The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proactive computing
Open accessAbstract
Human-in-the-loop computing has its limits. What must we do differently to prepare for the networking of thousands of embedded processors per person? And how do we move from human-centered to human-supervised computing? For the past 40 years, most of the IT research community has focused on interactive computing, J.C.R. Licklider’s powerful and human-centered vision of human-computer symbiosis [3]. In tandem with this research has come the creation of an IT industry that is hurtling toward the human/machine/network breakpoint—the point at which the number of networked interactive computers will surpass the number of people on the planet. We still have a long way to go before Licklider’s vision is attained—and are many years from extending per-capita penetration to most parts of the world. However, “missing science ” may no longer be the factor limiting progress toward these long-cherished goals. It is reasonable, though perhaps heretical, to suggest that refinements of the existing science base will be sufficient to drive these efforts forward. It is time for a change. The computer science research community now enjoys a rare and exciting opportunity to redefine its agenda and establish the new goals that will propel society beyond interactive computing and the human/machine breakpoint. In lifting our sights toward a world in which networked computers outnumber human beings by a hundred or thousand to one, we should consider what these “excess ” computers will be doing and craft a research agenda that can lead to increased human productivity and quality of life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Computer for the 21st Century
Weiser, M. (1991) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94 · Cited by 10,017
Licklider, J. C. R. (1960) · IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics · doi:10.1109/thfe2.1960.4503259 · Cited by 1,938
The design and implementation of an intentional naming system
Adjie-Winoto, W., Schwartz, E., Balakrishnan, H., & Lilley, J. (1999) · Proceedings of the seventeenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles · doi:10.1145/319151.319164 · Cited by 673
Patterson, D., Anderson, T., Cardwell, N., Fromm, R., Keeton, K., Kozyrakis, C., Thomas, R., & Yelick, K. (1997) · IEEE Micro · doi:10.1109/40.592312 · Cited by 665
Active network vision and reality: lessions from a capsule-based system
Wetherall, D. J. (1999) · doi:10.1145/319151.319156 · Cited by 167
Cited by
Chaves, A. P., & Gerosa, M. A. (2021) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1841438 · Cited by 572
Freedom and Privacy in Ambient Intelligence
Brey, P. (2005) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-006-0005-3 · Cited by 111
A basic model for proactive event-driven computing
Engel, Y., Etzion, O., & Feldman, Z. (2012) · Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems · doi:10.1145/2335484.2335496 · Cited by 67
Gaze-X: Adaptive, Affective, Multimodal Interface for Single-User Office Scenarios
Maat, L., & Pantic, M. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72348-6_13 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Tennenhouse, D.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 43-50
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2338251608
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 142.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proactive computing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/332833.332837
- The paper
- Tennenhouse, D. (2000). Proactive computing. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/332833.332837
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.