Outsider Oversight: Designing a Third Party Audit Ecosystem for AI Governance
Open accessAbstract
Much attention has focused on algorithmic audits and impact assessments to hold developers and users of algorithmic systems accountable. But existing algorithmic accountability policy approaches have neglected the lessons from non-algorithmic domains: notably, the importance of third parties. Our paper synthesizes lessons from other fields on how to craft effective systems of external oversight for algorithmic deployments. First, we discuss the challenges of third party oversight in the current AI landscape. Second, we survey audit systems across domains - e.g., financial, environmental, and health regulation - and show that the institutional design of such audits are far from monolithic. Finally, we survey the evidence base around these design components and spell out the implications for algorithmic auditing. We conclude that the turn toward audits alone is unlikely to achieve actual algorithmic accountability, and sustained focus on institutional design will be required for meaningful third party involvement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
19 of 161 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Even when connected to representative organizations, individuals or communities often lack vocabulary and ability to flag observed issues.
“Even when connected to representative organizations, such individuals or communities often lack the vocabulary and ability to flag the issues they observe [34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] source
Section 6.5 (page not provided) says that a specialist machine-learning background was not necessary for meaningful feedback and gives examples of community panelists identifying concerns about predictive policing. The paper acknowledges that technical concepts are difficult to explain, but its finding runs contrary to the attributed claim that these communities lack the ability to flag issues they observe. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Even participatory AIA approaches frame consulting external perspectives as responsibility of internal stakeholders.
“Even in cases when a participatory approach is considered, the responsibility of consulting with external perspectives when considering impacts to articulate in an AIA is still framed as the responsibility of internal stakeholders to coordinate and interpret these interactions [53].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] source
Section 2.3 (page unavailable) says participatory design brings relevant stakeholders into development and that gathering their views and resolving conflicting specifications create work and costs. It does not discuss AI impact assessments (AIAs) or say that internal stakeholders are responsible for coordinating and interpreting external consultations in an AIA. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Third-party watchdogs have conducted consequential studies of biased outcomes across many domains, including content curation, advertising, tenant screening, child welfare, criminal justice, hiring, immigration, education, and public health.
“Together, these watchdogs continue to participate in consequential studies to analyze the biased outcomes of models used in domains as varied as content curation [80], online advertising [40], tenant screening [39,70], child welfare [12], criminal justice [5,10,20,26,78], hiring [63], immigration [24], education [25] or public health [15,56].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [80] source
The Conclusion (page unavailable) describes a drug-safety study that developed and evaluated models for predicting adverse drug interactions. The Discussion mentions possible confounding and indication biases, but neither passage describes a third-party watchdog study of biased model outcomes. I searched for watchdogs, biased outcomes, and model bias in public health. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [70]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Evidence on mandatory audit rotations is mixed.
“The evidence on mandatory rotations is more mixed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 6 sources checked- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [65] source
Section 5, “Limitations of Internal Audits” (page unavailable), discusses auditor independence and the limits of internal audits, but not mandatory rotations or evidence about their effects. Searches for “mandatory rotations” and “auditor rotation mixed evidence” found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Environmental third-party audits were more accurate when auditors were paid from a common government fund rather than by the audited firm.
“A two-year randomized controlled trial showed that environmental third party audits were more accurate when auditors were not paid by the firm being audited, but by a common pool of government distributed funding [18].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] source
The 'Some key problems' section discusses conflicts of interest in corporate-funded AI ethics research and independent AI audits, but not environmental audits. Searches for the two-year trial and the comparison between firm-paid and government-funded auditors found no passage addressing the claimed accuracy result. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Longer auditor tenure increases firm-specific expertise.
“The longer an auditor gets to know a firm, the more firm-specific expertise the auditor acquires.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 5 sources checked- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [65] source
Sections 2.4 (The Internal Audit) and 3.3.1 (Audit Infrastructure) discuss auditors’ access to organizational information, but neither addresses whether longer tenure increases firm-specific expertise. Searches for auditor tenure and for auditors gaining knowledge of a firm over time found no passage making that point. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Auditor tenure is a key determinant of independence.
“The tenure of auditors is another key determinant of independence [15].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] source
Section 4 describes an audit of demographic disparities in mobility-data coverage, and §4.5 applies it to voter turnout. Searches for auditor tenure, appointment length, and independence found no passage addressing whether tenure determines auditor independence. The source therefore does not verify the cited claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Selection and compensation arrangements can undermine auditor independence and thereby audit quality.
“There is strong social science demonstrating that selection and compensation can undermine independence and, in turn, audit quality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] source
In “Independence and direction of research” (page unavailable), the paper says funding requirements can affect research independence. “Some key problems” (page unavailable) describes conflicts of interest in corporate-funded AI ethics work and calls for independent audits. It does not present social-science evidence that auditor selection or compensation arrangements undermine audit independence and, in turn, audit quality. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Even when algorithmic systems are disclosed, it remains difficult to anticipate which deployments are linked to known incidents and to prioritize cases or pursue targets proactively.
“However, even in instances when the algorithmic systems are themselves disclosed, it remains difficult to anticipate which of these deployments are linked to known incidents of harms, and thus challenging to prioritize cases or pursue targets proactively [64].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] source
Section 3.1.1 discusses choosing the scope of an audit, and Section 3.2.3 discusses disclosure of audit targets and its effects on auditability. Neither addresses whether disclosed system deployments can be linked to known incidents of harm or whether that difficulty prevents proactive prioritization. Searches for those connections found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
When car owners choose their own inspectors, they select more lenient inspectors, producing a race to the bottom.
“Similarly, when car owners are given the option to choose their own car inspectors, they select for more lenient car inspectors, resulting in a race to the bottom [10,34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [34] source
The Background (section 3) discusses oversight of surveillance technologies, and section 6.3 discusses algorithmic accountability. Neither addresses car owners choosing inspectors or a resulting race to the bottom. Searches for car-inspector choice, inspector leniency, and “race to the bottom” found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Investigative journalism tools such as Algorithm Tips can make information on algorithmic deployment more publicly accessible.
“Investigative journalism tools such as Algorithm Tips [83], a database of algorithmic tools being used by public agencies, can also make information on algorithmic deployment more publicly accessible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] source
The ‘Accountability to decision subjects’ section (p. 6) describes agencies sharing information about their algorithms with journalists and publishing model details, which supports the broader point about public access to information. Our copy does not identify Algorithm Tips or describe a database of public-agency algorithms, so it does not support that specific example. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Recurring audits revealed Facebook continued discriminating against minority users in job and housing ads despite earlier communications.
“For instance, it was recurring audits that revealed that Facebook was continuing to discriminate against minority users in job and housing ads,despite earlier communications that it would no longer do so [4,38,41,52,72].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 5 sources checked- cites [4] source
The Concluding Discussion reports that the authors' employment and housing ad tests found racially skewed delivery, and Anti-discrimination rules describes Facebook's earlier pledge to restrict certain targeting categories. The paper does not establish that recurring audits found continued discrimination against minority users generally, or that Facebook had promised to end all such discrimination; it limits its findings to the ads tested. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [52] source
Section 2.3 discusses third-party audits, while Section 3 discusses Facebook’s human-rights impact assessment concerning Myanmar. Neither addresses recurring audits of Facebook’s job or housing ads, discrimination against minority users in those ads, or earlier assurances that it would stop. Searches for those terms found no passage supporting the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [72]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Audit systems across financial, environmental, health and other domains vary substantially in institutional design.
“Second, we survey audit systems across domains -e.g., financial, environmental, and health regulation -and show that the institutional design of such audits are far from monolithic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
All audit systems have some mechanism of access to otherwise confidential information, such as entering facilities, inspecting records, or accessing financial statements.
“Third, all audit systems have some mechanism of access to otherwise confidential information: e.g., access to enter a facility to inspect the premises and records or the reporting or access to financial statements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A fair number of audit schemes are universal, mandatory for all entities subject to the regulator's jurisdiction.
“Table 1 shows that a fair number of audit schemes are universal (i.e., they are mandatory for all entities subject to the jurisdiction of the regulator).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Internal accountability approaches are not likely to identify or address main concerns of external stakeholders, especially if affected populations are neglected.
“While helpful in aligning internal stakeholders, such an approach is not likely to identify or address the main concerns of external stakeholders [54,66], particularly if that affected population or its representatives are systematically neglected or under-considered as affected non-users.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [54]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [66]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
These policy instructions reveal an assumption that internal parties will conduct compliance audits.
“These instructions around audit execution are ultimately attempts at control on audit quality and meaningfulness for accountability, but also reveal the assumption underpinning many of these proposals that internal parties are expected to be the ones conducting compliance audits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Policy proposals that mention algorithmic auditing, such as the GDPR, the proposed Algorithmic Accountability Act, and U.S. state and municipal proposals, tend to focus on internal audits controlled by the companies being targeted.
“Developments such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [86], the proposed Algorithmic Accountability Act [48], and several of the state-wide and municipal proposals throughout the U.S. [50] tend to focus instead on internal audits commissioned, executed, paid for and controlled by the companies being targeted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [86]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [48]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Even well-executed algorithmic audit results may be co-opted by audit targets to disguise deeper failures, as observed in the AI hiring tool industry.
“Worse yet -as was observed in the AI hiring tool industry [76,77] -even well-executed algorithmic audit results may get co-opted by audit targets and used to disguise deeper failures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [76]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [77]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Existing algorithmic accountability policy proposals have underused lessons from non-algorithmic domains, especially interventions that enable third-party participation.
“But existing algorithmic accountability policy approaches have neglected the lessons from non-algorithmic domains: notably, the importance of interventions that allow for the effective participation of third parties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
ESG reporting and auditing challenges rather than supports the turn toward audits of AI-branded products.
“While the sharp rise in ESG investment strategies is indeed impressive, ESG in many ways challenges, not supports, the turn toward the audits of algorithmic and artificial intelligence (AI) branded products.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The ICO released auditability guidelines for GDPR impact assessments, describing graphs and calculations for accuracy, fairness, and explainability.
“Similarly, the Information Commissioner's Office released a report of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Emphasis on internal audits can omit concerns of communities impacted by algorithmic deployments.
“Second, the emphasis on internal audits can omit concerns by communities impacted by algorithmic deployments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
First- or second-party audits have acute potential for conflicts of interest.
“Thirdly, there is acute potential for conflicts of interest with first or second party audits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Many AI policy developments focus on specifying what internal audits should include and may enforce these as minimum audit forms.
“First, many AI policy developments tend to focus on articulating some guidance on what an internal audit should include and potentially enforcing these as expectations for a bare minimum”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The assumption behind calls for Algorithmic Impact Assessments is that audit activities are executed by internal stakeholders.
“Specifically, the assumption behind calls for Algorithmic Impact Assessments (AIAs) remains that audit activities are executed by internal stakeholders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [67]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [73]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The New York City Council mandate for hiring tools specifies details of a bias audit.
“For instance, the New York City Council mandate for hiring tools specifies the details of a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Most mainstream interpretations of AIAs center execution as responsibility of the assessed organization.
“Most mainstream interpretations of the AIA continue to center its execution as the responsibility of the assessed organization [67,73].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [67]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [73]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Internal accountability approaches are developed in reference to limited compliance requirements and self-determined AI principles.
“Internal accountability approaches are developed in reference to a limited set of compliance requirements and self-determined AI principles [66].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Companies developing algorithmic policing tools prioritize police users even though impacted communities may have different expectations.
“For instance, companies developing algorithmic policing tools naturally prioritize the needs of the police users of their products, even though the community whose safety is impacted by the use of such tools may have different expectations and preferences [51].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Residents in low-income and minority communities are less likely to complain about street conditions or nuisance issues in a 311 system.
“Residents in low-income and minority communities, for instance, are less likely to complain about street conditions or”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Even when external auditing is contemplated, policy focuses on a narrow set of potential auditors.
“Fourth, even when external auditing is contemplated, the focus is on a narrow set of potential auditors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Facebook researchers' warnings on bias and misinformation were reported to have been internally suppressed.
“Similarly, the warnings from Facebook researchers on addressing mounting bias issues and misinformation campaigns was reported to have been internally suppressed [57].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Hired consultants' work can be manipulated when the company mediates publication, as in the conflicted Hirevue audit by ORCAA.
“Even the work of hired consultants can be manipulated when the publication process is mediated by the company itself, as demonstrated by the conflicted reporting on the Hirevue audit by consulting company ORCAA [21].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Complaint-initiated audits raise challenges.
“Complaint-initiated audits, however, also raise challenges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In some cases, users were purposefully inundated with notices designed to induce consent by default.
“In some cases, users were purposefully inundated with notices designed to induce them to consent by default [55,57,61,70].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [55]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [61]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Informational disclosures can distract regulators from more pressing problems.
“These types of informational disclosures can also distract regulators from more pressing problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Limited audit capacity has led to many audit failures.
“Last, the limited audit capacity has led to many instances of audit failures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Third-party reporting systems can help focus auditing resources on issues that matter most.
“These third-party reporting systems can help focus auditing resources on issues that matter most [81].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [81]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System database is predictive of true safety concerns with newly released vaccines.
“Another research study found that the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database is predictive of true safety concerns with newly released vaccines [26].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Third-party reporting is most successful when third parties possess high-quality information.
“Third-party reporting is most successful when third parties possess high quality information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If auditors are tasked with vague inspection mandates, their results may be difficult to understand or translate into enforcement actions or changed practices.
“If auditors are tasked with vague inspection mandates, their results may be difficult to understand or translate into enforcement actions or changed practices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
When income is reported to the IRS by third parties like banks and employers, individuals are far more likely to be tax compliant than if they self-reported.
“When an individual's income is reported to the IRS by third parties like banks and employers, for example, that individual is far more likely to be tax compliant than if they self-reported their income [41,47].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [47]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Conflicts of interest limit internal stakeholders' or hired parties' ability to scrutinize, honestly describe, and alter algorithmic development when incentives contradict corporate preferences.
“As a result of this conflict of interest, the ability of internal stakeholders or hired parties to properly scrutinize, honestly describe and effectively alter the algorithmic development process or its outcomes is limited when the incentives to do so directly contradict corporate preferences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Incident notices can easily become overwhelming.
“These notices, however, can easily become overwhelming.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
An analysis of investigated nursing home complaints found complaints predicted performance at subsequent inspections.
“One analysis of investigated nursing home complaints, for example, found that the complaints predicted performance at subsequent inspections [71].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Prompts similar to 'How Am I Driving?' stickers could nudge harm reporting for impacted stakeholders.
“Similar to the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The FDA has faced challenges assessing AI-enabled medical devices, largely deferring to company benchmarks on limited retrospective data.
“Similarly, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has faced challenges in assessing AI-enabled medical devices, largely deferring to company benchmarks on limited, retrospective data [89].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Eccles et al. (2012) found significant variation between companies and within industries in climate change reporting despite SEC interpretive guidance.
“Eccles et al. (2012) found that, despite the SEC's interpretive guidance, there is significant variation between companies and within industries in climate change reporting, with some companies disclosing no information about climate change, others using boilerplate language in their disclosures, and still others including robust quantitative metrics like GHG emissions and energy use [19].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
- Interpretationcitation
Consumer complaints are a valuable signal when harms are difficult to observe.
“Still, consumer complaints have proven to be a valuable signal when harms can be difficult to observe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Vehicle owners are significantly less likely to keep using emissions testing stations that fail to report favorably on their vehicles.
“One study found that vehicle owners were significantly less likely to keep using car emissions testing stations that fail to report favorably on their vehicles [10,39,63].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [63] source
- Premisenone given
Third parties have already used interventions to identify and prioritize potential harms.
“Third parties have already taken advantage of a range of interventions to identify and prioritize potential harms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Similar selection and payment dynamics have been found in credit rating agencies, supply chain audits, and accounting audits.
“Similar dynamics have been found in credit rating agencies [20,40], supply chain audits [69], and accounting audits [58].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [20] source
- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [69]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [58]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Credit ratings teams were less accurate when they interacted directly with clients.
“Another study found that credit ratings teams were less accurate in their evaluations when they interacted directly with clients [29].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Auditors who can sell extra non-audit services to clients are more likely to deliver audits favorable to those clients.
“Research suggests that auditors who may try to sell additional non-auditing services to their clients are more likely to produce client-favorable audits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Current strategies for harm discovery in AI involve ad hoc notice and reporting, limited to harms raised in public forums such as social media or the press.
“Current strategies for harm discovery in AI involve ad hoc processes of notice and reporting, limited to situations of harm raised and escalated in public forums such as social media or the press.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Public procurement disclosure requirements such as the POST Act require certain institutions like NYPD to publicly release information on AI technologies used.
“At times, public procurement process disclosure requirements such as the Public Oversight of Surveillance Technology (POST) Act [69] will require that certain (often public) institutions such as the New York Police Department (NYPD) publicly release information on which AI technologies are being used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Financial auditors whose clients say they may buy non-audit services later tend to produce lower-quality audits.
“Causholli et al. (2014) found that financial auditors whose clients express willingness to purchase their non-audit services in the future tend to produce lower-quality audits [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Public disclosure of algorithmic products in use is necessary to reveal incidents of algorithmic harm.
“As a result, it can be difficult for regulators and the public to identify incidents of algorithmic harm and the public disclosure of algorithmic products in use is necessary to reveal such issues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Supply chain monitors are more lenient when auditing entities they have inspected before.
“One analysis of nearly 17,000 supplier audits found that supply chain monitors are more lenient when auditing entities they have inspected before [69].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
An incident reporting system can focus auditing resources on issues that matter most, similar to FDA's system.
“Much like how FDA's system has enabled a wide range of techniques to surface issues, the incident reporting system can focus auditing resources on issues that matter most [81].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [81]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
When communities identify issues with algorithmic deployments, it can be difficult for them to articulate or find concrete evidence for harms.
“When communities identify issues with algorithmic deployments, it can be difficult for them to articulate or find concrete evidence for such harms [35].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Auditor-client familiarity can lead auditors to make judgments favorable to their client.
“There is strong evidence that auditorclient familiarity can induce auditors to make judgments that are favorable to their client.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [69]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In a study of 205 NHS hospitals in England, patient-perceived hospital cleanliness increased during inspection periods.
“One study of 205 NHS hospitals in England found that hospital cleanliness (as perceived by patients) increased during periods when inspections occurred [75].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Making audit outcomes accessible to the public through open release or a vetted request process improves auditor accountability.
“In general, making audit outcomes accessible to the public through open release or a vetted request process improves auditor accountability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
It often requires extraordinary effort for investigators to gain sufficient access for thorough analysis.
“To date, it still often requires extraordinary effort for investigators to gain sufficient access for a thorough analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Voluntary audits can be compromised if vendors require pre-publication review or NDAs to view results.
“Voluntary audits like these can also be compromised if AI vendors require pre-publication review of audit reports, or if (like HireVue) they mandate that individuals sign an NDA in order to view the audit results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Having a regulator or third-party accreditation body choose the auditor or use a central fund, rather than direct payment by audit targets, provides significant benefits.
“Rather than allowing companies to pick their own auditors or dictate the focus of their own audits, the literature suggests that there are significant benefits to a regulator (or third party accreditation body) choosing the auditor or using a central fund, instead of relying on direct payment from audit targets to pay auditors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Recent reports found serious limitations in voluntary AI vendor audits in hiring, such as Pymetrics and HireVue.
“Recent reports have found serious limitations with the voluntary audits undertaken by AI vendors in the hiring space, such as Pymetrics and HireVue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
A fully public inspection system is unlikely in the near term because the scale, expertise, and agility needed in AI governance exceed current government capacity.
“Second, a fully public inspection system seems unlikely in the near term, as the scale, expertise, and agility needed in the AI governance space far outstrips the current capacity of government agencies [22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Mediated access subject to auditor vetting and consistent with audit scope will be critical to enabling third-party auditing of AI systems.
“Such mediated access, subject to auditor vetting (perhaps by an audit oversight board) and consistent with audit scope, will be critical to enabling third party auditing of AI systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: All audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors.
- Rests on an assumption: Disclosure of audit information need not be direct or absolute.
- Interpretationreasoning
AI auditors retained by technology companies are potentially compromised by NDAs, financial conflicts, and competition for services.
“In AI, auditors retained by technology companies are potentially compromised by nondisclosure agreements, financial conflicts, and competition for services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Clear and rigorous standard-setting can improve third-party audit quality.
“Other research shows that clear and rigorous standard-setting can improve the quality of third-party audits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Public accessibility of financial auditors' communications and records in some U.S. states improved auditor conduct and communication quality.
“For example, some financial auditors must make their communications and records publicly accessible to shareholders in certain U.S. states-this has been proven to improve auditor conduct and lead to higher quality communications [77].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [77]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Even contracted third-party auditors face challenges because access is provided only on the audited target's terms.
“Even third parties who are contracted to conduct an audit can run into challenges, as access is provided only on the audited target's terms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The capacity gap calls into question policy proposals focused on academic researchers.
“The capacity gap also strongly calls into question the focus of current policy proposals that focus on academic researchers [60].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Collaborative audit arrangements often include contractual control over how much auditor results can be shared.
“Often, such collaborative arrangements also include some control or restriction through contracts of how much of the auditor results can be shared more broadly (as was the case for the Pymetrics audit [88]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] source
- Premisecitation
A randomized controlled trial showed that accuracy and consistency of inspections improved with training and peer review.
“A randomized controlled trial showed that the accuracy and consistency of these inspections improved with training and peer review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Supply chain audit teams with more training found significantly more violations than less-trained teams.
“One study of supply chain monitors found that audit teams who had more training found significantly more violations than audit teams that were less well-trained [69].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Accreditation is not exclusive of some regulatory oversight.
“Third, accreditation is not exclusive of some regulatory oversight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Food safety inspectors disagreed on how to implement the health code 60 percent of the time under the same conditions.
“Another study found that, observing the same conditions, food safety inspectors disagreed on how to implement the health code 60 percent of the time [37].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Social scientists working with Facebook were thwarted by delayed communications, incomplete data releases, and lack of a data dictionary.
“Similarly, attempts by social scientists to work directly with Facebook to gain access to data were thwarted by delayed communications, incomplete data releases and the lack of a clear data dictionary, making the released information indecipherable [60].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Limiting audit access to academic researchers may focus resources on academic novelty rather than other communities' needs.
“Limiting audit access to academic researchers may narrowly focus audit resources and attention on questions that are important for academic novelty, but misaligned with the needs of other communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
NIST protects models by having companies run models via a custom API for the Face Recognition Vendor Test.
“The National Institute of Standards and Technology, for instance, protects models by having companies run models via a custom Application Program Interface (API) for the Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Audit quality improves with client-specific expertise of audit team members.
“Additional research has found that audit quality improves with the amount of client-specific expertise held by audit team members [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Audit reports would help cure informational asymmetries in technology regulation by opening the black box of algorithmic design.
“Such reports would also help cure one of the major emerging informational asymmetries in technology regulation, by opening the black box of algorithmic design.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Audit results can inform general standard-setting around AI performance and engineering practice.
“Audit results can also inform more general standard-setting around AI performance and engineering practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Public release of third-party audits can prompt more rigorous auditing by allowing third-party verification.
“Separately, the public release of third-party audits can prompt more rigorous auditing practices by allowing for third-party verification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Auditors publicly recognized for accuracy tend to produce more accurate audits than non-recognized counterparts, especially with conflicts of interest.
“One study found that auditors who have been publicly recognized for their accuracy tend to produce more accurate audits than their non-recognized counterparts, particularly when there are conflicts of interest [23].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Mandatory disclosure requirements are not costless.
“Mandatory disclosure requirements, however, are not costless.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Repeated assessments, including after product release, can be effective at ensuring compliance.
“Repeated assessments, including after product release, can be effective at ensuring compliance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A restricted transparency regime for registered audit reports could have significant potential benefits.
“A restricted transparency regime for registered audit reports could have significant potential benefits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Many AI ethics and accountability discussions have been stymied by lack of concretely stated performance expectations and evidence.
“Many AI ethics and accountability discussions have been stymied by the lack of concretely stated expectations of performance and evidence [54].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- May combine two claims. 56
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 77
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGoogle researchers on the internal AI team were dismissed and blocked from publishing critiques of large language models that later proved critical to the company's product roadmap.
“For instance, Google researchers on the internal AI team were dismissed and blocked from publishing critiques on the large-scale language models [18,27], which would later be revealed to be critical to the company's future product roadmap [23,85,87].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 5 sources checked- cites [18] source
The Introduction reports that Google fired Timnit Gebru and Margaret Mitchell and that they were told not to cast Google’s technologies in a negative light in research focused on large language models. It does not establish that these researchers were blocked from publishing the critiques. The later product-roadmap point has separate citations in the citing sentence and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [27]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [85]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [87] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationFor an audit to successfully measure performance, its scope should be sufficiently delineated.
“For an audit to successfully measure performance, its scope should be sufficiently delineated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] source
The sections on benchmarking and defining a peer group say that how a comparison group and performance range are defined is crucial to assessing a company's ESG performance. That supports the general need to define the basis of an assessment, but the paper does not address audits or state a requirement about an audit's scope (searched: audit, scope, delineated). No page number was available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVoluntary reporting can be unreliable and create reporting bias.
“Voluntary reporting can be unreliable and create reporting bias [4].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] source
The paper’s “Measuring and comparing audiences” section uses self-reported gender and race data and notes that voter-file information may be outdated. Neither that section nor the other passages found when searching for voluntary reporting and reporting bias says that voluntary reporting is unreliable or creates reporting bias. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSimilar biases have been found in recent consumer complaints to the CFPB, although early CFPB complaints appeared higher from minority neighborhoods.
“Similar biases have been found in recent consumer complaints to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) [65]-although early CFPB complaints, if anything, appeared to be higher from minority neighborhoods [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [65] source
Section 2.1 discusses bias in automated facial analysis, not consumer complaints. Searches for CFPB, consumer complaints, and minority neighborhoods found no passage in our copy addressing the finding attributed to this source. The separate claim about early complaints is attached to citation [6], not this source. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResource constraints prompted development of syndromic surveillance in public health, adverse event reporting for pharmaceuticals, and financial fraud complaint databases to provide real-time signals and focus audit efforts.
“Similar resource constraints prompted the development of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [35]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [66]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [53] source
The passages on medical oversight (sections 2.3–2.4; page numbers unavailable) discuss professional review and accountability, not the development of surveillance or complaint databases. Searches for syndromic surveillance, pharmaceutical adverse-event reporting, financial fraud complaints, resource constraints, and real-time audit signals found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStricter teacher occupational licensing is associated with a wider distribution of student test scores, while other studies found no impact on standardized test scores.
“One study of occupational licensing laws for teachers found that stricter occupational licensing regimes is associated with a wider distribution of student test scores [52], though others concluded that state occupational licensing requirements for teachers had no impact on students' standardized test scores [28].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [52] source
The citation to this source is attached to the first clause, about stricter teacher licensing and the distribution of student test scores. Our copy discusses algorithmic impact assessments and accountability, including testing in a different context (section 4.1), but the passages found for searches on teacher occupational licensing and student test scores do not address that association. The second clause is attributed to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [28]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenRotation requirements are employed in a minority of audit cases.
“Rotation requirements, which require auditors to rotate across audit targets to ostensibly foster independence, are employed in a minority of cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenNearly all audit programs have specific standards and rules that help scope the audit.
“First, we note that nearly all audit programs have specific standards and rules that help to scope the audit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSignificant variation exists within third-party audits: they may be conducted by public agencies or private parties, which typically determines whether auditors are compensated by the audited party.
“Second, we note that significant variation exists within the third party audit category, which may be conducted by public agencies (e.g., nursing home inspections) or private parties (e.g., children's toys), which typically also determines whether auditors are compensated by the audited party.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThere are many varieties of audits.
“What this survey highlights most of all is that there are many varieties of audits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
FindingreasoningDue to limited regulatory capacity, public inspections appear more likely to be initiated by complaint or risk-based heuristic rather than universally mandated.
“Due to limited regulatory capacity, public inspections appear more likely to be initiated by some complaint or risk-based heuristic, rather than being universally mandated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenIn many cases, audit schemes contemplate post-audit actions such as recommendations for remediation and disclosure.
“Last, in many cases, the audit scheme contemplates post-audit actions, such as recommendations for remediation and disclosure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenAccreditation schemes exist for all instances where the auditee selects and compensates the third-party auditor.
“Fourth, accreditation schemes exist for all instances where the auditee selects and compensates the third party auditor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingown dataAccreditation is widespread in instances where auditees choose auditors.
“As seen in the instances where auditees choose auditors in Table 1, accreditation is widespread.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThird-party audits invariably involve privileged access to information.
“As Table 1 shows, third party audits invariably involve privileged access to information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAudited companies may ignore or overlook audit results.
“Furthermore, audited companies could outright ignore or overlook audit results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenConflicts of interest can compromise the quality of third-party audits of algorithmic systems, as in ESG.
“Like in ESG, conflicts of interest can compromise the quality of third-party audits of algorithmic systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEffective target identification, independence in selection and compensation, access to data and AI systems, clear audit standards, and post-audit transparency are critical for audits to promote rather than degrade accountability.
“Existing evidence from other regulatory fields suggests that effective target identification mechanisms, independence in selection and compensation, access to data and AI systems, clear and well-scoped audit standards, and post-audit report transparency will be critical to ensure that audits promote, rather than degrade, overall accountability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAIAs are often practically executed by similar stakeholders as internal audits, with broader regulatory implications and purpose of prompting institutional reflexivity and due diligence.
“Thus, AIAs are often practically executed by similar stakeholders as internal audits, with broader regulatory implications and a purpose framed towards prompting and gauging institutional reflexivity and due diligence, in addition to the audit goals of performance assessment with respect to articulated expectations [47].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningAudits can be qualitative or quantitative.
“Audits can be qualitative or quantitative, as system expectations can be articulated and assessed in either mode.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAuditing automated decision systems of a large technology platform can be as complex as auditing human rights violations in a large supply chain.
“Auditing the automated decision systems of a large technology platform can rival the complexity of auditing for human rights violations in a large supply chain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAIA scope can be broader than a specific product feature and includes reflective articulations of trade-offs and decision-making.
“The scope of an AIA is thus potentially broader than a specific product feature, and the assessment goes beyond just evaluation measurements, to include more reflective articulations of the trade-offs and decision-making inherent in the release and development of a particular algorithmic system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAuditor access to algorithmic systems is difficult to mediate, and identification of audit targets and scope is uncertain.
“The mediation of auditor access is difficult, and the identification of audit targets and scope uncertain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAudits evaluate performance relative to expected behavior as part of a broader accountability process.
“Audits evaluate performance relative to expected behavior, as part of a broader accountability process [62].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThird-party oversight work has led to voluntary moratoriums, lawsuits, regulatory action, congressional hearings, and recalls or redesigns of deployed algorithms.
“The impact of this work is undeniable -leading to voluntary moratoriums [30], and several successful lawsuits [75,79]; nation-wide waves of regulatory action and public outcry [74]; congressional hearings [3]; and the recalls or radical redesigns of the deployed algorithms [12,64,65,88].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [75]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [79] source
- cites [74]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlgorithmic audit standards and scope may be unclear, leading to unfocused and expensive assessments.
“The standards and scope of an algorithmic audit may be unclear -leading to assessments that are unfocused and expensive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningBecause ESG is ambiguous, ESG certifications risk becoming cheap talk that rubber stamps practices without promoting social responsibility.
“And due to the ambiguity of what is being audited, ESG certifications risk becoming”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [19] source
- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRegulatory and institutional interpretations of hate speech differ from those experiencing hate online, leading to moderation tools that marginalize and censor impacted users.
“In the same vein, regulatory and institutional interpretations of hate speech often differs dramatically from the understanding of those experiencing hate online [43], leading to deployed moderation tools that further marginalize and censor impacted users rather than protect them [16].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAudits are conventionally classified into first-, second-, and third-party types.
“By convention, audits are classified into three types [14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClearview AI claimed its facial recognition was 100% accurate across demographic groups under ACLU methodology but did not address ethical and legal challenges of its face data sourcing.
“The controversial facial recognition company Clearview AI, for example, claimed to be”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is precedent for auditors compromised by selection, payment, or employment by auditees; access struggles; diffuse performance standards; and auditees concealing findings.
“There is a clear precedent for situations of auditors compromised by selection, payment, or employment by auditees; auditors struggling to secure access; auditors clumsily navigating diffuse performance standards; and auditees that may elect to share or conceal findings otherwise hidden behind a nondisclosure agreement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [19] source
- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationInternal accountability tends to prioritize at most regulators' or customers' concerns, primarily to reduce liability risk, which may not align with impacted populations.
“This tends to prioritize at most the concerns of regulators or customers, primarily to reduce liability risk, which may not align with core concerns of impacted populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [54]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [66]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThird-party oversight by non-profits, journalists, and academics has exposed AI weaknesses but is not conventionally considered audits.
“We note that while third party oversight by non-profit organizations, journalists, and academics have, as noted above, played critical roles in exposing weaknesses to AI systems, such forms of oversight are not conventionally considered audits per se.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnlike most audits, AIAs are less strictly defined and tend to include more open-ended inquiry into impacts.
“Unlike most audits, AIAs are not as strictly defined and tend to include more open-ended inquiry into the impacts of a particular algorithmic deployment [55].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese format and content developments restrict and define audit content, focusing on concerns preferable for internal auditors and requiring internal access or cooperation.
“All of these format and content oriented developments work to restrict and define what is to be included in the audit, focusing on concerns that are preferable for internal auditors to operationalize, and that requires a certain level of access or internal co-operation to achieve.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe turn toward audits alone is unlikely to achieve actual algorithmic accountability; meaningful third-party involvement requires sustained focus on institutional design.
“We conclude that the turn toward audits alone is unlikely to achieve actual algorithmic accountability, and sustained focus on institutional design will be required for meaningful third party involvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIdentifying audit targets and scope is critical to ensuring audits are applied to relevant parties and conducted for the right issues.
“Identifying audit targets and scope is critical to ensuring that audits are applied to relevant parties, and conducted for the right issues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningRisk-based or complaint-based selection of audit targets can help allocate attention where needed most when resources are scarce.
“In those instances, risk-based or complaint-based selection of audit targets can help to allocate attention where needed the most.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenCompanies can adopt incident reporting systems to raise user and public awareness of a system's use in consequential scenarios.
“Companies can themselves adopt incident reporting systems to raise user and public awareness of a system's use in consequential scenarios.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenA third-party audit where the auditee selects and compensates the auditor, determines scope and access, and limits post-audit actions may be functionally indistinguishable from a first-party audit and questionably effective for downstream accountability.
“A third party audit where (a) the auditor is selected and compensated by the auditee (b) to conduct an audit of a scope and access determined by the auditee, and (c) with limited post-audit actions may be functionally indistinguishable from firstparty audit, and questionably effective in garnering the expected downstream accountability outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSerious limitations characterize the current AI audit landscape despite policy attention turning toward audits.
“In sum, while policy attention has been turning toward audits, serious limitations characterize the current AI audit landscape.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome proposals make regulatory agencies the primary external auditor, but regulatory capacity to conduct such audits is lacking.
“Other proposals put the onus on regulatory agencies to serve the primary role of external auditor [36], but regulatory capacity to conduct such audits is currently lacking [22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrivacy disclosure pop-ups implemented in response to the EU's ePrivacy Directive increased consent fatigue without meaningfully improving user privacy.
“Some have noted, for example, that the privacy disclosure pop-ups implemented in response to the EU's ePrivacy Directive have increased”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [67]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [76]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThird-party reporting has a similar effect on small businesses.
“Third-party reporting has a similar effect on small businesses [2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOne study found restaurant compliance notices were not representative of actual food safety status and pushed inspectors to spend resources adjudicating accuracy rather than addressing safety hazards.
“One study found, for instance, that restaurant compliance notices were not representative of actual food safety status, and pushed inspectors to spend outsize resources on adjudicating the accuracy of these notices rather than addressing safety hazards directly [36].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBefore the 2019 Gender Shades audit, NIST failed to measure demographic differences in its FRVT, overlooking for years that Asian and African American people were up to 100 times more likely to be misidentified than white men.
“Before 2019 and the intervention of the Algorithmic Justice League's Gender Shades audit [10], the U.S. National Institute of Technology (NIST) failed to measure demographic differences in their regular Facial Recognition Vendor's Test (FRVT), thus overlooking for many years that”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2022 and the Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act of 2021 contemplate obligations on regulated parties with enforcement by the FTC.
“Similarly, the Algorithmic Accountability Act in 2022, and the Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act of 2021 [49] contemplate obligations on regulated parties with enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWhen audit resources are scarce, it may not be possible to select all parties for audit.
“When audit resources are scarce, however, it may not be possible to select all parties for an audit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA future where AI audits are conducted only by company employees and consulting companies fails to learn lessons of how third parties have generated robust oversight.
“A future where AI audits are conducted by company employees and consulting companies alone fails to learn the lessons of how third parties have generated robust oversight of AI systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThird-party oversight of AI products has faced challenging access, in sharp contrast to other audit systems.
“This stands in sharp contrast to third party oversight of AI products, where access has proven challenging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI systems are diverse, impact a range of industries and stakeholders, and require more third-party participants with varied tools to assess harms for implicated stakeholders.
“Such systems are diverse, impacting a range of industries and stakeholders, and it will require more third party participants, representing a variety of communities and making use of a wide set of tools, to concretely assess a wider range of the harms involved for the implicated stakeholders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIndependence is key to third-party audits.
“The key to third-party audits is independence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough definitions are provided for recommender systems and automated decision systems, there is little guidance for translating them into specific performance expectations.
“Although definitions are provided for these terms, there is little guidance for how regulators, auditors, and companies are meant to translate such descriptions into specific performance expectations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe literature suggests benefits to establishing a national incident reporting system enabling third parties to file complaints about algorithmic systems.
“The literature suggests that there may be benefits to establishing a national incident reporting system to enable third parties to file complaints about algorithmic systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationAn audit may more productively ask whether an advertising platform violates disparate treatment provisions of the Fair Housing Act rather than asking whether there is bias.
“Instead of asking,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSystem of Records Notices may alert parties to potential uses of algorithms.
“System of Records Notices (SORN), which are intended to notify the public whenever a federal agency creates, modifies, or eliminates records involving personally identifiable information, may alert parties to potential uses of algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe status quo is that algorithm use is rarely disclosed transparently, making it hard to identify audit targets.
“The status quo is that the use of algorithms is rarely disclosed in a transparent manner, making it hard to identify audit targets in the first place [84].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCompensation consultants recommended higher CEO salaries when they also offered additional services to those executives.
“Murphy & Sandino (2009) found that compensation consultants recommended higher CEO salaries when those consultants offered additional services to those executives [59].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationSome evidence suggests auditing can help standardize information for more consistent reporting.
“Some evidence suggests that auditing can help to standardize information for more consistent reporting [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCross-selling opportunities may lower statutory audit quality but did not affect the quality of independent expert reports for takeover targets, though they may lower fees.
“Another study, however, concluded that while cross-selling opportunities could lead to lower quality statutory audits, they did not have an impact on the quality of independent expert reports provided to takeover targets-though the incentive to cross-sell could have an impact on lowering fees [9].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationNo auditor can audit an entire VLOP single-handedly, and the definition of ADS is context-dependent and broad, doing little to help scope an audit.
“No auditor can audit an entire VLOP single-handedly, and the definition of ADS is so context-dependent and purposefully broad [68] that it does little to help scope an audit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrivate car emissions testing facilities with more chances to cross-sell services are more likely to pass cars that fail emissions standards.
“Another study found that private car emissions testing facilities with more opportunities to cross-sell services to customers were more likely to pass cars that did not meet emissions standards [63].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRegulators can impose consequences ranging from monetary sanctions to industry bars for violations of auditor independence rules.
“If an auditor violates these independence rules, regulators can impose a range of consequences ranging from monetary sanctions to a bar from the industry [1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFinancial auditing independence rules prohibit close auditor-client relationships and prevent auditors from helping prepare financial statements.
“One approach to reduce concerns regarding familiarity is seen in financial auditing, where independence rules prohibit close relationships between auditors and their clients, and prevent the auditor from assisting in the preparation of the financial statements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOpening audits to third-party participation could allow diverse stakeholders to bring precise inquiries specific to their context, focus, and organizational target.
“Opening audits up for third party participation could also allow for a variety of stakeholders to come in with diverse yet precise inquiries specific to the context, focus and organizational target of which they are most concerned.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRegulators can use incident reporting information to identify priority targets and assess fees or penalties based on audit results.
“Regulators can use this information to identify specific priority targets and assess fees or penalties based on audit results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMinimizing conflicts of interest and undue influence helps ensure the reliability of audit results.
“Minimizing conflicts of interest and undue influence helps to ensure the reliability of audit results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningRegulators could incentivize third-party auditors to inspect repeatedly flagged cases through RFPs or bug bounties.
“They could then incentivize third party auditors to inspect repeatedly flagged cases in this database through various means, such as RFPs or bug bounties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAdjusting for differences in reporting propensities and actively soliciting minority perspectives will be key components of an incident reporting system's design.
“Nonetheless, considerations for how to adjust for differences in reporting propensities and actively solicit minority perspectives for incident reporting will be a key component of the system's design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenSarbanes-Oxley requires mandatory rotation of the lead audit partner.
“Sarbanes-Oxley, for example, requires mandatory rotation of the lead audit partner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThird parties often face great legal risk to gain access to audited AI systems and are vulnerable to corporate retaliation or obstruction.
“Currently, third parties are often forced to operate at great legal risk to gain access to the audited AI system, keeping them vulnerable to various forms of corporate retaliation or obstruction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe literature is mixed on licensing benefits, and accreditation through a professional organization may be preferred.
“The literature is much more mixed on the benefits of licensing schemes; accreditation through a professional organization may be preferred for three reasons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Demand for AI audit services will grow significantly in the near future.
- Rests on an assumption: Occupational licensing reduces the supply of services.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMore training and greater team experience are linked to better audit results.
“Training improves audit quality and more experienced team members are associated with more effective audits [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA shift in Belgian financial audit standards toward more rule-based procedures decreased auditing errors and increased auditor independence.
“One study, for example, found that a shift in Belgian financial audit standards towards more rule-based procedures decreased financial auditing errors and increased auditor independence [11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMore rigorous dental licensing standards did not improve average patient dental outcomes.
“Another analysis of dental licensing requirements found that more rigorous licensing standards did not improve average dental outcomes of patients [45].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLess empirical work has examined whether professional licensing affects quality than has examined costs and barriers to entry.
“While much empirical work has focused on the costs and barriers to entry imposed by occupational licensing, less empirical work has probed whether professional licensing has an impact on quality [44].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPCAOB inspections improved audit quality by prompting lower-quality auditors to exit the market.
“Another found that PCAOB inspections, which assess the compliance of registered public accounting firms with professional audit rules and standards, improved audit quality by prompting lower-quality auditors to exit the market [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCorporations can block access through paywalls, prohibitive Terms of Service, or product design that obscures test points.
“Corporations can also use non-legal strategies to block access, including setting up a paywall, adopting prohibitive Terms of Service conditions, or structuring the product to obscure any clear set of test points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningFears of legal repercussions or corporate retaliation can weaken audit inquiry, and professional standards can help determine limited conditions for liability.
“Fears of legal repercussions or corporate retaliation can weaken the audit inquiry, and professional standards can help determine limited conditions for liability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIncreasing or decreasing CPA licensing requirements had no meaningful effect on CPA quality.
“Several studies have found that increasing or decreasing licensing requirements for CPAs had no meaningful effect on CPA quality [7,12,16].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [12]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenHireVue commissioned and controlled the scope of its ORCAA audit, including mediating public communication through its PR channels.
“Similarly, Hirevue commissioned and controlled the scope of its audit by ORCAA, including by mediating any public communication of audit results through their own public relations channels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnannounced inspections provided better information about nursing home care quality and could reduce regulatory burdens, though announced inspections could better identify organizational issues.
“Another study found that unannounced inspections provided better information about the quality of care at nursing homes, and could reduce the regulatory burdens of conducting inspections-though announced inspections could be better suited to identifying organizational issues [46].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationExisting research on whether professional licensing affects quality is mixed.
“Existing research on this question is mixed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe PCAOB experience supports creating an audit oversight board within a public agency or public interest institution to monitor auditors and set scope and standards.
“In particular, the PCAOB experience lends support to the creation of an audit oversight board, housed within a public agency or operating as a separate public interest institution, in order to monitor auditors and to determine the expected scope and standards for audit work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development have engaged in audits to analyze disparate outcomes and civil rights compliance for decades.
“Similarly, the Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development have engaged in audits to analyze disparate outcomes and compliance to civil rights guidelines for decades [78].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThird-party AI auditors have faced cease-and-desist orders, legal threats, and subpoenas.
“For instance, those making use of crowd-sourcing data collection tools can be interrupted abruptly by claims of violations to privacy or intellectual property rights -NYU researchers studying the Facebook ad delivery algorithm were presented with a cease-and-desist order [58]; German auditors at Algorithm Watch were legally threatened by Instagram [9]; and civil society watch dogs were subpoenaed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [58]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [46]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAuditors subject to PCAOB inspections produced higher quality audits than auditors the PCAOB was not allowed to inspect, suggesting access to regulators may provide additional benefits.
“Another study found that auditors who were subject to PCAOB inspections produced higher quality audits compared to auditors (typically auditors of foreign SEC registrants) that the PCAOB was not allowed to inspect, suggesting that providing access to parties beyond auditors, such as regulators, may provide additional benefits [51].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThere is no clear sense of expectations for what a quality AI audit entails or who is qualified to execute it.
“These auditors make use of a range of tools and methodologies to execute their work, and there is no clear sense of expectations as to what a quality audit entails or who is qualified to execute audit work in the algorithmic context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningNon-academic groups can use a broader range of strategies to conduct audits and understand harms to distinct communities.
“Non-academic groups can also take advantage of a broader range of strategies to conduct audits and understand harms to distinct communities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn food safety inspections, frequent interactions between inspectors and facilities may improve expertise but can increase social coercion and bribery.
“This tradeoff has also been documented in food safety inspections, where frequent interactions between inspectors and facilities may improve inspector expertise, but can increase the likelihood of social coercion and even bribery [49,68].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [49]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [68]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAll audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors, and disclosure need not be direct or absolute.
“Protecting proprietary information is not a proper response, as all audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors, and disclosure does not need to be direct nor absolute.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: All audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors.
- Rests on an assumption: Disclosure of audit information need not be direct or absolute.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTraining, standardization, and accreditation of auditors are key to ensuring audits are accurately and consistently conducted.
“Training, standardization, and accreditation of auditors are also key to ensuring that audits are accurately and consistently conducted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA systematic analysis of PwC monitoring found that the resulting audits omitted major violations and had serious deficiencies.
“One systematic analysis of the monitoring methods employed by the company PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), for example, found that the resulting audits omitted several major violations and contained serious deficiencies [62].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenFor third-party audits to be effective, auditors must be granted access to enough data for a robust review.
“For third-party audits to be effective, auditors must be granted access to enough data to conduct a robust review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe literature strongly supports training, standardization, and accreditation for third-party AI auditors.
“The literature strongly supports training, standardization, and accreditation for third-party AI auditors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe FDA may withdraw an auditor's accreditation if the auditor certifies a supplier later linked to a foodborne illness outbreak or refuses FDA access to records.
“The FDA, for example, may withdraw an auditor's accreditation if that auditor certifies a supplier that is later linked to an outbreak of foodborne illness or if it refuses to give the FDA access to its records [54].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe PwC shortcomings were attributed in part to management pre-screening of information and interviews for auditors.
“The author attributed these shortcomings in part to management pre-screening of information and interviews for auditors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe audit approach is tangible and can reveal concrete issues and repeated product failures that general standards can later resolve.
“A major advantage of the audit approach we articulate is its tangibility: audits can help reveal concrete issues and repeated product failures that can later be resolved by general standards.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRestaurant grading across ten jurisdictions suffered from grade inflation and grading inconsistencies.
“Another analysis of restaurant grading across ten jurisdictions found that the practice-meant to protect consumers and improve food sanitation via targeted disclosures-suffered from several serious deficiencies, including grade inflation and grading inconsistencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAI policy can foster third-party audits through deliberate institutional design informed by other industries' audit schemes.
“AI policy can foster third party audits with more deliberate institutional design, informed by the audit schemes from other industries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPublic visibility of audit results can improve accountability by preventing concealment of undesirable outcomes and incentivizing better behavior.
“Public visibility of audit results can improve accountability in several ways.It can prevent companies from being able to disguise or hide undesirable audit outcomes [21] and incentivize better behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationConfidential PwC audits were shielded from verification by other researchers or NGOs and limited improvement of regulated entity conditions.
“An analysis of PwC's auditing practices also found that the confidential nature of PwC's audits shielded them from verification by other researchers or NGOs and limited their ability to improve the conditions of the regulated entity [62].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe paper's survey is necessarily selective and incomplete.
“As just a first step in the direction of learning from cognate audit schemes, and because the evidence draws from so many different areas, our survey is necessarily selective and incomplete.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIEEE P7013 standard for automated facial analysis is directly informed by the Gender Shades audit.
“For instance, IEEE P7013 Inclusion and Application Standards for Automated Facial Analysis Technology industry standard is directly informed by the Gender Shades audit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe paper's case studies and evidence are not exhaustive.
“First of all, our case studies and evidence offered above are not exhaustive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPublicly traded companies spend an average of $2.2 million to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley financial reporting requirements.
“One study found that publicly traded companies spend an average of $2.2 million to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act's financial reporting requirements [50].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA registry of audit results avoids bias from pre-publication review or NDA secrecy and ensures audits provide market incentives, inform enforcement, and provide evidence for standard setting.
“A registry of audit results avoids the bias from pre-publication review or the secrecy of findings under NDAs and ensures that audits can provide market incentives for companies to correct behavior, inform enforcement actions, and provide an evidence base for standard setting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMandated disclosure of food inspection results increased food business compliance with food safety regulations, though other studies found similar schemes ineffective.
“One study found that mandated disclosure of food inspection results increased the compliance of food businesses with food safety regulations [8], though others have found similar food safety disclosure schemes to be ineffective [31,36].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe AI community has largely ignored what other audit schemes teach about fostering policy environments for third-party participation.
“Our point in this specific text is more simple: as the AI community turns toward audits, it has largely ignored what other audit schemes have to teach us on fostering policy environments conducive to third party participation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA restaurant grading scheme shifted inspection resources away from more significant safety hazards.
“The implementation of a restaurant grading scheme shifted valuable inspection resources away from more significant safety hazards [36].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningSpecific interventions are necessary to allow effective participation of third parties in AI audits.
“The mere insistence for audits is not enough -in particular, specific interventions will be necessary to allow for the effective participation of third parties, who play a critical role yet continue to face serious and often debilitating challenges when engaged in their work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningLimited disclosure of audit results would balance proprietary information protection against external accountability benefits.
“Limited disclosure of audit results would balance the protection of proprietary information against the benefits of external accountability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisecitationThere is tension between AI transparency and enforcing intellectual property rights.
“Other commentators have also noted the tension that exists, particularly in the context of algorithmic accountability, between the desire for AI transparency and the desire to enforce existing intellectual property rights.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Lessons from non-algorithmic audit systems can be transferred to the design of AI audit ecosystems.
“Our paper synthesizes lessons from other fields on how to craft effective systems of external oversight for algorithmic deployments.”
“Existing evidence from other regulatory fields suggests that effective target identification mechanisms, independence in selection and compensation, access to data and AI systems, clear and well-scoped audit standards, and post-audit report transparency will be critical to ensure that audits promote, rather than degrade, overall accountability.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Third-party oversight is necessary for meaningful algorithmic accountability.
“We conclude that the turn toward audits alone is unlikely to achieve actual algorithmic accountability, and sustained focus on institutional design will be required for meaningful third party involvement.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Demand for AI audit services will grow significantly in the near future.
“First, the need for AI audit services is likely to grow significantly in the near future, and substantial evidence suggests that occupational licensing reduces the supply of services.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Occupational licensing reduces the supply of services.
“First, the need for AI audit services is likely to grow significantly in the near future, and substantial evidence suggests that occupational licensing reduces the supply of services.”
The paper relies on this without support.
All audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors.
“Protecting proprietary information is not a proper response, as all audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors, and disclosure does not need to be direct nor absolute.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Disclosure of audit information need not be direct or absolute.
“Protecting proprietary information is not a proper response, as all audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors, and disclosure does not need to be direct nor absolute.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Internal auditors have a contractual relationship with the auditee.
“Internal auditors have a contractual relationship with the auditee (Raji et al. 2022)”
From Accountability in Government Use of <scp>AI</scp> : Citizen Concerns and Preferences (2025) · cites this paper as Raji et al. 2022
The Terminology section defines internal oversight as conducted by stakeholders with a direct employment or contractual relationship with the auditee. The claim omits the employment alternative, so the paper does not say that all internal auditors have a contractual relationship. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredProcedural non-transparency makes audit effectiveness unmeasurable, perpetuating the 'regress of mistrust' where accountability and trust shift from audited organizations to auditors.
“Furthermore, due to procedural non-transparency, audit process effectiveness is not measurable, perpetuating what Power [53] refers to as the 'regress of mistrust, ' where accountability and trust are shifted away from the audited organizations and onto auditors themselves, who are in turn subjected to more audits and evaluations.”
From A Framework for Assurance Audits of Algorithmic Systems (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
Section 4.5.1 (Evidence Base; page unavailable) says confidential audits were shielded from third-party verification, supporting the concern that non-transparency hinders scrutiny. Our copy does not say audit effectiveness is unmeasurable or describe a 'regress of mistrust' in which trust and accountability shift to auditors. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExternal auditors are independent entities with no contractual ties to the auditee.
“External auditors, by contrast, are independent entities with no contractual ties to the auditee (Raji et al. 2022).”
From Accountability in Government Use of <scp>AI</scp> : Citizen Concerns and Preferences (2025) · cites this paper as Raji et al. 2022
The algorithmic auditing ecosystem is nascent and currently lacks the structure and standards of other audit domains, such as financial services.
“The algorithmic auditing ecosystem is nascent and currently lacks the structure and standards of other audit domains, such as financial services [42].”
From Auditing Work: Exploring the New York City algorithmic bias audit regime (2024) · cites this paper as [42]
A thorough evaluation alone is not sufficient to hold key stakeholders responsible for system-wide behavior.
“A thorough evaluation alone is not sufficient to hold key stakeholders responsible for system-wide behavior [13, 88]-auditors also need tools that support key components of the accountability process, including target identification, standardization of practice, communication, and advocacy [136].”
From Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Tooling (2025) · cites this paper as [88]
The maturity of the AI audit ecosystem in the technology sector lags far behind other industries such as finance and healthcare.
“Often defined as independent evaluations of the performance, fairness, legality, or safety of deployed AI systems, the maturity of the audit ecosystem in the technology sector lags far behind other industries such as finance and healthcare [38, 88].”
From Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Tooling (2025) · cites this paper as [88]
External auditors face the threat of legal action under existing privacy and anti-hacking laws.
“who face the threat of legal action under existing privacy and anti-hacking laws [88, 122]”
From Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Tooling (2025) · cites this paper as [88]
Power dynamics between auditors and the audited have a critical impact on accountability.
“Power dynamics between auditors and the audited have a critical impact on accountability [14, 88].”
From Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Tooling (2025) · cites this paper as [88]
Auditors envisioned audit report databases as accountability tools to facilitate amalgamation and communication of audit findings to key stakeholders.
“Likewise, auditors envisioned audit report databases as accountability tools to facilitate the amalgamation and communication of audit findings to key stakeholders, mirroring interventions such as the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) EDGAR database for financial accounting audits [88].”
From Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Tooling (2025) · cites this paper as [88]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
NIST is given two different names
MinorThe paper expands NIST as the National Institute of Technology in one passage and the National Institute of Standards and Technology in another.
“the U.S. National Institute of Technology (NIST) failed to measure demographic differences”
“The National Institute of Standards and Technology, for instance, protects models”
Murphy and Sandino study has conflicting publication years
MinorThe discussion dates the Murphy and Sandino study to 2009, while the corresponding appendix reference lists it as published in 2010.
“Murphy & Sandino (2009) found that compensation consultants recommended higher CEO salaries when those consultants offered additional services to those executives [59].”
“148. Kevin J Murphy and Tatiana Sandino. 2010. Executive pay and "independent" compensation consultants.”
Cites
Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI
Mittelstadt, B. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4 · Cited by 1,886 · cited 3× · see citing works
“While helpful in aligning internal stakeholders, such an approach is not likely to identify or address the main concerns of external stakeholders [54, 66], particularly if that affected population or its representatives are”
BackgroundInfluentialRaji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372873 · Cited by 1,372 · see citing works
Self-citationSwitch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity
Fedus, W., Zoph, B., & Shazeer, N. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.03961 · Cited by 1,005 · see citing works
Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: evaluating claims and practices
Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372828 · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Discrimination in online ad delivery
Sweeney, L. (2013) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2447976.2447990 · Cited by 783 · see citing works
Four Things No One Will Tell You About ESG Data
Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2019) · Journal of Applied Corporate Finance · doi:10.1111/jacf.12346 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Raji, I. D., & Buolamwini, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314244 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, E., Wu, K., Daneshjou, R., Ouyang, D., Ho, D. E., & Zou, J. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01312-x · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Self-citationVeale, M., Van Kleek, M., & Binns, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174014 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Strengthening the Financial Reporting System: Can Audit Committees Deliver?
Bédard, J., & Gendron, Y. (2009) · International Journal of Auditing · doi:10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00413.x · Cited by 478 · see citing works
The Need for Sector‐Specific Materiality and Sustainability Reporting Standards
Eccles, R. G., Krzus, M. P., Rogers, J., & Serafeim, G. (2012) · Journal of Applied Corporate Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6622.2012.00380.x · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditing
Raji, I. D., Gebru, T., Mitchell, M., Buolamwini, J., Lee, J., & Denton, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3375627.3375820 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Self-citationDiscrimination through Optimization
Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A., & Rieke, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359301 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Tatonetti, N. P., Fernald, G. H., & Altman, R. B. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000214 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Algorithmic Impact Assessments and Accountability: The Co-construction of Impacts
Metcalf, J., Moss, E., Watkins, E. A., Singh, R., & Elish, M. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445935 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.00973 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Self-citationLayers of bias: A unified approach for understanding problems with risk assessment
Eckhouse, L., Lum, K., Conti-Cook, C., & Ciccolini, J. (2019) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854818811379 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Toward situated interventions for algorithmic equity: lessons from the field
Katell, M., Young, M., Dailey, D., Herman, B., Guetler, V., Tam, A., Bintz, C., Raz, D., & Krafft, P. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372874 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Building and Auditing Fair Algorithms: A Case Study in Candidate Screening
Wilson, C., Ghosh, A., Jiang, S., Mislove, A., Baker, L., Szary, J., Trindel, K., & Polli, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445928 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
A Silicon Valley love triangle: Hiring algorithms, pseudo-science, and the quest for auditability
Sloane, M., Moss, E., & Chowdhury, R. (2022) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100425 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
(2020) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards intellectual freedom in an AI Ethics Global Community
Ebell, C., Baeza-Yates, R., Benjamins, R., Cai, H., Coeckelbergh, M., Duarte, T., Hickok, M., Jacquet, A., Kim, A., Krijger, J., et al. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00052-5 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Algorithms that "Don't See Color"
Sapieżyński, P., Ghosh, A., Kaplan, L., Rieke, A., & Mislove, A. E. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534135 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Designing Toxic Content Classification for a Diversity of Perspectives
Kumar, D., Kelley, P. G., Consolvo, S., Mason, J., Bursztein, E., Durumeric, Z., Thomas, K., & Bailey, M. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.04511 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
An Examination of the Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2019Preprint
MacCarthy, M. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3615731 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Coston, A., Guha, N., Ouyang, D., Lu, L., Chouldechova, A., & Ho, D. E. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445881 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationAuditing Digital Platforms for Discrimination in Economic Opportunity AdvertisingPreprint
Kingsley, S., Wang, C., Mikhalenko, A., Sinha, P., & Kulkarni, C. E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.09656 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
An Algorithmic Equity Toolkit for Technology Audits by Community Advocates and ActivistsPreprint
Katell, M. A., Young, M., Herman, B., Dailey, D., Tam, A., Guetler, V., Binz, C., Raz, D., & Krafft, P. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.02943 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Contemporary Housing Discrimination: Facebook, Targeted Advertising, and the Fair Housing Act
Spinks, C. N. (2020) · Houston Law Review · Cited by 8 · see citing works
A Silicon Valley Love Triangle: Hiring Algorithms, Pseudo-Science, and the Quest for AuditabilityPreprint
Sloane, M., Moss, E., & Chowdhury, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.12403
Algorithms that "Don't See Color": Comparing Biases in Lookalike and Special Ad Audiences
Sapiezynski, P., Ghosh, A., Kaplan, L., Rieke, A., & Mislove, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.07579
A Comparative Study of Medical Device Regulations: US, Europe, Canada, and Taiwan
Chen, Y.-J., Chiou, C.-M., Huang, Y.-W., Tu, P.-W., Lee, Y.-C., & Chien, C.-H. (2018) · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science · doi:10.1177/2168479017716712
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 2021. Impact. https://themarkup.org/series/impact Last accessed 25 October 2021 . 2021. Impact. https://themarkup.org/series/impact Last accessed 25 October 2021.
- Julia Angwin , Jeff Larson , Surya Mattu , and Lauren Kirchner . 2016 . Machine bias . ProPublica , May 23, 2016 (2016), 139--159. Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine bias. ProPublica, May 23, 2016 (2016), 139--159.
- Ann H. Baier and Lisa Ahramjian . 2020 . Organic Certification of Farms and Businesses Producing Agricultural Products ., 8 pages. Ann H. Baier and Lisa Ahramjian. 2020. Organic Certification of Farms and Businesses Producing Agricultural Products., 8 pages.
- Riccardo Boffo and Robert Patalano . 2020. Esg investing: Practices, progress and challenges. Éditions OCDE , Paris ( 2020 ). Riccardo Boffo and Robert Patalano. 2020. Esg investing: Practices, progress and challenges. Éditions OCDE, Paris (2020).
- Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru . 2018 . Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification . In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. PMLR, 77--91 . Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. PMLR, 77--91.
- Alexandra Chouldechova , Diana Benavides-Prado , Oleksandr Fialko , and Rhema Vaithianathan . 2018 . A case study of algorithm-assisted decision making in child maltreatment hotline screening decisions . In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR, 134--148 . Alexandra Chouldechova, Diana Benavides-Prado, Oleksandr Fialko, and Rhema Vaithianathan. 2018. A case study of algorithm-assisted decision making in child maltreatment hotline screening decisions. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR, 134--148.
- Ilija Djekic , Sladjana Dragojlovic , Zoran Miloradovic , Snezana Miljkovic-Zivanovic , Marija Savic , and Vesna Kekic . 2016. Improving the confectionery industry supply chain through second party audits. British Food Journal ( 2016 ). Ilija Djekic, Sladjana Dragojlovic, Zoran Miloradovic, Snezana Miljkovic-Zivanovic, Marija Savic, and Vesna Kekic. 2016. Improving the confectionery industry supply chain through second party audits. British Food Journal (2016).
- Alex C Engler . 2021. Independent auditors are struggling to hold AI companies accountable . FastCompany . Alex C Engler. 2021. Independent auditors are struggling to hold AI companies accountable. FastCompany.
- Foxglove. 2020. We put a stop to the A Level grading algorithm! https://www.foxglove.org.uk/2020/08/17/we-put-a-stop-to-the-a-level-gradingalgorithm/ Last accessed 25 October 2021 . Foxglove. 2020. We put a stop to the A Level grading algorithm! https://www.foxglove.org.uk/2020/08/17/we-put-a-stop-to-the-a-level-gradingalgorithm/ Last accessed 25 October 2021.
- Patrick Grother , Mei Ngan , and Kayee Hanaoka . 2019. Face recognition vendor test (fvrt): Part 3, demographic effects . National Institute of Standards and Technology . Patrick Grother, Mei Ngan, and Kayee Hanaoka. 2019. Face recognition vendor test (fvrt): Part 3, demographic effects. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
- Karen Hao . 2020. We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google. Here's what it says. Retrieved January 21 ( 2020 ), 2021. Karen Hao. 2020. We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google. Here's what it says. Retrieved January 21 (2020), 2021.
- Caroline Haskins , Ryan Mac , and Logan McDonald . 2020. The ACLU Slammed A Facial Recognition Company That Scrapes Photos From Instagram And Facebook. Buzzfeed News ( 2020 ). Caroline Haskins, Ryan Mac, and Logan McDonald. 2020. The ACLU Slammed A Facial Recognition Company That Scrapes Photos From Instagram And Facebook. Buzzfeed News (2020).
- Thomas Kadri . 2020. Digital Gatekeepers. Texas Law Review 99 ( 2020 ). Thomas Kadri. 2020. Digital Gatekeepers. Texas Law Review 99 (2020).
- Soohun Kim and Aaron Yoon . 2020. Analyzing active managers' commitment to esg: Evidence from united nations principles for responsible investment. Available at SSRN 3555984 ( 2020 ). Soohun Kim and Aaron Yoon. 2020. Analyzing active managers' commitment to esg: Evidence from united nations principles for responsible investment. Available at SSRN 3555984 (2020).
- Lauren Kirchner and Matthew Goldstein . 2020 . Access Denied: Faulty Automated Background Checks Freeze Out Renters. (2020). Lauren Kirchner and Matthew Goldstein. 2020. Access Denied: Faulty Automated Background Checks Freeze Out Renters. (2020).
- Ava Kofman and Ariana Tobin . 2019. Facebook Ads Can Still Discriminate Against Women and Older Workers , Despite a Civil Rights Settlement. ProPublica. Retrieved December 12 ( 2019 ), 2020. Ava Kofman and Ariana Tobin. 2019. Facebook Ads Can Still Discriminate Against Women and Older Workers, Despite a Civil Rights Settlement. ProPublica. Retrieved December 12 (2019), 2020.
- Ava Kofman and Ariana Tobin . 2021. Facebook Ads Can Still Discriminate Against Women and Older Workers , Despite a Civil Rights Settlement. ( 2021 ). Ava Kofman and Ariana Tobin. 2021. Facebook Ads Can Still Discriminate Against Women and Older Workers, Despite a Civil Rights Settlement. (2021).
- KATHLEEN McGRORY and NEIL Bedi . 2020. Targeted. The Tampa Bay Times 3 ( 2020 ). KATHLEEN McGRORY and NEIL Bedi. 2020. Targeted. The Tampa Bay Times 3 (2020).
- JB Merrill . 2020. Does facebook still sell discriminatory ads. The Markup ( 2020 ). JB Merrill. 2020. Does facebook still sell discriminatory ads. The Markup (2020).
- Emanuel Moss , Elizabeth AnneWatkins , Ranjit Singh , Madeleine Clare Elish, and Jacob Metcalf . 2021 . Assembling Accountability : Algorithmic Impact Assessment for the Public Interest . Available at SSRN 3877437 (2021). Emanuel Moss, Elizabeth AnneWatkins, Ranjit Singh, Madeleine Clare Elish, and Jacob Metcalf. 2021. Assembling Accountability: Algorithmic Impact Assessment for the Public Interest. Available at SSRN 3877437 (2021).
- Ziad Obermeyer , Brian Powers , Christine Vogeli , and Sendhil Mullainathan . 2019. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366, 6464 ( 2019 ), 447--453. Ziad Obermeyer, Brian Powers, Christine Vogeli, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366, 6464 (2019), 447--453.
- Michael O'Leary and Warren Valdmanis . 2021. An ESG Reckoning Is Coming. Harvard Business Review ( 2021 ). Michael O'Leary and Warren Valdmanis. 2021. An ESG Reckoning Is Coming. Harvard Business Review (2021).
- Nathaniel Persily . 2021. Facebook Hides Data Showing It Harms Users. Outside Scholars Need Access. (2021). Last accessed 25 October 2021 . Nathaniel Persily. 2021. Facebook Hides Data Showing It Harms Users. Outside Scholars Need Access. (2021). Last accessed 25 October 2021.
- Elizabeth Pollman . 2019. Corporate Social Responsibility , ESG, and Compliance. Forthcoming , Cambridge Handbook of Compliance (D. Daniel Sokol & Benjamin van Rooij eds.), Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper 2019 --35 (2019). Elizabeth Pollman. 2019. Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, and Compliance. Forthcoming, Cambridge Handbook of Compliance (D. Daniel Sokol & Benjamin van Rooij eds.), Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper 2019--35 (2019).
- Michael Power. 1997. The audit society: Rituals of verification. OUP Oxford. Michael Power. 1997. The audit society: Rituals of verification. OUP Oxford.
- Dillon Reisman , Jason Schultz , Kate Crawford , and Meredith Whittaker . 2018. Algorithmic impact assessments: A practical framework for public agency accountability . AI Now Institute ( 2018 ), 1--22. Dillon Reisman, Jason Schultz, Kate Crawford, and Meredith Whittaker. 2018. Algorithmic impact assessments: A practical framework for public agency accountability. AI Now Institute (2018), 1--22.
- Rashida Richardson . 2021. Defining and Demystifying Automated Decision Systems. Maryland Law Review , Forthcoming ( 2021 ). Rashida Richardson. 2021. Defining and Demystifying Automated Decision Systems. Maryland Law Review, Forthcoming (2021).
- Eva Rosen , Philip ME Garboden, and Jennifer E Cossyleon . 2021 . Racial Discrimination in Housing : How Landlords Use Algorithms and Home Visits to Screen Tenants. American Sociological Review ( 2021), 00031224211029618. Eva Rosen, Philip ME Garboden, and Jennifer E Cossyleon. 2021. Racial Discrimination in Housing: How Landlords Use Algorithms and Home Visits to Screen Tenants. American Sociological Review (2021), 00031224211029618.
- Nathan Sheard. 2021. Banning Government Use of Face Recognition Technology: 2020 Year in Review. Nathan Sheard. 2021. Banning Government Use of Face Recognition Technology: 2020 Year in Review.
- Ariana Tobin . 2019 . HUD sues Facebook over housing discrimination and says the company's algorithms have made the problem worse . ProPublica (March 28 , 2019). Available at https://www.propublica.org/article/hud-sues-facebookhousingdiscrimination-advertising-algorithms (last accessed April 29, 2019) (2019). Ariana Tobin. 2019. HUD sues Facebook over housing discrimination and says the company's algorithms have made the problem worse. ProPublica (March 28, 2019). Available at https://www.propublica.org/article/hud-sues-facebookhousingdiscrimination-advertising-algorithms (last accessed April 29, 2019) (2019).
- Daniel Trielli , Jennifer Stark , and Nicholas Diakopoulos . 2017 . Algorithm tips: A resource for algorithmic accountability in Government . In Proc. Computation+ Journalism Symposium. Daniel Trielli, Jennifer Stark, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2017. Algorithm tips: A resource for algorithmic accountability in Government. In Proc. Computation+ Journalism Symposium.
- 10.5555/3152676 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach
Mökander, J., Schuett, J., Kirk, H. R., & Floridi, L. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00289-2 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reduction
Shelby, R., Rismani, S., Henne, K., Moon, A., Rostamzadeh, N., Nicholas, P., Yilla-Akbari, N., Gallegos, J., Smart, A., Garcia, E., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3600211.3604673 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Hallucination‐Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading <scp>AI</scp> Legal Research Tools
Magesh, V., Surani, F., Dahl, M., Suzgun, M., Manning, C. D., & Ho, D. E. (2025) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/jels.12413 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citationBlack-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Audits
Casper, S., Ezell, C., Siegmann, C., Kolt, N., Curtis, T. L., Bucknall, B., Haupt, A. A., Wei, K., Scheurer, J., Hobbhahn, M., et al. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3659037 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
AI auditing: The Broken Bus on the Road to AI Accountability
Birhane, A., Steed, R., Ojewale, V., Vecchione, B., & Raji, I. D. (2024) · 2024 IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml59370.2024.00037 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Gradient of Generative AI Release: Methods and Considerations
Solaiman, I. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3593981 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Characterizing Manipulation from AI Systems
Carroll, M., Chan, A., Ashton, H., & Krueger, D. (2023) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623226 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Chan, A., Ezell, C., Kaufmann, M., Wei, K., Hammond, L., Bradley, H., Bluemke, E., Rajkumar, N., Krueger, D., Kolt, N., et al. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658948 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Tooling
Ojewale, V., Steed, R., Vecchione, B., Birhane, A., & Raji, I. D. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713301 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationHorneber, D., & Laumer, S. (2023) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-023-00817-8 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Deng, W. H., Guo, B., Devrio, A., Shen, H., Eslami, M., & Holstein, K. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581026 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Making It Possible for the Auditing of AI: A Systematic Review of AI Audits and AI Auditability
Li, Y., & Goel, S. (2024) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-024-10508-8 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Stogiannos, N., Malik, R., Kumar, A., Barnes, A., Pogose, M., Harvey, H., McEntee, M. F., & Malamateniou, C. (2023) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20221157 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Auditing Work: Exploring the New York City algorithmic bias audit regime
Groves, L., Metcalf, J., Kennedy, A., Vecchione, B., & Strait, A. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658959 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“We join calls from across the FAccT community that similar laws should address the capacity building of algorithm audit expertise, standards of practice, and robust oversight mechanisms [48].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHartmann, D., de Pereira, J. R. L., Streitbörger, C., & Berendt, B. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00595-3 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Deng, C., Duan, Y., Jin, X., Chang, H., Tian, Y., Liu, H., Wang, Y., Gao, K., Zou, H. P., Jin, Y., et al. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00797-3 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
A Framework for Assurance Audits of Algorithmic Systems
Lam, K., Lange, B., Blili-Hamelin, B., Davidovic, J., Brown, S., & Hasan, A. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658957 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“This lack of clear guidance poses several challenges in the current algorithm auditing industry.”
BackgroundInfluentialHow to design an AI ethics board
Schuett, J., Reuel, A.-K., & Carlier, A. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00409-y · Cited by 46 · see citing works
The necessity of AI audit standards boards
Manheim, D., Martin, S., Bailey, M., Samin, M., & Greutzmacher, R. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02320-y · Cited by 45 · see citing works
The Foundation Model Transparency Index
Bommasani, R., Klyman, K., Longpre, S., Kapoor, S., Maslej, N., Xiong, B., Zhang, D., & Liang, P. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.12941 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Three lines of defense against risks from AI
Schuett, J. (2025) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01811-0 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence bias auditing – current approaches, challenges and lessons from practice
Lacmanović, S., & Škare, M. (2025) · Review of Accounting and Finance · doi:10.1108/raf-01-2025-0006 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Blösser, M., & Weihrauch, A. (2023) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-01-2023-0009 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Abrahams, T. O., Farayola, O. A., Kaggwa, S., Uwaoma, P. U., Hassan, A. O., & Dawodu, S. O. (2024) · Finance & Accounting Research Journal · doi:10.51594/farj.v6i1.706 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Frontier AI developers need an internal audit function
Schuett, J. (2024) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.17665 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Seger, E., Dreksler, N., Moulange, R., Dardaman, E., Schuett, J., Wei, K., Winter, C., Arnold, M., Ó hÉigeartaigh, S., Korinek, A., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4596436 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Assessing dual use risks in AI research: necessity, challenges and mitigation strategies
Brenneis, A. (2024) · Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/17470161241267782 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Contextualizing User Perceptions about Biases for Human-Centered Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Yuan, C. W., Bi, N., Lin, Y.-F., & Tseng, Y. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580945 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Ononiwu, M., Azonuche, T. I., Okoh, O. F., & Enyejo, J. O. (2023) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Science Engineering and Technology · doi:10.32628/ijsrset232531 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Should Users Trust Advanced AI Assistants? Justified Trust As a Function of Competence and Alignment
Manzini, A., Keeling, G., Marchal, N., McKee, K. R., Rieser, V., & Gabriel, I. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658964 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Alam, M. F., Lentsch, A., Yu, N., Barmack, S., Kim, S., Acemoğlu, D., Hart, A. J., Johnson, S., & Ahmed, F. (2024) · doi:10.21428/e4baedd9.e39b392d · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Regulation by Design: Features, Practices, Limitations, and Governance Implications
Prifti, K., Morley, J., Novelli, C., & Floridi, L. (2024) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-024-09675-z · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Algorithmic Decision-Making, Agency Costs, and Institution-Based Trust
Dowding, K. M., & Taylor, B. R. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00757-5 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Beyond Ads: Sequential Decision-Making Algorithms in Law and Public Policy
Henderson, P., Chugg, B., Anderson, B., & Ho, D. E. (2022) · ACM Symposium on Computer Science and Law (CSLAW) · doi:10.1145/3511265.3550439 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom Transparency to Accountability and Back: A Discussion of Access and Evidence in AI Auditing
Cen, S. H., & Alur, R. (2024) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3689904.3694711 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Reclaiming the Digital Commons: A Public Data Trust for Training Data
Chan, A., Bradley, H., & Rajkumar, N. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3600211.3604658 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Hartmann, D., Oueslati, A., Staufer, D., Pohlmann, L., Munzert, S., & Heuer, H. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713998 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Algorithmic audits of algorithms, and the law
Merrer, E. L., Pons, R., & Trédan, G. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00343-z · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Bound by the Bounty: Collaboratively Shaping Evaluation Processes for Queer AI Harms
Dennler, N. S., Ovalle, A., Singh, A., Soldaini, L., Subramonian, A., Tu, H., Agnew, W. S., Ghosh, A., Yee, K., Peradejordi, I. F., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3600211.3604682 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Human-Centered Evaluation and Auditing of Language Models
Xiao, Z., Deng, W. H., Lam, M. S., Eslami, M., Kim, J., Lee, M., & Liao, Q. V. (2024) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3613905.3636302 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Accountability in Government Use of <scp>AI</scp> : Citizen Concerns and Preferences
Feng, N., & Chandra, Y. (2025) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.70030 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Kim, S., Ho, J., Li, Y., Fan, B., Yang, W. Y., Ramey, J. B., Fox, S., Zhu, H., Zimmerman, J., & Eslami, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3686905 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Terms-we-serve-with: Five dimensions for anticipating and repairing algorithmic harm
Rakova, B., Shelby, R. M., & Ma, M. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231211553 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
A Framework for Assurance Audits of Algorithmic Systems
Lange, B., Lam, K., Blili-Hamelin, B., Davidovic, J., Brown, S., & Hasan, A. (2024) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Lassiter, T. B., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3686963 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Xiong, Y., & Kim, J. K. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100120 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
McClellan, M. (2025) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm18090475 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Information Security, Ethics, and Integrity in LLM Agent Interaction
Chen, Y.-J., & Madisetti, V. K. (2025) · Journal of Information Security · doi:10.4236/jis.2025.161010 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Pitfalls of Evidence-Based AI Policy
Casper, S., Krueger, D., & Hadfield-Menell, D. (2025) · SuperIntelligence - Robotics - Safety & Alignment · doi:10.70777/si.v2i2.14611 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Access Denied: Meaningful Data Access for Quantitative Algorithm Audits
Zaccour, J., Binns, R., & Rocher, L. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713963 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Consumer vulnerability within digital platforms as service ecosystems
Lee, K., Bart, Y., & Cauffman, C. (2025) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-03-2025-0179 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
A Framework for Auditing Chatbots for Dialect-Based Quality-of-Service Harms
Harvey, E., Kizilcec, R. F., & Koenecke, A. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732137 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Human-Centered Evaluation and Auditing of Language Models
Liu, Y. L., Deng, W. H., Lam, M. S., Eslami, M., Kim, J., Liao, Q. V., Xu, W., Novikova, J., & Xiao, Z. (2025) · Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706599.3706729 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Context-specific certification of AI systems: a pilot in the financial industry
Brogle, K., Kallina, E., Sargeant, H., Shankar, V., Weller, A., Casovan, A., & Bhatt, U. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00720-w · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Herrador, M., & Rehberger, J. (2025) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2025.107994 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Accountability in Algorithmic Systems: From Principles to Practice
Wilkinson, D., Crawford, K., Wallach, H., Raji, I. D., Rakova, B., Singh, R., Strohmayer, A., & Zuckerman, E. (2023) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3544549.3583747 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrating XAI into Safe AI Development and AI Certification Processes: An Expert-Based Analysis
Frész, B., Göbels, V. P., Omri, S., Brajovic, D., Aichele, A., Kutz, J., Neuhüttler, J., & Huber, M. F. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30849-8_13 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Misabstraction in Sociotechnical Systems
de Troya, Í. M. D. R., Kernahan, J., Doorn, N., Dignum, V., & Dobbe, R. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732122 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
From Incidents to Insights: Patterns of Responsibility following AI Harms
Richards, I., Benn, C., & Zilka, M. (2025) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3757887.3763018 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The Future of AI in the GCC Post‐ NPM Landscape: A Comparative Analysis of Kuwait and the UAE
Albous, M. R., Alboloushi, B., & Lacheret, A. (2025) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.70084 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Nieuwenhuizen, E., Trehan, V., & Porumbescu, G. A. (2025) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.70034 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Yücel, A., & Bozdoğanoğlu, B. (2024) · Denetişim · doi:10.58348/denetisim.1540801 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
User-based algorithmic auditing
Hacohen, U. Y. (2025) · Theoretical Inquiries in Law · doi:10.1515/til-2025-0012 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Privacy Concerns in ChatGPT Data Collection and Its Impact on Individuals
Alzamil, L. M., Alhasani, A. M., & Alshehri, S. (2025) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi17110511 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Blueprint for Auditing Generative AIPreprint
Mökander, J., Curl, J., & Kshirsagar, M. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4887768 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Historical Methods for AI Evaluations, Assessments, and Audits
Sandoval, . C. B., & Jing, F. S. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732093 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Opportunities and challenges of multidisciplinary algorithmic impact assessments
Sandoval, . C. B., Jing, F. S., Garcia, A. A., Berger, S., Candello, H. C. D. S. P., & Lustig, C. (2025) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2025.2499302 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
AI, Education, and Academic Publishing in between Knowledge Capitalism and Socialism
Ma, Y. (2025) · Beijing international review of education · doi:10.1177/25902547251390638 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
RECONCILING TRADE SECRETS AND AI PUBLIC TRANSPARENCY
Keller, P., & Aplin, T. F. (2026) · The Cambridge Law Journal · doi:10.1017/s0008197325101086 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and person-centred practice: a critical reflection
Fernandes, J. B., & McCormack, B. G. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02776-2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Operational responsibility in AI governance: a user-centric liability framework
Chen, Z. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01163-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Toward Patient-Centered AI Fact Labels: Leveraging Extrinsic Trust Cues
Yoo, D. W., Stroud, A. M., Zhu, X., Miller, J. E., & Barry, B. A. (2025) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3715336.3735758 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Laufer, B., Kleinberg, J. M., Levy, K. E. C., & Nissenbaum, H. F. (2023) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623237 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“It’s Just a Wild, Wild West”: Harnessing Public Procurement as an AI Governance Mechanism
Hudig, A. I., Kallina, E., & Singh, J. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791968 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Who is responsible for assessing the adherence to AI-specific requirements, also post-contract award [see e.g. 120, 131, 134]?”
Governing Artificial Intelligence Through Auditing
Oluka, A., & Mashau, P. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3922-1.ch005 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Collaboratively Designing and Evaluating Responsible AI Interventions
Deng, W. H., Berman, G., Kaur, H., Schwartz, R., Ibrahim, M. A., Eslami, M., Holstein, K., & Madaio, M. (2024) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3678884.3687136 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Role and Use of Race in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models Related to Health
Were, M. C., Li, A., Malin, B., Yin, Z., Coco, J., Collins, B. X., Clayton, E. W., Novak, L. L., Hendricks‐Sturrup, R., Oluyomi, A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/73996 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Misalignment or misuse? The AGI alignment tradeoff
Hellrigel-Holderbaum, M., & Dung, L. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02403-y · Cited by 3 · see citing works
High-stakes team based public sector decision making and AI oversightPreprint
Morgan, D., Hashem, Y., Straub, V. J., & Bright, J. (2022) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/arq3w · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A Causal Framework for AI Regulation and AuditingPreprint
Sharkey, L., Ghuidhir, C. N., Braun, D., Scheurer, J., Balesni, M., Bushnaq, L., Stix, C., & Hobbhahn, M. (2024) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202401.1424.v1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Improving Group Fairness Assessments with Proxies
Harvey, E., Lee, M. S. A., & Singh, J. P. (2024) · ACM Journal on Responsible Computing · doi:10.1145/3677175 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Research on the Application of AI Technology in Auditing
Zhang, S. (2024) · Economic management & global business studies. · doi:10.69610/j.emgbs.20240831 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Governing AI in Public HRM: A Critical Analysis of Taiwan’s Draft Artificial Intelligence Basic Law
Yang, Y.-S. (2025) · Journal of Governance and Public Policy · doi:10.18196/jgpp.v12i3.26878 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Mapping Research on AI Ethics and Human Rights: A Bibliometric Study with a TCCM-Based Agenda
Singh, J., Thapliyal, S., Kumar, S., Das, S. S., Rawat, S. S., Jha, V. K., Chaudhary, R., Bhagat, R. K., Sharma, S. R., Anand, A., et al. (2026) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.173404.1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Discrimination DRIFT: A Practical Framework for Responsible AI
Wyer, S. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01211-2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Abdallah, A., Methen, W. D. S. A., Diab, M. F. S., Mohamed, G. S. K., Alsarhan, M. F., Aleisa, H. E. H., Alshammari, M. D. M., & Alazzam, M. B. (2025) · EDPACS · doi:10.1080/07366981.2025.2606527 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Global Approaches to Auditing Artificial Intelligence: A Literature Review
(IPIE), I. P. O. T. I. E., Sylvester, P., Chun, W. H. K., Hannák, A., Mendoza, M., Broussard, M., Сергеевич, Е. Р., Nelson, A., Sandvig, C., Sesan, G., et al. (2024) · doi:10.61452/bwym7397 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Towards A Global AI Auditing Framework: Assessment and Recommendations
(IPIE), I. P. O. T. I. E., Faveri, B., Johnson-León, M., Sylvester, P., Chun, W. H. K., Hannák, A., Mendoza, M., Broussard, M., Сергеевич, Е. Р., Nelson, A., et al. (2025) · doi:10.61452/zwed1485 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
AI Adoption, Audit Outcomes, and Professional Reputation
Tarawiru, Y., Hasdiana, Bachtiar, Y., & Parman (2025) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2025.2581114 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nainggolan, A. N., & Winoto, A. (2025) · International Conference on Computing and Applied Informatics (ICCAI) · doi:10.1109/iccai65301.2025.11278986 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Regulatory Frameworks and Ethical Governance of Neural Networks in Computer Science Applications
Kumar, G., Kumari, R., Shukla, A., Yadav, A. P., Verma, R., & Gaur, J. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Energy, Signal Processing and Cyber Security (iSSSC) · doi:10.1109/isssc66652.2025.11388372 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Comprehensive and comparative analysis of AI in the energy sector
Worthmann, C., & Malik, K. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00728-2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Auditoria i control dels sistemes d’intel·ligència artificial d’alt risc al sector públic
Pérez, J. C. (2025) · Revista Catalana de Dret Públic · doi:10.58992/rcdp.i71.2025.4506 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Jin, A., Asemota, A., Krane, D. E., Adams, N., & Abebe, R. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791552 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Beyond Explanation: Evidentiary Rights for Algorithmic Accountability
Stewart, M. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3805689.3806532 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Alamdari, P. A., Klassen, T. Q., & McIlraith, S. A. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812339 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
There is no free benchmark: An institutional view of legal AI benchmarking
Guha, N., Zhang, A. K., Tsang, C., Manning, C. D., Nyarko, J., & Ho, D. E. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2509757122 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationA comparative analysis of AI regulation of the EU and Canada with emphasis on oversight
Sarabdeen, J. (2026) · International Journal of Law and Management · doi:10.1108/ijlma-08-2025-0377 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
COMPLIANCE THEATRE: RETHINKING EVALUATION AND ENFORCEMENT IN FRONTIER AI REGULATION
Bartlett, M. (2026) · The Cambridge Law Journal · doi:10.1017/s000819732610155x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Raji, I. D., Xu, P., Honigsberg, C., & Ho, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2022-07-26
- Pages
- 557-571
- ISSN
- 3065-8365 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4288058319
- Semantic Scholar
- c253ab3e988d996b9253f8437cbdc37c415a2f0b
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 22.74
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Mozilla Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- third-party oversight, algorithmic auditing, AI governance, algorithmic accountability, institutional design, external supervision, regulatory audits, financial regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review