Cited by 432Design Education and PracticeCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceUsability and User Interface Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation

Open access
Shneiderman, Ben·2000·ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Abstract

A challenge for human-computer interaction researchers and user interf ace designers is to construct information technologies that support creativity. This ambitious goal can be attained by building on an adequate understanding of creative processes. This article offers a four-phase framework for creativity that might assist designers in providing effective tools for users: (1)Collect: learn from provious works stored in libraries, the Web, etc.; (2)Relate: consult with peers and mentors at early, middle, and late stages, (3)Create: explore, compose, evaluate possible solutions; and (4)Donate: disseminate the results and contribute to the libraries. Within this integrated framework, this article proposes eight activities that require human-computer interaction research and advanced user interface design. A scenario about an architect illustrates the process of creative work within such an environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/344949.345077

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. DORCEY , T. 1995 . Cu-SeeMe deskotp videoconferencing software . Connexions 9 , 3 (Mar.). DORCEY, T. 1995. Cu-SeeMe deskotp videoconferencing software. Connexions 9, 3 (Mar.).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Shneiderman, B.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Shneiderman, Ben
Venue
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Published
2000-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
114-138
ISSN
  • 1073-0516 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7325
OpenAlex
W2136525681
Cited by
432
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
FWCI
34.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
creativity support, creative process, user interface design, knowledge sharing, design framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review