Cited by 99Social Robot Interaction and HRIAI in Service InteractionsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

The Persistence of First Impressions: The Effect of Repeated Interactions on the Perception of a Social Robot

Paetzel, Maike, Perugia, Giulia, Castellano, Ginevra·2020·Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Abstract

Numerous studies in social psychology have shown that familiarization across repeated interactions improves people's perception of the other. If and how these findings relate to human-robot interaction (HRI) is not well understood, even though such knowledge is crucial when pursuing long-term interactions. In our work, we investigate the persistence of first impressions by asking 49 participants to play a geography game with a robot. We measure how their perception of the robot changes over three sessions with three to ten days of zero exposure in between. Our results show that different perceptual dimensions stabilize within different time frames, with the robot's competence being the fastest to stabilize and perceived threat the most fluctuating over time. We also found evidence that perceptual differences between robots with varying levels of humanlikeness persist across repeated interactions. This study has important implications for HRI design as it sheds new light on the influence of robots' embodiment and interaction abilities. Moreover, it also impacts HRI theory as it presents novel findings contributing to research on the uncanny valley and robot perception in general.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3319502.3374786

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In educational scenarios, entrainment is an indicator for better learning outcomes and mutual understanding.

    “In educational scenarios, entrainment has been identified as an indicator for better learning outcomes and mutual understanding [128].”

    From A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction (2021) · cites this paper as [128]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paetzel, M., Perugia, G., & Castellano, G.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-03-09
Pages
73-82
OpenAlex
W3010164621
Cited by
99
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4
FWCI
18.69
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning (RIT15-0133)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
first impressions, human-robot interaction, familiarity, repeated interaction, robot competence, threat perception, human-likeness, embodiment, uncanny valley, long-term interaction, robot perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review