Cited by 165Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Outsider Oversight: Designing a Third Party Audit Ecosystem for AI Governance

Open access
Raji, Inioluwa Deborah, Xu, Peggy, Honigsberg, Colleen, Ho, Daniel·2022·Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society

Abstract

Much attention has focused on algorithmic audits and impact assessments to hold developers and users of algorithmic systems accountable. But existing algorithmic accountability policy approaches have neglected the lessons from non-algorithmic domains: notably, the importance of third parties. Our paper synthesizes lessons from other fields on how to craft effective systems of external oversight for algorithmic deployments. First, we discuss the challenges of third party oversight in the current AI landscape. Second, we survey audit systems across domains - e.g., financial, environmental, and health regulation - and show that the institutional design of such audits are far from monolithic. Finally, we survey the evidence base around these design components and spell out the implications for algorithmic auditing. We conclude that the turn toward audits alone is unlikely to achieve actual algorithmic accountability, and sustained focus on institutional design will be required for meaningful third party involvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3514094.3534181

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

19 of 161 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Even when connected to representative organizations, individuals or communities often lack vocabulary and ability to flag observed issues.

    “Even when connected to representative organizations, such individuals or communities often lack the vocabulary and ability to flag the issues they observe [34].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] source

      Section 6.5 (page not provided) says that a specialist machine-learning background was not necessary for meaningful feedback and gives examples of community panelists identifying concerns about predictive policing. The paper acknowledges that technical concepts are difficult to explain, but its finding runs contrary to the attributed claim that these communities lack the ability to flag issues they observe. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Even participatory AIA approaches frame consulting external perspectives as responsibility of internal stakeholders.

    “Even in cases when a participatory approach is considered, the responsibility of consulting with external perspectives when considering impacts to articulate in an AIA is still framed as the responsibility of internal stakeholders to coordinate and interpret these interactions [53].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53] source

      Section 2.3 (page unavailable) says participatory design brings relevant stakeholders into development and that gathering their views and resolving conflicting specifications create work and costs. It does not discuss AI impact assessments (AIAs) or say that internal stakeholders are responsible for coordinating and interpreting external consultations in an AIA. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Third-party watchdogs have conducted consequential studies of biased outcomes across many domains, including content curation, advertising, tenant screening, child welfare, criminal justice, hiring, immigration, education, and public health.

    “Together, these watchdogs continue to participate in consequential studies to analyze the biased outcomes of models used in domains as varied as content curation [80], online advertising [40], tenant screening [39,70], child welfare [12], criminal justice [5,10,20,26,78], hiring [63], immigration [24], education [25] or public health [15,56].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [80] source

      The Conclusion (page unavailable) describes a drug-safety study that developed and evaluated models for predicting adverse drug interactions. The Discussion mentions possible confounding and indication biases, but neither passage describes a third-party watchdog study of biased model outcomes. I searched for watchdogs, biased outcomes, and model bias in public health. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [40]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [39]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [70]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    Evidence on mandatory audit rotations is mixed.

    “The evidence on mandatory rotations is more mixed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [27]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [32]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [38]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [43]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [65] source

      Section 5, “Limitations of Internal Audits” (page unavailable), discusses auditor independence and the limits of internal audits, but not mandatory rotations or evidence about their effects. Searches for “mandatory rotations” and “auditor rotation mixed evidence” found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Environmental third-party audits were more accurate when auditors were paid from a common government fund rather than by the audited firm.

    “A two-year randomized controlled trial showed that environmental third party audits were more accurate when auditors were not paid by the firm being audited, but by a common pool of government distributed funding [18].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] source

      The 'Some key problems' section discusses conflicts of interest in corporate-funded AI ethics research and independent AI audits, but not environmental audits. Searches for the two-year trial and the comparison between firm-paid and government-funded auditors found no passage addressing the claimed accuracy result. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 56
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 77
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Google researchers on the internal AI team were dismissed and blocked from publishing critiques of large language models that later proved critical to the company's product roadmap.

    “For instance, Google researchers on the internal AI team were dismissed and blocked from publishing critiques on the large-scale language models [18,27], which would later be revealed to be critical to the company's future product roadmap [23,85,87].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [18] source

      The Introduction reports that Google fired Timnit Gebru and Margaret Mitchell and that they were told not to cast Google’s technologies in a negative light in research focused on large language models. It does not establish that these researchers were blocked from publishing the critiques. The later product-roadmap point has separate citations in the citing sentence and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [27]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [85]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [87] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    For an audit to successfully measure performance, its scope should be sufficiently delineated.

    “For an audit to successfully measure performance, its scope should be sufficiently delineated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] source

      The sections on benchmarking and defining a peer group say that how a comparison group and performance range are defined is crucial to assessing a company's ESG performance. That supports the general need to define the basis of an assessment, but the paper does not address audits or state a requirement about an audit's scope (searched: audit, scope, delineated). No page number was available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Voluntary reporting can be unreliable and create reporting bias.

    “Voluntary reporting can be unreliable and create reporting bias [4].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] source

      The paper’s “Measuring and comparing audiences” section uses self-reported gender and race data and notes that voter-file information may be outdated. Neither that section nor the other passages found when searching for voluntary reporting and reporting bias says that voluntary reporting is unreliable or creates reporting bias. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Similar biases have been found in recent consumer complaints to the CFPB, although early CFPB complaints appeared higher from minority neighborhoods.

    “Similar biases have been found in recent consumer complaints to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) [65]-although early CFPB complaints, if anything, appeared to be higher from minority neighborhoods [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [65] source

      Section 2.1 discusses bias in automated facial analysis, not consumer complaints. Searches for CFPB, consumer complaints, and minority neighborhoods found no passage in our copy addressing the finding attributed to this source. The separate claim about early complaints is attached to citation [6], not this source. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [6]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Resource constraints prompted development of syndromic surveillance in public health, adverse event reporting for pharmaceuticals, and financial fraud complaint databases to provide real-time signals and focus audit efforts.

    “Similar resource constraints prompted the development of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [35]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [66]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [53] source

      The passages on medical oversight (sections 2.3–2.4; page numbers unavailable) discuss professional review and accountability, not the development of surveillance or complaint databases. Searches for syndromic surveillance, pharmaceutical adverse-event reporting, financial fraud complaints, resource constraints, and real-time audit signals found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Stricter teacher occupational licensing is associated with a wider distribution of student test scores, while other studies found no impact on standardized test scores.

    “One study of occupational licensing laws for teachers found that stricter occupational licensing regimes is associated with a wider distribution of student test scores [52], though others concluded that state occupational licensing requirements for teachers had no impact on students' standardized test scores [28].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [52] source

      The citation to this source is attached to the first clause, about stricter teacher licensing and the distribution of student test scores. Our copy discusses algorithmic impact assessments and accountability, including testing in a different context (section 4.1), but the passages found for searches on teacher occupational licensing and student test scores do not address that association. The second clause is attributed to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [28]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Rotation requirements are employed in a minority of audit cases.

    “Rotation requirements, which require auditors to rotate across audit targets to ostensibly foster independence, are employed in a minority of cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Nearly all audit programs have specific standards and rules that help scope the audit.

    “First, we note that nearly all audit programs have specific standards and rules that help to scope the audit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Significant variation exists within third-party audits: they may be conducted by public agencies or private parties, which typically determines whether auditors are compensated by the audited party.

    “Second, we note that significant variation exists within the third party audit category, which may be conducted by public agencies (e.g., nursing home inspections) or private parties (e.g., children's toys), which typically also determines whether auditors are compensated by the audited party.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    There are many varieties of audits.

    “What this survey highlights most of all is that there are many varieties of audits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingreasoning

    Due to limited regulatory capacity, public inspections appear more likely to be initiated by complaint or risk-based heuristic rather than universally mandated.

    “Due to limited regulatory capacity, public inspections appear more likely to be initiated by some complaint or risk-based heuristic, rather than being universally mandated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    In many cases, audit schemes contemplate post-audit actions such as recommendations for remediation and disclosure.

    “Last, in many cases, the audit scheme contemplates post-audit actions, such as recommendations for remediation and disclosure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Accreditation schemes exist for all instances where the auditee selects and compensates the third-party auditor.

    “Fourth, accreditation schemes exist for all instances where the auditee selects and compensates the third party auditor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingown data

    Accreditation is widespread in instances where auditees choose auditors.

    “As seen in the instances where auditees choose auditors in Table 1, accreditation is widespread.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Third-party audits invariably involve privileged access to information.

    “As Table 1 shows, third party audits invariably involve privileged access to information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Audited companies may ignore or overlook audit results.

    “Furthermore, audited companies could outright ignore or overlook audit results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Conflicts of interest can compromise the quality of third-party audits of algorithmic systems, as in ESG.

    “Like in ESG, conflicts of interest can compromise the quality of third-party audits of algorithmic systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Effective target identification, independence in selection and compensation, access to data and AI systems, clear audit standards, and post-audit transparency are critical for audits to promote rather than degrade accountability.

    “Existing evidence from other regulatory fields suggests that effective target identification mechanisms, independence in selection and compensation, access to data and AI systems, clear and well-scoped audit standards, and post-audit report transparency will be critical to ensure that audits promote, rather than degrade, overall accountability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AIAs are often practically executed by similar stakeholders as internal audits, with broader regulatory implications and purpose of prompting institutional reflexivity and due diligence.

    “Thus, AIAs are often practically executed by similar stakeholders as internal audits, with broader regulatory implications and a purpose framed towards prompting and gauging institutional reflexivity and due diligence, in addition to the audit goals of performance assessment with respect to articulated expectations [47].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Audits can be qualitative or quantitative.

    “Audits can be qualitative or quantitative, as system expectations can be articulated and assessed in either mode.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Auditing automated decision systems of a large technology platform can be as complex as auditing human rights violations in a large supply chain.

    “Auditing the automated decision systems of a large technology platform can rival the complexity of auditing for human rights violations in a large supply chain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    AIA scope can be broader than a specific product feature and includes reflective articulations of trade-offs and decision-making.

    “The scope of an AIA is thus potentially broader than a specific product feature, and the assessment goes beyond just evaluation measurements, to include more reflective articulations of the trade-offs and decision-making inherent in the release and development of a particular algorithmic system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Auditor access to algorithmic systems is difficult to mediate, and identification of audit targets and scope is uncertain.

    “The mediation of auditor access is difficult, and the identification of audit targets and scope uncertain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Audits evaluate performance relative to expected behavior as part of a broader accountability process.

    “Audits evaluate performance relative to expected behavior, as part of a broader accountability process [62].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Third-party oversight work has led to voluntary moratoriums, lawsuits, regulatory action, congressional hearings, and recalls or redesigns of deployed algorithms.

    “The impact of this work is undeniable -leading to voluntary moratoriums [30], and several successful lawsuits [75,79]; nation-wide waves of regulatory action and public outcry [74]; congressional hearings [3]; and the recalls or radical redesigns of the deployed algorithms [12,64,65,88].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [75]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [79] source
    • cites [74]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Algorithmic audit standards and scope may be unclear, leading to unfocused and expensive assessments.

    “The standards and scope of an algorithmic audit may be unclear -leading to assessments that are unfocused and expensive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Because ESG is ambiguous, ESG certifications risk becoming cheap talk that rubber stamps practices without promoting social responsibility.

    “And due to the ambiguity of what is being audited, ESG certifications risk becoming”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [19] source
    • cites [37]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Regulatory and institutional interpretations of hate speech differ from those experiencing hate online, leading to moderation tools that marginalize and censor impacted users.

    “In the same vein, regulatory and institutional interpretations of hate speech often differs dramatically from the understanding of those experiencing hate online [43], leading to deployed moderation tools that further marginalize and censor impacted users rather than protect them [16].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [43]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [16]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Audits are conventionally classified into first-, second-, and third-party types.

    “By convention, audits are classified into three types [14].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Clearview AI claimed its facial recognition was 100% accurate across demographic groups under ACLU methodology but did not address ethical and legal challenges of its face data sourcing.

    “The controversial facial recognition company Clearview AI, for example, claimed to be”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is precedent for auditors compromised by selection, payment, or employment by auditees; access struggles; diffuse performance standards; and auditees concealing findings.

    “There is a clear precedent for situations of auditors compromised by selection, payment, or employment by auditees; auditors struggling to secure access; auditors clumsily navigating diffuse performance standards; and auditees that may elect to share or conceal findings otherwise hidden behind a nondisclosure agreement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [19] source
    • cites [37]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Internal accountability tends to prioritize at most regulators' or customers' concerns, primarily to reduce liability risk, which may not align with impacted populations.

    “This tends to prioritize at most the concerns of regulators or customers, primarily to reduce liability risk, which may not align with core concerns of impacted populations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [54]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [66]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Third-party oversight by non-profits, journalists, and academics has exposed AI weaknesses but is not conventionally considered audits.

    “We note that while third party oversight by non-profit organizations, journalists, and academics have, as noted above, played critical roles in exposing weaknesses to AI systems, such forms of oversight are not conventionally considered audits per se.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Unlike most audits, AIAs are less strictly defined and tend to include more open-ended inquiry into impacts.

    “Unlike most audits, AIAs are not as strictly defined and tend to include more open-ended inquiry into the impacts of a particular algorithmic deployment [55].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [55]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These format and content developments restrict and define audit content, focusing on concerns preferable for internal auditors and requiring internal access or cooperation.

    “All of these format and content oriented developments work to restrict and define what is to be included in the audit, focusing on concerns that are preferable for internal auditors to operationalize, and that requires a certain level of access or internal co-operation to achieve.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The turn toward audits alone is unlikely to achieve actual algorithmic accountability; meaningful third-party involvement requires sustained focus on institutional design.

    “We conclude that the turn toward audits alone is unlikely to achieve actual algorithmic accountability, and sustained focus on institutional design will be required for meaningful third party involvement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Identifying audit targets and scope is critical to ensuring audits are applied to relevant parties and conducted for the right issues.

    “Identifying audit targets and scope is critical to ensuring that audits are applied to relevant parties, and conducted for the right issues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Risk-based or complaint-based selection of audit targets can help allocate attention where needed most when resources are scarce.

    “In those instances, risk-based or complaint-based selection of audit targets can help to allocate attention where needed the most.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Companies can adopt incident reporting systems to raise user and public awareness of a system's use in consequential scenarios.

    “Companies can themselves adopt incident reporting systems to raise user and public awareness of a system's use in consequential scenarios.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    A third-party audit where the auditee selects and compensates the auditor, determines scope and access, and limits post-audit actions may be functionally indistinguishable from a first-party audit and questionably effective for downstream accountability.

    “A third party audit where (a) the auditor is selected and compensated by the auditee (b) to conduct an audit of a scope and access determined by the auditee, and (c) with limited post-audit actions may be functionally indistinguishable from firstparty audit, and questionably effective in garnering the expected downstream accountability outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Serious limitations characterize the current AI audit landscape despite policy attention turning toward audits.

    “In sum, while policy attention has been turning toward audits, serious limitations characterize the current AI audit landscape.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some proposals make regulatory agencies the primary external auditor, but regulatory capacity to conduct such audits is lacking.

    “Other proposals put the onus on regulatory agencies to serve the primary role of external auditor [36], but regulatory capacity to conduct such audits is currently lacking [22].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [36]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Privacy disclosure pop-ups implemented in response to the EU's ePrivacy Directive increased consent fatigue without meaningfully improving user privacy.

    “Some have noted, for example, that the privacy disclosure pop-ups implemented in response to the EU's ePrivacy Directive have increased”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [67]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [76]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Third-party reporting has a similar effect on small businesses.

    “Third-party reporting has a similar effect on small businesses [2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    One study found restaurant compliance notices were not representative of actual food safety status and pushed inspectors to spend resources adjudicating accuracy rather than addressing safety hazards.

    “One study found, for instance, that restaurant compliance notices were not representative of actual food safety status, and pushed inspectors to spend outsize resources on adjudicating the accuracy of these notices rather than addressing safety hazards directly [36].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Before the 2019 Gender Shades audit, NIST failed to measure demographic differences in its FRVT, overlooking for years that Asian and African American people were up to 100 times more likely to be misidentified than white men.

    “Before 2019 and the intervention of the Algorithmic Justice League's Gender Shades audit [10], the U.S. National Institute of Technology (NIST) failed to measure demographic differences in their regular Facial Recognition Vendor's Test (FRVT), thus overlooking for many years that”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [10]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [26]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2022 and the Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act of 2021 contemplate obligations on regulated parties with enforcement by the FTC.

    “Similarly, the Algorithmic Accountability Act in 2022, and the Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act of 2021 [49] contemplate obligations on regulated parties with enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    When audit resources are scarce, it may not be possible to select all parties for audit.

    “When audit resources are scarce, however, it may not be possible to select all parties for an audit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A future where AI audits are conducted only by company employees and consulting companies fails to learn lessons of how third parties have generated robust oversight.

    “A future where AI audits are conducted by company employees and consulting companies alone fails to learn the lessons of how third parties have generated robust oversight of AI systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Third-party oversight of AI products has faced challenging access, in sharp contrast to other audit systems.

    “This stands in sharp contrast to third party oversight of AI products, where access has proven challenging.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI systems are diverse, impact a range of industries and stakeholders, and require more third-party participants with varied tools to assess harms for implicated stakeholders.

    “Such systems are diverse, impacting a range of industries and stakeholders, and it will require more third party participants, representing a variety of communities and making use of a wide set of tools, to concretely assess a wider range of the harms involved for the implicated stakeholders.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Independence is key to third-party audits.

    “The key to third-party audits is independence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Although definitions are provided for recommender systems and automated decision systems, there is little guidance for translating them into specific performance expectations.

    “Although definitions are provided for these terms, there is little guidance for how regulators, auditors, and companies are meant to translate such descriptions into specific performance expectations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The literature suggests benefits to establishing a national incident reporting system enabling third parties to file complaints about algorithmic systems.

    “The literature suggests that there may be benefits to establishing a national incident reporting system to enable third parties to file complaints about algorithmic systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    An audit may more productively ask whether an advertising platform violates disparate treatment provisions of the Fair Housing Act rather than asking whether there is bias.

    “Instead of asking,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    System of Records Notices may alert parties to potential uses of algorithms.

    “System of Records Notices (SORN), which are intended to notify the public whenever a federal agency creates, modifies, or eliminates records involving personally identifiable information, may alert parties to potential uses of algorithms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The status quo is that algorithm use is rarely disclosed transparently, making it hard to identify audit targets.

    “The status quo is that the use of algorithms is rarely disclosed in a transparent manner, making it hard to identify audit targets in the first place [84].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [84]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Compensation consultants recommended higher CEO salaries when they also offered additional services to those executives.

    “Murphy & Sandino (2009) found that compensation consultants recommended higher CEO salaries when those consultants offered additional services to those executives [59].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Some evidence suggests auditing can help standardize information for more consistent reporting.

    “Some evidence suggests that auditing can help to standardize information for more consistent reporting [30].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cross-selling opportunities may lower statutory audit quality but did not affect the quality of independent expert reports for takeover targets, though they may lower fees.

    “Another study, however, concluded that while cross-selling opportunities could lead to lower quality statutory audits, they did not have an impact on the quality of independent expert reports provided to takeover targets-though the incentive to cross-sell could have an impact on lowering fees [9].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    No auditor can audit an entire VLOP single-handedly, and the definition of ADS is context-dependent and broad, doing little to help scope an audit.

    “No auditor can audit an entire VLOP single-handedly, and the definition of ADS is so context-dependent and purposefully broad [68] that it does little to help scope an audit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [68]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Private car emissions testing facilities with more chances to cross-sell services are more likely to pass cars that fail emissions standards.

    “Another study found that private car emissions testing facilities with more opportunities to cross-sell services to customers were more likely to pass cars that did not meet emissions standards [63].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Regulators can impose consequences ranging from monetary sanctions to industry bars for violations of auditor independence rules.

    “If an auditor violates these independence rules, regulators can impose a range of consequences ranging from monetary sanctions to a bar from the industry [1].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Financial auditing independence rules prohibit close auditor-client relationships and prevent auditors from helping prepare financial statements.

    “One approach to reduce concerns regarding familiarity is seen in financial auditing, where independence rules prohibit close relationships between auditors and their clients, and prevent the auditor from assisting in the preparation of the financial statements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Opening audits to third-party participation could allow diverse stakeholders to bring precise inquiries specific to their context, focus, and organizational target.

    “Opening audits up for third party participation could also allow for a variety of stakeholders to come in with diverse yet precise inquiries specific to the context, focus and organizational target of which they are most concerned.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Regulators can use incident reporting information to identify priority targets and assess fees or penalties based on audit results.

    “Regulators can use this information to identify specific priority targets and assess fees or penalties based on audit results.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Minimizing conflicts of interest and undue influence helps ensure the reliability of audit results.

    “Minimizing conflicts of interest and undue influence helps to ensure the reliability of audit results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Regulators could incentivize third-party auditors to inspect repeatedly flagged cases through RFPs or bug bounties.

    “They could then incentivize third party auditors to inspect repeatedly flagged cases in this database through various means, such as RFPs or bug bounties.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Adjusting for differences in reporting propensities and actively soliciting minority perspectives will be key components of an incident reporting system's design.

    “Nonetheless, considerations for how to adjust for differences in reporting propensities and actively solicit minority perspectives for incident reporting will be a key component of the system's design.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Sarbanes-Oxley requires mandatory rotation of the lead audit partner.

    “Sarbanes-Oxley, for example, requires mandatory rotation of the lead audit partner.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Third parties often face great legal risk to gain access to audited AI systems and are vulnerable to corporate retaliation or obstruction.

    “Currently, third parties are often forced to operate at great legal risk to gain access to the audited AI system, keeping them vulnerable to various forms of corporate retaliation or obstruction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The literature is mixed on licensing benefits, and accreditation through a professional organization may be preferred.

    “The literature is much more mixed on the benefits of licensing schemes; accreditation through a professional organization may be preferred for three reasons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Demand for AI audit services will grow significantly in the near future.
    • Rests on an assumption: Occupational licensing reduces the supply of services.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    More training and greater team experience are linked to better audit results.

    “Training improves audit quality and more experienced team members are associated with more effective audits [5].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A shift in Belgian financial audit standards toward more rule-based procedures decreased auditing errors and increased auditor independence.

    “One study, for example, found that a shift in Belgian financial audit standards towards more rule-based procedures decreased financial auditing errors and increased auditor independence [11].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    More rigorous dental licensing standards did not improve average patient dental outcomes.

    “Another analysis of dental licensing requirements found that more rigorous licensing standards did not improve average dental outcomes of patients [45].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Less empirical work has examined whether professional licensing affects quality than has examined costs and barriers to entry.

    “While much empirical work has focused on the costs and barriers to entry imposed by occupational licensing, less empirical work has probed whether professional licensing has an impact on quality [44].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    PCAOB inspections improved audit quality by prompting lower-quality auditors to exit the market.

    “Another found that PCAOB inspections, which assess the compliance of registered public accounting firms with professional audit rules and standards, improved audit quality by prompting lower-quality auditors to exit the market [17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Corporations can block access through paywalls, prohibitive Terms of Service, or product design that obscures test points.

    “Corporations can also use non-legal strategies to block access, including setting up a paywall, adopting prohibitive Terms of Service conditions, or structuring the product to obscure any clear set of test points.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Fears of legal repercussions or corporate retaliation can weaken audit inquiry, and professional standards can help determine limited conditions for liability.

    “Fears of legal repercussions or corporate retaliation can weaken the audit inquiry, and professional standards can help determine limited conditions for liability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Increasing or decreasing CPA licensing requirements had no meaningful effect on CPA quality.

    “Several studies have found that increasing or decreasing licensing requirements for CPAs had no meaningful effect on CPA quality [7,12,16].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [12]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [16]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    HireVue commissioned and controlled the scope of its ORCAA audit, including mediating public communication through its PR channels.

    “Similarly, Hirevue commissioned and controlled the scope of its audit by ORCAA, including by mediating any public communication of audit results through their own public relations channels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Unannounced inspections provided better information about nursing home care quality and could reduce regulatory burdens, though announced inspections could better identify organizational issues.

    “Another study found that unannounced inspections provided better information about the quality of care at nursing homes, and could reduce the regulatory burdens of conducting inspections-though announced inspections could be better suited to identifying organizational issues [46].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Existing research on whether professional licensing affects quality is mixed.

    “Existing research on this question is mixed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The PCAOB experience supports creating an audit oversight board within a public agency or public interest institution to monitor auditors and set scope and standards.

    “In particular, the PCAOB experience lends support to the creation of an audit oversight board, housed within a public agency or operating as a separate public interest institution, in order to monitor auditors and to determine the expected scope and standards for audit work.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development have engaged in audits to analyze disparate outcomes and civil rights compliance for decades.

    “Similarly, the Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development have engaged in audits to analyze disparate outcomes and compliance to civil rights guidelines for decades [78].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Third-party AI auditors have faced cease-and-desist orders, legal threats, and subpoenas.

    “For instance, those making use of crowd-sourcing data collection tools can be interrupted abruptly by claims of violations to privacy or intellectual property rights -NYU researchers studying the Facebook ad delivery algorithm were presented with a cease-and-desist order [58]; German auditors at Algorithm Watch were legally threatened by Instagram [9]; and civil society watch dogs were subpoenaed”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [58]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [9]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [46]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Auditors subject to PCAOB inspections produced higher quality audits than auditors the PCAOB was not allowed to inspect, suggesting access to regulators may provide additional benefits.

    “Another study found that auditors who were subject to PCAOB inspections produced higher quality audits compared to auditors (typically auditors of foreign SEC registrants) that the PCAOB was not allowed to inspect, suggesting that providing access to parties beyond auditors, such as regulators, may provide additional benefits [51].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    There is no clear sense of expectations for what a quality AI audit entails or who is qualified to execute it.

    “These auditors make use of a range of tools and methodologies to execute their work, and there is no clear sense of expectations as to what a quality audit entails or who is qualified to execute audit work in the algorithmic context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisereasoning

    Non-academic groups can use a broader range of strategies to conduct audits and understand harms to distinct communities.

    “Non-academic groups can also take advantage of a broader range of strategies to conduct audits and understand harms to distinct communities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In food safety inspections, frequent interactions between inspectors and facilities may improve expertise but can increase social coercion and bribery.

    “This tradeoff has also been documented in food safety inspections, where frequent interactions between inspectors and facilities may improve inspector expertise, but can increase the likelihood of social coercion and even bribery [49,68].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [49]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [68]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    All audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors, and disclosure need not be direct or absolute.

    “Protecting proprietary information is not a proper response, as all audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors, and disclosure does not need to be direct nor absolute.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: All audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors.
    • Rests on an assumption: Disclosure of audit information need not be direct or absolute.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Training, standardization, and accreditation of auditors are key to ensuring audits are accurately and consistently conducted.

    “Training, standardization, and accreditation of auditors are also key to ensuring that audits are accurately and consistently conducted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A systematic analysis of PwC monitoring found that the resulting audits omitted major violations and had serious deficiencies.

    “One systematic analysis of the monitoring methods employed by the company PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), for example, found that the resulting audits omitted several major violations and contained serious deficiencies [62].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    For third-party audits to be effective, auditors must be granted access to enough data for a robust review.

    “For third-party audits to be effective, auditors must be granted access to enough data to conduct a robust review.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The literature strongly supports training, standardization, and accreditation for third-party AI auditors.

    “The literature strongly supports training, standardization, and accreditation for third-party AI auditors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The FDA may withdraw an auditor's accreditation if the auditor certifies a supplier later linked to a foodborne illness outbreak or refuses FDA access to records.

    “The FDA, for example, may withdraw an auditor's accreditation if that auditor certifies a supplier that is later linked to an outbreak of foodborne illness or if it refuses to give the FDA access to its records [54].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [54]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The PwC shortcomings were attributed in part to management pre-screening of information and interviews for auditors.

    “The author attributed these shortcomings in part to management pre-screening of information and interviews for auditors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The audit approach is tangible and can reveal concrete issues and repeated product failures that general standards can later resolve.

    “A major advantage of the audit approach we articulate is its tangibility: audits can help reveal concrete issues and repeated product failures that can later be resolved by general standards.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Restaurant grading across ten jurisdictions suffered from grade inflation and grading inconsistencies.

    “Another analysis of restaurant grading across ten jurisdictions found that the practice-meant to protect consumers and improve food sanitation via targeted disclosures-suffered from several serious deficiencies, including grade inflation and grading inconsistencies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI policy can foster third-party audits through deliberate institutional design informed by other industries' audit schemes.

    “AI policy can foster third party audits with more deliberate institutional design, informed by the audit schemes from other industries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Public visibility of audit results can improve accountability by preventing concealment of undesirable outcomes and incentivizing better behavior.

    “Public visibility of audit results can improve accountability in several ways.It can prevent companies from being able to disguise or hide undesirable audit outcomes [21] and incentivize better behavior.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Confidential PwC audits were shielded from verification by other researchers or NGOs and limited improvement of regulated entity conditions.

    “An analysis of PwC's auditing practices also found that the confidential nature of PwC's audits shielded them from verification by other researchers or NGOs and limited their ability to improve the conditions of the regulated entity [62].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The paper's survey is necessarily selective and incomplete.

    “As just a first step in the direction of learning from cognate audit schemes, and because the evidence draws from so many different areas, our survey is necessarily selective and incomplete.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    IEEE P7013 standard for automated facial analysis is directly informed by the Gender Shades audit.

    “For instance, IEEE P7013 Inclusion and Application Standards for Automated Facial Analysis Technology industry standard is directly informed by the Gender Shades audit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The paper's case studies and evidence are not exhaustive.

    “First of all, our case studies and evidence offered above are not exhaustive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Publicly traded companies spend an average of $2.2 million to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley financial reporting requirements.

    “One study found that publicly traded companies spend an average of $2.2 million to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act's financial reporting requirements [50].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A registry of audit results avoids bias from pre-publication review or NDA secrecy and ensures audits provide market incentives, inform enforcement, and provide evidence for standard setting.

    “A registry of audit results avoids the bias from pre-publication review or the secrecy of findings under NDAs and ensures that audits can provide market incentives for companies to correct behavior, inform enforcement actions, and provide an evidence base for standard setting.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mandated disclosure of food inspection results increased food business compliance with food safety regulations, though other studies found similar schemes ineffective.

    “One study found that mandated disclosure of food inspection results increased the compliance of food businesses with food safety regulations [8], though others have found similar food safety disclosure schemes to be ineffective [31,36].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [31]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [36]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The AI community has largely ignored what other audit schemes teach about fostering policy environments for third-party participation.

    “Our point in this specific text is more simple: as the AI community turns toward audits, it has largely ignored what other audit schemes have to teach us on fostering policy environments conducive to third party participation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A restaurant grading scheme shifted inspection resources away from more significant safety hazards.

    “The implementation of a restaurant grading scheme shifted valuable inspection resources away from more significant safety hazards [36].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Specific interventions are necessary to allow effective participation of third parties in AI audits.

    “The mere insistence for audits is not enough -in particular, specific interventions will be necessary to allow for the effective participation of third parties, who play a critical role yet continue to face serious and often debilitating challenges when engaged in their work.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Limited disclosure of audit results would balance proprietary information protection against external accountability benefits.

    “Limited disclosure of audit results would balance the protection of proprietary information against the benefits of external accountability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisecitation

    There is tension between AI transparency and enforcing intellectual property rights.

    “Other commentators have also noted the tension that exists, particularly in the context of algorithmic accountability, between the desire for AI transparency and the desire to enforce existing intellectual property rights.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
113 of 113
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Lessons from non-algorithmic audit systems can be transferred to the design of AI audit ecosystems.

    “Our paper synthesizes lessons from other fields on how to craft effective systems of external oversight for algorithmic deployments.”
    “Existing evidence from other regulatory fields suggests that effective target identification mechanisms, independence in selection and compensation, access to data and AI systems, clear and well-scoped audit standards, and post-audit report transparency will be critical to ensure that audits promote, rather than degrade, overall accountability.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Third-party oversight is necessary for meaningful algorithmic accountability.

    “We conclude that the turn toward audits alone is unlikely to achieve actual algorithmic accountability, and sustained focus on institutional design will be required for meaningful third party involvement.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Demand for AI audit services will grow significantly in the near future.

    “First, the need for AI audit services is likely to grow significantly in the near future, and substantial evidence suggests that occupational licensing reduces the supply of services.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Occupational licensing reduces the supply of services.

    “First, the need for AI audit services is likely to grow significantly in the near future, and substantial evidence suggests that occupational licensing reduces the supply of services.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    All audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors.

    “Protecting proprietary information is not a proper response, as all audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors, and disclosure does not need to be direct nor absolute.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Disclosure of audit information need not be direct or absolute.

    “Protecting proprietary information is not a proper response, as all audit systems provide some form of privileged access to auditors, and disclosure does not need to be direct nor absolute.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Internal auditors have a contractual relationship with the auditee.

    “Internal auditors have a contractual relationship with the auditee (Raji et al. 2022)”

    From Accountability in Government Use of <scp>AI</scp> : Citizen Concerns and Preferences (2025) · cites this paper as Raji et al. 2022

    The Terminology section defines internal oversight as conducted by stakeholders with a direct employment or contractual relationship with the auditee. The claim omits the employment alternative, so the paper does not say that all internal auditors have a contractual relationship. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Procedural non-transparency makes audit effectiveness unmeasurable, perpetuating the 'regress of mistrust' where accountability and trust shift from audited organizations to auditors.

    “Furthermore, due to procedural non-transparency, audit process effectiveness is not measurable, perpetuating what Power [53] refers to as the 'regress of mistrust, ' where accountability and trust are shifted away from the audited organizations and onto auditors themselves, who are in turn subjected to more audits and evaluations.”

    From A Framework for Assurance Audits of Algorithmic Systems (2024) · cites this paper as [53]

    Section 4.5.1 (Evidence Base; page unavailable) says confidential audits were shielded from third-party verification, supporting the concern that non-transparency hinders scrutiny. Our copy does not say audit effectiveness is unmeasurable or describe a 'regress of mistrust' in which trust and accountability shift to auditors. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • External auditors are independent entities with no contractual ties to the auditee.

    “External auditors, by contrast, are independent entities with no contractual ties to the auditee (Raji et al. 2022).”
  • The algorithmic auditing ecosystem is nascent and currently lacks the structure and standards of other audit domains, such as financial services.

    “The algorithmic auditing ecosystem is nascent and currently lacks the structure and standards of other audit domains, such as financial services [42].”
  • A thorough evaluation alone is not sufficient to hold key stakeholders responsible for system-wide behavior.

    “A thorough evaluation alone is not sufficient to hold key stakeholders responsible for system-wide behavior [13, 88]-auditors also need tools that support key components of the accountability process, including target identification, standardization of practice, communication, and advocacy [136].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • NIST is given two different names

    Minor

    The paper expands NIST as the National Institute of Technology in one passage and the National Institute of Standards and Technology in another.

  • Murphy and Sandino study has conflicting publication years

    Minor

    The discussion dates the Murphy and Sandino study to 2009, while the corresponding appendix reference lists it as published in 2010.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 2021. Impact. https://themarkup.org/series/impact Last accessed 25 October 2021 . 2021. Impact. https://themarkup.org/series/impact Last accessed 25 October 2021.
  2. Julia Angwin , Jeff Larson , Surya Mattu , and Lauren Kirchner . 2016 . Machine bias . ProPublica , May 23, 2016 (2016), 139--159. Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine bias. ProPublica, May 23, 2016 (2016), 139--159.
  3. Ann H. Baier and Lisa Ahramjian . 2020 . Organic Certification of Farms and Businesses Producing Agricultural Products ., 8 pages. Ann H. Baier and Lisa Ahramjian. 2020. Organic Certification of Farms and Businesses Producing Agricultural Products., 8 pages.
  4. Riccardo Boffo and Robert Patalano . 2020. Esg investing: Practices, progress and challenges. Éditions OCDE , Paris ( 2020 ). Riccardo Boffo and Robert Patalano. 2020. Esg investing: Practices, progress and challenges. Éditions OCDE, Paris (2020).
  5. Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru . 2018 . Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification . In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. PMLR, 77--91 . Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. PMLR, 77--91.
  6. Alexandra Chouldechova , Diana Benavides-Prado , Oleksandr Fialko , and Rhema Vaithianathan . 2018 . A case study of algorithm-assisted decision making in child maltreatment hotline screening decisions . In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR, 134--148 . Alexandra Chouldechova, Diana Benavides-Prado, Oleksandr Fialko, and Rhema Vaithianathan. 2018. A case study of algorithm-assisted decision making in child maltreatment hotline screening decisions. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR, 134--148.
  7. Ilija Djekic , Sladjana Dragojlovic , Zoran Miloradovic , Snezana Miljkovic-Zivanovic , Marija Savic , and Vesna Kekic . 2016. Improving the confectionery industry supply chain through second party audits. British Food Journal ( 2016 ). Ilija Djekic, Sladjana Dragojlovic, Zoran Miloradovic, Snezana Miljkovic-Zivanovic, Marija Savic, and Vesna Kekic. 2016. Improving the confectionery industry supply chain through second party audits. British Food Journal (2016).
  8. Alex C Engler . 2021. Independent auditors are struggling to hold AI companies accountable . FastCompany . Alex C Engler. 2021. Independent auditors are struggling to hold AI companies accountable. FastCompany.
  9. Foxglove. 2020. We put a stop to the A Level grading algorithm! https://www.foxglove.org.uk/2020/08/17/we-put-a-stop-to-the-a-level-gradingalgorithm/ Last accessed 25 October 2021 . Foxglove. 2020. We put a stop to the A Level grading algorithm! https://www.foxglove.org.uk/2020/08/17/we-put-a-stop-to-the-a-level-gradingalgorithm/ Last accessed 25 October 2021.
  10. Patrick Grother , Mei Ngan , and Kayee Hanaoka . 2019. Face recognition vendor test (fvrt): Part 3, demographic effects . National Institute of Standards and Technology . Patrick Grother, Mei Ngan, and Kayee Hanaoka. 2019. Face recognition vendor test (fvrt): Part 3, demographic effects. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  11. Karen Hao . 2020. We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google. Here's what it says. Retrieved January 21 ( 2020 ), 2021. Karen Hao. 2020. We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google. Here's what it says. Retrieved January 21 (2020), 2021.
  12. Caroline Haskins , Ryan Mac , and Logan McDonald . 2020. The ACLU Slammed A Facial Recognition Company That Scrapes Photos From Instagram And Facebook. Buzzfeed News ( 2020 ). Caroline Haskins, Ryan Mac, and Logan McDonald. 2020. The ACLU Slammed A Facial Recognition Company That Scrapes Photos From Instagram And Facebook. Buzzfeed News (2020).
  13. Thomas Kadri . 2020. Digital Gatekeepers. Texas Law Review 99 ( 2020 ). Thomas Kadri. 2020. Digital Gatekeepers. Texas Law Review 99 (2020).
  14. Soohun Kim and Aaron Yoon . 2020. Analyzing active managers' commitment to esg: Evidence from united nations principles for responsible investment. Available at SSRN 3555984 ( 2020 ). Soohun Kim and Aaron Yoon. 2020. Analyzing active managers' commitment to esg: Evidence from united nations principles for responsible investment. Available at SSRN 3555984 (2020).
  15. Lauren Kirchner and Matthew Goldstein . 2020 . Access Denied: Faulty Automated Background Checks Freeze Out Renters. (2020). Lauren Kirchner and Matthew Goldstein. 2020. Access Denied: Faulty Automated Background Checks Freeze Out Renters. (2020).
  16. Ava Kofman and Ariana Tobin . 2019. Facebook Ads Can Still Discriminate Against Women and Older Workers , Despite a Civil Rights Settlement. ProPublica. Retrieved December 12 ( 2019 ), 2020. Ava Kofman and Ariana Tobin. 2019. Facebook Ads Can Still Discriminate Against Women and Older Workers, Despite a Civil Rights Settlement. ProPublica. Retrieved December 12 (2019), 2020.
  17. Ava Kofman and Ariana Tobin . 2021. Facebook Ads Can Still Discriminate Against Women and Older Workers , Despite a Civil Rights Settlement. ( 2021 ). Ava Kofman and Ariana Tobin. 2021. Facebook Ads Can Still Discriminate Against Women and Older Workers, Despite a Civil Rights Settlement. (2021).
  18. KATHLEEN McGRORY and NEIL Bedi . 2020. Targeted. The Tampa Bay Times 3 ( 2020 ). KATHLEEN McGRORY and NEIL Bedi. 2020. Targeted. The Tampa Bay Times 3 (2020).
  19. JB Merrill . 2020. Does facebook still sell discriminatory ads. The Markup ( 2020 ). JB Merrill. 2020. Does facebook still sell discriminatory ads. The Markup (2020).
  20. Emanuel Moss , Elizabeth AnneWatkins , Ranjit Singh , Madeleine Clare Elish, and Jacob Metcalf . 2021 . Assembling Accountability : Algorithmic Impact Assessment for the Public Interest . Available at SSRN 3877437 (2021). Emanuel Moss, Elizabeth AnneWatkins, Ranjit Singh, Madeleine Clare Elish, and Jacob Metcalf. 2021. Assembling Accountability: Algorithmic Impact Assessment for the Public Interest. Available at SSRN 3877437 (2021).
  21. Ziad Obermeyer , Brian Powers , Christine Vogeli , and Sendhil Mullainathan . 2019. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366, 6464 ( 2019 ), 447--453. Ziad Obermeyer, Brian Powers, Christine Vogeli, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366, 6464 (2019), 447--453.
  22. Michael O'Leary and Warren Valdmanis . 2021. An ESG Reckoning Is Coming. Harvard Business Review ( 2021 ). Michael O'Leary and Warren Valdmanis. 2021. An ESG Reckoning Is Coming. Harvard Business Review (2021).
  23. Nathaniel Persily . 2021. Facebook Hides Data Showing It Harms Users. Outside Scholars Need Access. (2021). Last accessed 25 October 2021 . Nathaniel Persily. 2021. Facebook Hides Data Showing It Harms Users. Outside Scholars Need Access. (2021). Last accessed 25 October 2021.
  24. Elizabeth Pollman . 2019. Corporate Social Responsibility , ESG, and Compliance. Forthcoming , Cambridge Handbook of Compliance (D. Daniel Sokol & Benjamin van Rooij eds.), Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper 2019 --35 (2019). Elizabeth Pollman. 2019. Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, and Compliance. Forthcoming, Cambridge Handbook of Compliance (D. Daniel Sokol & Benjamin van Rooij eds.), Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper 2019--35 (2019).
  25. Michael Power. 1997. The audit society: Rituals of verification. OUP Oxford. Michael Power. 1997. The audit society: Rituals of verification. OUP Oxford.
  26. Dillon Reisman , Jason Schultz , Kate Crawford , and Meredith Whittaker . 2018. Algorithmic impact assessments: A practical framework for public agency accountability . AI Now Institute ( 2018 ), 1--22. Dillon Reisman, Jason Schultz, Kate Crawford, and Meredith Whittaker. 2018. Algorithmic impact assessments: A practical framework for public agency accountability. AI Now Institute (2018), 1--22.
  27. Rashida Richardson . 2021. Defining and Demystifying Automated Decision Systems. Maryland Law Review , Forthcoming ( 2021 ). Rashida Richardson. 2021. Defining and Demystifying Automated Decision Systems. Maryland Law Review, Forthcoming (2021).
  28. Eva Rosen , Philip ME Garboden, and Jennifer E Cossyleon . 2021 . Racial Discrimination in Housing : How Landlords Use Algorithms and Home Visits to Screen Tenants. American Sociological Review ( 2021), 00031224211029618. Eva Rosen, Philip ME Garboden, and Jennifer E Cossyleon. 2021. Racial Discrimination in Housing: How Landlords Use Algorithms and Home Visits to Screen Tenants. American Sociological Review (2021), 00031224211029618.
  29. Nathan Sheard. 2021. Banning Government Use of Face Recognition Technology: 2020 Year in Review. Nathan Sheard. 2021. Banning Government Use of Face Recognition Technology: 2020 Year in Review.
  30. Ariana Tobin . 2019 . HUD sues Facebook over housing discrimination and says the company's algorithms have made the problem worse . ProPublica (March 28 , 2019). Available at https://www.propublica.org/article/hud-sues-facebookhousingdiscrimination-advertising-algorithms (last accessed April 29, 2019) (2019). Ariana Tobin. 2019. HUD sues Facebook over housing discrimination and says the company's algorithms have made the problem worse. ProPublica (March 28, 2019). Available at https://www.propublica.org/article/hud-sues-facebookhousingdiscrimination-advertising-algorithms (last accessed April 29, 2019) (2019).
  31. Daniel Trielli , Jennifer Stark , and Nicholas Diakopoulos . 2017 . Algorithm tips: A resource for algorithmic accountability in Government . In Proc. Computation+ Journalism Symposium. Daniel Trielli, Jennifer Stark, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2017. Algorithm tips: A resource for algorithmic accountability in Government. In Proc. Computation+ Journalism Symposium.
  32. 10.5555/3152676 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raji, I. D., Xu, P., Honigsberg, C., & Ho, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-07-26
Pages
557-571
ISSN
3065-8365 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4288058319
Cited by
122
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 2
FWCI
22.74
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
Mozilla Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
third-party oversight, algorithmic auditing, AI governance, algorithmic accountability, institutional design, external supervision, regulatory audits, financial regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review