Cited by 46Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisDigital Media and Visual ArtArt, Technology, and Culture

Initial Images: Using Image Prompts to Improve Subject Representation in Multimodal AI Generated Art

Qiao, Han, Liu, Vivian, Chilton, Lydia·2022·Creativity and Cognition

Abstract

Advances in text-to-image generative models have made it easier for people to create art by just prompting models with text. However, creating through text leaves users with limited control over the final composition or the way the subject is represented. A potential solution is to use image prompts alongside text prompts to condition the model. To better understand how and when image prompts can improve subject representation in generations, we conduct an annotation experiment to quantify their effect on generations of abstract, concrete plural, and concrete singular subjects. We find that initial images improved subject representation across all subject types, with the most noticeable improvement in concrete singular subjects. In an analysis of different types of initial images, we find that icons and photos produced high quality generations of different aesthetics. We conclude with design guidelines for how initial images can improve subject representation in AI art.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3527927.3532792

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qiao, H., Liu, V., & Chilton, L.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Creativity and Cognition
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-06-20
Pages
15-28
OpenAlex
W4283167234
Cited by
46
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 10
FWCI
3.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Creativity and Cognition (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSF (National Science Foundation) (1644869)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
Keywords
image prompts, text-to-image generation, multimodal conditioning, subject representation, AI-generated art, icons, aesthetic preference, design guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review