Cited by 61Software Engineering ResearchAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques

You see what I want you to see: poisoning vulnerabilities in neural code search

Wan, Yao, Zhang, Shijie, Zhang, Hongyu, Sui, Yulei, Xu, Guandong, Yao, Dezhong, Jin, Hai, Sun, Lichao·2022·Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering

Abstract

Searching and reusing code snippets from open-source software repositories based on natural-language queries can greatly improve programming productivity.Recently, deep-learning-based approaches have become increasingly popular for code search. Despite substantial progress in training accurate models of code search, the robustness of these models has received little attention so far.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3540250.3549153

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study adheres to standard dataset partitions and cleaning protocols established by prior studies to ensure consistency and comparability across all tasks.

    “To ensure consistency and comparability across all tasks, we adhere to the standard dataset partitions and cleaning protocols as established by prior studies in the field [43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wan, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, H., Sui, Y., Xu, G., Yao, D., Jin, H., & Sun, L.
Affiliations
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Lehigh University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-11-07
Pages
1233-1245
OpenAlex
W4308627220
Cited by
60
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 7
FWCI
10.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Keywords
code search, poisoning attacks, adversarial robustness, open-source repositories, natural language queries, deep learning models, model robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review