Cited by 157Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringEmotion and Mood Recognition

Stressing the accuracy: Wrist‐worn wearable sensor validation over different conditions

Menghini, Luca, Gianfranchi, Evelyn, Cellini, Nicola, Patron, Elisabetta, Tagliabue, Mariaelena, Sarlo, Michela·2019·Psychophysiology

Abstract

Wearable sensors are promising instruments for conducting both laboratory and ambulatory research in psychophysiology. However, scholars should be aware of their measurement error and the conditions in which accuracy is achieved. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of a wearable sensor designed for research purposes, the E4 wristband (Empatica, Milan, Italy), in measuring heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and skin conductance (SC) over five laboratory conditions widely used in stress reactivity research (seated rest, paced breathing, orthostatic, Stroop, speech task) and two ecological conditions (slow walking, keyboard typing). Forty healthy participants concurrently wore the wristband and two gold standard measurement systems (i.e., electrocardiography and finger SC sensor). The wristband accuracy was determined by evaluating the signal quality and the correlations with and the Bland‐Altman plots against gold standard‐derived measurements. Moreover, exploratory analyses were performed to assess predictors of measurement error. Mean HR measures showed the best accuracy over all conditions. HRV measures showed satisfactory accuracy in seated rest, paced breathing, and recovery conditions but not in dynamic conditions, including speaking. Accuracy was diminished by wrist movements, cognitive and emotional stress, nonstationarity, and larger wrist circumferences. Wrist SC measures showed neither correlation nor visual resemblance with finger SC signal, suggesting that the two sites may reflect different phenomena. Future studies are needed to assess the responsivity of wrist SC to emotional and cognitive stress. Limitations and implications for laboratory and ambulatory research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/psyp.13441

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Greater wearable movement is associated with decreased photoplethysmography accuracy.

    “which may be due to the fact that greater wearable movement is associated with decreased PPG accuracy as discussed below62.”
  • Higher body mass index, which likely covaries with larger wrist circumference, has been shown to be associated with reduced heart rate accuracy, although these outcomes have not been found in all studies.

    “Higher body mass index, which likely covaries with larger wrist circumference as described above, has been shown to be associated with reduced HR accuracy42,62, although again these outcomes have not been found in all studies44,46.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menghini, L., Gianfranchi, E., Cellini, N., Patron, E., Tagliabue, M., & Sarlo, M.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Menghini, Luca
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-07-23
Volume
56
Issue
11
Pages
e13441-e13441
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2963323264
Cited by
157
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
FWCI
12.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research information system (University of Urbino) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Università degli Studi di Padova
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
wearable sensors, measurement accuracy, heart rate, heart rate variability, skin conductance, stress reactivity, ambulatory measurement, wrist kinematics, cognitive stress, emotional stress, non-stationarity, sensor validation, gold standard comparison
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Adolescent, Adult, Electrocardiography, Female, Fingers, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Psychomotor Performance, Stress, Psychological, Wrist, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review