Text Mining-based Social-Psychological Vulnerability Analysis of Potential Victims To Cybergrooming: Insights and Lessons Learned
Open accessAbstract
Cybergrooming is a serious cybercrime that primarily targets youths through online platforms. Although reactive predator detection methods have been studied, proactive victim protection and crime prevention can also be achieved through vulnerability analysis of potential youth victims. Despite its significance, vulnerability analysis has not been thoroughly studied in the data science literature, while several social science studies used survey-based methods. To address this gap, we investigate humans’ social-psychological traits and quantify key vulnerability factors to cybergrooming by analyzing text features in the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC). Through pairwise correlation studies, we demonstrate the degrees of key vulnerability dimensions to cybergrooming from youths’ conversational features. Our findings reveal that victims have negative correlations with family and community traits, contrasting with previous social survey studies that indicated family relationships or social support as key vulnerability factors. We discuss the current limitations of text mining analysis and suggest cross-validation methods to increase the validity of research findings. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into understanding the vulnerability factors to cybergrooming and highlights the importance of adopting multidisciplinary approaches.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing
Lateef, F. (2010) · Journal of Emergencies Trauma and Shock · doi:10.4103/0974-2700.70743 · Cited by 991 · see citing works
Quantifying Mental Health Signals in Twitter
Coppersmith, G., Dredze, M., & Harman, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality · doi:10.3115/v1/w14-3207 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Detecting depression and mental illness on social media: an integrative review
Guntuku, S. C., Yaden, D. B., Kern, M. L., Ungar, L. H., & Eichstaedt, J. C. (2017) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.005 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Predicting postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media
de Choudhury, M., Counts, S., & Horvitz, E. (2013) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2466447 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Detection of Depression-Related Posts in Reddit Social Media Forum
Tadesse, M. M., Lin, H., Xu, B., & Yang, L. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2909180 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
A review of young people's vulnerabilities to online grooming
Whittle, H., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Beech, A., & Collings, G. (2013) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.008 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
The role of personality, age, and gender in tweeting about mental illness
Preoțiuc-Pietro, D., Eichstaedt, J. C., Park, G., Sap, M., Smith, L. K., Tobolsky, V. A., Schwartz, H. A., & Ungar, L. (2015) · Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych) · doi:10.3115/v1/w15-1203 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Detecting Changes in Suicide Content Manifested in Social Media Following Celebrity Suicides
Kumar, M., Dredze, M. H., Coppersmith, G., & Choudhury, M. D. (2015) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/2700171.2791026 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Using Social Media for Mental Health Surveillance
Skaik, R., & Inkpen, D. Z. (2020) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3422824 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Analysing the connectivity and communication of suicidal users on twitter
Colombo, G. B., Burnap, P., Hodorog, A., & Scourfield, J. (2015) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2015.07.018 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Multi-kernel SVM based depression recognition using social media data
Peng, Z., Hu, Q., & Dang, J. (2017) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-017-0697-1 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Social and Psychological Effects of the Internet Use
Diomidous, M., Chardalias, K., Magita, A., Koutonias, P., Panagiotopoulou, P., & Mantas, J. (2016) · Acta Informatica Medica · doi:10.5455/aim.2016.24.66-69 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Predicting individuals’ vulnerability to social engineering in social networks
Albladi, S. M., & Weir, G. R. S. (2020) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-020-00047-5 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Cyber-aggression, Cyberbullying, and Cyber-grooming: A Survey and Research Challenges
Mladenović, M., Ošmjanski, V., & Stanković, S. V. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3424246 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Effect of personality traits on trust and risk to phishing vulnerability: Modeling and analysis
Cho, J.-H., Cam, H., & Oltramari, A. (2016) · IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support · doi:10.1109/cogsima.2016.7497779 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationConducting Risky Research with Teens
Badillo-Urquiola, K. A., Shea, Z., Agha, Z., Lediaeva, I., & Wiśniewski, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3432930 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Experimental Investigation of Technical and Human Factors Related to Phishing Susceptibility
Greitzer, F. L., Li, W., Laskey, K. B., Lee, J., & Purl, J. D. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3461672 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Online Social Deception and Its Countermeasures: A Survey
Guo, Z. Y., Cho, J.-H., Chen, I.-R., Sengupta, S., Hong, M., & Mitra, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3047337 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationRisk factors for being a victim of online grooming in adolescents
Schoeps, K., Montoya-Castilla, I., Garaigordobil, M., & Peris Hernández, M. (2020) · Psicothema · doi:10.7334/psicothema2019.179 · Cited by 43 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The participants can self-report their preferences or responses and provide honest human thoughts in a safe and anonymous setting [35].”
BackgroundMethodMcDonald, N., Badillo-Urquiola, K. A., Ames, M. G., Dell, N. L., Keneski, E., Sleeper, M., & Wiśniewski, P. (2020) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3334480.3375174 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Network-aware privacy risk estimation in online social networks
Pensa, R. G., Blasi, G. D., & Bioglio, L. (2019) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-019-0558-x · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Moving beyond 'one size fits all'
Walker, A. M., Yao, Y., Geeng, C., Hoyle, R., & Wiśniewski, P. (2019) · interactions · doi:10.1145/3358904 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
GARS: Real-time system for identification, assessment and control of cyber grooming attacks
Michalopoulos, D., Mavridis, I. K., & Janković, M. (2014) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2013.12.004 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Nguyen, T., Nguyen, D. T., Larsen, M. E., O’Dea, B., Yearwood, J. L., Phung, D., Venkatesh, S., & Christensen, H. M. (2017) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3041021.3054136 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
SAFER: Social Capital-Based Friend Recommendation to Defend against Phishing Attacks
Guo, Z. Y., Cho, J.-H., Chen, I.-R., Sengupta, S., Hong, M., & Mitra, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19288 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantifying Privacy Vulnerability to Socialbot Attacks: An Adaptive Non-Submodular Model
Li, X., Smith, J. D., Pan, T., Dinh, T. N., & Thai, M. T. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing · doi:10.1109/tetc.2018.2840433 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- P. Anderson, Z. Zuo, L. Yang, and Y. Qu. 2019. An Intelligent Online Grooming Detection System Using AI Technologies. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE). 1-6.
- P. Bours and H. Kulsrud. 2019. Detection of Cyber Grooming in Online Conver- sation. In 2019 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS). 1-6.
- K. R. Choo. 2009. Online child grooming: A literature review on the misuse of social networking sites for grooming children for sexual ofences. Vol. 103. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
- M. A. Fauzi and P. Bours. 2020. Ensemble Method for Sexual Predators Identi- fcation in Online Chats. In 2020 8th International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF). IEEE, 1-6.
- Jihoon Oh, Kyongsik Yun, Ji-Hyun Hwang, and Jeong-Ho Chae. 2017. Classifca- tion of suicide attempts through a machine learning algorithm based on multiple systemic psychiatric scales. Frontiers in psychiatry 8 (2017), 192.
- Pei Wang, Zhen Guo, Lifu Huang, and Jin-Hee Cho. 2021. SERI: Generative Chatbot Framework for Cybergrooming Prevention. In The First Workshop on Evaluations and Assessments of Neural Conversation Systems (EANCS) at EMNLP 2021.
- Pei Wang, Zhen Guo, Lifu Huang, and Jin-Hee Cho. 2023. Authentic Dialogue Generation to Improve Youth's Awareness of Cybergrooming for Online Safety. TechRxiv preprint techrxiv.22102466.v1 (2023).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
OSN Traits and Vulnerability for Measurement and Analysis
Bhardwaj, R., Bhardwaj, V., Rawat, R., Rawat, H., Muzumdar, P., & Borana, K. (2024) · doi:10.1002/9781394231126.ch27 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Psychological Profiling in Cybersecurity: A Look at LLMs and Psycholinguistic Features
Tshimula, J. M., Nkashama, D. K., Muabila, J. T., Galekwa, R. M., Kanda, H., Dialufuma, M. V., Didier, M. M., Kalala, K., Mundele, S., Lenye, P. K., et al. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-1483-7_31 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Zhang, X., Akter, M., An, H., Liu, M., Zhang, Q., Huang, L., Cho, J.-H., J. Wisniewski, P., & Lee, S. W. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790949
Self-citationAuthentic Dialogue Generation to Improve Youth’s Awareness of Cybergrooming for Online Safety
Guo, Z. Y., Wang, P., Huang, L., & Cho, J.-H. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) · doi:10.1109/ictai59109.2023.00017 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationA Cognitive Topic Modeling Approach for Detailed Learner Analysis in Asynchronous Discussions
Ding, R., Luo, X., Chen, S., Wu, X., Zhang, C., Liu, L., Huang, Y., Chen, L., Huang, J., Zheng, Y., et al. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3573873 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
de Lucena, W. A., & Ribeiro, A. D. R. L. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-32023-0_4
SCOPE: A Proof-of-Concept Framework for Measuring Alignment in Data-Scarce Cybergrooming Domains
Choi, J.-E., Fan, S., & Steinebach, M. (2026) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac69091.2026.00048
- Authors
- Guo, Z., Wang, P., Cho, J.-H., & Huang, L.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2023-04-30
- Pages
- 1381-1388
- OpenAlex
- W4367318957
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Keywords
- online grooming, victim vulnerability, youth, LIWC, online predators, victim protection, cybercrime prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
