigating health management practices of individuals with diabetes
Mamykina, L., Mynatt, E. D., & Kaufman, D. R. (2006) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1124772.1124910 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Revisiting Reflection in HCI: Four Design Resources for Technologies that Support Reflection
Bentvelzen, M., Woźniak, P. W., Herbes, P. S. F., Stefanidi, E., & Niess, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3517233 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Ramesh, S. H., Ouskine, A., Khorasani, E., Ebrahimipour, M., Finestone, H., Chan, A. D. C., & Rajabiyazdi, F. (2024) · Graphics Interface · doi:10.1145/3670947.3670978 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Raj, S., Lee, J. M., Garrity, A., & Newman, M. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
- Published
- 2019-03-29
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-20
- ISSN
- 2474-9567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2931981991
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- sensemaking, contextual information, type 1 diabetes, chronic disease, data triangulation, patient agency, trust in data, action planning, information needs, caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review