Cited by 55Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and Analysis

Domain Generalization for Activity Recognition via Adaptive Feature Fusion

Open access
Qin, Xin, Wang, Jindong, Chen, Yiqiang, Lu, Wang, Jiang, Xinlong·2023·ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology

Abstract

Human activity recognition requires the efforts to build a generalizable model using the training datasets with the hope to achieve good performance in test datasets. However, in real applications, the training and testing datasets may have totally different distributions due to various reasons such as different body shapes, acting styles, and habits, damaging the model’s generalization performance. While such a distribution gap can be reduced by existing domain adaptation approaches, they typically assume that the test data can be accessed in the training stage, which is not realistic. In this article, we consider a more practical and challenging scenario: domain-generalized activity recognition (DGAR) where the test dataset cannot be accessed during training. To this end, we propose Adaptive Feature Fusion for Activity Recognition (AFFAR) , a domain generalization approach that learns to fuse the domain-invariant and domain-specific representations to improve the model’s generalization performance. AFFAR takes the best of both worlds where domain-invariant representations enhance the transferability across domains and domain-specific representations leverage the model discrimination power from each domain. Extensive experiments on three public HAR datasets show its effectiveness. Furthermore, we apply AFFAR to a real application, i.e., the diagnosis of Children’s Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), which also demonstrates the superiority of our approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3552434

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Thomas G. Dietterich. 2002. Ensemble learning. The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks 2 (2002), 110-125.
  2. Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. 2017. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep net- works. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1126-1135.
  3. Yaroslav Ganin, Evgeniya Ustinova, Hana Ajakan, Pascal Germain, Hugo Larochelle, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, and Victor Lempitsky. 2016. Domain-adversarial training of neural networks. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 17, 1 (2016), 2096-2030.
  4. Arthur Gretton, Karsten M. Borgwardt, Malte J. Rasch, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Alexander Smola. 2012. A kernel two-sample test. Journal of Machine Learning Research 13, (March 2012), 723-773.
  5. Ishaan Gulrajani and David Lopez-Paz. 2021. In search of lost domain generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR'21).
  6. Nishkam Ravi, Nikhil Dandekar, Preetham Mysore, and Michael L. Littman. 2005. Activity recognition from accelerom- eter data. In AAAI, Vol. 5. 1541-1546.
  7. Shiori Sagawa, Pang Wei Koh, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto, and Percy Liang. 2020. Distributionally robust neural networks for group shifts: On the importance of regularization for worst-case generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR'20).
  8. Mihaela C. Stoian, Sameer Bansal, and Sharon Goldwater. 2020. Analyzing ASR pretraining for low-resource speech- to-text translation. In ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP'20). IEEE, 7909-7913.
  9. Vladimir Vapnik. 1992. Principles of risk minimization for learning theory. In Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems. 831-838.
  10. Mi Zhang and Alexander A. Sawchuk. 2012. USC-HAD: A daily activity dataset for ubiquitous activity recognition using wearable sensors. In ACM UbiComp. ACM, 1036-1043.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qin, X., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Lu, W., & Jiang, X.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Computing Technology (CN)
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
  • Beijing Key Laboratory of Mobile Computing and Pervasive Devices, Institute of Computing Technology, CAS, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
Published
2022-11-09
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 2157-6904 (ISSN-L)
  • 2157-6912
OpenAlex
W4289517877
Cited by
55
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2021YFC2501202)
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (61972383, 61902377, 62101530, 61902379)
  • Science and Technology Service Network Initiative, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-STS-QYZD-2021-11-001)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
domain generalization, human activity recognition, adaptive feature fusion, domain-invariant features, domain-specific representations, distribution shift, cross-domain transferability, ADHD diagnosis, wearable sensor data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review