Cited by 123Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataEmotion and Mood RecognitionInternet of Things and AI

Privacy-preserving Federated Deep Learning for Wearable IoT-based Biomedical Monitoring

Can, Yekta Said, Ersoy, Cem·2021·ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

Abstract

IoT devices generate massive amounts of biomedical data with increased digitalization and development of the state-of-the-art automated clinical data collection systems. When combined with advanced machine learning algorithms, the big data could be useful to improve the health systems for decision-making, diagnosis, and treatment. Mental healthcare is also attracting attention, since most medical problems can be associated with mental states. Affective computing is among the emerging biomedical informatics fields for automatically monitoring a person’s mental state in ambulatory environments by using physiological and physical signals. However, although affective computing applications are promising to improve our daily lives, before analyzing physiological signals, privacy issues and concerns need to be dealt with. Federated learning is a promising candidate for developing high-performance models while preserving the privacy of individuals. It is a privacy protection solution that stores model parameters instead of the data itself and abides by the data protection laws such as EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). We applied federated learning to heart activity data collected with smart bands for stress-level monitoring in different events. We achieved encouraging results for using federated learning in IoT-based wearable biomedical monitoring systems by preserving the privacy of the data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3428152

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By collectively building a global model for the prediction of brain age, the FL paradigm in the neuroimaging domain works effectively.

    “By collectively building a global model for the prediction of brain age, the FL paradigm in the neuroimaging domain works effectively.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Can, Y. S., & Ersoy, C.
Affiliations
  • Koç University (TR)
  • Boğaziçi University (TR)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
Published
2021-01-05
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
  • 1533-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-6051
OpenAlex
W3119097278
Cited by
123
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 6
FWCI
8.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
federated learning, privacy preservation, wearable devices, Internet of Things, biomedical monitoring, affective computing, mental health monitoring, stress detection, smart band, physiological signals, GDPR, California Consumer Privacy Act

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review