Cited by 722Mental Health via WritingEmotion and Mood RecognitionSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Detecting depression and mental illness on social media: an integrative review

Guntuku, Sharath Chandra, Yaden, David B, Kern, Margaret L, Ungar, Lyle H, Eichstaedt, Johannes C·2017·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.005

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of consent or awareness is especially crucial when the data relates to a socially stigmatizing health condition such as mental illness.

    “For instance, data is typically captured from social media platforms without the consent or awareness of users (Bidargaddi et al., 2017), which is especially crucial when the data relates to a socially stigmatizing health condition such as mental illness (Guntuku, Yaden, Kern, Ungar, & Eichstaedt, 2017).”

    From Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice (2020) · cites this paper as Guntuku, Yaden, Kern, Ungar, & Eichstaedt, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guntuku, S. C., Yaden, D. B., Kern, M. L., Ungar, L. H., & Eichstaedt, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Eichstaedt, Johannes C
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
18
Pages
43-49
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2741216199
Cited by
722
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 3
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
Funders
Templeton Religion Trust (#TRT0048)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
depression detection, mental illness, social media, automated detection, Twitter, Facebook, online forums, linguistic patterns, online activities, passive monitoring, mental health screening, at-risk individuals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review