Cited by 3Tactile and Sensory InteractionsInteractive and Immersive DisplaysMotor Control and Adaptation

Modeling Gliding-based Target Selection for Blind Touchscreen Users

Open access
Ko, Yu-Jung, Putkonen, Aini, Aydin, Ali Selman, Feiz, Shirin, Wang, Yuheng, Ashok, Vikas, Ramakrishnan, IV, Oulasvirta, Antti +1 more·2021·Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Gliding a finger on touchscreen to reach a target, that is, touch exploration, is a common selection method of blind screen-reader users. This paper investigates their gliding behavior and presents a model for their motor performance. We discovered that the gliding trajectories of blind people are a mixture of two strategies: 1) ballistic movements with iterative corrections relying on non-visual feedback, and 2) multiple sub-movements separated by stops, and concatenated until the target is reached. Based on this finding, we propose the mixture pointing model, a model that relates movement time to distance and width of the target. The model outperforms extant models, improving R2 from 0.65 for Fitts’ law to 0.76, and is superior in cross-validation and information criteria. The model advances understanding of gliding-based target selection and serves as a tool for designing interface layouts for screen-reader based touch exploration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3447526.3472022

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [28]Kane SK, Bigham JP, 2008. Slide rule: making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques In Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, 73– 80.
  2. [41]Savitzky A and Golay MJ. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical chemistry 36, 8 (1964), 1627– 1639.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ko, Y.-J., Putkonen, A., Aydin, A. S., Feiz, S., Wang, Y., Ashok, V., Ramakrishnan, IV, Oulasvirta, A., & Bi, X.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • Old Dominion University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-09-27
Volume
2021
Pages
1-14
OpenAlex
W3199783247
Cited by
3
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • NSF (National Science Foundation) (1815514, 1805076, 1936027)
  • Finnish Center for Artificial Intelligence FCAI
  • NIH (National Institutes of Health) (R01EY030085, R01HD097188)
  • The Academy of Finland projects Human Automata (328813)
  • The Academy of Finland projects Human BAD (318559)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
blind users, gliding, target selection, Fitts' law, ballistic movements, movement time, screen readers, touchscreen interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review