Cited by 260Green IT and SustainabilityEnergy Efficiency in ComputingCloud Computing and Resource Management

Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances

Open access
Dodge, Jesse, Prewitt, Taylor, Tachet des Combes, Remi, Odmark, Erika, Schwartz, Roy, Strubell, Emma, Luccioni, Alexandra Sasha, Smith, Noah A. +2 more·2022·2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency

Abstract

The advent of cloud computing has provided people around the world with unprecedented access to computational power and enabled rapid growth in technologies such as machine learning, the computational demands of which incur a high energy cost and a commensurate carbon footprint. As a result, recent scholarship has called for better estimates of the greenhouse gas impact of AI: data scientists today do not have easy or reliable access to measurements of this information, which precludes development of actionable tactics. We argue that cloud providers presenting information about software carbon intensity to users is a fundamental stepping stone towards minimizing emissions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3531146.3533234

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Udit Gupta, Young Geun Kim, Sylvia Lee, Jordan Tse, Hsien-Hsin S Lee, Gu-Yeon Wei, David Brooks, and Carole-Jean Wu. 2021. Chasing Carbon: The Elusive Environmental Footprint of Computing. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA). IEEE, 854-867.
  2. Young Geun Kim and Carole-Jean Wu. 2021. AutoFL: Enabling Heterogeneity- Aware Energy Efficient Federated Learning. In MICRO-54: 54th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture. 183-198.
  3. Eric Masanet, Arman Shehabi, Nuoa Lei, Sarah Smith, and Jonathan Koomey. 2020. Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates. Science 367, 6481 (2020), 984-986.
  4. Valérie Masson-Delmotte, Panmao Zhai, Hans-Otto Pörtner, Debra Roberts, Jim Skea, Priyadarshi R Shukla, Anna Pirani, Wilfran Moufouma-Okia, Clotilde Péan, Roz Pidcock, et al. 2018. Global warming of 1.5 C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1, 5 (2018).
  5. Vasilii Mosin, Roberto Aguilar, Alexander Platonov, Albert Vasiliev, Alexander Kedrov, and Anton Ivanov. 2019. Remote sensing and machine learning for tree detection and classification in forestry applications. In Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XXV, Vol. 11155. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 111550F.
  6. NeurIPS 2021 Conference. 2021. NeurIPS 2021 Paper Checklist Guidelines. https: //neurips.cc/Conferences/2021/PaperInformation/PaperChecklist
  7. Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, Noah A Smith, and Oren Etzioni. 2020. Green AI. Commun. ACM 63, 12 (2020), 54-63.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dodge, J., Prewitt, T., Tachet des Combes, R., Odmark, E., Schwartz, R., Strubell, E., Luccioni, A. S., Smith, N. A., DeCario, N., & Buchanan, W.
Affiliations
  • Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Microsoft Research, Canada
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Hugging Face (US)
Venue
2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-06-20
Pages
1877-1894
OpenAlex
W4283157527
Cited by
257
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 7
FWCI
74.38
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
  • Microsoft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Keywords
carbon intensity, artificial intelligence, cloud computing, greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, machine learning, carbon footprint, cloud service providers, emission measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review