Cited by 11Innovative Human-Technology InteractionUsability and User Interface DesignInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development

MyCareBudget: Co-creating a Healthcare Digital Commons with and for Disabled Citizens and their Unpaid Carers

Open access
Glick, Peter, Crivellaro, Clara·2023·Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Supporting disabled populations and their unpaid carers through designing sustainable healthcare interventions and infrastructures, is an important, yet challenging, area in HCI research. We report on a collaboration with 23 disabled citizens, unpaid carers, and a care organisation, wishing to co-develop digital responses to challenges they face in the management of self-directed care budgets. We describe how leveraging participatory methods, including asynchronous and remote engagements, enabled the co-creation of a sustainable digital common-pool resource, used by over 5,000 people worldwide. This study contributes novel configurations of methods and tools for co-design with ‘seldom heard’ populations. Demonstrating how these enabled the collective articulation of what constitutes trust, governance, and responsibility, in the design of a digital commons, “MyCareBudget”, offering peer-produced care documents for use by disabled citizens and their unpaid carers. We discuss implications for HCI interested in co-designing sustainable socio-technical interventions with underserved and marginalised populations, in healthcare settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3544548.3580934

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peer-generated content and moderation were more trusted by care recipients than official guidance.

    “For example, one study showed that peer-generated content and moderation were more trusted by care recipients than official guidance [17].”

    From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

    Section 5.2 says participants considered peers more trustworthy sources of care information than local health authorities and agreed that peers should moderate content. It does not compare trust in peer moderation with official moderation or guidance. Section 4.4 also shows that participants included unpaid carers and third-sector staff, not only care recipients. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 80

  1. Ellen Balka. 2012. ACTION for Health -Influencing technology design, practice and policy through Participatory Design. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (0 ed.), Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson (Eds.). Routledge, London, UK, 257 -280. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108543 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Oliver Bates, Carolynne Lord, Hayley Alter, and Ben Kirman. 2020. Let's start talking the walk. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3401335.3401364 · DOI
  3. Rosanna Bellini, Debora De Castro Leal, Hazel Anneke Dixon, Sarah E. Fox, and Angelika Strohmayer. 2022. "There is no justice, just us": Making mosaics of justice in social justice Human-Computer Interaction. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503698 · DOI
  4. Cynthia L. Bennett, Daniela K. Rosner, and Alex S. Taylor. 2020. The Care Work of Access. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3313831.3376568 · DOI
  5. Mela Bettega, Raul Masu, and Maurizio Teli. 2021. "It's like a GPS community tool": Tactics to foster Digital Commons through Artifact Ecology. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1710-1725. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462034 · DOI
  6. Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2010. Participatory design and "democratizing innovation". In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Par- ticipatory Design Conference on -PDC '10. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 41. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900448 ISSN: 00010782. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. Agonistic partici- patory design: Working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign 8, 2-3 (2012), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.672577 Publisher: Taylor & Francis. · DOI
  8. Jeanette L. Blomberg and Austin Henderson. 1990. Reflections on participatory design: lessons from the trillium experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI confer- ence on Human factors in computing systems Empowering people -CHI '90. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97307 · DOI
  9. Tone Bratteteig and Ingvild Eide. 2017. Becoming a Good Homecare Practi- tioner: Integrating Many Kinds of Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26, 4-6 (Dec. 2017), 563-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9288-7 Publisher: Springer. · DOI
  10. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological., H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher (Eds.). Vol. 2. American Psychological Association, Washington, 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004 ISSN: 1743-9760. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Susanne Bødker and Morten Kyng. 2018. Participatory Design that Mat- ters-Facing the Big Issues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 1 (Feb. 2018), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152421 · DOI
  12. James I. Charlton. 1998. Nothing About Us Without Us. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520925441 · DOI
  13. Frank Chen, Eric Hekler, Jinhui Hu, Shen Li, and Candy Zhao. 2011. Designing for context-aware health self-monitoring, feedback, and engagement. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work -CSCW '11. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 613. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958927 · DOI
  14. Yunan Chen, Victor Ngo, and Sun Young Park. 2013. Caring for caregivers. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '13. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 91. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776. 2441789 ISSN: 1084628X. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Yunan Chen, Nervo Verdezoto, Xinning Gui, Xiaojuan Ma, Claus Bossen, Naveen Bagalkot, Valeria Herskovic, and Bernd Ploderer. 2019. Unpacking the Infrastruc- turing Work of Patients and Caregivers around the World. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299021 · DOI
  16. Rachel Elizabeth Clarke, Jo Briggs, Andrea Armstrong, Alistair MacDonald, John Vines, Emma Flynn, and Karen Salt. 2021. Socio-materiality of trust: co-design with a resource limited community organisation. CoDesign 17, 3 (July 2021), 258-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1631349 Publisher: Taylor & Francis. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Tina Cook. 2021. Participatory Research: Its Meaning and Messiness. Beleidsonder- zoek Online 0, 3 (2021), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.5553/BO/221335502021000003001 · DOI
  18. Clara Crivellaro, Rob Anderson, Daniel Lambton-Howard, Tom Nappey, Patrick Olivier, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Alexander Wilson, and Pete Wright. 2019. Infras- tructuring Public Service Transformation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 26, 3 (June 2019), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3310284 · DOI
  19. Christopher A Le Dantec and Carl DiSalvo. 2013. Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science 43, 2 (April 2013), 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712471581 arXiv: 0-226-45803-2 ISBN: 0306-3127. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Jill P. Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne Larose, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback!: The Role of Collective Storytelling Online in a Social Movement Organization. In CSCW'13. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 477-489. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/2441776.2441831 · DOI
  21. Pelle Ehn. 2008. Participation in Design Things. In Participatory Design Conference (PDC), Bloomington, Indiana, USA. ACM, New York, NY USA, 92-101.
  22. Shannon Freeman, Kelly Skinner, Laura Middleton, Beibei Xiong, and Mei Lan Fang. 2021. Engaging Hard-to-Reach, Hidden, and Seldom-Heard Populations in Research. In Knowledge, Innovation, and Impact: A Guide for the Engaged Health Researcher, Andrew Sixsmith, Judith Sixsmith, Alex Mihailidis, and Mei Lan Fang (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-34390-3 · DOI
  23. Erica Gadsby. 2013. Personal Budgets and Health : a review of the evidence Feb- ruary 2013. Technical Report. Policy Research Unit in Commissioning and the Healthcare System, Canterbury. 44 pages.
  24. Aakash Gautam and Deborah Tatar. 2020. p for political: Participation Without Agency Is Not Enough. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 -Participation(s) Otherwise -Volume 2. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385142 · DOI
  25. Peter Glick, Rachel E Clarke, and Clara Crivellaro. 2022. Exploring Experiences of Self-Directed Care Budgets: Design Implications for Socio-Technical Interven- tions. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '22). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517697 · DOI
  26. Xinning Gui and Yunan Chen. 2019. Making Healthcare Infrastructure Work. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605. 3300688 · DOI
  27. Xinning Gui, Yunan Chen, and Kathleen H. Pine. 2018. Navigating the Healthcare Service "Black Box". In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274330 Issue: CSCW ISSN: 2573-0142. · DOI
  28. Andrea Hamm, Yuya Shibuya, Stefan Ullrich, and Teresa Cerratto Cer- ratto Pargman. 2021. What Makes Civic Tech Initiatives To Last Over Time? Dissecting Two Global Cases. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Hu- man Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-17. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445667 · DOI
  29. Alex Hanna and Tina M. Park. 2020. Against Scale: Provocations and Resistances to Scale Thinking. http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08850 arXiv:2010.08850 [cs]. · arXiv
  30. Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, Gwen Klerks, Maria Menendez Blanco, Laura Maye, Angelika Strohmayer, Martijn de Waal, and Ben Schouten. 2020. Making Civic Initiatives Last: Ecosystems, Technologies, Approaches and Challenges. In Com- panion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 433-436. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395921 · DOI
  31. Mike Harding, Bran Knowles, Nigel Davies, and Mark Rouncefield. 2015. HCI, Civic Engagement & Trust. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -CHI '15, Vol. 2015-April. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 2833-2842. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702255 · DOI
  32. Christina Harrington, Sheena Erete, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Deconstructing Community-Based Collaborative Design. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction (claisse, Vol. 3). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-25. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3359318 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Gillian R. Hayes. 2011. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18, 3 (July 2011), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993060.1993065 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Gillian R. Hayes. 2012. Taking action in your research. Interactions 19, 4 (July 2012), 50-53. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212890 · DOI
  35. Jos-Marien Jansen, Karin Niemantsverdriet, Anne Wil Burghoorn, Peter Lovei, Ineke Neutelings, Eva Deckers, and Simon Nienhuijs. 2020. Design for Co- responsibility. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1537-1549. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3357236.3395469 · DOI
  36. Matthew William Johnson, Esther Han Beol Jang, Frankie O'Rourke, Rachel Ye, and Kurtis Heimerl. 2021. Network Capacity as Common Pool Resource: Community-Based Congestion Management in a Community Network. Proceed- ings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449135 · DOI
  37. Karen Jones, Julien Forder, James Caiels, Elizabeth Welch, and Karen Windle. 2010. Evidence Scan: Personal health budgets. Technical Report. The Health Foundation, London. 1-22 pages. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t89drw.17 Issue: September. · DOI
  38. Helena Karasti and Karen S. Baker. 2008. Community Design: growing one's own information infrastructure. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008. ACM, Indianapolis, 217-220.
  39. Elizabeth Kaziunas, Michael S. Klinkman, and Mark S. Ackerman. 2019. Precarious Interventions: Designing for Ecologies of Care. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-27. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/3359215 Issue: CSCW ISSN: 2573-0142. · DOI
  40. Sara Kindon, Rachel Pain, and Mike Kesby. 2007. Connecting people, participation and place. In Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods (1 ed.). Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, UK, 7.
  41. Max Krüger, Anne Weibert, Debora de Castro Leal, Dave Randall, and Volker Wulf. 2021. It Takes More Than One Hand to Clap: On the Role of 'Care' in Maintaining Design Results.. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-14. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/3411764.3445389 · DOI
  42. Helen Leonard. 2020. Children with complex health needs and personal health budgets. Archives of Disease in Childhood 105, 3 (March 2020), 211-213. https: //doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-317092 · DOI
  43. Ann Light and Yoko Akama. 2012. The Human Touch: Participatory practice and the role of facilitation in designing with communities. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers: Volume 1 -PDC '12, Vol. 1. ACM Press, New York, NY USA, 61. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347645 · DOI
  44. Ann Light, Katie J. Hill, Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, Fiona Hackney, Kim Halskov, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2013. Exploring the dynamics of ownership in community- oriented design projects. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies -C&T '13. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1145/2482991.2482998 · DOI
  45. Peter Linebaugh. 2008. The Magna Carta manifesto: liberties and commons for all. University of California Press, Berkeley.
  46. Kiel Long, Lyndsey L. Bakewell, Roisin C. McNaney, Konstantina Vasileiou, Mark Atkinson, Manuela Barreto, Julie Barnett, Michael Wilson, Shaun Lawson, and John Vines. 2017. Connecting Those That Care. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Gabriel Urzaiz, Sergio F. Ochoa, José Bravo, Liming Luke Chen, and Jonice Oliveira (Eds.), Vol. 8276. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1339-1351. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025715 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. · DOI
  47. Rachael Luck. 2018. What is it that makes participation in design participatory design? Design Studies 59 (2018), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Jennifer Manuel and Clara Crivellaro. 2020. Place-Based Policymaking and HCI. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376158 · DOI
  49. Manzini. 2015. Design, when everybody designs. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mas- sachusetts.
  50. Sanna Marttila, Andrea Botero, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2014. Towards com- mons design in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference on Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doc- toral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts -PDC '14 -volume 2, Vol. 2. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2662155.2662187 · DOI
  51. Elliot G. Mitchell, Rosa Maimone, Andrea Cassells, Jonathan N. Tobin, Patricia Davidson, Arlene M. Smaldone, and Lena Mamykina. 2021. Automated vs. Human Health Coaching. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5 (April 2021), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449173 · DOI
  52. Catherine Needham. 2008. Realising the Potential of Co-production: Negotiating Improvements in Public Services. Social Policy and Society 7, 2 (2008), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746407004174 · DOI
  53. Stuart Alan Nicholson, Clara Crivellaro, Adrian K Clear, Dan Jackson, Rob Comber, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, and Patrick Olivier. 2021. Sustaining a Net- worked Community Resource: Findings from a Longitudinal Situated Display Deployment. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3411764.3445693 · DOI
  54. Patrick Olivier and Peter Wright. 2015. Digital civics: Taking a Local Turn. Interactions 22, 4 (June 2015), 61-63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2776885 · DOI
  55. Elinor Ostrom. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  56. Elinor Ostrom. 1996. Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development 24, 6 (1996), 1073-1087. https://doi.org/10. 1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X · DOI
  57. John Owens, Teodor Mladenov, and Alan Cribb. 2017. What Justice, What Autonomy? The Ethical Constraints upon Personalisation. Ethics and Social Welfare 11, 1 (Jan. 2017), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2016.1234631 Publisher: Taylor & Francis. · DOI
  58. Xinru Page, Andrew Capener, Spring Cullen, Tao Wang, Monica Garfield, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2022. Perceiving Affordances Differently: The Unintended Consequences When Young Autistic Adults Engage with Social Media. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517596 · DOI
  59. Andrea Grimes Parker. 2013. Designing for health activism. Interactions 20, 2 (2013), 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2427076.2427082 · DOI
  60. Giacomo Poderi and Yvonne Dittrich. 2018. Participatory design and sustain- ability. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial -Volume 2. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210604.3210624 · DOI
  61. Ravihansa Rajapakse, Margot Brereton, and Laurianne Sitbon. 2018. Design Artefacts to Support People with a Disability to Build Personal Infrastructures. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018 -DIS '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3196709.3196749 · DOI
  62. Ravihansa Rajapakse, Margot Brereton, and Laurianne Sitbon. 2021. A respectful design approach to facilitate codesign with people with cognitive or sensory impairments and makers. CoDesign 17, 2 (April 2021), 159-187. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15710882.2019.1612442 · DOI
  63. Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1 (March 2008), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15710880701875068 ISBN: 9781450361071. · DOI · Paper page
  64. Mark Schurgin, Mark Schlager, Laura Vardoulakis, Laura R Pina, and Lauren Wilcox. 2021. Isolation in Coordination: Challenges of Caregivers in the USA. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445413 · DOI
  65. M. Six Silberman. 2015. Information systems for the age of consequences. First Monday 20, 8 (July 2015), 7. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i8.6128 Publisher: firstmonday.org ISBN: 9781317920908. · DOI
  66. Andrew Sixsmith. 2022. Ethical challenges in aging and technology. In The15th In- ternational Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. ACM, Corfu Greece, 552-555. https://doi.org/10.1145/3529190.3534756 · DOI
  67. Dean Spade. 2015. Normal Life. Duke University Press, New York, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822374794 · DOI
  68. Katta Spiel, Kathrin Gerling, Cynthia L Bennett, Emeline Brulé, Rua M Williams, Jennifer Rode, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2020. Nothing About Us Without Us: Investigating the Role of Critical Disability Studies in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, New York, USA, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375150 · DOI
  69. Lucy Suchman. 2002. Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandi- navian Journal of Information Systems 14, 2 (2002), 91-105. http://aisel.aisnet. org/sjis/vol14/iss2/7
  70. Cella M Sum, Rahaf Alharbi, Franchesca Spektor, Cynthia L Bennett, Christina N Harrington, Katta Spiel, and Rua Mae Williams. 2022. Dreaming Disability Justice in HCI. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101. 3503731 · DOI
  71. Emily Sun, Ross McLachlan, and Mor Naaman. 2017. TAMIES. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2385-2396. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2998181.2998202 · DOI
  72. Reem Talhouk, Kyle Montague, Hala Ghattas, Vera Araujo-Soares, Balsam Ahmad, and Madeline Balaam. 2022. Refugee Food Insecurity & Technology: Surfacing Experiences of Adaptation, Navigation, Negotiation and Sharing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 31, 2 (June 2022), 341-372. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10606-022-09423-w · DOI
  73. Reem Talhouk, Kellie Morrissey, Sarah Fox, Nadia Pantidi, Emma Simpson, Lydia Emma Michie, and Madeline Balaam. 2018. Human Computer Inter- action & Health Activism. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3185369 · DOI
  74. Nick Taylor, Keith Cheverst, Peter Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1549-1558. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466206 · DOI
  75. Maurizio Teli. 2015. Computing and the Common. Hints of a new utopia in Participatory Design. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1, 1 (Oct. 2015), 4. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21318 · DOI
  76. Maurizio Teli, Marcus Foth, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Irina Anastasiu, and Peter Lyle. 2020. Tales of Institutioning and Commoning. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 -Participation(s) Otherwise -Volume 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385020 · DOI
  77. John Vines, Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright, John McCarthy, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Configuring participation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -CHI '13. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 429. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470716 · DOI
  78. Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Clara Crivellaro, Pete Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2018. Infrastructuring the Solidarity Economy. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -CHI '18. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174055 · DOI
  79. Rua M Williams and Juan E Gilbert. 2019. "Nothing About Us Without Us" Transforming Participatory Research and Ethics in Human Systems Engineering. In Advancing Diversity, Inclusion, and Social Justice Through Human Systems Engineering, Rod D Roscoe, Erin K Chiou, and Abigail R Wooldridge (Eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 22.
  80. Sue Yeandle, Yueh-Ching Chou, Michael Fine, Mary Larkin, and Alisoun Milne. 2017. Care and caring: interdisciplinary perspectives on a societal issue of global significance. International Journal of Care and Caring 1, 1 (2017), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1332/ · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glick, P., & Crivellaro, C.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-04-19
Pages
1-16
OpenAlex
W4366547368
Cited by
11
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L016176/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Keywords
informal caregivers, co-design, digital commons, participatory design, socio-technical interventions, marginalised populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review