Cited by 216Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsPhonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesInnovation in Digital Healthcare Systems

Analysis of Chewing Sounds for Dietary Monitoring

Amft, Oliver, Stäger, Mathias, Lukowicz, Paul, Tröster, Gerhard·2005·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/11551201_4

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amft, O., Stäger, M., Lukowicz, P., & Tröster, G.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • UMIT TIROL - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology (AT)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2005
Pages
56-72
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2162226056
Cited by
216
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.89
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
Keywords
dietary monitoring, eating detection, unobtrusive sensing, ubiquitous systems, cardiovascular disease prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review