Cited by 42Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDigital Media Forensic Detection

Data Poisoning in Sequential and Parallel Federated Learning

Nuding, Florian, Mayer, Rudolf·2022·Proceedings of the 2022 ACM on International Workshop on Security and Privacy Analytics

Abstract

Federated Machine Learning has recently become a prominent approach to leverage data that is distributed across different clients, without the need to centralize data. Models are trained locally, and only model parameters are shared and aggregated into a global model. Federated learning can increase privacy of sensitive data, as the data itself is never shared, and benefit from the distributed setting by utilizing computational resources of the clients. Adversarial Machine Learning attacks machine learning systems in respect to their confidentiality, integrity or availability. Recent research has shown that many forms of machine learning are susceptible to these types of attacks. Besides its advantages, federated learning opens new attack surfaces due to its distributed nature, which amplifies concerns of adversarial attacks. In this paper, we evaluate data poisoning attacks in federated settings. By altering certain training inputs that are used in the training phase with a specific pattern, an adversary may later trigger malicious behavior in the prediction phase. We show on datasets for traffic sign and face recognition that federated learning is effective on a similar level as centralized learning, but is indeed vulnerable to data poisoning attacks. We test both a parallel as well as a sequential (incremental cyclic) federated learning, and perform an in-depth analysis on several hyper-parameters of the adversaries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3510548.3519372

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An attacker with sufficiently long continuous learning cycles can achieve high accuracy on backdoor samples.

    “Florian et al. [88] pointed out that an attacker with sufficiently long continuous learning cycles can achieve high accuracy on backdoor samples.”

    From Poisoning attacks in federated learning: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [88]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuding, F., & Mayer, R.
Affiliations
TU Wien (AT)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2022 ACM on International Workshop on Security and Privacy Analytics
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-04-18
Pages
24-34
OpenAlex
W4224316323
Cited by
42
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM International Workshop on Security and Privacy Analytics (IWSPA) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • FFG (COMET SBA-K1)
  • EU H2020 (826078 (project 'FeatureCloud'))
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
data poisoning, federated learning, adversarial learning, traffic sign recognition, face recognition, hyperparameter analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review