Cited by 29Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Substance Use Screening using Virtual Agents: Towards Automated Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT)

Bickmore, Timothy, Rubin, Amy, Simon, Steven·2020·Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents

Abstract

Alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use cause significant loss quality of life, and represent a large economic burden on society. Standardized questionnaires have been developed to enable healthcare providers to screen individuals for substance misuse problems that may require intervention. Although routine use of these screeners is promoted in many healthcare organizations, their administration can be irregular and lack follow through. In addition, patients may be reluctant to report substance use. We report on the development and validation of a Virtual Agent designed to automate the administration of a standard substance use screening instrument. We report on two validation studies in which a total of 57 patients at a US Veterans Administration medical center were screened by the virtual agent, comparing first to a research assistant administering the standard screening questionnaire, and second to a standard computerized text-based implementation of the questionnaire. Assessment correlations between the agent and human administration were all significant, ranging from rho=0.83 to 0.94, with more disclosure to the agent. Correlations were lower for Study 2 (0.56 - 0.88), with participants significantly more satisfied with the Agent compared to the standard tool.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3383652.3423869

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Users can trust, have the feeling of being cared for, and build an alliance with various types of relational agents based tablet/computer apps, such as alcohol and substance misuse counseling apps, and stress management apps.

    “Some researchers found that users can trust, have the feeling of being cared for, and build an alliance with various types of relational agents based tablet/computer apps, such as alcohol and substance misuse counseling apps, and stress management apps (71–74).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bickmore, T., Rubin, A., & Simon, S.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-10-19
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W3094548555
Cited by
29
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
21.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
substance use screening, virtual agents, chatbots, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, illicit drug use, patient disclosure, patient satisfaction, veterans, automated screening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review