Cited by 38Digital Media and Visual ArtGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisArt, Technology, and Culture

Beyond Text-to-Image: Multimodal Prompts to Explore Generative AI

Open access
Liu, Vivian·2023·Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Text-to-image AI systems have proven to have extraordinary generative capacities that have facilitated widespread adoption. However, these systems are primarily text-based, which is a fundamental inversion of what many artists are traditionally used to: having full control over the composition of their work. Prior work has shown that there is great utility in using text prompts and that AI augmented workflows can increase momentum on creative tasks for end users. However, multimodal interactions beyond text need to be further defined, so end users can have rich points of interaction that allow them to truly co-pilot AI-generated content creation. To this end, the goal of my research is to equip creators with workflows that 1) translate abstract design goals into prompts of visual language, 2) structure exploration of design outcomes, and 3) integrate creator contributions into generations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3544549.3577043

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent work on design considerations for generative AI has been limited to specific application domains or technologies.

    “Although recent work has begun to probe at design considerations for generative AI, this work has been limited to specific application domains or technologies. For example, guidelines of various maturity levels exist for GAN-based interfaces [57, 195], image creation [102, 104, 173], prompt engineering [102, 104], virtual reality [169], collaborative storytelling [146], and workflows with co-crea”

    From Design Principles for Generative AI Applications (2024) · cites this paper as [102]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.48550/arxiv.2203.06566 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, V.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Vivian
Venue
Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-04-19
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4366594418
Cited by
38
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2
FWCI
11.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (GRF DGE - 1644869)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
Keywords
text-to-image generation, multimodal prompts, generative AI, human-AI co-creation, creative workflows, prompt engineering, visual language, design exploration, human-AI interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review